Breve Análise do Smartphone Huawei P30 Lite New Edition – Memória de gama alta

Name: Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
Brand: Huawei

Virtude nascida da necessidade?

A Huawei relançou o P30 Lite como a New Edition, que tem muito espaço de armazenamento em comparação com outros dispositivos em sua classe de preços e uma câmera frontal com alguns megapixels extras. Nesta análise, veremos se esta receita ainda produz um smartphone atualizado.

Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 02/05/2020 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android ARM Smartphone Touchscreen

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Huawei P30 Lite New Edition (P30 Serie)

Processador

HiSilicon Kirin 710 8 x 2.2 GHz, Cortex-A73/-A53

Placa gráfica

ARM Mali-G51 MP4

Memória

6 GB

Pantalha

6.15 polegadas 19,27:9, 2312 x 1080 pixel 415 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, IPS, Entalhe de gota d'água, Brilhante: sim, 60 Hz

Disco rígido

256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 256 GB

, 242 GB livre

Conexões

1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Conector de áudio de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: microSD de até 512 GB, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Acelerômetro, giroscópio, sensor de proximidade, bússola

Funcionamento em rede

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.2, 2G (850/900/1800/1900), 3G (B1/B2/B4/B5/B8), 4G (B1/B3/B4/B7/B8/B20/B38), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 7.4 x 152.9 x 72.7

Bateria

3340 mAh Lítio-Polímero

Charging

fast charging / Quickcharge

Sistema Operativo

Android 9.0 Pie

Camera

Primary Camera: 48 MPix f/1.8, phase detection AF, LED flash, Video @1080p/30FPS (camera 1); 8.0MP, wide-angle lens (camera 2); 2.0MP, depth of field (camera 3)
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix f/2.0, Video @1080p/30FPS

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: Alto-falante mono na borda inferior, Teclado: Teclado virtual, Carregador rápido, cabo USB, fones, SIM tool, 24 Meses Garantia, SAR value: 0,7W/kg (head), 1,1W/kg (body); LTE Cat.12 (600 Mbps/100 Mbps); DRM Widevine: L1; notification LED, fanless

peso

159 g, Suprimento de energia: 54 g

Preço

349 Euro

Links

Huawei página inicial

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Comparison

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Drive	Size	Resolution
79 % v7 ^(old)	02/2020	Huawei P30 Lite New Edition Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4	159 g	256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	6.15"	2312x1080
79.8 % v7 ^(old)	01/2020	Samsung Galaxy A51 Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3	172 g	128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	6.50"	2400x1080
78.3 % v7 ^(old)	05/2019	Huawei P30 Lite Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4	159 g	128 GB eMMC Flash	6.15"	2312x1080
81.6 % v7 ^(old)	07/2019	Xiaomi Mi 9T SD 730, Adreno 618	191 g	64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	6.39"	2340x1080
80.2 % v7 ^(old)	05/2019	Google Pixel 3a SD 670, Adreno 616	147 g	64 GB eMMC Flash	5.60"	2220x1080

Size Comparison

Samsung Galaxy A51 Xiaomi Mi 9T Huawei P30 Lite New Edition Huawei P30 Lite Google Pixel 3a DIN A6 ❌

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Google Pixel 3a Adreno 616, SD 670, 64 GB eMMC Flash	541 (422^min - 570^max) MBit/s +142%
Samsung Galaxy A51 Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9611, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	297 (189^min - 335^max) MBit/s +33%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Adreno 618, SD 730, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	293 (161^min - 346^max) MBit/s +31%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	224 (197^min - 260^max) MBit/s
Huawei P30 Lite Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash	218 (95^min - 239^max) MBit/s -3%
iperf3 receive AX12
Google Pixel 3a Adreno 616, SD 670, 64 GB eMMC Flash	637 (275^min - 679^max) MBit/s +237%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Adreno 618, SD 730, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	333 (297^min - 343^max) MBit/s +76%
Samsung Galaxy A51 Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9611, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	298 (185^min - 350^max) MBit/s +58%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	189 (80^min - 224^max) MBit/s
Huawei P30 Lite Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash	188 (45^min - 237^max) MBit/s -1%

