Breve Análise do Smartphone Huawei Y5 2019: Melhor que no ano passado

Name: Huawei Y5 2019
Brand: Huawei

Couro falso – qualidades reais.

Os compradores sempre tiveram que desembolsar pouco mais de 100 Euros (~$113) pelo Huawei Y5, e eles devem saber que não podem esperar um milagre de desempenho por isso. Este ano, eles receberão uma tela com um entalhe, um acabamento de couro sintético opcional e câmeras aprimoradas. Descubra em nossa análise, por que a melhoria realmente o torna um dispositivo melhor.

Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 06/15/2019 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Touchscreen Smartphone Android ARM

Test device courtesy of cyberport.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Huawei Y5 2019 (Y5 Serie)

Processador

Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761 4 x 2 GHz, Cortex-A53

Placa gráfica

PowerVR GE8300

Memória

2048 MB

Pantalha

5.71 polegadas 19:9, 1520 x 720 pixel 295 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, IPS, Entalhe en forma de lágima, Brilhante: sim

Disco rígido

16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB

, 11 GB livre

Conexões

1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Porta de áudio de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: microSD de até 512 GB, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Sensor de aceleração, sensor de proximidade

Funcionamento em rede

802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G (850/900/1800/1900), 3G (B1/B5/B8), 4G (B1/B3/B5/B7/B8/B20), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 8.5 x 147.1 x 70.8

Bateria

0 Wh, 3020 mAh Lítio-Polímero

Sistema Operativo

Android 9.0 Pie

Camera

Primary Camera: 13 MPix f/1.8, phase comparison AF, LED flash, videos @1080p/30fps
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix f/2.2, LED flash

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: Alto-falante mono no lado inferior, Teclado: Teclado virtual, carregador, cabo USB, ferramenta SIM, headset, 24 Meses Garantia, SAR value: 0.42 W/kg head, 0.86 W/kg body; LTE Cat 4 (150 Mbps / 50 Mbps); notification LED, fanless

peso

146 g, Suprimento de energia: 63 g

Preço

129 Euro

Links

Huawei página inicial

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
BQ Aquaris C Adreno 308, 425, 16 GB eMMC Flash	216 (189^min - 218^max) MBit/s +289%
Motorola Moto E5 Play Adreno 308, 425, 16 GB eMMC Flash	56.6 (29^min - 61^max) MBit/s +2%
Huawei Y5 2019 PowerVR GE8300, Helio A22 MT6761, 16 GB eMMC Flash	55.5 (52^min - 59^max) MBit/s
Xiaomi Redmi 7 Adreno 506, SD 632, 32 GB eMMC Flash	55.4 (52^min - 61^max) MBit/s 0%
Nokia 2.1 Adreno 308, 425, 8 GB eMMC Flash	52.7 (27^min - 58^max) MBit/s -5%
Huawei Y5 2018 PowerVR GE8100, MT6739, 16 GB eMMC Flash	52.3 MBit/s -6%
iperf3 receive AX12
BQ Aquaris C Adreno 308, 425, 16 GB eMMC Flash	268 (247^min - 276^max) MBit/s +325%
Huawei Y5 2019 PowerVR GE8300, Helio A22 MT6761, 16 GB eMMC Flash	63 (56^min - 61^max) MBit/s
Motorola Moto E5 Play Adreno 308, 425, 16 GB eMMC Flash	55.5 (49^min - 57^max) MBit/s -12%
Huawei Y5 2018 PowerVR GE8100, MT6739, 16 GB eMMC Flash	52 MBit/s -17%
Xiaomi Redmi 7 Adreno 506, SD 632, 32 GB eMMC Flash	51.4 (49^min - 54^max) MBit/s -18%
Nokia 2.1 Adreno 308, 425, 8 GB eMMC Flash	48.7 (29^min - 54^max) MBit/s -23%

Huawei Y5 2019; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø59.2 (56-61)

Huawei Y5 2019; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø55.5 (52-59)

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

ColorChecker: The target color is displayed in the bottom half of each field.


