Breve Análise do Smartphone Huawei P40 Pro Plus: Carro-chefe com zoom 100x
Competing Devices
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Drive | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
89.3 % v7 (old) | 07/2020 | Huawei P40 Pro Plus Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16 | 226 g | 512 GB UFS 3.0 Flash | 6.58" | 2640x1200 | |
87.1 % v7 (old) | 09/2019 | Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU | 226 g | 64 GB SSD | 6.50" | 2688x1242 | |
86.1 % v7 (old) | 03/2020 | Oppo Find X2 Pro SD 865, Adreno 650 | 202 g | 512 GB UFS 3.0 Flash | 6.70" | 3168x1440 | |
89.4 % v7 (old) | 04/2020 | Huawei P40 Pro Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16 | 209 g | 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash | 6.58" | 2640x1200 | |
88.5 % v7 (old) | 04/2020 | OnePlus 8 Pro SD 865, Adreno 650 | 199 g | 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash | 6.78" | 3168x1440 | |
88.9 % v7 (old) | 04/2020 | Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11 | 219 g | 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash | 6.90" | 3200x1440 |
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Daylight scene 1Daylight scene 25x zoomUltra-wide-angleLow-light environment
|
iluminação: 95 %
iluminação com acumulador: 672 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.5 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 2.4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.25
Huawei P40 Pro Plus OLED, 2640x1200, 6.6" | Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max OLED, 2688x1242, 6.5" | Huawei P40 Pro OLED, 2640x1200, 6.6" | OnePlus 8 Pro AMOLED, 3168x1440, 6.8" | Oppo Find X2 Pro AMOLED, 3168x1440, 6.7" | Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 3200x1440, 6.9" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | 10% | 9% | 32% | -77% | -37% | |
Brightness middle | 672 | 790 18% | 584 -13% | 796 18% | 778 16% | 734 9% |
Brightness | 672 | 790 18% | 576 -14% | 779 16% | 775 15% | 748 11% |
Brightness Distribution | 95 | 97 2% | 95 0% | 94 -1% | 99 4% | 95 0% |
Black Level * | ||||||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.5 | 1.4 7% | 1.1 27% | 0.68 55% | 4.4 -193% | 3.2 -113% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3.2 | 3.4 -6% | 2.3 28% | 1.55 52% | 8.7 -172% | 6.8 -113% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.4 | 1.9 21% | 1.8 25% | 1.1 54% | 5.6 -133% | 2.7 -13% |
Gamma | 2.25 98% | 2.23 99% | 2.16 102% | 2.237 98% | 2.26 97% | 2.11 104% |
CCT | 6250 104% | 6466 101% | 6355 102% | 6310 103% | 7250 90% | 6299 103% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 367.6 Hz | ≤ 99 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 367.6 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 367.6 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
2.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 1.6 ms rise | |
↘ 1.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 10 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 2 ms rise | |
↘ 2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 11 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
PCMark for Android | |
Work performance score (sort by value) | |
Huawei P40 Pro Plus | |
Huawei P40 Pro | |
OnePlus 8 Pro | |
Oppo Find X2 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra | |
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G (10628 - 14814, n=4) | |
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value) | |
Huawei P40 Pro Plus | |
Huawei P40 Pro | |
OnePlus 8 Pro | |
Oppo Find X2 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra | |
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G (8512 - 11509, n=4) |
Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1) | |
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=161, last 2 years) | |
Huawei P40 Pro (Huawei Browser 10.1) | |
Huawei P40 Pro Plus (Huawei Browser 10.1.2.322) | |
Oppo Find X2 Pro (Chrome 80) | |
OnePlus 8 Pro (Chrome 80) | |
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G (55.6 - 70, n=4) | |
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra (Chrome 80) |
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1) | |
Huawei P40 Pro (Huawei Browser 10.1) | |
Huawei P40 Pro Plus (Huawei Browser 10.1.2.322) | |
OnePlus 8 Pro (Chrome 80) | |
Oppo Find X2 Pro (Chrome 80) | |
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G (103.2 - 116.6, n=4) | |
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra (Chrome 80) |
Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1) | |
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=146, last 2 years) | |
Huawei P40 Pro (Huawei Browser 10.1) | |
Huawei P40 Pro Plus (Huawei Browser 10.1.2.322) | |
Oppo Find X2 Pro (Chrome 80) | |
OnePlus 8 Pro (Chome 80) | |
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G (63 - 71.8, n=4) | |
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra (Chrome 80) |
WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1) | |
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years) | |
Huawei P40 Pro Plus (Huawei Browser 10.1.2.322) | |
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G (95 - 124, n=3) | |
OnePlus 8 Pro (Chrome 80) | |
Oppo Find X2 Pro (Chrome 80) | |
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra (Chrome 80) | |
Huawei P40 Pro |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1) | |