Huawei P30 Lite New Edition; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø190.4 (82-224)

Huawei P30 Lite New Edition; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø224 (197-260)

GPS Huawei P30 Lite New Edition – overview

GPS Huawei P30 Lite New Edition – bridge

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

Huawei P30 Lite New Edition

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max

OnePlus 6T

Olympus E-M10 II

click to load images

Huawei P30 Lite New Edition

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max

OnePlus 6T

Olympus E-M10 II

click to load images

Huawei P30 Lite New Edition

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max

OnePlus 6T

Olympus E-M10 II

ColorChecker Huawei P30 Lite New Edition: 5.72 ∆E min: 1.84 - max: 10.92 ∆E

Test chart – perfect lighting conditions


491 cd/m²	487 cd/m²	492 cd/m²
482 cd/m²	507 cd/m²	474 cd/m²
478 cd/m²	473 cd/m²	447 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 507 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 481.2 cd/m² Minimum: 1.13 cd/m²
iluminação: 88 %
iluminação com acumulador: 507 cd/m²
Contraste: 1334:1 (Preto: 0.38 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.72 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 5.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.158

	Huawei P30 Lite New Edition IPS, 2312x1080, 6.2"	Samsung Galaxy A51 AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.5"	Huawei P30 Lite IPS LCD, 2312x1080, 6.2"	Xiaomi Mi 9T AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.4"	Google Pixel 3a P-OLED, 2220x1080, 5.6"
Screen		24%	8%	34%	-2%
Brightness middle	507	589 16%	451 -11%	589 16%	403 -21%
Brightness	481	589 22%	430 -11%	589 22%	411 -15%
Brightness Distribution	88	94 7%	90 2%	96 9%	96 9%
Black Level *	0.38		0.55 -45%
Contrast	1334		820 -39%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	4.72	2.22 53%	1.4 70%	2.5 47%	5.1 -8%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	7.84	8.24 -5%	4.4 44%	4.9 37%	11 -40%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	5.5	2.6 53%	2.5 55%	1.6 71%	2 64%
Gamma	2.158 ^102%	2.111 ^104%	2.22 ^99%	2.24 ^98%	2.22 ^99%
CCT	7596 ^86%	6508 ^100%	6422 ^101%	6544 ^99%	6589 ^99%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

893 Hz

≤ 10 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 893 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 10 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 893 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 9 ms rise
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 15 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 50 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
44 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 21 ms rise
44 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 23 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 71 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Geekbench 5.0
5.0 Single-Core (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144	319 Points
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	347 Points +9%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (319 - 335, n=2)	327 Points +3%
Average of class Smartphone (703 - 1668, n=10, last 2 years)	928 Points +191%
5.0 Multi-Core (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144	1266 Points
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1326 Points +5%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (1266 - 1412, n=2)	1339 Points +6%
Average of class Smartphone (1908 - 4353, n=10, last 2 years)	3014 Points +138%
OpenCL Score 5.0 (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144	848 Points
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1522 Points +79%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (848 - 984, n=2)	916 Points +8%
Average of class Smartphone (498 - 9123, n=6, last 2 years)	4173 Points +392%
Vulkan Score 5.0 (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144	723 Points
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1079 Points +49%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 ()	723 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (261 - 7988, n=5, last 2 years)	3404 Points +371%

PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144	7593 Points
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	6416 Points -16%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	8125 Points +7%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	9049 Points +19%
Google Pixel 3a Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	9458 Points +25%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (7004 - 9854, n=13)	8380 Points +10%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144	6042 Points
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	5649 Points -7%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	6483 Points +7%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	7533 Points +25%
Google Pixel 3a Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	7387 Points +22%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (5803 - 7141, n=12)	6497 Points +8%