606 cd/m²	611 cd/m²	555 cd/m²
616 cd/m²	630 cd/m²	557 cd/m²
604 cd/m²	604 cd/m²	558 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 630 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 593.4 cd/m² Minimum: 2.4 cd/m²
iluminação: 88 %
iluminação com acumulador: 630 cd/m²
Contraste: 955:1 (Preto: 0.66 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.79 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
96.1% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.176

	Huawei Y5 2019 IPS, 1520x720, 5.7"	Huawei Y5 2018 IPS, 1440x720, 5.5"	Nokia 2.1 IPS, 1280x720, 5.5"	BQ Aquaris C IPS, 1440x720, 5.5"	Xiaomi Redmi 7 IPS, 1520x720, 6.3"	Motorola Moto E5 Play IPS, 960x480, 5.2"
Screen		-40%	1%	12%	9%	-35%
Brightness middle	630	475 -25%	338 -46%	623 -1%	444 -30%	369 -41%
Brightness	593	470 -21%	327 -45%	608 3%	441 -26%	358 -40%
Brightness Distribution	88	91 3%	82 -7%	91 3%	90 2%	81 -8%
Black Level *	0.66	0.76 -15%	0.27 59%	0.61 8%	0.45 32%	0.4 39%
Contrast	955	625 -35%	1252 31%	1021 7%	987 3%	923 -3%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	5.79	9.12 -58%	5.36 7%	4.5 22%	3.94 32%	9.75 -68%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	9.54	18.86 -98%	9.77 -2%	7.33 23%	6.72 30%	18.28 -92%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	7	12 -71%	6.2 11%	4.8 31%	4.8 31%	11.8 -69%
Gamma	2.176 ^101%	2.342 ^94%	2.345 ^94%	2.596 ^85%	2.294 ^96%	2.057 ^107%
CCT	8420 ^77%	9861 ^66%	8460 ^77%	7557 ^86%	7445 ^87%	11971 ^54%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)						78.6

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

1000 Hz

≤ 10 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 1000 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 10 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 1000 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
14 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 5 ms rise
14 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 9 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 31 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
30 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 11 ms rise
30 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 19 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 36 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei Y5 2019 Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048	839 Points
Huawei Y5 2018 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	662 Points -21%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	636 Points -24%
BQ Aquaris C Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 2048	647 Points -23%
Xiaomi Redmi 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072	1227 Points +46%
Motorola Moto E5 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	647 Points -23%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761 (832 - 839, n=2)	836 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (844 - 9574, n=82, last 2 years)	5422 Points +546%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei Y5 2019 Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048	2436 Points
Huawei Y5 2018 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	1827 Points -25%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	1602 Points -34%
BQ Aquaris C Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 2048	1769 Points -27%
Xiaomi Redmi 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072	4301 Points +77%
Motorola Moto E5 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	1635 Points -33%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761 (2354 - 2436, n=2)	2395 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (2630 - 30323, n=82, last 2 years)	14892 Points +511%
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Huawei Y5 2019 Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048	1715 Points
Huawei Y5 2018 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	1451 Points -15%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	1405 Points -18%
BQ Aquaris C Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 2048	1218 Points -29%
Xiaomi Redmi 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072	3850 Points +124%
Motorola Moto E5 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	1397 Points -19%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761 (1607 - 1715, n=2)	1661 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (5192 - 18534, n=57, last 2 years)	11924 Points +595%

PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Huawei Y5 2019 Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048	5616 Points
Huawei Y5 2018 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	4133 Points -26%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	Points -100%
BQ Aquaris C Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 2048	4058 Points -28%
Xiaomi Redmi 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072	7117 Points +27%
Motorola Moto E5 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	4152 Points -26%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761 (4229 - 7216, n=9)	6389 Points +14%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Huawei Y5 2019 Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048	4195 Points
Huawei Y5 2018 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	2675 Points -36%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	3146 Points -25%
BQ Aquaris C Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 2048	3281 Points -22%
Xiaomi Redmi 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072	5912 Points +41%
Motorola Moto E5 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	3209 Points -24%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761 (4195 - 5511, n=11)	4831 Points +15%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Huawei Y5 2019 Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048	8452 Points
Huawei Y5 2018 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	4161 Points -51%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	6133 Points -27%
BQ Aquaris C Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 2048	6056 Points -28%
Xiaomi Redmi 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072	14786 Points +75%
Motorola Moto E5 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	6379 Points -25%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761 (7228 - 8657, n=9)	8343 Points -1%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Huawei Y5 2019 Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048	7514 Points
Huawei Y5 2018 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	3575 Points -52%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	5487 Points -27%
BQ Aquaris C Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 2048	5434 Points -28%
Xiaomi Redmi 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072	14536 Points +93%
Motorola Moto E5 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	5712 Points -24%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761 (6349 - 7695, n=9)	7447 Points -1%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei Y5 2019 Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048	15004 Points
Huawei Y5 2018 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	9755 Points -35%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	10427 Points -31%
BQ Aquaris C Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 2048	10105 Points -33%
Xiaomi Redmi 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072	15735 Points +5%
Motorola Moto E5 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	10784 Points -28%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761 (12725 - 15348, n=9)	14468 Points -4%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Huawei Y5 2019 Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048	418 Points
Huawei Y5 2018 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	125 Points -70%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	58 Points -86%
BQ Aquaris C Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 2048	69 Points -83%
Xiaomi Redmi 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072	936 Points +124%
Motorola Moto E5 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	239 Points -43%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761 (411 - 507, n=12)	458 Points +10%
Average of class Smartphone (812 - 7285, n=26, last 2 years)	4204 Points +906%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei Y5 2019 Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048	362 Points
Huawei Y5 2018 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	102 Points -72%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	46 Points -87%
BQ Aquaris C Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 2048	55 Points -85%
Xiaomi Redmi 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072	807 Points +123%
Motorola Moto E5 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	199 Points -45%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761 (357 - 454, n=12)	406 Points +12%
Average of class Smartphone (756 - 9451, n=26, last 2 years)	4740 Points +1209%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Huawei Y5 2019 Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048	911 Points
Huawei Y5 2018 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	562 Points -38%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	892 Points -2%
BQ Aquaris C Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 2048	845 Points -7%
Xiaomi Redmi 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072	2132 Points +134%
Motorola Moto E5 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	819 Points -10%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761 (755 - 923, n=12)	842 Points -8%
Average of class Smartphone (1093 - 4349, n=26, last 2 years)	3303 Points +263%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Huawei Y5 2019 Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048	509 Points
Huawei Y5 2018 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	175 Points -66%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	297 Points -42%
BQ Aquaris C Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 2048	294 Points -42%
Xiaomi Redmi 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072	943 Points +85%
Motorola Moto E5 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	296 Points -42%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761 (442 - 539, n=12)	502 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (883 - 23024, n=74, last 2 years)	11160 Points +2093%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei Y5 2019 Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048	451 Points
Huawei Y5 2018 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	145 Points -68%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	250 Points -45%
BQ Aquaris C Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 2048	247 Points -45%
Xiaomi Redmi 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072	813 Points +80%
Motorola Moto E5 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	249 Points -45%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761 (390 - 485, n=12)	449 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (840 - 45492, n=74, last 2 years)	19815 Points +4294%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei Y5 2019 Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048	924 Points
Huawei Y5 2018 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	614 Points -34%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	885 Points -4%
BQ Aquaris C Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 2048	861 Points -7%
Xiaomi Redmi 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072	2147 Points +132%
Motorola Moto E5 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	877 Points -5%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761 (775 - 954, n=12)	867 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone (1075 - 8749, n=74, last 2 years)	5009 Points +442%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Huawei Y5 2019 Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048	239 Points
Huawei Y5 2018 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	84 Points -65%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	Points -100%
Xiaomi Redmi 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072	516 Points +116%
Motorola Moto E5 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	Points -100%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761 (239 - 298, n=11)	263 Points +10%
Average of class Smartphone (286 - 17553, n=74, last 2 years)	3077 Points +1187%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei Y5 2019 Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048	197 Points
Huawei Y5 2018 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	68 Points -65%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	Points -100%
Xiaomi Redmi 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072	424 Points +115%
Motorola Moto E5 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	Points -100%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761 (197 - 250, n=11)	220 Points +12%
Average of class Smartphone (240 - 29890, n=74, last 2 years)	3252 Points +1551%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Huawei Y5 2019 Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048	918 Points
Huawei Y5 2018 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	560 Points -39%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	Points -100%
Xiaomi Redmi 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072	2119 Points +131%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761 (738 - 918, n=11)	843 Points -8%
Average of class Smartphone (858 - 7180, n=74, last 2 years)	3288 Points +258%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Huawei Y5 2019 Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048	299 Points
Huawei Y5 2018 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	107 Points -64%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	Points -100%
Xiaomi Redmi 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072	567 Points +90%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761 (238 - 317, n=11)	288 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone (317 - 20131, n=160, last 2 years)	7682 Points +2469%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei Y5 2019 Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048	250 Points
Huawei Y5 2018 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	87 Points -65%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	Points -100%
Xiaomi Redmi 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072	469 Points +88%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761 (197 - 267, n=11)	242 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (267 - 33376, n=160, last 2 years)	11410 Points +4464%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei Y5 2019 Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048	940 Points
Huawei Y5 2018 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	600 Points -36%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	Points -100%
Xiaomi Redmi 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072	2133 Points +127%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761 (780 - 940, n=11)	862 Points -8%
Average of class Smartphone (877 - 8480, n=160, last 2 years)	4587 Points +388%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Huawei Y5 2019 Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048	262 Points
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761 (253 - 365, n=3)	293 Points +12%
Average of class Smartphone (365 - 6635, n=73, last 2 years)	2841 Points +984%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei Y5 2019 Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048	210 Points
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761 (203 - 298, n=3)	237 Points +13%
Average of class Smartphone (298 - 8601, n=73, last 2 years)	3085 Points +1369%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei Y5 2019 Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048	1868 Points
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761 (1667 - 1868, n=3)	1758 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone (1667 - 4198, n=73, last 2 years)	2706 Points +45%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Y5 2019 Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048	21 fps
Huawei Y5 2018 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	10 fps -52%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	14 fps -33%
BQ Aquaris C Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 2048	13 fps -38%
Xiaomi Redmi 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072	37 fps +76%
Motorola Moto E5 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	20 fps -5%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761 (20 - 23, n=7)	21 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (23 - 165, n=170, last 2 years)	85.7 fps +308%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Y5 2019 Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048	14 fps
Huawei Y5 2018 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	6 fps -57%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	7.6 fps -46%
BQ Aquaris C Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 2048	7.6 fps -46%
Xiaomi Redmi 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072	25 fps +79%
Motorola Moto E5 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	7.6 fps -46%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761 (14 - 15, n=7)	14.1 fps +1%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=170, last 2 years)	279 fps +1893%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Huawei Y5 2019 Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048	12 fps
Huawei Y5 2018 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	5.7 fps -52%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	6.1 fps -49%
BQ Aquaris C Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 2048	5.6 fps -53%
Xiaomi Redmi 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072	19 fps +58%
Motorola Moto E5 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	11 fps -8%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761 (11 - 15, n=7)	12.9 fps +8%
Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 165, n=170, last 2 years)	75 fps +525%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Y5 2019 Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048	6.5 fps
Huawei Y5 2018 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	2.7 fps -58%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	2.7 fps -58%
BQ Aquaris C Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 2048	2.8 fps -57%
Xiaomi Redmi 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072	11 fps +69%
Motorola Moto E5 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	2.7 fps -58%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761 (6.5 - 7.3, n=7)	6.67 fps +3%
Average of class Smartphone (12 - 482, n=170, last 2 years)	164.1 fps +2425%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Y5 2019 Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048	7.8 fps
Huawei Y5 2018 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	3.4 fps -56%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	fps -100%
Xiaomi Redmi 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072	14 fps +79%
Motorola Moto E5 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	fps -100%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761 (7.6 - 11, n=7)	8.96 fps +15%
Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 158, n=170, last 2 years)	65.2 fps +736%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Y5 2019 Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048	4.3 fps
Huawei Y5 2018 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	1.6 fps -63%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	fps -100%
Xiaomi Redmi 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072	7 fps +63%
Motorola Moto E5 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	fps -100%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761 (2.5 - 5, n=7)	4.13 fps -4%
Average of class Smartphone (8.3 - 341, n=170, last 2 years)	116.5 fps +2609%

GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Y5 2019 Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048	3.2 fps
Huawei Y5 2018 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	1.4 fps -56%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	fps -100%
Xiaomi Redmi 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072	7.8 fps +144%
Motorola Moto E5 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	fps -100%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761 (1.5 - 4.1, n=7)	3.36 fps +5%
Average of class Smartphone (5 - 119, n=171, last 2 years)	47.5 fps +1384%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Y5 2019 Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048	2 fps
Huawei Y5 2018 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	0.85 fps -57%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	fps -100%
Xiaomi Redmi 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072	3.9 fps +95%
Motorola Moto E5 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	fps -100%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761 (1.9 - 2.2, n=7)	2.01 fps +1%
Average of class Smartphone (3.1 - 216, n=170, last 2 years)	70.3 fps +3415%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Y5 2019 Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048	4.3 fps
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	fps -100%
Xiaomi Redmi 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072	7 fps +63%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761 (2.3 - 6.1, n=14)	4.65 fps +8%
Average of class Smartphone (3.6 - 123, n=202, last 2 years)	49.3 fps +1047%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Y5 2019 Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048	2.3 fps
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	fps -100%
Xiaomi Redmi 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072	3.9 fps +70%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761 (1.9 - 4.2, n=14)	2.49 fps +8%
Average of class Smartphone (2.3 - 261, n=202, last 2 years)	79.4 fps +3352%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Y5 2019 Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048	2.8 fps
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	fps -100%
Xiaomi Redmi 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072	4.2 fps +50%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761 (2.7 - 3.9, n=14)	3.09 fps +10%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 119, n=202, last 2 years)	37.1 fps +1225%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Y5 2019 Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048	0.8 fps
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	fps -100%
Xiaomi Redmi 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072	1.3 fps +63%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761 (0.7 - 0.9, n=14)	0.825 fps +3%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 104, n=202, last 2 years)	31.6 fps +3850%

AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei Y5 2019 Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048	63421 Points
Huawei Y5 2018 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	45817 Points -28%
BQ Aquaris C Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 2048	43307 Points -32%
Xiaomi Redmi 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072	102781 Points +62%
Motorola Moto E5 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	Points -100%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761 (63421 - 65996, n=5)	64636 Points +2%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Huawei Y5 2019 Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048	983 Points
Huawei Y5 2018 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	224 Points -77%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	643 Points -35%
BQ Aquaris C Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 2048	219 Points -78%
Xiaomi Redmi 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072	1695 Points +72%
Motorola Moto E5 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	654 Points -33%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761 (744 - 986, n=7)	914 Points -7%
Average of class Smartphone (1196 - 11976, n=152, last 2 years)	6257 Points +537%
System (sort by value)
Huawei Y5 2019 Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048	1798 Points
Huawei Y5 2018 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	1363 Points -24%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	1228 Points -32%
BQ Aquaris C Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 2048	1187 Points -34%
Xiaomi Redmi 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072	4090 Points +127%
Motorola Moto E5 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	1241 Points -31%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761 (1419 - 1798, n=7)	1584 Points -12%
Average of class Smartphone (2368 - 16475, n=152, last 2 years)	10131 Points +463%
Memory (sort by value)
Huawei Y5 2019 Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048	1421 Points
Huawei Y5 2018 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	1034 Points -27%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	502 Points -65%
BQ Aquaris C Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 2048	457 Points -68%
Xiaomi Redmi 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072	1758 Points +24%
Motorola Moto E5 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	490 Points -66%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761 (531 - 1458, n=7)	1119 Points -21%
Average of class Smartphone (962 - 12716, n=152, last 2 years)	6714 Points +372%
Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei Y5 2019 Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048	471 Points
Huawei Y5 2018 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	187 Points -60%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	428 Points -9%
BQ Aquaris C Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 2048	434 Points -8%
Xiaomi Redmi 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072	1072 Points +128%
Motorola Moto E5 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	418 Points -11%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761 (470 - 580, n=7)	491 Points +4%
Average of class Smartphone (1017 - 58651, n=152, last 2 years)	16761 Points +3459%
Web (sort by value)
Huawei Y5 2019 Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048	775 Points
Huawei Y5 2018 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	10 Points -99%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	649 Points -16%
BQ Aquaris C Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 2048	10 Points -99%
Xiaomi Redmi 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072	1071 Points +38%
Motorola Moto E5 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	720 Points -7%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761 (715 - 1037, n=7)	834 Points +8%
Average of class Smartphone (841 - 2145, n=152, last 2 years)	1557 Points +101%

Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 2.0 | WebXPRT 3 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=162, last 2 years)	119.3 Points +661%
Xiaomi Redmi 7 (Chrome 73)	26.9 Points +72%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761 (13.4 - 20.3, n=6)	15.8 Points +1%
Huawei Y5 2019 (Chrome 74)	15.68 Points

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=148, last 2 years)	133.6 runs/min +809%
Xiaomi Redmi 7 (Chome 73)	27.44 runs/min +87%
Huawei Y5 2019 (Chome 74)	14.7 runs/min
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761 (12.5 - 15.7, n=5)	14.6 runs/min -1%

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=82, last 2 years)	147.1 Points +320%
Xiaomi Redmi 7 (Chrome 73)	58 Points +66%
Huawei Y5 2019 (Chrome 74)	35 Points
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761 (30 - 39, n=6)	34 Points -3%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=204, last 2 years)	36733 Points +698%
Xiaomi Redmi 7 (Chrome 73)	8258 Points +79%
Huawei Y5 2019 (Chrome 74)	4603 Points
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761 (3920 - 5041, n=8)	4513 Points -2%
BQ Aquaris C (Chrome 70)	3160 Points -31%
Huawei Y5 2018 (Chrome 67)	3138 Points -32%
Nokia 2.1 (Chrome 70)	2503 Points -46%
Motorola Moto E5 Play	2412 Points -48%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Huawei Y5 2018 (Chrome 67)	16492 ms * -59%
Nokia 2.1 (Chrome 70)	13821 ms * -33%
Motorola Moto E5 Play	13477 ms * -30%
BQ Aquaris C (Chrome 70)	13253 ms * -28%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761 (9310 - 12215, n=6)	10624 ms * -3%
Huawei Y5 2019 (Chrome 74)	10364 ms *
Xiaomi Redmi 7 (Chrome 73)	4856 ms * +53%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=161, last 2 years)	1583 ms * +85%

