Breve Análise do Smartphone Huawei P30 Lite

Name: Huawei P30 Lite
Brand: Huawei

Obra-prima de fotografia de gama média?

O smartphone mais vendido a partir do 3º trimestre de 2018 recebe outra reencarnação. A Huawei chama o P30 Lite de uma obra-prima fotográfica com uma câmera tripla "revolucionária". Descubra se esta câmera de 48 MP é capaz de redefinir a fotografia de smartphones de gama média em nossa análise do Huawei P30 Lite.

Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 05/24/2019 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Smartphone Android Touchscreen

Test device courtesy of Huawei Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Huawei P30 Lite (P30 Serie)

Processador

HiSilicon Kirin 710 8 x 2.2 GHz, Cortex-A73/-A53

Placa gráfica

ARM Mali-G51 MP4

Memória

4 GB

Pantalha

6.15 polegadas 19.27:9, 2312 x 1080 pixel 415 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, IPS LCD, Brilhante: sim

Disco rígido

128 GB eMMC Flash, 128 GB

, 108 GB livre

Conexões

1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Áudio de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: Cartões microSD de até 512 GB, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Sensor de proximidade, acelerômetro, bússola, giroscópio, efeito hall, OTG, Miracast, Status-LED

Funcionamento em rede

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.2, 4G LTE TDD: B38, 4G LTE FDD: B1 / B3 / B4 / B7 / B7 / B8 / B20, 3G WCDMA: B1 / B2 / B2 / B4 / B5 / B8, 2G: B2 / B3 / B5 / B8, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 7.4 x 152.9 x 72.7

Bateria

3340 mAh Lítio-Polímero, Tempo de conversação 3G (de acordo com o fabricante): 21 h

Sistema Operativo

Android 9.0 Pie

Camera

Primary Camera: 48 MPix 48 MP (wide-angle lens, f/1.8 aperture) + 8 MP (ultra-wide-angle lens) + 2 MP (bokeh lens), Camera2 API: Limited
Secondary Camera: 24 MPix 24 MP, apertura f/2.0

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: Alto-falante mono, Teclado: on-screen, Fones, carregador, cabo USB, ferramenta SIM, guia de início rápido, capa protetora da tela, cartão de garantia, EMUI 9.0, 24 Meses Garantia, head SAR: 1.23 W/kg, body SAR: 1.19 W/kg, LTE Cat. 12 (600/100 Mbps), DRM Widevine: L1, fanless

peso

159 g, Suprimento de energia: 54 g

Preço

369 Euro

Links

Huawei página inicial

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Xiaomi Poco F1 Adreno 630, SD 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	647 (598^min - 665^max) MBit/s +197%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Adreno 630, SD 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	429 (256^min - 448^max) MBit/s +97%
Nokia 8.1 Adreno 616, SD 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash	300 (169^min - 367^max) MBit/s +38%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Adreno 509, SD 636, 64 GB eMMC Flash	288 (138^min - 294^max) MBit/s +32%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Adreno 616, SD 712, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	279 (229^min - 303^max) MBit/s +28%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9610, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	272 (250^min - 285^max) MBit/s +25%
Sony Xperia 10 Adreno 508, SD 630, 64 GB eMMC Flash	253 (128^min - 283^max) MBit/s +16%
Huawei P30 Lite Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash	218 (95^min - 239^max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Xiaomi Poco F1 Adreno 630, SD 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	675 (630^min - 704^max) MBit/s +259%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Adreno 630, SD 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	491 (444^min - 499^max) MBit/s +161%
Sony Xperia 10 Adreno 508, SD 630, 64 GB eMMC Flash	334 (326^min - 341^max) MBit/s +78%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Adreno 509, SD 636, 64 GB eMMC Flash	332 (314^min - 341^max) MBit/s +77%
Nokia 8.1 Adreno 616, SD 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash	312 (273^min - 341^max) MBit/s +66%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Adreno 616, SD 712, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	311 (214^min - 346^max) MBit/s +65%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9610, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	294 (278^min - 302^max) MBit/s +56%
Huawei P30 Lite Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash	188 (45^min - 237^max) MBit/s