3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144	1004 Points
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	2068 Points +106%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	1414 Points +41%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	3196 Points +218%
Google Pixel 3a Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	2477 Points +147%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (673 - 1503, n=15)	1218 Points +21%
Average of class Smartphone (812 - 7285, n=26, last 2 years)	4204 Points +319%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144	870 Points
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	2027 Points +133%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	1256 Points +44%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	3184 Points +266%
Google Pixel 3a Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	2419 Points +178%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (568 - 1355, n=15)	1072 Points +23%
Average of class Smartphone (756 - 9451, n=26, last 2 years)	4740 Points +445%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144	2179 Points
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	2225 Points +2%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	2490 Points +14%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	3239 Points +49%
Google Pixel 3a Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	2708 Points +24%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (1907 - 2654, n=15)	2422 Points +11%
Average of class Smartphone (1093 - 4349, n=26, last 2 years)	3303 Points +52%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144	1382 Points
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	2060 Points +49%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	1494 Points +8%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	3312 Points +140%
Google Pixel 3a Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	2582 Points +87%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (844 - 1534, n=15)	1395 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (883 - 23024, n=73, last 2 years)	11109 Points +704%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144	1261 Points
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1993 Points +58%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	1336 Points +6%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	3316 Points +163%
Google Pixel 3a Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	2533 Points +101%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (740 - 1378, n=15)	1250 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (840 - 45492, n=73, last 2 years)	19708 Points +1463%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144	2084 Points
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	2336 Points +12%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	2578 Points +24%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	3296 Points +58%
Google Pixel 3a Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	2771 Points +33%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (1656 - 2723, n=15)	2358 Points +13%
Average of class Smartphone (1075 - 8749, n=73, last 2 years)	5001 Points +140%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144	858 Points
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1592 Points +86%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	963 Points +12%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	2192 Points +155%
Google Pixel 3a Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	1651 Points +92%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (550 - 1002, n=15)	891 Points +4%
Average of class Smartphone (286 - 17553, n=70, last 2 years)	3006 Points +250%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144	730 Points
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1473 Points +102%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	819 Points +12%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	2008 Points +175%
Google Pixel 3a Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	1482 Points +103%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (457 - 857, n=15)	755 Points +3%
Average of class Smartphone (240 - 29890, n=70, last 2 years)	3166 Points +334%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144	2207 Points
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	2217 Points 0%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	2489 Points +13%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	3227 Points +46%
Google Pixel 3a Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	2728 Points +24%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (1924 - 2716, n=15)	2429 Points +10%
Average of class Smartphone (858 - 7180, n=70, last 2 years)	3260 Points +48%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144	967 Points
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1654 Points +71%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	981 Points +1%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	2347 Points +143%
Google Pixel 3a Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	1772 Points +83%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (563 - 1351, n=15)	965 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (317 - 23762, n=163, last 2 years)	8254 Points +754%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144	838 Points
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1530 Points +83%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	843 Points +1%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	2176 Points +160%
Google Pixel 3a Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	1611 Points +92%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (470 - 1194, n=15)	831 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (267 - 40163, n=163, last 2 years)	12419 Points +1382%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144	2092 Points
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	2311 Points +10%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	2550 Points +22%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	3241 Points +55%
Google Pixel 3a Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	2763 Points +32%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (1851 - 2789, n=15)	2350 Points +12%
Average of class Smartphone (877 - 10632, n=163, last 2 years)	4759 Points +127%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144	927 Points
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1554 Points +68%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	Points -100%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	2060 Points +122%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (927 - 1365, n=6)	1061 Points +14%
Average of class Smartphone (365 - 6635, n=69, last 2 years)	2784 Points +200%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144	796 Points
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1438 Points +81%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	1917 Points +141%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (796 - 1220, n=6)	924 Points +16%
Average of class Smartphone (298 - 7971, n=69, last 2 years)	3009 Points +278%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144	2196 Points
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	2161 Points -2%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	2786 Points +27%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (2196 - 2345, n=6)	2293 Points +4%
Average of class Smartphone (1667 - 4198, n=69, last 2 years)	2686 Points +22%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144	31 fps
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	40 fps +29%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	31 fps 0%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	58 fps +87%
Google Pixel 3a Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	52 fps +68%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (31 - 36, n=12)	34.6 fps +12%
Average of class Smartphone (23 - 166, n=174, last 2 years)	86.6 fps +179%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144	33 fps
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	46 fps +39%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	33 fps 0%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	77 fps +133%
Google Pixel 3a Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	58 fps +76%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (33 - 39, n=12)	37.6 fps +14%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=174, last 2 years)	296 fps +797%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144	16 fps
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	23 fps +44%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	16 fps 0%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	34 fps +113%
Google Pixel 3a Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	27 fps +69%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (14 - 19, n=12)	17.9 fps +12%
Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 166, n=174, last 2 years)	76.1 fps +376%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144	18 fps
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	24 fps +33%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	17 fps -6%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	38 fps +111%
Google Pixel 3a Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	29 fps +61%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (17 - 21, n=12)	20 fps +11%
Average of class Smartphone (12 - 502, n=174, last 2 years)	175 fps +872%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144	11 fps
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	14 fps +27%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	11 fps 0%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	24 fps +118%
Google Pixel 3a Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	19 fps +73%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (11 - 13, n=12)	12.3 fps +12%
Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 166, n=174, last 2 years)	66.7 fps +506%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144	12 fps
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	15 fps +25%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	12 fps 0%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	27 fps +125%
Google Pixel 3a Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	20 fps +67%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (12 - 14, n=12)	13.6 fps +13%
Average of class Smartphone (8.3 - 365, n=174, last 2 years)	124.3 fps +936%

GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144	7.3 fps
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	8.6 fps +18%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	6.5 fps -11%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	13 fps +78%
Google Pixel 3a Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	10 fps +37%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (6.4 - 7.3, n=12)	6.74 fps -8%
Average of class Smartphone (5 - 154, n=175, last 2 years)	49.5 fps +578%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144	6.4 fps
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	10 fps +56%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	6.9 fps +8%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	16 fps +150%
Google Pixel 3a Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	11 fps +72%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (6.4 - 7.7, n=12)	7.49 fps +17%
Average of class Smartphone (3.1 - 216, n=174, last 2 years)	74.8 fps +1069%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144	6.4 fps
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	9.1 fps +42%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	6.4 fps 0%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	15 fps +134%
Google Pixel 3a Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	11 fps +72%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (4.6 - 6.9, n=13)	6.03 fps -6%
Average of class Smartphone (3.6 - 166, n=207, last 2 years)	50.7 fps +692%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144	6.9 fps
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	10 fps +45%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	7 fps +1%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	16 fps +132%
Google Pixel 3a Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	12 fps +74%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (4.6 - 7, n=13)	6.52 fps -6%
Average of class Smartphone (2.3 - 321, n=207, last 2 years)	84.9 fps +1130%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144	4.2 fps
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	5.5 fps +31%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	4.2 fps 0%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	9.3 fps +121%
Google Pixel 3a Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	7 fps +67%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (2.2 - 7, n=13)	3.92 fps -7%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 144, n=207, last 2 years)	38.9 fps +826%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144	2.6 fps
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	3.5 fps +35%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	2.6 fps 0%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	6.1 fps +135%
Google Pixel 3a Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	4.4 fps +69%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (2.6 - 4, n=13)	2.92 fps +12%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 129, n=207, last 2 years)	34 fps +1208%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144	2153 Points
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	634 Points -71%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	2201 Points +2%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	3329 Points +55%
Google Pixel 3a Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	2811 Points +31%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (2140 - 2445, n=13)	2255 Points +5%
Average of class Smartphone (1196 - 12993, n=158, last 2 years)	6499 Points +202%
System (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144	4909 Points
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	4738 Points -3%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	5146 Points +5%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	6760 Points +38%
Google Pixel 3a Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	5480 Points +12%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (4826 - 5568, n=13)	5208 Points +6%
Average of class Smartphone (2368 - 17953, n=158, last 2 years)	10346 Points +111%
Memory (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144	2993 Points
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1605 Points -46%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	3036 Points +1%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	4646 Points +55%
Google Pixel 3a Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	3288 Points +10%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (2823 - 4360, n=13)	3181 Points +6%
Average of class Smartphone (962 - 18911, n=158, last 2 years)	7058 Points +136%
Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144	1466 Points
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	2168 Points +48%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	1478 Points +1%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	3559 Points +143%
Google Pixel 3a Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	2818 Points +92%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (1450 - 1489, n=13)	1470 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (1017 - 58651, n=158, last 2 years)	17998 Points +1128%
Web (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144	998 Points
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	10 Points -99%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	1024 Points +3%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	1099 Points +10%
Google Pixel 3a Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	1229 Points +23%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (982 - 1212, n=13)	1092 Points +9%
Average of class Smartphone (841 - 2363, n=158, last 2 years)	1578 Points +58%