* ... smaller is better

	Huawei Y5 2019	Huawei Y5 2018	Nokia 2.1	BQ Aquaris C	Xiaomi Redmi 7	Motorola Moto E5 Play	Average 16 GB eMMC Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		-9%	-0%	-11%	22%	28%	-36%	1561%
Sequential Read 256KB	272.1	245.3 -10%	288.3 6%	275.9 1%	298 10%	279 3%	164.5 ?(9.66 - 294, n=256) -40%	1834 ?(226 - 4512, n=193, last 2 years) 574%
Sequential Write 256KB	45.2	47.8 6%	51.2 13%	45.7 1%	84.7 87%	52.2 15%	43 ?(8.74 - 106.3, n=256) -5%	1426 ?(57.5 - 3908, n=193, last 2 years) 3055%
Random Read 4KB	62.1	39 -37%	50.5 -19%	39.1 -37%	73.6 19%	46.31 -25%	21.7 ?(2.49 - 62.1, n=256) -65%	278 ?(22.2 - 543, n=193, last 2 years) 348%
Random Write 4KB	13.1	11.8 -10%	13.45 3%	9.8 -25%	14.4 10%	43.16 229%	8.08 ?(0.49 - 44.9, n=256) -38%	310 ?(9.4 - 753, n=193, last 2 years) 2266%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard	81.8 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	81.7 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 0%	79.4 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -3%	83 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 1%	85.9 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 5%	83.7 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 2%	59.1 ?(8.1 - 87.7, n=137) -28%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard	63.1 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	62.3 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -1%	61.9 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -2%	59.2 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -6%	63.3 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 0%	28.83 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -54%	39.8 ?(6.38 - 65.8, n=137) -37%

Huawei Y5 2019; Arena of Valor; min; 1.29.1.2: Ø32.3 (30-34)

Huawei Y5 2019; Arena of Valor; high HD; 1.29.1.2: Ø30.6 (19-32)

Huawei Y5 2019; Asphalt 9: Legends; Standard / low; 1.5.4a: Ø9.1 (2-17)

Huawei Y5 2019; Asphalt 9: Legends; High Quality; 1.5.4a: Ø8.12 (4-12)

Carga Máxima

Inatividade


41.2 °C	36.3 °C	35.5 °C
40.6 °C	36.6 °C	36.2 °C
39.2 °C	36.2 °C	35.3 °C

Máximo: 41.2 °C
Médio: 37.5 °C


31.8 °C	33.9 °C	36.9 °C
32.8 °C	34.6 °C	37.2 °C
34.1 °C	35.7 °C	36.8 °C

Máximo: 37.2 °C
Médio: 34.9 °C

alimentação elétrica 38.7 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.7 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.5 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.2 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37.2 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.2 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Huawei Y5 2019 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 64.4% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 64.4% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 64.4% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (125.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 95% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 99% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 0% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Huawei Y5 2018 audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (63.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.8% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (11.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 69% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 82% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 14% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0 / 0.1 Watt
Ocioso	1.2 / 1.9 / 2.4 Watt
Carga	3.3 / 4.6 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Huawei Y5 2019 3020 mAh	Huawei Y5 2018 3020 mAh	Nokia 2.1 4000 mAh	BQ Aquaris C 3000 mAh	Xiaomi Redmi 7 4000 mAh	Motorola Moto E5 Play 2120 mAh	Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		-23%	20%	0%	4%	5%	11%	-24%
Idle Minimum *	1.2	1.3 -8%	0.7 42%	0.7 42%	1 17%	1.2 -0%	0.881 ?(0.57 - 1.7, n=8) 27%	0.895 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=153, last 2 years) 25%
Idle Average *	1.9	1.7 11%	1.2 37%	1.9 -0%	1.7 11%	1.6 16%	1.864 ?(1.52 - 2.42, n=8) 2%	1.447 ?(0.6 - 4.26, n=153, last 2 years) 24%
Idle Maximum *	2.4	2.5 -4%	1.9 21%	2.5 -4%	2.1 12%	2 17%	2.13 ?(1.66 - 2.44, n=8) 11%	1.608 ?(0.83 - 4.45, n=153, last 2 years) 33%
Load Average *	3.3	5.5 -67%	3.2 3%	4.1 -24%	3.3 -0%	3.6 -9%	3.1 ?(2.34 - 3.79, n=8) 6%	6.41 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=148, last 2 years) -94%
Load Maximum *	4.6	6.8 -48%	4.8 -4%	5.2 -13%	5.6 -22%	4.5 2%	4.12 ?(3.16 - 4.76, n=8) 10%	9.61 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=148, last 2 years) -109%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		20h 56min
WiFi Websurfing		11h 49min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		12h 12min
Carga (máximo brilho)		4h 9min

