Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve Análise do Smartphone Huawei P9
Huawei P9 (P9 Serie)
Processador
HiSilicon Kirin 955 8 x 2.5 GHz, Cortex-A72/-A53
Placa gráfica
Memória
3 GB
, LPDDR4
Pantalha
5.20 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 424 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, 10 pontos multi-touch, IPS-NEO, JDI, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB
, 23.22 GB livre
peso
144 g, Suprimento de energia: 64 g
Preço
569 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 582 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 562.6 cd/m² Minimum: 7.89 cd/m²iluminação: 91 %
iluminação com acumulador: 582 cd/m²
Contraste: 1532:1 (Preto: 0.38 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.4 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 4.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.44% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
77.78% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
87.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.5% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
93.8% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.2
| Huawei P9 IPS-NEO, JDI, 1920x1080, 5.2" | Huawei P8 IPS-NEO, 1920x1080, 5.2" | Apple iPhone 6S IPS, 1334x750, 4.7" | Samsung Galaxy S7 SAMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.1" | Microsoft Lumia 950 AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.2" | OnePlus 2 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5" | Sony Xperia Z5 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -4% | -1% | 15% | 1% | -3% | -44% | |
| Brightness middle | 582 | 453 -22% | 552 -5% | 350 -40% | 292 -50% | 451 -23% | 669 15% |
| Brightness | 563 | 439 -22% | 549 -2% | 351 -38% | 298 -47% | 446 -21% | 624 11% |
| Brightness Distribution | 91 | 91 0% | 87 -4% | 98 8% | 92 1% | 90 -1% | 85 -7% |
| Black Level * | 0.38 | 0.28 26% | 0.39 -3% | 0.3 21% | 0.68 -79% | ||
| Contrast | 1532 | 1618 6% | 1415 -8% | 1503 -2% | 984 -36% | ||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.4 | 4.7 -7% | 3.4 23% | 2.04 54% | 2.48 44% | 3.84 13% | 7.96 -81% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.4 | 3.25 56% | |||||
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.8 | 5.03 -5% | 4.16 13% | 1.63 66% | 1.97 59% | 3.97 17% | 10.95 -128% |
| Gamma | 2.2 100% | 2.27 97% | 2.21 100% | 2.07 106% | 2.06 107% | 2.46 89% | 2.61 84% |
| CCT | 6175 105% | 7439 87% | 7288 89% | 6391 102% | 6640 98% | 7283 89% | 7402 88% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 77.78 | 72.04 -7% | 62.18 -20% | 86.86 12% | 58.07 -25% | ||
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 99.44 | 95.93 -4% | 99.35 0% | 90.14 -9% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 26 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 13 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 13 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 59 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 49 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 30 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 19 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 83 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
PCMark for Android | AnTuTu v6 | Geekbench 3 | 3DMark | GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | GFXBench 3.0 | GFXBench 3.1 | BaseMark OS II | Lightmark | Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal
| PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value) | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| Huawei P8 | |
| Huawei Mate 8 | |
| Google Nexus 5X | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 | |
| Motorola Moto X Force | |
| Sony Xperia Z5 | |
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| Huawei Mate 8 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 | |
| Motorola Moto X Force | |
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| Huawei P8 | |
| Huawei Mate 8 | |
| Google Nexus 5X | |
| Microsoft Lumia 950 | |
| Apple iPhone 6S | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 | |
| Motorola Moto X Force | |
| Sony Xperia Z5 | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| Huawei P8 | |
| Huawei Mate 8 | |
| Google Nexus 5X | |
| Microsoft Lumia 950 | |