AnTuTu v8
Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144	185725 Points
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	181295 Points -2%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (185725 - 194475, n=2)	190100 Points +2%
UX (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144	60649 Points
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	38475 Points -37%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (55985 - 60649, n=2)	58317 Points -4%
MEM (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144	35479 Points
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	43405 Points +22%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (35479 - 37021, n=2)	36250 Points +2%
GPU (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144	28697 Points
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	36821 Points +28%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (28697 - 29020, n=2)	28859 Points +1%
CPU (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144	60900 Points
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	62594 Points +3%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (60900 - 72449, n=2)	66675 Points +9%

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=169, last 2 years)	124.4 Points +297%
Xiaomi Mi 9T (Chrome 75.0.3770.101)	47.13 Points +50%
Google Pixel 3a	33.56 Points +7%
Huawei P30 Lite (Chrome 74)	31.78 Points +1%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (30 - 33, n=8)	31.5 Points +1%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition (Chrome 79)	31.33 Points
Samsung Galaxy A51 (Chrome 79)	27.68 Points -12%

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Xiaomi Mi 9T (Chrome 75.0.3770.101)	87.5 Points +72%
Huawei P30 Lite (Chrome 74)	55.1 Points +8%
Samsung Galaxy A51 (Chrome 79)	51.3 Points +1%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition (Chrome 79)	50.9 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (47 - 55.1, n=10)	50.2 Points -1%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=152, last 2 years)	143.9 runs/min +358%
Xiaomi Mi 9T (Chrome 75.0.3770.101)	46.46 runs/min +48%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (30.4 - 33.9, n=6)	31.9 runs/min +2%
Huawei P30 Lite (Chrome 74)	31.7 runs/min +1%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition (Chrome 79)	31.4 runs/min
Samsung Galaxy A51 (Chrome 79)	29.1 runs/min -7%

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years)	150.2 Points +189%
Xiaomi Mi 9T (Chrome 75.0.3770.101)	86 Points +65%
Huawei P30 Lite (Chrome 74)	66 Points +27%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (52 - 69, n=11)	61.7 Points +19%
Samsung Galaxy A51 (Chrome 79)	57 Points +10%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition (Chrome 79)	52 Points

Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=210, last 2 years)	38550 Points +304%
Xiaomi Mi 9T (Chrome 75.0.3770.101)	17501 Points +83%
Google Pixel 3a	10844 Points +14%
Samsung Galaxy A51 (Chrome 79)	10194 Points +7%
Huawei P30 Lite (Chrome 74)	9779 Points +2%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (9041 - 10544, n=13)	9659 Points +1%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition (Chrome 79)	9549 Points

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Samsung Galaxy A51 (Chrome 79)	4375 ms * -1%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition (Chrome 79)	4318 ms *
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (3999 - 4853, n=13)	4223 ms * +2%
Huawei P30 Lite (Chrome 74)	4138 ms * +4%
Google Pixel 3a	3589 ms * +17%
Xiaomi Mi 9T (Chrome 75.0.3770.101)	2564 ms * +41%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=167, last 2 years)	1523 ms * +65%