Huawei P30 Lite; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø187.9 (45-237)

Huawei P30 Lite; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø218 (95-239)

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

Huawei P30 Lite

Xiaomi Mi 9

Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus

Canon EOS 70D

click to load images

Huawei P30 Lite

Xiaomi Mi 9

Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus

Canon EOS 70D

click to load images

Huawei P30 Lite

Xiaomi Mi 9

Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus

Canon EOS 70D


412 cd/m²	456 cd/m²	441 cd/m²
418 cd/m²	451 cd/m²	428 cd/m²
414 cd/m²	426 cd/m²	427 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 456 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 430.3 cd/m² Minimum: 1.05 cd/m²
iluminação: 90 %
iluminação com acumulador: 451 cd/m²
Contraste: 820:1 (Preto: 0.55 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.4 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 2.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.22

	Huawei P30 Lite IPS LCD, 2312x1080, 6.2"	Xiaomi Mi 9 SE AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6"	Motorola Moto G7 Plus IPS, 2270x1080, 6.2"	Xiaomi Poco F1 IPS, 2246x1080, 6.2"	Xiaomi Mi 8 AMOLED, 2248x1080, 6.2"	Samsung Galaxy A50 AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.4"	Nokia 8.1 IPS, 2246x1080, 6.2"	Sony Xperia 10 IPS-LCD, 2520x1080, 6"
Screen		10%	-79%	-21%	-63%	-18%	-40%	-37%
Brightness middle	451	583 29%	537 19%	489 8%	430 -5%	644 43%	567 26%	547 21%
Brightness	430	577 34%	525 22%	486 13%	434 1%	628 46%	547 27%	525 22%
Brightness Distribution	90	97 8%	85 -6%	93 3%	94 4%	91 1%	92 2%	93 3%
Black Level *	0.55		0.58 -5%	0.34 38%			0.61 -11%	0.36 35%
Contrast	820		926 13%	1438 75%			930 13%	1519 85%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1.4	1.6 -14%	6.41 -358%	3.8 -171%	5.09 -264%	2.64 -89%	4.39 -214%	4.6 -229%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	4.4	3.9 11%	10.86 -147%	7.1 -61%	8.05 -83%	9.23 -110%	7.28 -65%	12.1 -175%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2.5	2.7 -8%	6.7 -168%	4.4 -76%	3.3 -32%	2.5 -0%	4.9 -96%	3.9 -56%
Gamma	2.22 ^99%	2.27 ^97%	2.099 ^105%	2.22 ^99%	2.257 ^97%	2.024 ^109%	2.248 ^98%	2.17 ^101%
CCT	6422 ^101%	6267 ^104%	8310 ^78%	7213 ^90%	7026 ^93%	6649 ^98%	7642 ^85%	7158 ^91%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
31.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 14.8 ms rise
31.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 16.4 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 83 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
54.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 26 ms rise
54.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 28.4 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 90 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	1544 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	1875 Points +21%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	1337 Points -13%
Xiaomi Poco F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	2468 Points +60%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	2430 Points +57%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1721 Points +11%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	1799 Points +17%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	837 Points -46%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (1523 - 1614, n=11)	1560 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (844 - 9574, n=82, last 2 years)	5422 Points +251%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	5429 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	5975 Points +10%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	4992 Points -8%
Xiaomi Poco F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	9182 Points +69%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	8907 Points +64%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	5605 Points +3%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	5856 Points +8%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	3986 Points -27%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (5266 - 5615, n=11)	5454 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2630 - 30323, n=82, last 2 years)	14892 Points +174%
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	3551 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	7282 Points +105%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	4287 Points +21%
Xiaomi Poco F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	14369 Points +305%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	13371 Points +277%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	4913 Points +38%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	6813 Points +92%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	3763 Points +6%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (2631 - 4083, n=11)	3514 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (5192 - 18534, n=57, last 2 years)	11924 Points +236%

PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	8125 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	8346 Points +3%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	7618 Points -6%
Xiaomi Poco F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	9664 Points +19%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	9689 Points +19%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	7029 Points -13%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	8309 Points +2%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	4948 Points -39%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (7004 - 9854, n=13)	8380 Points +3%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	6483 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	6832 Points +5%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	6277 Points -3%
Xiaomi Poco F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	8101 Points +25%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	7983 Points +23%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	5827 Points -10%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	6887 Points +6%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	5987 Points -8%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (5803 - 7141, n=12)	6497 Points 0%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	18377 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	29316 Points +60%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	19525 Points +6%
Xiaomi Poco F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	63159 Points +244%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	55397 Points +201%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	16037 Points -13%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	28895 Points +57%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	16290 Points -11%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (12120 - 22168, n=12)	19147 Points +4%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	21643 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	43514 Points +101%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	20953 Points -3%
Xiaomi Poco F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	82125 Points +279%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	77203 Points +257%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	16593 Points -23%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	39655 Points +83%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	17878 Points -17%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (2177 - 22605, n=12)	18746 Points -13%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	12023 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	13686 Points +14%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	15766 Points +31%
Xiaomi Poco F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	34928 Points +191%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	27858 Points +132%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	14353 Points +19%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	14820 Points +23%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	12437 Points +3%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (11158 - 22668, n=12)	16572 Points +38%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	1414 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	2073 Points +47%
Xiaomi Poco F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	5687 Points +302%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	4363 Points +209%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1430 Points +1%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	2691 Points +90%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	1315 Points -7%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (673 - 1503, n=15)	1218 Points -14%
Average of class Smartphone (812 - 7285, n=26, last 2 years)	4204 Points +197%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	1256 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	1980 Points +58%
Xiaomi Poco F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	8261 Points +558%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	6243 Points +397%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1279 Points +2%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	2763 Points +120%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	1235 Points -2%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (568 - 1355, n=15)	1072 Points -15%
Average of class Smartphone (756 - 9451, n=26, last 2 years)	4740 Points +277%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	2490 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	2480 Points 0%
Xiaomi Poco F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	2720 Points +9%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	2124 Points -15%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	2432 Points -2%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	2467 Points -1%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	1687 Points -32%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (1907 - 2654, n=15)	2422 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (1093 - 4349, n=26, last 2 years)	3303 Points +33%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	1494 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	2217 Points +48%
Xiaomi Poco F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	5230 Points +250%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	4034 Points +170%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1667 Points +12%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	2772 Points +86%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	1375 Points -8%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (844 - 1534, n=15)	1395 Points -7%
Average of class Smartphone (883 - 23024, n=74, last 2 years)	11160 Points +647%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	1336 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	2146 Points +61%
Xiaomi Poco F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	6898 Points +416%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	5328 Points +299%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1553 Points +16%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	2855 Points +114%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	1299 Points -3%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (740 - 1378, n=15)	1250 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone (840 - 45492, n=74, last 2 years)	19815 Points +1383%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	2578 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	2506 Points -3%
Xiaomi Poco F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	2832 Points +10%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	2181 Points -15%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	2241 Points -13%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	2516 Points -2%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	1732 Points -33%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (1656 - 2723, n=15)	2358 Points -9%
Average of class Smartphone (1075 - 8749, n=74, last 2 years)	5009 Points +94%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	963 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	2073 Points +115%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	Points -100%
Xiaomi Poco F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	3972 Points +312%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	3356 Points +248%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1296 Points +35%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	1834 Points +90%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	809 Points -16%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (550 - 1002, n=15)	891 Points -7%
Average of class Smartphone (286 - 17553, n=74, last 2 years)	3077 Points +220%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	819 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	1980 Points +142%
Xiaomi Poco F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	4746 Points +479%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	4010 Points +390%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1149 Points +40%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	1702 Points +108%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	704 Points -14%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (457 - 857, n=15)	755 Points -8%
Average of class Smartphone (240 - 29890, n=74, last 2 years)	3252 Points +297%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	2489 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	2480 Points 0%
Xiaomi Poco F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	2528 Points +2%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	2137 Points -14%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	2351 Points -6%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	2514 Points +1%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	1645 Points -34%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (1924 - 2716, n=15)	2429 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (858 - 7180, n=74, last 2 years)	3288 Points +32%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	981 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	2217 Points +126%
Xiaomi Poco F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	3669 Points +274%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	3646 Points +272%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1328 Points +35%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	1964 Points +100%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	896 Points -9%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (563 - 1351, n=15)	965 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (317 - 20131, n=160, last 2 years)	7682 Points +683%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	843 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	2146 Points +155%
Xiaomi Poco F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	4468 Points +430%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	4471 Points +430%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1188 Points +41%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	1845 Points +119%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	792 Points -6%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (470 - 1194, n=15)	831 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (267 - 33376, n=160, last 2 years)	11410 Points +1253%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	2550 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	2506 Points -2%
Xiaomi Poco F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	2257 Points -11%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	2215 Points -13%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	2266 Points -11%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	2534 Points -1%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	1664 Points -35%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (1851 - 2789, n=15)	2350 Points -8%
Average of class Smartphone (877 - 8480, n=160, last 2 years)	4587 Points +80%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	1988 Points
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	861 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (927 - 1365, n=6)	1061 Points
Average of class Smartphone (365 - 6635, n=73, last 2 years)	2841 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	1907 Points
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	693 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (796 - 1220, n=6)	924 Points
Average of class Smartphone (298 - 8601, n=73, last 2 years)	3085 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	2338 Points
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	2167 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (2196 - 2345, n=6)	2293 Points
Average of class Smartphone (1667 - 4198, n=73, last 2 years)	2706 Points