| Apple iPhone 6S | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 | |
| Motorola Moto X Force | |
| Sony Xperia Z5 | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| Huawei Mate 8 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 | |
| Motorola Moto X Force | |
| Sony Xperia Z5 | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| Huawei Mate 8 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 | |
| Motorola Moto X Force | |
| Sony Xperia Z5 | |
| Lightmark - 1920x1080 1080p (sort by value) | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| Huawei Mate 8 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 | |
| Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value) | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| Huawei Mate 8 | |
| Apple iPhone 6S | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| Huawei P8 | |
| Huawei Mate 8 | |
| Google Nexus 5X | |
| Microsoft Lumia 950 | |
| Apple iPhone 6S | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 | |
| Motorola Moto X Force | |
| Sony Xperia Z5 | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| Huawei Mate 8 | |
| Google Nexus 5X | |
| Microsoft Lumia 950 | |
| Apple iPhone 6S | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 | |
| Motorola Moto X Force | |
| Sony Xperia Z5 | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value) | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| Huawei P8 | |
| Huawei Mate 8 | |
| Google Nexus 5X | |
| Microsoft Lumia 950 | |
| Apple iPhone 6S | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 | |
| Motorola Moto X Force | |
| Sony Xperia Z5 | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value) | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| Huawei P8 | |
| Huawei Mate 8 | |
| Google Nexus 5X | |
| Microsoft Lumia 950 | |
| Apple iPhone 6S | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 | |
| Motorola Moto X Force | |
| Sony Xperia Z5 | |
| Vellamo 3.x - Browser (sort by value) | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| Huawei P8 | |
| Huawei Mate 8 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 | |
| BaseMark OS II - Web (sort by value) | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| Huawei P8 | |
| Huawei Mate 8 | |
| Google Nexus 5X | |
| Microsoft Lumia 950 | |
| Apple iPhone 6S | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 | |
| Motorola Moto X Force | |
| Sony Xperia Z5 | |
* ... smaller is better
| AndroBench 3-5 | |
| Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value) | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| Huawei P8 | |
| Huawei Mate 8 | |
| Google Nexus 5X | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 | |
| Motorola Moto X Force | |
| Sony Xperia Z5 | |
| Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value) | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| Huawei P8 | |
| Huawei Mate 8 | |
| Google Nexus 5X | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 | |
| Motorola Moto X Force | |
| Sony Xperia Z5 | |
| Random Read 4KB (sort by value) | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| Huawei P8 | |
| Huawei Mate 8 | |
| Google Nexus 5X | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 | |
| Motorola Moto X Force | |
| Sony Xperia Z5 | |
| Random Write 4KB (sort by value) | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| Huawei P8 | |
| Huawei Mate 8 | |
| Google Nexus 5X | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 | |
| Motorola Moto X Force | |
| Sony Xperia Z5 | |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (sort by value) | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 | |
| Motorola Moto X Force | |
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (sort by value) | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 | |
| Motorola Moto X Force | |
| Asphalt 8: Airborne | |||
| Configurações | Valor | ||
| high | 30 fps | ||
| Dead Trigger 2 | |||
| Configurações | Valor | ||
| high | 60 fps | ||
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 40 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.1 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38.8 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.9 °C / 93 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.1 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38.8 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.9 °C / 93 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Consumo de energia
