Notebookcheck Logo

Breve Análise do Smartphone Huawei P9 Lite

Cuidado do produto. A Huawei suplementa a sua linha P9 com o elegante smartphone P9 de gama média. O telefone Android de 5,2-polegadas demostrou ser um digno sucessor do campeão de vendas P8 Lite no teste.
Huawei P9 Lite (P9 Serie)
Processador
HiSilicon Kirin 650 8 x 2 GHz, Cortex-A53
Placa gráfica
ARM Mali-T830 MP2
Memória
3 GB 
Pantalha
5.20 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 424 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, FHD, 10 Multitouchpunkte, IPS, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB 
, 9.51 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Conector combinado de fones e microfone (3,5 mm), Card Reader: micro-SD (máx. 128 GB), 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: acelerômetro, sensor de proximidade, sensor de luz ambiente, bússola digital, leitor de digitais, Wi-Fi Direct, Miracast
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 4.1, GSM/GPRS/EDGE (850, 900, 1800 e 1900 MHz), UMTS/HSPA+ (Band 1, 2 e 8), LTE (Band 1, 3, 7, 8, 20), nano-SIM, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 7.5 x 146.8 x 72.6
Bateria
3000 mAh Lítio-Polímero, Tempo de conversação 2G (de acordo com o fabricante): 32 h, Tempo de conversação 3G (de acordo com o fabricante): 19 h, Standby 2G (de acordo com o fabricante): 630 h, Standby 3G (de acordo com o fabricante): 610 h
Sistema Operativo
Android 6.0 Marshmallow
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix BSI AF, f/2.0
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix LED flash, f/2.0
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Alto falante mono, Teclado: virtual, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Fones estéreo, Fonte de alimentação modular, cabo USB, guia de início rápido, 24 Meses Garantia, F, fanless
peso
147 g, Suprimento de energia: 30 g
Preço
299 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

156.5 mm 77.2 mm 10.8 mm 167 g151.3 mm 76.3 mm 8.2 mm 158 g146.8 mm 72.6 mm 7.5 mm 147 g145.8 mm 72.3 mm 8.1 mm 159 g145 mm 70.9 mm 6.95 mm 144 g143 mm 70.6 mm 7.7 mm 133 g134.5 mm 65.2 mm 7.4 mm 131 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g
Garmin Edge 500 - route
Garmin Edge 500 - route
Garmin Edge 500 - underpass
Garmin Edge 500 - underpass
Garmin Edge 500 - turning point
Garmin Edge 500 - turning point
Huawei P9 Lite - route
Huawei P9 Lite - route
Huawei P9 Lite - underpass
Huawei P9 Lite - underpass
Huawei P9 Lite - turning point
Huawei P9 Lite - turning point

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
455
cd/m²
492
cd/m²
458
cd/m²
454
cd/m²
505
cd/m²
465
cd/m²
445
cd/m²
495
cd/m²
444
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
FHD, 10 Multitouchpunkte tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 505 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 468.1 cd/m² Minimum: 2.68 cd/m²
iluminação: 88 %
iluminação com acumulador: 505 cd/m²
Contraste: 682:1 (Preto: 0.74 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 4.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.5
Huawei P9 Lite
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 650, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Asus ZenFone Selfie ZD551KL
Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Honor 5X
Adreno 405, 616 MSM8939v2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Huawei P8 lite
Mali-450 MP4, Kirin 620, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Huawei P9
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
Mali-T720 MP2, 7578, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Screen
3%
8%
-3%
22%
-12%
25%
Brightness middle
505
392
-22%
535
6%
365
-28%
582
15%
289
-43%
386
-24%
Brightness
468
382
-18%
521
11%
353
-25%
563
20%
291
-38%
394
-16%
Brightness Distribution
88
93
6%
85
-3%
93
6%
91
3%
96
9%
88
0%
Black Level *
0.74
0.41
45%
0.43
42%
0.42
43%
0.38
49%
Contrast
682
956
40%
1244
82%
869
27%
1532
125%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
4.1
5.55
-35%
4.88
-19%
5.2
-27%
4.4
-7%
4.7
-15%
1.11
73%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
5.8
8.66
-49%
7.4
-28%
7.3
-26%
3.35
42%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
4.9
4.7
4%
5.2
-6%
5.85
-19%
4.8
2%
3
39%
1.34
73%
Gamma
2.5 88%
2.7 81%
2.26 97%
2.17 101%
2.2 100%
2.03 108%
2.12 104%
CCT
7116 91%
7270 89%
7766 84%
7252 90%
6175 105%
6291 103%
6441 101%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
70.86
77.78
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
91.25
99.44

