Breve Análise do Smartphone Huawei P8 Lite 2017

Name: Huawei P8 lite 2017
Brand: Huawei

Carro-chefe lite 2.0. O Huawei P8 lite foi o descendente reduzido do segundo telefone carro-chefe da Huawei. Apesar de tudo, agora foi retrabalhado com um novo design, painel Full HD, e muitas outras melhorias. Nosso relatório revela se o P8 lite (2017) é uma boa opção.

Florian Wimmer, ✓ Manuel Masiero (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 02/22/2017 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

ARM Android Smartphone Touchscreen

Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Huawei P8 lite 2017 (P8 Serie)

Processador

HiSilicon Kirin 655 8 x 2.1 GHz, Cortex-A53

Placa gráfica

ARM Mali-T830 MP2, Análises do: 900 MHz

Memória

3 GB

Pantalha

5.20 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 424 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, IPS, Brilhante: sim

Disco rígido

16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB

, 10 GB livre

Conexões

1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Conector combinado de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: micro-SD máx. 128 GB, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: sensor de proximidade , acelerômetor, bússola, USB-OTG

Funcionamento em rede

802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 4.1, GSM (850/900/1800/1900), UMTS (850/900/1900/2100), LTE (B1/B3/B7/B8/B20); LTE Cat. 6 (max. 300 Mbit/s download, max. 50 MBit/s upload); SAR rate: 0.96W/kg (head), 0.98W/kg (body), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 7.6 x 147.2 x 72.9

Bateria

11.4 Wh, 3000 mAh Lítio-Ion, Standby 2G (de acordo com o fabricante): 531 h

Sistema Operativo

Android 7.0 Nougat

Camera

Primary Camera: 12 MPix Phase comparison AF, LED flash, videos @1080p/30fps
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: Alto falante na borda inferior, Teclado: teclado virtual, Ferramenta SIM, carregador, cabo USB, fones, HiCare, HiGame, themes, gerenciador de telefone, 24 Meses Garantia, Rádio FM, fanless

peso

147 g, Suprimento de energia: 47 g

Preço

240 Euro

Links

Huawei página inicial

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Lenovo ZUK Z2 Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB eMMC Flash	318 MBit/s +490%
HTC One A9s Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 32 GB eMMC Flash	109 MBit/s +102%
Huawei P8 lite 2017 Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 655, 16 GB eMMC Flash	53.9 MBit/s
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737, 32 GB eMMC Flash	49.7 MBit/s -8%
iperf3 receive AX12
Lenovo ZUK Z2 Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB eMMC Flash	296 MBit/s +443%
HTC One A9s Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 32 GB eMMC Flash	102 MBit/s +87%
Huawei P8 lite 2017 Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 655, 16 GB eMMC Flash	54.5 MBit/s
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737, 32 GB eMMC Flash	47.4 MBit/s -13%

GPS Huawei P8 lite (2017): Traffic circle

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images


556 cd/m²	572 cd/m²	570 cd/m²
556 cd/m²	575 cd/m²	569 cd/m²
526 cd/m²	555 cd/m²	555 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 575 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 559.3 cd/m² Minimum: 6.6 cd/m²
iluminação: 91 %
iluminação com acumulador: 575 cd/m²
Contraste: 1474:1 (Preto: 0.39 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 7.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
93.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.4

	Huawei P8 lite 2017 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2"	Huawei P8 lite IPS, 1280x720, 5"	Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL IPS, 1280x720, 5.2"	HTC One A9s IPS, 1280x720, 5"	Lenovo ZUK Z2 IPS, 1920x1080, 5"
Screen		-15%	-4%	9%	-5%
Brightness middle	575	365 -37%	507 -12%	348 -39%	512 -11%
Brightness	559	353 -37%	474 -15%	320 -43%	502 -10%
Brightness Distribution	91	93 2%	85 -7%	85 -7%	84 -8%
Black Level *	0.39	0.42 -8%	0.53 -36%	0.23 41%	0.58 -49%
Contrast	1474	869 -41%	957 -35%	1513 3%	883 -40%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	5.2	5.2 -0%	4.7 10%	3.5 33%	3.8 27%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	10.3		7.2 30%	6.4 38%	11.2 -9%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	7.2	5.85 19%	4.8 33%	4 44%	2.7 62%
Gamma	2.4 ^92%	2.17 ^101%	2.25 ^98%	2.3 ^96%	2.09 ^105%
CCT	7224 ^90%	7252 ^90%	6441 ^101%	6527 ^100%	6076 ^107%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)		70.86
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)		91.25