| desligado |   0.02 / 0.38 Watt |
| Ocioso |  0.77 / 2.36 / 2.37 Watt |
| Carga |
3.09 / 5.35 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Gossen Metrahit Energy | |
| Huawei P9 Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash | Huawei P8 Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash | Google Nexus 5X Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash | Sony Xperia Z5 Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash | OnePlus 2 Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash | Apple iPhone 6S A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe) | Samsung Galaxy S7 Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash | Microsoft Lumia 950 Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -12% | -1% | -17% | -4% | 23% | 7% | -64% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 0.77 | 0.7 9% | 0.55 29% | 0.7 9% | 0.6 22% | 0.5 35% | 0.68 12% | 1.97 -156% |
| Idle Average * | 2.36 | 2 15% | 1.44 39% | 1.7 28% | 1.7 28% | 1.6 32% | 1.02 57% | 2.42 -3% |
| Idle Maximum * | 2.37 | 2.1 11% | 1.9 20% | 1.8 24% | 1.8 24% | 1.9 20% | 1.14 52% | 2.96 -25% |
| Load Average * | 3.09 | 4.9 -59% | 3.36 -9% | 5.6 -81% | 5.7 -84% | 2.5 19% | 4.73 -53% | 5.94 -92% |
| Load Maximum * | 5.35 | 7.4 -38% | 9.76 -82% | 8.7 -63% | 6 -12% | 4.8 10% | 7.16 -34% | 7.79 -46% |
* ... smaller is better
| Huawei P9 11.46 Wh | Huawei P8 Wh | Apple iPhone 6S 7 Wh | Samsung Galaxy S7 11.55 Wh | Motorola Moto X Force Wh | Google Nexus 5X 10 Wh | Microsoft Lumia 950 12 Wh | Huawei Mate 8 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -16% | -6% | 19% | 17% | 2% | -17% | 43% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1514 | 826 -45% | 1510 0% | 1810 20% | 1610 6% | 1775 17% | 1500 -1% | 1872 24% |
| H.264 | 568 | 581 2% | 699 23% | 892 57% | 710 25% | 555 -2% | 570 0% | 963 70% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 569 | 434 -24% | 492 -14% | 456 -20% | 426 -25% | 412 -28% | 250 -56% | 865 52% |
| Load | 206 | 215 4% | 137 -33% | 242 17% | 330 60% | 245 19% | 187 -9% | 256 24% |
Pro
+ SoC veloz
+ Armazenamento expansível
+ Ampla cobertura de frequências
+ Boas câmeras
+ Qualidade das chamadas
+ Headset incluído
+ Carga rápida
+ USB Tipo C
+ Boa duração da bateria
Contra
- Sem App2SD
- LTE Cat.. Apenas 6
- Sem receptor de rádio
- Sem infravermelhos
- Sem MHL ou SlimPort
- Somente USB 2.0
- DNGs não podem ser armazenados na micro-SD
- Afogamento do SoC sob carga permanente
A empresa chinesa continua com a história de sucesso da sua série P com o Huawei P9, e consistentemente desenvolve ainda mais o seu carro chefe. Mais uma vez, o ótimo painel IPS, bom desempenho, qualidade das fotos da dual-câmera Leica, a boa duração da bateria e o generoso período de garantia, nos impressionaram.
Os componentes que a Huawei instalou em seu smartphone, no geral, funcionam bem, mas nem sempre são os mais modernos. Por exemplo, LTE Cat. 9 não está abordo, somente o antigo Cat. Versão 6. No entanto, ele tem uma gama de frequências muito ampla. Também é agradável que as qualidades do telefone não sejam passadas por alto. O P9 oferece uma qualidade de chamadas muito e uma boa supressão do ruído de fundo.
O Huawei P9 é um potente smartphone premium que não precisa de superlativos, e convence com o seu conceito geral balanceado.
Junto com o leve EMUI 4.1, o SoC veloz fornece um desempenho incrível, mas mostra um afogamento bastante notório sob uso intenso permanente. A dual-câmera não é a reinvenção anunciada da fotografia móvel, mas tira boas fotos com um toque muito original. Por outro lado, o recurso de vídeo da câmera mostra fraquezas. Suas gravações a 60 FPS não são impressionantes, e não oferece Ultra HD, para começar.
Embora a Huawei tenha aumentado o preço com o seu P9, o smartphone ainda oferece uma boa razão de preço-desempenho e um pacote balanceado. No entanto, o aparelho não satisfará completamente os fanáticos dos óculos VR ou os entusiastas do vídeo.
Esta é uma versão reduzida da análise original. Você pode ler a análise completa em inglês aqui.
Huawei P9
- 04/28/2016 v5.1 (old)
Daniel Schmidt
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado
Price comparison