* ... smaller is better

	Huawei P30 Lite New Edition	Samsung Galaxy A51	Huawei P30 Lite	Xiaomi Mi 9T	Google Pixel 3a	Average 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		-32%	-39%	-41%	-52%	-10%	133%
Sequential Read 256KB	800	496.1 -38%	293.2 -63%	492.7 -38%	302 -62%	829 ?(496 - 984, n=23) 4%	1887 ?(226 - 4512, n=198, last 2 years) 136%
Sequential Write 256KB	391.1	184.9 -53%	158.6 -59%	179.2 -54%	253.9 -35%	376 ?(198.5 - 914, n=23) -4%	1471 ?(57.5 - 3908, n=198, last 2 years) 276%
Random Read 4KB	198.7	110.8 -44%	71.6 -64%	128.6 -35%	63.6 -68%	168.8 ?(108.4 - 265, n=23) -15%	278 ?(22.2 - 483, n=198, last 2 years) 40%
Random Write 4KB	171.6	104.4 -39%	87.3 -49%	107.8 -37%	99.9 -42%	143.6 ?(22.1 - 280, n=23) -16%	311 ?(9.4 - 753, n=198, last 2 years) 81%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard	76.6 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	73 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -5%	76.8 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 0%			66.8 ?(25.5 - 82.6, n=4) -13%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard	66.8 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	60.1 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -10%	67.8 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 1%			56.3 ?(16.7 - 73.3, n=4) -16%

Huawei P30 Lite New Edition; Arena of Valor; min; 1.33.1.5: Ø30.3 (29-31)

Huawei P30 Lite New Edition; Arena of Valor; high HD; 1.33.1.5: Ø30.1 (2-31)

Huawei P30 Lite New Edition; Asphalt 9: Legends; Standard / low; 1.9.3a: Ø29.1 (16-31)

Huawei P30 Lite New Edition; Asphalt 9: Legends; High Quality; 1.9.3a: Ø28.9 (14-31)

Carga Máxima

Inatividade


42 °C	38.4 °C	38.2 °C
42.5 °C	38.2 °C	38.5 °C
40.4 °C	38 °C	38.2 °C

Máximo: 42.5 °C
Médio: 39.4 °C


35 °C	36.8 °C	43 °C
35 °C	37.2 °C	43.5 °C
34.7 °C	38.1 °C	41.4 °C

Máximo: 43.5 °C
Médio: 38.3 °C

alimentação elétrica 43.2 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.4 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.5 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.5 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.2 °C / 90 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Huawei P30 Lite New Edition audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 63.4% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 63.4% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 63.4% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (120.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 88% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 3% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 96% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy A51 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 65.7% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 65.7% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 65.7% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (123.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 91% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 2% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 97% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0 / 0.2 Watt
Ocioso	0.95 / 2.1 / 2.4 Watt
Carga	4.2 / 7.7 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Huawei P30 Lite New Edition 3340 mAh	Samsung Galaxy A51 4000 mAh	Huawei P30 Lite 3340 mAh	Xiaomi Mi 9T 4000 mAh	Google Pixel 3a 3000 mAh	Average HiSilicon Kirin 710	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		8%	-4%	44%	35%	-6%	-3%
Idle Minimum *	0.95	0.9 5%	0.91 4%	0.54 43%	0.61 36%	1.058 ?(0.8 - 2.3, n=13) -11%	0.883 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=160, last 2 years) 7%
Idle Average *	2.1	1.7 19%	2.41 -15%	0.95 55%	1.56 26%	2.2 ?(1.2 - 3, n=13) -5%	1.467 ?(0.6 - 4.36, n=160, last 2 years) 30%
Idle Maximum *	2.4	1.8 25%	2.43 -1%	1.08 55%	1.6 33%	2.57 ?(2.2 - 4.2, n=13) -7%	1.621 ?(0.83 - 4.46, n=160, last 2 years) 32%
Load Average *	4.2	5.2 -24%	4.57 -9%	2.7 36%	2.67 36%	4.61 ?(4.06 - 6, n=13) -10%	6.55 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=154, last 2 years) -56%
Load Maximum *	7.7	6.6 14%	7.57 2%	5.4 30%	4.33 44%	7.6 ?(6.13 - 9.4, n=13) 1%	9.9 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=154, last 2 years) -29%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		22h 39min
WiFi Websurfing		11h 59min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		13h 22min
Carga (máximo brilho)		3h 43min

