Breve Análise do Smartphone Huawei Y5 2018

Name: Huawei Y5 2018
Brand: Huawei

As cheap as possible.

O Y5 2018 é atualmente um dos smartphones mais baratos da linha ocidental da Huawei. Por 120 euros (~$140; versão dos EUA ~$120), os compradores receberão a tarifa padrão nessa faixa de preço. Isso é suficiente para o novo smartphone Huawei sobreviva o enxame de concorrentes?

Florian Wimmer, 👁 Florian Schmitt, ✓ Felicitas Krohn (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 07/25/2018 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android ARM Smartphone Touchscreen

Test device courtesy of Huawei Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Huawei Y5 2018 (Y5 Serie)

Processador

Mediatek MT6739 4 x 1.5 GHz, Cortex-A53

Placa gráfica

PowerVR GE8100

Memória

2048 MB

Pantalha

5.45 polegadas 2:1, 1440 x 720 pixel 295 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, IPS, Brilhante: sim

Disco rígido

16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB

, 9.3 GB livre

Conexões

1 USB 2.0, Card Reader: microSD até 256 GB, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: acclerômetro, sensor de proximidade, USB-OTG

Funcionamento em rede

802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM (850/900/1800/1900), UMTS (900/1900/2100), LTE (B1/B3/B5/B7/B8/B20), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 8.3 x 146.5 x 70.9

Bateria

11.47 Wh, 3020 mAh Lítio-Polímero

Sistema Operativo

Android 8.0 Oreo

Camera

Primary Camera: 8 MPix f/2.2, contrast AF, LED flash
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix f/2.2, LED flash

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: Alto-falante mono orientado para frente, Teclado: Teclado virtual, carregador, cabo USB, ferramenta de ejeção SIM, 24 Meses Garantia, SAR value: 0.36W/kg (head), 1.06W/kg (body); LTE Cat.4: 150 Mb/s (download), 50 Mb/s (upload), fanless

peso

145 g, Suprimento de energia: 50 g

Preço

119 Euro

Links

Huawei página inicial

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Xiaomi Mi A1 Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash	237 MBit/s +353%
Sony Xperia L1 Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737T, 16 GB eMMC Flash	88.6 MBit/s +69%
Umidigi A1 Pro PowerVR GE8100, MT6739, 16 GB eMMC Flash	55.8 MBit/s +7%
Huawei Y5 2018 PowerVR GE8100, MT6739, 16 GB eMMC Flash	52.3 MBit/s
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737, 16 GB eMMC Flash	46.8 MBit/s -11%
iperf3 receive AX12
Xiaomi Mi A1 Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash	237 MBit/s +356%
Sony Xperia L1 Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737T, 16 GB eMMC Flash	92.2 MBit/s +77%
Umidigi A1 Pro PowerVR GE8100, MT6739, 16 GB eMMC Flash	55.7 MBit/s +7%
Huawei Y5 2018 PowerVR GE8100, MT6739, 16 GB eMMC Flash	52 MBit/s
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737, 16 GB eMMC Flash	42.1 MBit/s -19%

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images


473 cd/m²	468 cd/m²	457 cd/m²
477 cd/m²	475 cd/m²	446 cd/m²
489 cd/m²	481 cd/m²	463 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 489 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 469.9 cd/m² Minimum: 4.02 cd/m²
iluminação: 91 %
iluminação com acumulador: 475 cd/m²
Contraste: 625:1 (Preto: 0.76 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 9.12 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 12 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
96.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.342

	Huawei Y5 2018 IPS, 1440x720, 5.5"	Lenovo Moto E4 Plus IPS, 1280x720, 5.5"	Sony Xperia L1 IPS, 1280x720, 5.5"	Umidigi A1 Pro IPS, 1440x720, 5.5"	Xiaomi Mi A1 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5"
Screen		35%	30%	65%	43%
Brightness middle	475	425 -11%	479 1%	594 25%	503 6%
Brightness	470	425 -10%	478 2%	570 21%	478 2%
Brightness Distribution	91	93 2%	94 3%	86 -5%	88 -3%
Black Level *	0.76	0.37 51%	0.58 24%	0.22 71%	0.37 51%
Contrast	625	1149 84%	826 32%	2700 332%	1359 117%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	9.12	4.7 48%	4.5 51%	6.63 27%	3.92 57%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	18.86	8.3 56%	7.5 60%	13.99 26%	7.86 58%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	12	4.6 62%	4.1 66%	9.2 23%	4.9 59%
Gamma	2.342 ^94%	2.17 ^101%	2.03 ^108%	2.24 ^98%	2.223 ^99%
CCT	9861 ^66%	7445 ^87%	7139 ^91%	8663 ^75%	7884 ^82%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