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=203, last 2 years) | |
Huawei P40 Pro (Huawei Browser 10.1) | |
OnePlus 8 Pro (Chrome 80) | |
Huawei P40 Pro Plus (Huawei Browser 10.1.2.322) | |
Oppo Find X2 Pro (Chrome 80) | |
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G (20917 - 23690, n=4) | |
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra (Chrome 80) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra (Chrome 80) | |
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G (1914 - 2287, n=4) | |
Oppo Find X2 Pro (Chrome 80) | |
OnePlus 8 Pro (Chrome 80) | |
Huawei P40 Pro (Huawei Browser 10.1) | |
Huawei P40 Pro Plus (Huawei Browser 10.1.2.322) | |
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=160, last 2 years) | |
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1) |
* ... smaller is better
Huawei P40 Pro Plus | Huawei P40 Pro | OnePlus 8 Pro | Oppo Find X2 Pro | Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra | Average 512 GB UFS 3.0 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | -17% | -26% | -26% | -22% | -20% | 10% | |
Sequential Read 256KB | 1802 | 1775 -1% | 1627 -10% | 1606 -11% | 1632 -9% | 1593 ? -12% | 1839 ? 2% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 911 | 395.7 -57% | 730 -20% | 729 -20% | 697 -23% | 565 ? -38% | 1425 ? 56% |
Random Read 4KB | 324.1 | 228.1 -30% | 208.3 -36% | 202.6 -37% | 202.4 -38% | 211 ? -35% | 277 ? -15% |
Random Write 4KB | 318.9 | 271.8 -15% | 197.7 -38% | 205 -36% | 221.4 -31% | 196.5 ? -38% | 309 ? -3% |
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 82.3 ? | 82.3 ? 0% | 67.6 ? -18% | 82.5 ? 0% | |||
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 67.4 ? | 68.1 ? 1% | 58.3 ? -14% | 69.8 ? 4% |
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 33.3 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 31.2 °C / 88 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.2 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Huawei P40 Pro Plus audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 48% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 66% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Huawei P40 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.3% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 16% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 38% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
desligado | 0.01 / 0.14 Watt |
Ocioso | 0.82 / 2.06 / 2.07 Watt |
Carga |
2.99 / 6.64 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Huawei P40 Pro Plus 4200 mAh | Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max 3969 mAh | Huawei P40 Pro 4200 mAh | OnePlus 8 Pro 4510 mAh | Oppo Find X2 Pro 4260 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5000 mAh | Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -22% | 8% | -86% | -77% | -18% | -22% | -24% | |
Idle Minimum * | 0.82 | 0.92 -12% | 0.92 -12% | 2.2 -168% | 1.47 -79% | 0.76 7% | 1.24 ? -51% | 0.894 ? -9% |
Idle Average * | 2.06 | 2.9 -41% | 1.41 32% | 3.3 -60% | 3.43 -67% | 1.91 7% | 2.33 ? -13% | 1.456 ? 29% |
Idle Maximum * | 2.07 | 2.94 -42% | 1.47 29% | 3.7 -79% | 3.52 -70% | 1.96 5% | 2.49 ? -20% | 1.616 ? 22% |
Load Average * | 2.99 | 3.65 -22% | 3.35 -12% | 5.9 -97% | 6.2 -107% | 4.72 -58% | 3.55 ? -19% | 6.45 ? -116% |
Load Maximum * | 6.64 | 6.18 7% | 6.37 4% | 8.3 -25% | 10.63 -60% | 10.15 -53% | 7.09 ? -7% | 9.8 ? -48% |
* ... smaller is better
Huawei P40 Pro Plus 4200 mAh | Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max 3969 mAh | Huawei P40 Pro 4200 mAh | OnePlus 8 Pro 4510 mAh | Oppo Find X2 Pro 4260 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5000 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 55% | 0% | 26% | -13% | 9% | |
Reader / Idle | 1422 | 2618 84% | 1474 4% | 2103 48% | 1858 31% | |
H.264 | 1115 | 1346 21% | 1137 2% | 1023 -8% | 1131 1% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 750 | 909 21% | 743 -1% | 923 23% | 654 -13% | 720 -4% |
Load | 209 | 408 95% | 198 -5% | 296 42% | 221 6% |
Pro
Contra
Veredicto - Smartphone incrível com desvantagens consideráveis
Um ótimo smartphone após o outro: Como seu irmão, o P40 Pro, o Huawei P40 Pro Plus é um excelente smartphone. No entanto, as diferenças entre eles são tão pequenas que gastar 1399 Euros (~ US $ 1599) no carro-chefe P40 pode não ser a melhor opção, principalmente porque o P40 Pro faz o mesmo trabalho por apenas 999 Euros (~$ 1.142).
Embora o Huawei P40 Pro Plus seja um ótimo smartphone, ele enfrenta três desafios: Não há serviços do Google, é muito caro e é quase idêntico ao P40 Pro.
O zoom digital 100x e o zoom ótico 10x são vantagens claras do P40 Pro Plus. Dito isto, poucos usuários se sentirão limitados pelo zoom digital 50x doP40 Pro. As diferenças restantes em termos de recursos certamente não compensam o preço mais alto: O dobro de espaço de armazenamento, carregamento sem fio mais rápido e uma parte traseira de cerâmica em vez de uma parte traseira de vidro.
O P40 Pro Plus não teve muita escolha quando se trata da falta de serviços do Google. Ainda assim, essa desvantagem desqualifica o smartphone para usuários que dependem deles. O Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra é a primeira alternativa que vem à mente: O modelo básico é significativamente mais barato que o P40 Pro Plus e vem com os serviços do Google, 5G e a mesma opção de zoom 100x.
Huawei P40 Pro Plus
- 08/31/2022 v7 (old)
Manuel Masiero