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	31 fps
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	58 fps +87%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	35 fps +13%
Xiaomi Poco F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	60 fps +94%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	60 fps +94%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	36 fps +16%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	57 fps +84%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	25 fps -19%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (31 - 36, n=12)	34.6 fps +12%
Average of class Smartphone (23 - 165, n=170, last 2 years)	85.7 fps +176%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	33 fps
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	74 fps +124%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	36 fps +9%
Xiaomi Poco F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	150 fps +355%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	120 fps +264%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	39 fps +18%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	65 fps +97%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	29 fps -12%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (33 - 39, n=12)	37.6 fps +14%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=170, last 2 years)	279 fps +745%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	16 fps
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	33 fps +106%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	15 fps -6%
Xiaomi Poco F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	58 fps +263%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	56 fps +250%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	21 fps +31%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	31 fps +94%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	11 fps -31%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (14 - 19, n=12)	17.9 fps +12%
Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 165, n=170, last 2 years)	75 fps +369%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	17 fps
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	36 fps +112%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	16 fps -6%
Xiaomi Poco F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	71 fps +318%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	67 fps +294%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	23 fps +35%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	32 fps +88%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	13 fps -24%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (17 - 21, n=12)	20 fps +18%
Average of class Smartphone (12 - 482, n=170, last 2 years)	164.1 fps +865%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	11 fps
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	24 fps +118%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	9.8 fps -11%
Xiaomi Poco F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	54 fps +391%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	45 fps +309%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	13 fps +18%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	22 fps +100%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	7.8 fps -29%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (11 - 13, n=12)	12.3 fps +12%
Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 158, n=170, last 2 years)	65.2 fps +493%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	12 fps
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	26 fps +117%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	10 fps -17%
Xiaomi Poco F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	35 fps +192%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	47 fps +292%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	14 fps +17%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	23 fps +92%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	9.5 fps -21%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (12 - 14, n=12)	13.6 fps +13%
Average of class Smartphone (8.3 - 341, n=170, last 2 years)	116.5 fps +871%

GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	6.5 fps
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	13 fps +100%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	6 fps -8%
Xiaomi Poco F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	33 fps +408%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	28 fps +331%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	8.1 fps +25%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	12 fps +85%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	4.3 fps -34%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (6.4 - 7.3, n=12)	6.74 fps +4%
Average of class Smartphone (5 - 119, n=171, last 2 years)	47.5 fps +631%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	6.9 fps
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	15 fps +117%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	6.3 fps -9%
Xiaomi Poco F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	35 fps +407%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	26 fps +277%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	8.9 fps +29%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	13 fps +88%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	5.3 fps -23%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (6.4 - 7.7, n=12)	7.49 fps +9%
Average of class Smartphone (3.1 - 216, n=170, last 2 years)	70.3 fps +919%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	6.4 fps
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	14 fps +119%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	5.6 fps -12%
Xiaomi Poco F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	31 fps +384%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	35 fps +447%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	8.2 fps +28%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	13 fps +103%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	4.4 fps -31%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (4.6 - 6.9, n=13)	6.03 fps -6%
Average of class Smartphone (3.6 - 123, n=202, last 2 years)	49.3 fps +670%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	7 fps
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	16 fps +129%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	5.4 fps -23%
Xiaomi Poco F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	32 fps +357%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	34 fps +386%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	9 fps +29%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	14 fps +100%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	4.9 fps -30%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (4.6 - 7, n=13)	6.52 fps -7%
Average of class Smartphone (2.3 - 261, n=202, last 2 years)	79.4 fps +1034%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	4.2 fps
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	9.1 fps +117%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	2 fps -52%
Xiaomi Poco F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	22 fps +424%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	22 fps +424%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	4.9 fps +17%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	8.2 fps +95%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	2.7 fps -36%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (2.2 - 7, n=13)	3.92 fps -7%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 119, n=202, last 2 years)	37.1 fps +783%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	2.6 fps
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	5.8 fps +123%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	2.3 fps -12%
Xiaomi Poco F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	14 fps +438%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	14 fps +438%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	3.1 fps +19%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	5 fps +92%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	1.7 fps -35%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (2.6 - 4, n=13)	2.92 fps +12%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 104, n=202, last 2 years)	31.6 fps +1115%

AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	132834 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	179353 Points +35%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	117557 Points -12%
Xiaomi Poco F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	263165 Points +98%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	144194 Points +9%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	169262 Points +27%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	88287 Points -34%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (124870 - 183420, n=10)	139210 Points +5%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	2201 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	2906 Points +32%
Xiaomi Poco F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	3838 Points +74%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	3852 Points +75%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	2193 Points 0%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	2731 Points +24%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	1374 Points -38%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (2140 - 2445, n=13)	2255 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone (1196 - 11976, n=152, last 2 years)	6257 Points +184%
System (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	5146 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	5932 Points +15%
Xiaomi Poco F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	6506 Points +26%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	6620 Points +29%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	5112 Points -1%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	5681 Points +10%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	3159 Points -39%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (4826 - 5568, n=13)	5208 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (2368 - 16475, n=152, last 2 years)	10131 Points +97%
Memory (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	3036 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	2969 Points -2%
Xiaomi Poco F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	3239 Points +7%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	3261 Points +7%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	2492 Points -18%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	2947 Points -3%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	983 Points -68%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (2823 - 4360, n=13)	3181 Points +5%
Average of class Smartphone (962 - 12716, n=152, last 2 years)	6714 Points +121%
Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	1478 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	3453 Points +134%
Xiaomi Poco F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	7945 Points +438%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	7895 Points +434%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1957 Points +32%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	3086 Points +109%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	1409 Points -5%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (1450 - 1489, n=13)	1470 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (1017 - 58651, n=152, last 2 years)	16761 Points +1034%
Web (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	1024 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	1172 Points +14%
Xiaomi Poco F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	1296 Points +27%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	1292 Points +26%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	927 Points -9%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	1077 Points +5%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	815 Points -20%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (982 - 1212, n=13)	1092 Points +7%
Average of class Smartphone (841 - 2145, n=152, last 2 years)	1557 Points +52%

Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 2.0 | WebXPRT 3 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=162, last 2 years)	119.3 Points +275%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE (Chrome 73)	37.21 Points +17%
Huawei P30 Lite (Chrome 74)	31.78 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (30 - 33, n=8)	31.5 Points -1%
Sony Xperia 10 (Chrome Version 73)	16.25 Points -49%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=148, last 2 years)	133.6 runs/min +321%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE (Chrome 73)	37.5 runs/min +18%
Samsung Galaxy A50 (Chome 73)	33.07 runs/min +4%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (30.4 - 33.9, n=6)	31.9 runs/min +1%
Huawei P30 Lite (Chrome 74)	31.7 runs/min

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=82, last 2 years)	147.1 Points +123%
Xiaomi Mi 8 (Chrome 72)	83 Points +26%
Nokia 8.1 (Chrome 71)	72 Points +9%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE (Chrome 73)	72 Points +9%
Huawei P30 Lite (Chrome 74)	66 Points
Samsung Galaxy A50 (Chrome 73)	62 Points -6%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (52 - 69, n=11)	61.7 Points -7%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus	54 Points -18%
Sony Xperia 10 (Chrome Version 73)	39 Points -41%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=204, last 2 years)	36733 Points +276%
Xiaomi Mi 8 (Chrome 72)	15086 Points +54%
Xiaomi Poco F1 (Chrome 68)	14514 Points +48%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE (Chrome 73)	13562 Points +39%
Nokia 8.1 (Chrome 71)	12717 Points +30%
Samsung Galaxy A50 (Chrome 73)	10322 Points +6%
Huawei P30 Lite (Chrome 74)	9779 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (9041 - 10544, n=13)	9659 Points -1%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus	8368 Points -14%
Sony Xperia 10 (Chrome Version 73)	4865 Points -50%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Sony Xperia 10 (Chrome Version 73)	10257 ms * -148%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus	4776 ms * -15%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (3999 - 4853, n=13)	4223 ms * -2%
Huawei P30 Lite (Chrome 74)	4138 ms *
Samsung Galaxy A50 (Chrome 73)	3897 ms * +6%
Nokia 8.1 (Chrome 71)	3035 ms * +27%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE (Chrome 73)	2912 ms * +30%
Xiaomi Mi 8 (Chrome 72)	2818 ms * +32%
Xiaomi Poco F1 (Chrome 68)	2714 ms * +34%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=161, last 2 years)	1583 ms * +62%

* ... smaller is better

	Huawei P30 Lite	Xiaomi Mi 9 SE	Motorola Moto G7 Plus	Xiaomi Poco F1	Xiaomi Mi 8	Samsung Galaxy A50	Nokia 8.1	Sony Xperia 10	Average 128 GB eMMC Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		19%	3%	18%	45%	7%	-13%	-11%	-1%	467%
Sequential Read 256KB	293.2	492.5 68%	283.6 -3%	705 140%	693 136%	507 73%	279.3 -5%	273.8 -7%	283 ?(106.7 - 511, n=76) -3%	1834 ?(226 - 4512, n=193, last 2 years) 526%
Sequential Write 256KB	158.6	190.1 20%	208.7 32%	155.6 -2%	207.8 31%	192.1 21%	203.8 28%	232.9 47%	194.6 ?(72.3 - 314, n=76) 23%	1426 ?(57.5 - 3908, n=193, last 2 years) 799%
Random Read 4KB	71.6	115.8 62%	76.6 7%	101 41%	136.3 90%	98.9 38%	69.9 -2%	53.1 -26%	82.7 ?(8.63 - 247, n=76) 16%	278 ?(22.2 - 543, n=193, last 2 years) 288%
Random Write 4KB	87.3	21.86 -75%	73.1 -16%	17.81 -80%	21 -76%	18.2 -79%	7.3 -92%	14.39 -84%	55.1 ?(3.84 - 159.9, n=76) -37%	310 ?(9.4 - 753, n=193, last 2 years) 255%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard	76.8 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)		82.8 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 8%	85.3 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 11%		73.9 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -4%	84.7 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 10%	83.2 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 8%	78.1 ?(29.2 - 153.8, n=34) 2%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard	67.8 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)		62.1 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -8%	65.6 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -3%		60.7 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -10%	58.3 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -14%	63.8 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -6%	61.8 ?(26.1 - 81.9, n=34) -9%