166.7 Hz

≤ 25 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 166.7 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 25 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 166.7 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
18 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 7 ms rise
18 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 11 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 36 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
41 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 22 ms rise
41 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 19 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 61 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei Y5 2018	38060 Points
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus	30619 Points -20%
Sony Xperia L1	37495 Points -1%
Umidigi A1 Pro	36073 Points -5%
Xiaomi Mi A1	63101 Points +66%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (25012 - 38060, n=13)	33655 Points -12%

AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei Y5 2018	45817 Points
Umidigi A1 Pro	45868 Points 0%
Xiaomi Mi A1	77161 Points +68%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (26874 - 46951, n=13)	41995 Points -8%

PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Huawei Y5 2018	4133 Points
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus	3624 Points -12%
Sony Xperia L1	4285 Points +4%
Umidigi A1 Pro	4330 Points +5%
Xiaomi Mi A1	5721 Points +38%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (3742 - 5136, n=11)	4323 Points +5%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Huawei Y5 2018	2675 Points
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus	2768 Points +3%
Sony Xperia L1	3237 Points +21%
Umidigi A1 Pro	3159 Points +18%
Xiaomi Mi A1	4895 Points +83%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (2467 - 5377, n=16)	3206 Points +20%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Huawei Y5 2018	224 Points
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus	536 Points +139%
Sony Xperia L1	744 Points +232%
Umidigi A1 Pro	208 Points -7%
Xiaomi Mi A1	1263 Points +464%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (162 - 637, n=15)	291 Points +30%
Average of class Smartphone (1196 - 11976, n=152, last 2 years)	6326 Points +2724%
System (sort by value)
Huawei Y5 2018	1363 Points
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus	1086 Points -20%
Sony Xperia L1	1338 Points -2%
Umidigi A1 Pro	1318 Points -3%
Xiaomi Mi A1	3187 Points +134%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (1103 - 1526, n=15)	1294 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone (2368 - 16475, n=152, last 2 years)	10181 Points +647%
Memory (sort by value)
Huawei Y5 2018	1034 Points
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus	591 Points -43%
Sony Xperia L1	798 Points -23%
Umidigi A1 Pro	802 Points -22%
Xiaomi Mi A1	881 Points -15%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (420 - 1039, n=15)	768 Points -26%
Average of class Smartphone (962 - 12716, n=152, last 2 years)	6785 Points +556%
Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei Y5 2018	187 Points
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus	208 Points +11%
Sony Xperia L1	386 Points +106%
Umidigi A1 Pro	184 Points -2%
Xiaomi Mi A1	1012 Points +441%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (18 - 190, n=15)	160.5 Points -14%
Average of class Smartphone (1017 - 58651, n=152, last 2 years)	17165 Points +9079%
Web (sort by value)
Huawei Y5 2018	10 Points
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus	620 Points +6100%
Sony Xperia L1	743 Points +7330%
Umidigi A1 Pro	10 Points 0%
Xiaomi Mi A1	895 Points +8850%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (7 - 624, n=15)	165.4 Points +1554%
Average of class Smartphone (841 - 2145, n=152, last 2 years)	1566 Points +15560%

Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei Y5 2018	662 Points
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus	556 Points -16%
Sony Xperia L1	674 Points +2%
Umidigi A1 Pro	665 Points 0%
Xiaomi Mi A1	881 Points +33%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (571 - 675, n=14)	632 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone (844 - 9574, n=82, last 2 years)	5486 Points +729%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei Y5 2018	1827 Points
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus	1562 Points -15%
Sony Xperia L1	1875 Points +3%
Umidigi A1 Pro	1852 Points +1%
Xiaomi Mi A1	4396 Points +141%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (1418 - 1896, n=14)	1733 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone (2630 - 30323, n=82, last 2 years)	15064 Points +725%
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Huawei Y5 2018	1451 Points
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus	952 Points -34%
Sony Xperia L1	1241 Points -14%
Umidigi A1 Pro	1450 Points 0%
Xiaomi Mi A1	3678 Points +153%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (1125 - 1460, n=12)	1328 Points -8%
Average of class Smartphone (5192 - 18534, n=58, last 2 years)	11998 Points +727%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Huawei Y5 2018	4161 Points
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus	3692 Points -11%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus	3692 Points -11%
Sony Xperia L1	6669 Points +60%
Xiaomi Mi A1	13799 Points +232%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (3392 - 4339, n=17)	3912 Points -6%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Huawei Y5 2018	3575 Points
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus	3183 Points -11%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus	3183 Points -11%
Sony Xperia L1	6015 Points +68%
Xiaomi Mi A1	13314 Points +272%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (2878 - 4346, n=17)	3398 Points -5%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei Y5 2018	9755 Points
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus	8390 Points -14%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus	8390 Points -14%
Sony Xperia L1	10767 Points +10%
Xiaomi Mi A1	15816 Points +62%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (7103 - 10981, n=17)	9367 Points -4%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Huawei Y5 2018	125 Points
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus	163 Points +30%
Sony Xperia L1	285 Points +128%
Umidigi A1 Pro	168 Points +34%
Xiaomi Mi A1	476 Points +281%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (120 - 211, n=17)	157.5 Points +26%
Average of class Smartphone (812 - 7285, n=26, last 2 years)	4204 Points +3263%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei Y5 2018	102 Points
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus	133 Points +30%
Sony Xperia L1	238 Points +133%
Umidigi A1 Pro	140 Points +37%
Xiaomi Mi A1	390 Points +282%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (102 - 185, n=17)	131.6 Points +29%
Average of class Smartphone (756 - 9451, n=26, last 2 years)	4740 Points +4547%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Huawei Y5 2018	562 Points
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus	753 Points +34%
Sony Xperia L1	939 Points +67%
Umidigi A1 Pro	537 Points -4%
Xiaomi Mi A1	2079 Points +270%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (445 - 690, n=17)	567 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (1093 - 4349, n=26, last 2 years)	3303 Points +488%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Huawei Y5 2018	84 Points
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus	99 Points +18%
Sony Xperia L1	184 Points +119%
Umidigi A1 Pro	108 Points +29%
Xiaomi Mi A1	473 Points +463%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (80 - 221, n=17)	104.9 Points +25%
Average of class Smartphone (286 - 17553, n=73, last 2 years)	3084 Points +3571%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei Y5 2018	68 Points
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus	79 Points +16%
Sony Xperia L1	149 Points +119%
Umidigi A1 Pro	88 Points +29%
Xiaomi Mi A1	388 Points +471%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (65 - 185, n=17)	85.4 Points +26%
Average of class Smartphone (240 - 29890, n=73, last 2 years)	3263 Points +4699%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Huawei Y5 2018	560 Points
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus	783 Points +40%
Sony Xperia L1	968 Points +73%
Umidigi A1 Pro	531 Points -5%
Xiaomi Mi A1	2070 Points +270%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (486 - 690, n=17)	567 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (858 - 7180, n=73, last 2 years)	3286 Points +487%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Y5 2018	10 fps
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus	11 fps +10%
Sony Xperia L1	19 fps +90%
Umidigi A1 Pro	9.7 fps -3%
Xiaomi Mi A1	22 fps +120%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (8.2 - 15, n=17)	10.1 fps +1%
Average of class Smartphone (23 - 165, n=170, last 2 years)	86.1 fps +761%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Y5 2018	6 fps
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus	6 fps 0%
Sony Xperia L1	11 fps +83%
Umidigi A1 Pro	6 fps 0%
Xiaomi Mi A1	23 fps +283%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (4.9 - 6.1, n=17)	5.64 fps -6%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=170, last 2 years)	283 fps +4617%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Huawei Y5 2018	5.7 fps
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus	4.8 fps -16%
Sony Xperia L1	8.8 fps +54%
Umidigi A1 Pro	5.4 fps -5%
Xiaomi Mi A1	9.5 fps +67%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (4.4 - 10, n=16)	5.61 fps -2%
Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 165, n=170, last 2 years)	75.5 fps +1225%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Y5 2018	2.7 fps
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus	2.2 fps -19%
Sony Xperia L1	4.1 fps +52%
Umidigi A1 Pro	2.7 fps 0%
Xiaomi Mi A1	9.8 fps +263%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (2.2 - 2.8, n=14)	2.56 fps -5%
Average of class Smartphone (12 - 482, n=170, last 2 years)	167.1 fps +6089%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Y5 2018	3.4 fps
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus	3.4 fps 0%
Sony Xperia L1	6.3 fps +85%
Umidigi A1 Pro	3.3 fps -3%
Xiaomi Mi A1	6.3 fps +85%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (2.6 - 6.7, n=16)	3.51 fps +3%
Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 158, n=170, last 2 years)	65.6 fps +1829%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Y5 2018	1.6 fps
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus	1.4 fps -12%
Sony Xperia L1	2.6 fps +63%
Umidigi A1 Pro	1.6 fps 0%
Xiaomi Mi A1	6.4 fps +300%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (1.3 - 1.7, n=16)	1.494 fps -7%
Average of class Smartphone (8.3 - 341, n=170, last 2 years)	118.5 fps +7306%

GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Y5 2018	1.4 fps
Umidigi A1 Pro	1.4 fps 0%
Xiaomi Mi A1	3.5 fps +150%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (1.1 - 2.6, n=15)	1.553 fps +11%
Average of class Smartphone (5 - 119, n=171, last 2 years)	47.9 fps +3321%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Y5 2018	0.85 fps
Umidigi A1 Pro	0.9 fps +6%
Xiaomi Mi A1	3.6 fps +324%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (0.6 - 0.91, n=14)	0.826 fps -3%
Average of class Smartphone (3.1 - 216, n=170, last 2 years)	71.2 fps +8276%

Legend

Huawei Y5 2018 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Lenovo Moto E4 Plus Mediatek MT6737, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Sony Xperia L1 Mediatek MT6737T, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Umidigi A1 Pro Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Xiaomi Mi A1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 64 GB eMMC Flash

Average Mediatek MT6739

Average of class Smartphone

JetStream 1.1 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Xiaomi Mi A1	26.08 Points +47%
Umidigi A1 Pro (Chrome 66)	17.86 Points +1%
Huawei Y5 2018 (Chrome 67)	17.7 Points
Sony Xperia L1 (Chrome 59)	17.37 Points -2%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (13.4 - 18.5, n=14)	16.7 Points -6%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus (Chrome 60)	14.55 Points -18%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=204, last 2 years)	37278 Points +1088%
Xiaomi Mi A1	4756 Points +52%
Umidigi A1 Pro (Chrome 66)	3191 Points +2%
Huawei Y5 2018 (Chrome 67)	3138 Points
Average Mediatek MT6739 (2093 - 3386, n=15)	2945 Points -6%
Sony Xperia L1 (Chrome 59)	2684 Points -14%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus (Chrome 60)	2273 Points -28%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus (Chrome 60)	17405 ms * -6%
Huawei Y5 2018 (Chrome 67)	16492 ms *
Average Mediatek MT6739 (13599 - 18154, n=16)	16427 ms * -0%
Umidigi A1 Pro (Chrome 66)	15718 ms * +5%
Sony Xperia L1 (Chrome 59)	12507 ms * +24%
Xiaomi Mi A1	9868 ms * +40%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=161, last 2 years)	1563 ms * +91%

* ... smaller is better

	Huawei Y5 2018	Lenovo Moto E4 Plus	Sony Xperia L1	Umidigi A1 Pro	Xiaomi Mi A1	Average 16 GB eMMC Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		4%	-45%	-7%	65%	-31%	1669%
Sequential Read 256KB	245.3	194.4 -21%	181.9 -26%	269.2 10%	277.4 13%	164.5 ?(9.66 - 294, n=256) -33%	1847 ?(226 - 4512, n=193, last 2 years) 653%
Sequential Write 256KB	47.8	42 -12%	40.2 -16%	44.4 -7%	202.4 323%	43 ?(8.74 - 106.3, n=256) -10%	1436 ?(57.5 - 3908, n=193, last 2 years) 2904%
Random Read 4KB	39	19.15 -51%	13.6 -65%	29.6 -24%	78.1 100%	21.7 ?(2.49 - 62.1, n=256) -44%	277 ?(22.2 - 483, n=193, last 2 years) 610%
Random Write 4KB	11.8	29.4 149%	5.9 -50%	10.2 -14%	7.19 -39%	8.08 ?(0.49 - 44.9, n=256) -32%	308 ?(9.4 - 753, n=193, last 2 years) 2510%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard	81.7 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	66.3 -19%	37.81 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401) -54%	81 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -1%	83.6 2%	59.1 ?(8.1 - 87.7, n=137) -28%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard	62.3 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	46.6 -25%	26.25 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401) -58%	58.8 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -6%	57.9 -7%	39.8 ?(6.38 - 65.8, n=137) -36%