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 15 ms rise
↘ 17 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 84 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
40 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 17 ms rise
↘ 23 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 57 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei P9 Lite
50366 Points
Honor 5X
37152 Points -26%
Huawei P9
95743 Points +90%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
27232 Points -46%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
35964 Points -29%
Geekbench 3
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei P9 Lite
883 Points
Asus ZenFone Selfie ZD551KL
680 Points -23%
Honor 5X
698 Points -21%
Huawei P8 lite
588 Points -33%
Huawei P9
1767 Points +100%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
473 Points -46%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei P9 Lite
3768 Points
Asus ZenFone Selfie ZD551KL
2720 Points -28%
Honor 5X
3047 Points -19%
Huawei P8 lite
2754 Points -27%
Huawei P9
6522 Points +73%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
1425 Points -62%
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Huawei P9 Lite
11769 Points
Asus ZenFone Selfie ZD551KL
7954 Points -32%
Honor 5X
7852 Points -33%
Huawei P8 lite
5629 Points -52%
Huawei P9
19854 Points +69%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
4400 Points -63%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
7229 Points -39%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Huawei P9 Lite
11318 Points
Asus ZenFone Selfie ZD551KL
8099 Points -28%
Honor 5X
7764 Points -31%
Huawei P8 lite
5167 Points -54%
Huawei P9
21577 Points +91%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
3838 Points -66%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
6522 Points -42%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P9 Lite
13676 Points
Asus ZenFone Selfie ZD551KL
7484 Points -45%
Honor 5X
8174 Points -40%
Huawei P8 lite
8206 Points -40%
Huawei P9
15517 Points +13%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
9022 Points -34%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
11653 Points -15%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Huawei P9 Lite
554 Points
Asus ZenFone Selfie ZD551KL
154 Points -72%
Honor 5X
129 Points -77%
Huawei P9
1237 Points +123%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
53 Points -90%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
281 Points -49%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P9 Lite
473 Points
Asus ZenFone Selfie ZD551KL
124 Points -74%
Honor 5X
103 Points -78%
Huawei P9
1080 Points +128%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
42 Points -91%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
235 Points -50%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P9 Lite
1373 Points
Asus ZenFone Selfie ZD551KL
952 Points -31%
Honor 5X
1089 Points -21%
Huawei P9
2510 Points +83%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
709 Points -48%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
916 Points -33%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P9 Lite
19 fps
Asus ZenFone Selfie ZD551KL
14 fps -26%
Honor 5X
14 fps -26%
Huawei P8 lite
15.3 fps -19%
Huawei P9
43 fps +126%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
9.7 fps -49%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
20 fps +5%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P9 Lite
19 fps
Asus ZenFone Selfie ZD551KL
14 fps -26%
Honor 5X
14 fps -26%
Huawei P8 lite
9.9 fps -48%
Huawei P9
40 fps +111%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
5.2 fps -73%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
12 fps -37%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Huawei P9 Lite
8.4 fps
Asus ZenFone Selfie ZD551KL
5.5 fps -35%
Honor 5X
5.9 fps -30%
Huawei P9
19 fps +126%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
3.8 fps -55%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
8.4 fps 0%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P9 Lite
7.8 fps
Asus ZenFone Selfie ZD551KL
5.6 fps -28%
Honor 5X
5.4 fps -31%
Huawei P9
18 fps +131%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
1.8 fps -77%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
4.1 fps -47%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P9 Lite
4.9 fps
Huawei P9
11 fps +124%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
fps -100%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P9 Lite
4.5 fps
Huawei P9
10 fps +122%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
fps -100%
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
Huawei P9 Lite
5339 Points
Asus ZenFone Selfie ZD551KL
3244 Points -39%
Honor 5X
3794 Points -29%
Huawei P8 lite
3717 Points -30%
Huawei P9
7058 Points +32%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
4126 Points -23%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
4051 Points -24%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Huawei P9 Lite
1197 Points
Asus ZenFone Selfie ZD551KL
917 Points -23%
Honor 5X
297 Points -75%
Huawei P8 lite
687 Points -43%
Huawei P9
2025 Points +69%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
585 Points -51%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
662 Points -45%
System (sort by value)
Huawei P9 Lite
2438 Points
Asus ZenFone Selfie ZD551KL
1456 Points -40%
Honor 5X
1378 Points -43%
Huawei P8 lite
1467 Points -40%
Huawei P9
3930 Points +61%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
1060 Points -57%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
1380 Points -43%
Memory (sort by value)
Huawei P9 Lite
1346 Points
Asus ZenFone Selfie ZD551KL
967 Points -28%
Honor 5X
787 Points -42%
Huawei P8 lite
816 Points -39%
Huawei P9
2627 Points +95%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
643 Points -52%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
443 Points -67%
Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P9 Lite
818 Points
Asus ZenFone Selfie ZD551KL
757 Points -7%
Honor 5X
763 Points -7%
Huawei P8 lite
303 Points -63%
Huawei P9
1583 Points +94%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
312 Points -62%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
415 Points -49%
Web (sort by value)
Huawei P9 Lite
765 Points
Asus ZenFone Selfie ZD551KL
664 Points -13%
Honor 5X
9 Points -99%
Huawei P8 lite
616 Points -19%
Huawei P9
1029 Points +35%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
551 Points -28%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
756 Points -1%
AndroBench 3-5
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value)
Huawei P9 Lite
283.5 MB/s
Asus ZenFone Selfie ZD551KL
131 MB/s -54%
Honor 5X
144 MB/s -49%
Huawei P8 lite
139.5 MB/s -51%
Huawei P9
281.3 MB/s -1%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
147 MB/s -48%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
168.8 MB/s -40%
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value)
Huawei P9 Lite
46.24 MB/s
Asus ZenFone Selfie ZD551KL
103.8 MB/s +124%
Honor 5X
78 MB/s +69%
Huawei P8 lite
52.8 MB/s +14%
Huawei P9
72.2 MB/s +56%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
72 MB/s +56%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
27.27 MB/s -41%
Random Read 4KB (sort by value)
Huawei P9 Lite
38.22 MB/s
Asus ZenFone Selfie ZD551KL
10.13 MB/s -73%
Honor 5X
17 MB/s -56%
Huawei P8 lite
18.46 MB/s -52%
Huawei P9
39 MB/s +2%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
21 MB/s -45%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
21.92 MB/s -43%
Random Write 4KB (sort by value)
Huawei P9 Lite
15.35 MB/s
Asus ZenFone Selfie ZD551KL
5.63 MB/s -63%
Honor 5X
10 MB/s -35%
Huawei P8 lite
8.32 MB/s -46%
Huawei P9
47.45 MB/s +209%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
11.6 MB/s -24%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
10.27 MB/s -33%