Aspahlt 9 Legends

Huawei P30 Lite; High Quality: Ø29.3 (20-31)

Huawei P30 Lite; Standard / low: Ø29.7 (26-31)

PUBG Compare

Huawei P30 Lite; Smooth: Ø24.8 (23-26)

Huawei P30 Lite; Balanced: Ø24.7 (21-26)

Huawei P30 Lite; HD: Ø23.1 (16-26)

Carga Máxima

Inatividade


41.5 °C	41.5 °C	38 °C
42.3 °C	40 °C	37.9 °C
40.7 °C	40.8 °C	38.3 °C

Máximo: 42.3 °C
Médio: 40.1 °C


36.9 °C	39.1 °C	41.2 °C
35.3 °C	38.5 °C	42.9 °C
36 °C	39.3 °C	41.9 °C

Máximo: 42.9 °C
Médio: 39 °C

alimentação elétrica 27.9 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.3 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 40.1 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.3 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.9 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.1 °C / 92 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Huawei P30 Lite audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.8% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (1.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 41% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 60% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Xiaomi Mi 9 SE audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 17% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 39% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.01 / 0.24 Watt
Ocioso	0.91 / 2.41 / 2.43 Watt
Carga	4.57 / 7.57 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Huawei P30 Lite 3340 mAh	Xiaomi Mi 9 SE 3070 mAh	Motorola Moto G7 Plus 3000 mAh	Xiaomi Poco F1 4000 mAh	Xiaomi Mi 8 3400 mAh	Samsung Galaxy A50 4000 mAh	Nokia 8.1 3500 mAh	Sony Xperia 10 2870 mAh	Average HiSilicon Kirin 710	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		43%	1%	10%	-28%	8%	27%	20%	-3%	2%
Idle Minimum *	0.91	0.53 42%	1.1 -21%	0.65 29%	1.5 -65%	0.8 12%	0.8 12%	0.72 21%	1.058 ?(0.8 - 2.3, n=13) -16%	0.895 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=153, last 2 years) 2%
Idle Average *	2.41	1.18 51%	1.7 29%	1.97 18%	2.2 9%	1.5 38%	1.5 38%	2.16 10%	2.2 ?(1.2 - 3, n=13) 9%	1.447 ?(0.6 - 4.26, n=153, last 2 years) 40%
Idle Maximum *	2.43	1.2 51%	2.1 14%	2.01 17%	2.6 -7%	1.7 30%	1.8 26%	2.17 11%	2.57 ?(2.2 - 4.2, n=13) -6%	1.608 ?(0.83 - 4.45, n=153, last 2 years) 34%
Load Average *	4.57	3.04 33%	5.1 -12%	4.29 6%	6.1 -33%	5.9 -29%	3.2 30%	3.32 27%	4.61 ?(4.06 - 6, n=13) -1%	6.41 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=148, last 2 years) -40%
Load Maximum *	7.57	4.83 36%	7.9 -4%	9.05 -20%	10.9 -44%	8.3 -10%	5.4 29%	5.34 29%	7.6 ?(6.13 - 9.4, n=13) -0%	9.61 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=148, last 2 years) -27%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		20h 48min
WiFi Websurfing		8h 35min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		11h 25min
Carga (máximo brilho)		3h 18min