	Huawei P30 Lite New Edition 3340 mAh	Samsung Galaxy A51 4000 mAh	Huawei P30 Lite 3340 mAh	Xiaomi Mi 9T 4000 mAh	Google Pixel 3a 3000 mAh
Battery Runtime		14%	-16%	41%	-15%
Reader / Idle	1359	1689 24%	1248 -8%	2138 57%
H.264	802	846 5%	685 -15%	1208 51%
WiFi v1.3	719	698 -3%	515 -28%	991 38%	612 -15%
Load	223	289 30%	198 -11%	258 16%

Pro

+ Muito armazenamento UFS 2.1

+ Boa qualidade de construção

+ Design luxuoso

+ Sensor de digitais preciso

+ Alto-falante sólido

+ Boa tela táctil

+ Fotos lindas

Contra

- Wi-Fi lento

- Bluetooth 4.2

- Afogamento sob uso intenso

- Poucas bandas LTE suportadas

- O desempenho poderia ser mais veloz

Veredicto – Bastante a situação

Com o P30 Lite New Edition, a Huawei não reinventou a roda e lançou uma atualização sólida que provavelmente nasceu por necessidade. A Huawei pede desculpas pelo design familiar, mas de maneira alguma desatualizado, com uma configuração de memória quase desconhecida por esse preço. Seu antecessor já ofereceu algumas vantagens óbvias: As câmeras decentes retornaram e, embora a maior resolução da câmera frontal não faça diferença durante o uso diário, ainda é boa de ter. Outras vantagens incluem a qualidade da construção, o sensor de digitais sensível na parte traseira e o bom painel IPS.

Em termos de desempenho, pouco mudou além do armazenamento rápido: Embora o sistema operacional funcione de maneira relativamente fluente no SoC, em geral, o smartphone é um pouco mais lento do que os outros em sua faixa de preço. Isso piora pelo fato de que o processador é afogado sob uso intenso. Da mesma forma, o lento Wi-Fi e o baixo número de frequências LTE suportadas são um aborrecimento.

Embora o P30 Lite New Edition da Huawei possa usar componentes mais modernos, o fabricante os compensa com muito armazenamento e um design elegante.

Além disso, a versão 4.2 do Bluetooth sugere que o design do telefone é um pouco antiquado, já que a Huawei provavelmente usaria componentes mais modernos para o atual smartphone de gama média, se não fosse a disputa comercial.

O resultado é um sólido smartphone de gama média, que deve agradar aos usuários que precisam de muito armazenamento. No entanto, as deficiências mencionadas acima devem ser lembradas.

Huawei P30 Lite New Edition - 01/27/2020 v7 ^(old)
Florian Schmitt

Acabamento

85%

Teclado

65 / 75 → 87%

Mouse

90%

Conectividade

50 / 70 → 72%

Peso

92%

Bateria

89%

Pantalha

86%

Desempenho do jogos

11 / 64 → 17%

Desempenho da aplicação

60 / 86 → 69%

Temperatura

86%

Ruído

100%

Audio

73 / 90 → 81%

Camera

63%

Médio

73%

79%

Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Marius Schell - Tech Writer and translator - 398 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2020

contact me via: LinkedIn

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Huawei P30 Lite New Edition – Memória de gama alta

Florian Schmitt, 2020-02- 5 (Update: 2020-02-19)

Comparison

Size Comparison

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

Huawei P30 Lite New Edition audio analysis

Samsung Galaxy A51 audio analysis

Pro

Contra

Veredicto – Bastante a situação

More articles related to this device

Price comparison