Carga Máxima

Inatividade


37.1 °C	34.2 °C	33.4 °C
36.5 °C	34.2 °C	33.1 °C
35.7 °C	34.1 °C	33.2 °C

Máximo: 37.1 °C
Médio: 34.6 °C


33.2 °C	34.5 °C	37.6 °C
33.7 °C	34.2 °C	37.7 °C
33.2 °C	34.6 °C	35.9 °C

Máximo: 37.7 °C
Médio: 35 °C

alimentação elétrica 36.5 °C | Temperatura do quarto 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.6 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.1 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37.7 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Huawei Y5 2018 audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (63.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.8% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (11.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 69% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 83% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 14% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Xiaomi Mi A1 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 21% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 71% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 42% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0 / 0.04 Watt
Ocioso	1.3 / 1.7 / 2.5 Watt
Carga	5.5 / 6.8 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Huawei Y5 2018 3020 mAh	Lenovo Moto E4 Plus 5000 mAh	Sony Xperia L1 2620 mAh	Umidigi A1 Pro 3150 mAh	Xiaomi Mi A1 3080 mAh	Average Mediatek MT6739	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		26%	3%	-15%	-38%	-7%	4%
Idle Minimum *	1.3	0.89 32%	0.89 32%	1.8 -38%	2.2 -69%	1.522 ?(0.87 - 2.8, n=16) -17%	0.895 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=153, last 2 years) 31%
Idle Average *	1.7	1.87 -10%	2.05 -21%	2.3 -35%	2.8 -65%	2.17 ?(1.6 - 3.5, n=16) -28%	1.453 ?(0.6 - 4.26, n=153, last 2 years) 15%
Idle Maximum *	2.5	1.98 21%	2.18 13%	3.2 -28%	3.4 -36%	2.86 ?(1.68 - 6.3, n=16) -14%	1.613 ?(0.83 - 4.45, n=153, last 2 years) 35%
Load Average *	5.5	3.04 45%	6.02 -9%	4.7 15%	6.2 -13%	4.73 ?(2.8 - 7, n=16) 14%	6.5 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=148, last 2 years) -18%
Load Maximum *	6.8	4.01 41%	6.94 -2%	6 12%	7.2 -6%	5.99 ?(3.5 - 11.9, n=16) 12%	9.86 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=148, last 2 years) -45%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria


WiFi Websurfing		11h 25min

	Huawei Y5 2018 3020 mAh	Lenovo Moto E4 Plus 5000 mAh	Sony Xperia L1 2620 mAh	Umidigi A1 Pro 3150 mAh	Xiaomi Mi A1 3080 mAh
Battery Runtime		15%	-17%	-11%	-8%
WiFi v1.3	685	788 15%	567 -17%	608 -11%	633 -8%
Reader / Idle			1398
H.264			656
Load			223

Pro

+ Longa duração da bateria

+ Carcaça leve e estável

+ Permanece frio

Contra

- Sem WLAN 5 GHz

- Alto-falante muito fraco

- Cintilação da tela com brilho baixo

Huawei Y5 2018 - 07/17/2018 v6 ^(old)
Florian Wimmer

Acabamento

67%

Teclado

64 / 75 → 85%

Mouse

82%

Conectividade

32 / 60 → 53%

Peso

93%

Bateria

94%

Pantalha

79%

Desempenho do jogos

6 / 63 → 10%

Desempenho da aplicação

35 / 70 → 50%

Temperatura

91%

Ruído

100%

Audio

38 / 91 → 42%

Camera

49%

Médio

64%

76%

Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Huawei Y5 2018

Florian Wimmer, 2018-07-25 (Update: 2018-08- 1)

Size Comparison

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

Huawei Y5 2018 audio analysis

Xiaomi Mi A1 audio analysis

Pro

Contra

More articles related to this device

Price comparison