	Huawei P30 Lite 3340 mAh	Xiaomi Mi 9 SE 3070 mAh	Motorola Moto G7 Plus 3000 mAh	Xiaomi Poco F1 4000 mAh	Xiaomi Mi 8 3400 mAh	Samsung Galaxy A50 4000 mAh	Nokia 8.1 3500 mAh	Sony Xperia 10 2870 mAh
Battery Runtime		11%	19%	43%	29%	32%	32%	-1%
Reader / Idle	1248	1374 10%		2088 67%	1634 31%	1587 27%	1682 35%	1006 -19%
H.264	685	853 25%	809 18%	936 37%	897 31%	869 27%	857 25%	620 -9%
WiFi v1.3	515	510 -1%	715 39%	808 57%	736 43%	701 36%	738 43%	541 5%
Load	198	218 10%	196 -1%	220 11%	215 9%	275 39%	246 24%	233 18%

Pro

+ Design

+ Qualidade de construção

+ Bons módulos de câmera

+ GPS preciso

+ Painel IPS bem calibrado

+ 128 GB de memória integrada

Contra

- Armazenamento eMMC em vez de UFS

- Modem Wi-Fi lento

- Disponibilidade limitada para bandas LTE

- Bluetooth 4.2

- Relação de contraste e brilho da tela

- Gravação de vídeo de apenas 1080p

- Afogamento

- Desempenho do SoC durante os jogos

In review: Huawei P30 Lite. Review unit courtesy of Huawei Germany.

Assim como o seu predecessor o P30 Lite Acabou sendo um smartphone de gama média sólido e decente, incapaz de se diferenciar de seus concorrentes em relação a desempenho ou conectividade. O sufixo “Lite” é claramente perceptível, ao contrário de outros dispositivos, como o Xiaomi Mi 9 SE. Se você está procurando dispositivo diário poderoso e capaz, sugerimos dar uma olhada mais de perto no vasto campo de contendores do Snapdragon.

Embora existam muitos melhores smartphones de gama média disponíveis, esperamos que o P30 Lite se torne um dos smartphones de maior sucesso na sua faixa de preços.

O P30 Lite oferece um design moderno, uma excelente qualidade de construção e um painel IPS com ângulos de visão amplos e cores precisas. As câmeras, particularmente a câmera frontal de 24 MP, são mais do que adequadas para sua classe. No entanto, existem muitas deficiências pequenas que estragam a impressão geral, particularmente ao levar em conta o preço de rua da Huawei. Felizmente, o fabricante chinês provou ser adaptativo o suficiente para perceber que o ajuste de brilho baseado no contexto pode ser demais e, portanto, reduziu o efeito ao mínimo.

Huawei P30 Lite - 2019-11-04 11/04/2019 v7 ^(old)
Marcus Herbrich

Acabamento

85%

Teclado

65 / 75 → 87%

Mouse

90%

Conectividade

47 / 70 → 68%

Peso

92%

Bateria

86%

Pantalha

88%

Desempenho do jogos

11 / 64 → 18%

Desempenho da aplicação

57 / 86 → 67%

Temperatura

86%

Ruído

100%

Audio

72 / 90 → 80%

Camera

62%

Médio

72%

78%

Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Finn D Boerne - Translator - 450 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2017

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Huawei P30 Lite

Marcus Herbrich, 2019-05-24 (Update: 2019-05-25)

Size Comparison

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

Aspahlt 9 Legends

PUBG Compare

Huawei P30 Lite audio analysis

Xiaomi Mi 9 SE audio analysis

Pro

Contra

More articles related to this device

Price comparison