Legend

 
Huawei P9 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 650, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Asus ZenFone Selfie ZD551KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MSM8939, Qualcomm Adreno 405, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Honor 5X Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v2, Qualcomm Adreno 405, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei P8 lite HiSilicon Kirin 620, ARM Mali-450 MP4, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei P9 HiSilicon Kirin 955, ARM Mali-T880 MP4, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016 Samsung Exynos 7578, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei P9 Lite
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 650, 16 GB eMMC Flash
4756 Points
Asus ZenFone Selfie ZD551KL
Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 32 GB eMMC Flash
3146 Points -34%
Honor 5X
Adreno 405, 616 MSM8939v2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
3595 Points -24%
Huawei P8 lite
Mali-450 MP4, Kirin 620, 16 GB eMMC Flash
2483 Points -48%
Huawei P9
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash
11783 Points +148%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 16 GB eMMC Flash
2730 Points -43%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
Mali-T720 MP2, 7578, 16 GB eMMC Flash
3566 Points -25%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value)
Huawei P9 Lite
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 650, 16 GB eMMC Flash
9397 ms *
Asus ZenFone Selfie ZD551KL
Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 32 GB eMMC Flash
14594 ms * -55%
Honor 5X
Adreno 405, 616 MSM8939v2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
12510 ms * -33%
Huawei P8 lite
Mali-450 MP4, Kirin 620, 16 GB eMMC Flash
15866 ms * -69%
Huawei P9
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash
2923 ms * +69%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 16 GB eMMC Flash
13046 ms * -39%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
Mali-T720 MP2, 7578, 16 GB eMMC Flash
11796 ms * -26%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei P9 Lite
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 650, 16 GB eMMC Flash
29.03 Points
Asus ZenFone Selfie ZD551KL
Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 32 GB eMMC Flash
18.94 Points -35%
Honor 5X
Adreno 405, 616 MSM8939v2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
21.92 Points -24%
Huawei P9
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash
68.4 Points +136%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 16 GB eMMC Flash
16.8 Points -42%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
Mali-T720 MP2, 7578, 16 GB eMMC Flash
22.1 Points -24%