	Huawei Y5 2019 3020 mAh	Huawei Y5 2018 3020 mAh	Nokia 2.1 4000 mAh	BQ Aquaris C 3000 mAh	Xiaomi Redmi 7 4000 mAh	Motorola Moto E5 Play 2120 mAh
Battery Runtime		-3%	14%	-18%	18%	-46%
Reader / Idle	1256				1489 19%
H.264	732				902 23%
WiFi v1.3	709	685 -3%	809 14%	583 -18%	848 20%	382.9 -46%
Load	249				268 8%

Pro

+ Boa câmera principal

+ Desempenho comparativamente alto

+ Design moderno

+ Tela brilhante

+ Boa duração da bateria

Contra

- Sem leitor de digitais

- A tela tem uma tonalidade azul

- Sem certificação DRM

- Sem muito espaço de armazenamento

- A carcaça é um pouco sensível à pressão

Veredicto – Muitas melhorias

Testing the Huawei Y5 2019. Test unit provided by Cyberport.

O Huawei Y5 2019 é uma boa atualização em relação ao Y5 2018 e oferece várias vantagens. Por um lado, devemos mencionar o maior desempenho do sistema, depois está o design mais moderno com um entalhe em forma de lágrima, e também está o alto-falante dedicado que, apesar de oferecer um som medíocre, ainda é melhor do que seu antecessor. A tela tem uma reprodução de cores mais precisa e também pode ser mais brilhante do que a do antecessor, se necessário.

A Huawei teria feito um favor a si mesma e aos seus clientes adicionando um sensor de digitais, mas por outro lado, com 13 Megapixels, a câmera agora oferece uma resolução bastante alta na comparação de classes e também pode tirar fotos aceitáveis.

O Huawei Y5 2019: Um bom smartphone econômico com muito desempenho e melhoria significativa em relação ao seu antecessor.

O Xiaomi Redmi 7 é um forte concorrente, com certeza. Custa apenas 30 Euros (~$34) a mais e oferece significativamente mais desempenho, um sensor de digitais e maior duração da bateria. O BQ Aquaris C oferece um WLAN e sensor de digitais consideravelmente mais rápidos. Ao mesmo tempo, o Huawei Y5 2019 eliminou várias fraquezas do seu antecessor e é agora um smartphone de baixo custo competitivo.

Atualmente, o custo adicional em comparação com o Y5 2018 é de cerca de 20 Euros (~$23). Se você não pode decidir entre os dois smartphones, o modelo mais atual é definitivamente a melhor escolha.

Nota: No momento de nossos testes, todos estão falando sobre a guerra comercial entre os EUA e a China, e a Huawei é particularmente afetada. No entanto, o fabricante afirma que não deve haver limitações em termos de atualizações de software ou aplicativos utilizáveis para todos os modelos atualmente disponíveis e que foram vendidos.

Huawei Y5 2019 - 2019-10-31 10/31/2019 v7 ^(old)
Florian Schmitt

Acabamento

71%

Teclado

65 / 75 → 87%

Mouse

83%

Conectividade

38 / 70 → 55%

Peso

93%

Bateria

89%

Pantalha

83%

Desempenho do jogos

4 / 64 → 6%

Desempenho da aplicação

39 / 86 → 45%

Temperatura

90%

Ruído

100%

Audio

67 / 90 → 74%

Camera

46%

Médio

67%

73%

Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Mark Riege - Translator - 534 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2018

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Huawei Y5 2019: Melhor que no ano passado

Florian Schmitt, 2019-06-15 (Update: 2019-06-18)

Size Comparison

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

Huawei Y5 2019 audio analysis

Huawei Y5 2018 audio analysis

Pro

Contra

Veredicto – Muitas melhorias

More articles related to this device

Price comparison