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 10 ms rise
32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 22 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 84 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 9 ms rise
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 15 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 31 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei P8 lite 2017	56798 Points
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL	30365 Points -47%
HTC One A9s	51330 Points -10%
Lenovo ZUK Z2	122513 Points +116%

Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei P8 lite 2017	780 Points
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL	569 Points -27%
HTC One A9s	711 Points -9%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei P8 lite 2017	3240 Points
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL	1362 Points -58%
HTC One A9s	2936 Points -9%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Huawei P8 lite 2017	11611 Points
Huawei P8 lite	5629 Points -52%
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL	3827 Points -67%
HTC One A9s	10766 Points -7%
Lenovo ZUK Z2	29241 Points +152%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Huawei P8 lite 2017	11147 Points
Huawei P8 lite	5167 Points -54%
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL	3369 Points -70%
HTC One A9s	10453 Points -6%
Lenovo ZUK Z2	32997 Points +196%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P8 lite 2017	13590 Points
Huawei P8 lite	8206 Points -40%
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL	7298 Points -46%
HTC One A9s	12025 Points -12%
Lenovo ZUK Z2	20910 Points +54%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Huawei P8 lite 2017	606 Points
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL	157 Points -74%
HTC One A9s	603 Points 0%
Lenovo ZUK Z2	3302 Points +445%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P8 lite 2017	516 Points
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL	128 Points -75%
HTC One A9s	524 Points +2%
Lenovo ZUK Z2	4506 Points +773%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P8 lite 2017	1547 Points
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL	741 Points -52%
HTC One A9s	1269 Points -18%
Lenovo ZUK Z2	1706 Points +10%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Huawei P8 lite 2017	389 Points
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL	103 Points -74%
HTC One A9s	425 Points +9%
Lenovo ZUK Z2	2419 Points +522%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P8 lite 2017	321 Points
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL	83 Points -74%
HTC One A9s	359 Points +12%
Lenovo ZUK Z2	2792 Points +770%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P8 lite 2017	1532 Points
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL	699 Points -54%
HTC One A9s	1175 Points -23%
Lenovo ZUK Z2	1648 Points +8%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P8 lite 2017	19 fps
Huawei P8 lite	15.3 fps -19%
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL	10 fps -47%
HTC One A9s	27 fps +42%
Lenovo ZUK Z2	60 fps +216%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P8 lite 2017	18 fps
Huawei P8 lite	9.9 fps -45%
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL	5.9 fps -67%
HTC One A9s	18 fps 0%
Lenovo ZUK Z2	91 fps +406%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Huawei P8 lite 2017	8.5 fps
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL	4.7 fps -45%
HTC One A9s	14 fps +65%
Lenovo ZUK Z2	43 fps +406%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P8 lite 2017	7.9 fps
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL	2.2 fps -72%
HTC One A9s	7.2 fps -9%
Lenovo ZUK Z2	44 fps +457%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P8 lite 2017	5 fps
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL	3.4 fps -32%
HTC One A9s	11 fps +120%
Lenovo ZUK Z2	29 fps +480%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P8 lite 2017	4.6 fps
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL	1.4 fps -70%
HTC One A9s	2.6 fps -43%
Lenovo ZUK Z2	30 fps +552%

PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
Huawei P8 lite 2017	4419 Points
Huawei P8 lite	3717 Points -16%
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL	2517 Points -43%
HTC One A9s	3350 Points -24%
Lenovo ZUK Z2	6969 Points +58%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Huawei P8 lite 2017	435 Points
Huawei P8 lite	687 Points +58%
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL	588 Points +35%
HTC One A9s	Points -100%
Lenovo ZUK Z2	2290 Points +426%
System (sort by value)
Huawei P8 lite 2017	2694 Points
Huawei P8 lite	1467 Points -46%
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL	1041 Points -61%
Lenovo ZUK Z2	2986 Points +11%
Memory (sort by value)
Huawei P8 lite 2017	1658 Points
Huawei P8 lite	816 Points -51%
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL	780 Points -53%
Lenovo ZUK Z2	1983 Points +20%
Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P8 lite 2017	826 Points
Huawei P8 lite	303 Points -63%
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL	210 Points -75%
Lenovo ZUK Z2	4335 Points +425%
Web (sort by value)
Huawei P8 lite 2017	10 Points
Huawei P8 lite	616 Points +6060%
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL	703 Points +6930%
Lenovo ZUK Z2	1071 Points +10610%