* ... smaller is better

Asphalt 8: Airborne
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high30 fps
Dead Trigger 2
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high60 fps
Carga Máxima
 37.3 °C36.6 °C38.1 °C 
 37.4 °C35.7 °C42.1 °C 
 36.6 °C35.5 °C36.4 °C 
Máximo: 42.1 °C
Médio: 37.3 °C
35.2 °C35 °C36 °C
34.6 °C34.6 °C34.8 °C
34.3 °C33.9 °C34.4 °C
Máximo: 36 °C
Médio: 34.8 °C
alimentação elétrica  32.3 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.9 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.3 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.1 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.6 °C / 92 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.08 / 0.3 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.73 / 2.09 / 2.11 Watt
Carga midlight 4.15 / 5.05 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Gossen Metrahit Energy
Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
23h 24min
WiFi Websurfing
10h 04min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
9h 28min
Carga (máximo brilho)
4h 32min
Huawei P9 Lite
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 650, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Asus ZenFone Selfie ZD551KL
Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Honor 5X
Adreno 405, 616 MSM8939v2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Huawei P8 lite
Mali-450 MP4, Kirin 620, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Huawei P9
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
Mali-T720 MP2, 7578, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Battery Runtime
-11%
-15%
-39%
-6%
21%
34%
Reader / Idle
1404
1008
-28%
1053
-25%
715
-49%
1514
8%
1599
14%
1978
41%
H.264
568
530
-7%
602
6%
369
-35%
568
0%
658
16%
863
52%
WiFi v1.3
604
516
-15%
643
6%
351
-42%
569
-6%
643
6%
628
4%
Load
272
293
8%
144
-47%
194
-29%
206
-24%
402
48%
376
38%

Pro

+ Tela Full HD brilhante
+ Construção de alta qualidade
+ SoC octa-core e 3 GB de RAM
+ LTE e dual-SIM
+ Android 6.0
+ Boas câmeras
+ Longa duração da bateria

Contra

- Escorregadio por causa da traseira lisa
- Não suporta App2SD
- Painel não calibrado de forma ideal
- Apenas um alto falante mono
In review: Huawei P9 Lite. Review sample courtesy of Huawei.
In review: Huawei P9 Lite. Review sample courtesy of Huawei.

Com o P9 Lite, a Huawei tem um potente smartphone de gama média em sua linha, que faz muitas coisas melhor que o anterior P8 Lite. Não é um verdadeiro oponente para o carro chefe Huawei P9 que oferece o leitor de digitais superior, LTE mais veloz, Bluetooth mais recente, Wi-Fi dual-band, USB Type-C, um SoC muito mais veloz e um painel de maior contraste. Ambos os smartphones virtualmente tem o mesmo visual, embora a mistura de metal-plástico do P9 Lite não deixa uma impressão de alta qualidade quanto a do corpo monobloco de alumínio do P9. No entanto, não queremos falar mal do P9 Lite: O irmão menor do P9 atrai com o seu painel Full HD muito brilhante e o SO Android 6.0.1 mais recente. Um veloz SoC HiSilicon Kirin 650 e 3 GB de memória de trabalho também participam e garantem uma boa velocidade de trabalho. A conectividade não dá motivo para reclamar com LTE, Wi-Fi 802.11n e slot dual-SIM. A muito boa duração da bateria completa o pacote.

A Huawei cria um forte rival para o seu próprio P9, muito mais caro, com o P9 Lite.

O sólido P9 Lite da Huawei apenas tem que aceitar alguns pontos de crítica. A traseira de plástico poderia fornecer mais aderência e a câmera poderia oferecer um pouco mais de qualidade. No entanto, isso é reclamar em um nível alto, vendo que o smartphone já faz boas fotos e vídeos. O mesmo acontece com o painel calibrado de forma inexata, porém, isto dificilmente é notado no uso do dia a dia. O alto falante mono, de fato não deveria estar no lado negativo, dado que também está instalado no P9.

Esta é uma versão reduzida da análise original. Você pode ler a análise completa em inglês aqui.

Huawei P9 Lite - 05/23/2016 v5.1 (old)
Manuel Masiero

Acabamento
91%
Teclado
69 / 75 → 92%
Mouse
88%
Conectividade
43 / 60 → 72%
Peso
93%
Bateria
92%
Pantalha
86%
Desempenho do jogos
25 / 63 → 39%
Desempenho da aplicação
47 / 70 → 67%
Temperatura
88%
Ruído
100%
Audio
66 / 91 → 72%
Camera
71%
Médio
74%
85%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Huawei P9 Lite
Manuel Masiero, 2016-06- 3 (Update: 2016-06- 5)