Legend

Huawei P8 lite 2017 HiSilicon Kirin 655, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Huawei P8 lite HiSilicon Kirin 620, ARM Mali-450 MP4, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL Mediatek MT6737, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash

HTC One A9s Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Lenovo ZUK Z2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 64 GB eMMC Flash

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 | Octane V2 | WebXPRT 2015 | JetStream 1.1

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value)
Huawei P8 lite 2017	8768 ms *
Huawei P8 lite	15866 ms * -81%
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL	14983 ms * -71%
HTC One A9s	9346 ms * -7%
Lenovo ZUK Z2	3290 ms * +62%

Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei P8 lite 2017	4630 Points
Huawei P8 lite	2483 Points -46%
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL	2534 Points -45%
HTC One A9s	4395 Points -5%
Lenovo ZUK Z2	8436 Points +82%

WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value)
Huawei P8 lite 2017	62 Points
Huawei P8 lite	47 Points -24%
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL	35 Points -44%
HTC One A9s	69 Points +11%

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei P8 lite 2017	29.5 Points
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL	16.47 Points -44%
HTC One A9s	27.48 Points -7%
Lenovo ZUK Z2	51.7 Points +75%

* ... smaller is better

AndroBench 3-5
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value)
Huawei P8 lite 2017	165.8 MB/s
Huawei P8 lite	139.5 MB/s -16%
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL	174.2 MB/s +5%
HTC One A9s	210.2 MB/s +27%
Lenovo ZUK Z2	239.4 MB/s +44%
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value)
Huawei P8 lite 2017	42 MB/s
Huawei P8 lite	52.8 MB/s +26%
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL	65.2 MB/s +55%
HTC One A9s	68.6 MB/s +63%
Lenovo ZUK Z2	46.52 MB/s +11%
Random Read 4KB (sort by value)
Huawei P8 lite 2017	38.7 MB/s
Huawei P8 lite	18.46 MB/s -52%
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL	20.9 MB/s -46%
HTC One A9s	21.3 MB/s -45%
Lenovo ZUK Z2	21.27 MB/s -45%
Random Write 4KB (sort by value)
Huawei P8 lite 2017	8 MB/s
Huawei P8 lite	8.32 MB/s +4%
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL	9.1 MB/s +14%
HTC One A9s	34.6 MB/s +333%
Lenovo ZUK Z2	5.64 MB/s -29%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
Huawei P8 lite 2017	53.1 MB/s
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL	47.67 MB/s -10%
HTC One A9s	39.6 MB/s -25%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
Huawei P8 lite 2017	32.1 MB/s
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL	29.59 MB/s -8%
HTC One A9s	25.6 MB/s -20%

Asphalt 8: Airborne
	Configurações	Valor
	high	25 fps
	very low	30 fps

... comparado com

Dead Trigger 2
	Configurações	Valor
	high	29 fps

... comparado com

Carga Máxima

Inatividade


32 °C	29.8 °C	30.4 °C
32.8 °C	30.3 °C	33 °C
31.9 °C	30.3 °C	31.9 °C

Máximo: 33 °C
Médio: 31.4 °C


29.1 °C	30.3 °C	30.4 °C
29.6 °C	31.4 °C	31.4 °C
29.9 °C	31.2 °C	31.9 °C

Máximo: 31.9 °C
Médio: 30.6 °C

alimentação elétrica 42.3 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20.5 °C | Voltcraft IR-350

(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 31.4 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 33 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 31.9 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.5 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

Huawei P8 lite 2017 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 32.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.9% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 69% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 82% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 14% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 37.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 9.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (30.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 77% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 19% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 88% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 10% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.22 / 0.82 Watt
Ocioso	1.44 / 2.47 / 2.58 Watt
Carga	4.55 / 6.3 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Huawei P8 lite 2017 3000 mAh	Huawei P8 lite mAh	Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL 4100 mAh	HTC One A9s 2300 mAh	Lenovo ZUK Z2 3500 mAh
Power Consumption		6%	11%	7%	4%
Idle Minimum *	1.44	1.4 3%	0.74 49%	1.29 10%	1.31 9%
Idle Average *	2.47	2.3 7%	2.04 17%	2.28 8%	2.03 18%
Idle Maximum *	2.58	2.5 3%	2.22 14%	2.52 2%	2.08 19%
Load Average *	4.55	3.9 14%	5.57 -22%	4.06 11%	5.45 -20%
Load Maximum *	6.3	6 5%	6.59 -5%	5.91 6%	6.75 -7%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		22h 06min
WiFi Websurfing		10h 04min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		10h 44min
Carga (máximo brilho)		4h 43min

	Huawei P8 lite 2017 3000 mAh	Huawei P8 lite mAh	Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL 4100 mAh	HTC One A9s 2300 mAh	Lenovo ZUK Z2 3500 mAh
Battery Runtime		-41%	21%	-5%	-10%
Reader / Idle	1326	715 -46%	1462 10%	1543 16%
H.264	644	369 -43%	845 31%	587 -9%
WiFi v1.3	604	351 -42%	814 35%	517 -14%	546 -10%
Load	283	194 -31%	301 6%	245 -13%

Pro

+ Tela de alta resolução...

+ ... com alto contraste e alto brilho

+ Boa duração da bateria

+ Desempenho relativamente alto

+ Baixas temperaturas da carcaça

+ Boa câmera principal

+ Módulo GPS preciso

+ Websites são carregados rapidamente

+ Boa configuração incl. dual-SIM

+ Sensor de digitais veloz

Contra

- Traseira escorregadia

- Carcaça sensível à digitais

- Tonalidade massivamente azul da tela

- Qualidade pobre da imagem da câmera frontal

- Longos tempos de carga

In review: Huawei P8 Lite (2017). Review sample courtesy of Notebooksbilliger.de

Embora a decisão de reiterar a versão reduzida do antigo carro-chefe seja pouco comum, o fabricante criou mais que apenas um smartphone de gama média competitivo com o Huawei P8 lite (2017). Nosso modelo de teste supera o seu predecessor, o Huawei P8 lite, em muitos aspectos e inclusive pode competir com aparelhos mais caros em alguns setores. O primeiro em ser mencionado seria o leitor de digitais muito veloz e preciso que é difícil d encontrar em uma aparelho de 250 Euros. A tela tem uma resolução mais alta que o comum nesta categoria, mas sem muito impacto na duração da bateria: Dois dias úteis sem recarregar são facilmente possíveis na prática. O desempenho do smartphone é bom e o aparelho dificilmente esquenta ao mesmo tempo.

A qualidade das chamadas é apenas medíocre, e o alto falante dificilmente convencerá a um verdadeiro fanático da música. A tela brilhante e de baixo contraste, infelizmente tem uma visível tonalidade, e a carga da bateria leva um longo tempo. A carcaça é escorregadia demais e o smartphone poderia cair no chão.

A Huawei apresenta uma atualização, em geral, bem-sucedida de seu smartphone de gama média com o P8 lite (2017). Valeu a penas abordar esta perspectiva diferente e reconfigurar o smartphone quase esquecido com uma tela melhor, boa duração da bateria, e um aumento considerável do desempenho.

A Huawei compensa as desvantagens do smartphone com os pontos positivos adicionais antes mencionados junto com o módulo GPS muito preciso e boa configuração. Por isso, outorgamos ao Huawei P8 lite (2017) uma recomendação de compra.

Huawei P8 lite 2017 - 2017-02-13 02/13/2017 v6 ^(old)
Florian Wimmer

Acabamento

84%

Teclado

65 / 75 → 87%

Mouse

91%

Conectividade

40 / 60 → 67%

Peso

93%

Bateria

92%

Pantalha

85%

Desempenho do jogos

22 / 63 → 34%

Desempenho da aplicação

41 / 70 → 59%

Temperatura

93%

Ruído

100%

Audio

58 / 91 → 64%

Camera

73%

Médio

72%

83%

Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Huawei P8 Lite 2017

Florian Wimmer, 2017-02-22 (Update: 2017-03- 2)