Breve Análise do Smartphone Huawei P20
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| LG V30 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S9 | |
| Huawei P20 Pro | |
| Huawei P20 | |
| Apple iPhone 8 | |
| Huawei P10 | |
| Google Pixel 2 | |
| Huawei P20 Lite | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Apple iPhone 8 | |
| LG V30 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S9 | |
| Huawei P20 | |
| Huawei P20 Pro | |
| Huawei P10 | |
| Google Pixel 2 | |
| Huawei P20 Lite | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 96 %
iluminação com acumulador: 753 cd/m²
Contraste: 2035:1 (Preto: 0.37 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.3 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 1.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.18
| Huawei P20 LTPS, 2240x1080, 5.8" | Apple iPhone 8 IPS True Tone, 1334x750, 4.7" | Google Pixel 2 AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5" | Huawei P10 LTPS, 1920x1080, 5.1" | Huawei P20 Lite IPS, 2280x1080, 5.8" | Huawei P20 Pro OLED, 2240x1080, 6.1" | LG V30 OLED, 2880x1440, 6" | Samsung Galaxy S9 Super AMOLED, 2960x1440, 5.8" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -11% | -30% | -104% | -122% | -6% | -133% | -23% | |
| Brightness middle | 753 | 604 -20% | 396 -47% | 547 -27% | 528 -30% | 569 -24% | 432 -43% | 529 -30% |
| Brightness | 748 | 580 -22% | 404 -46% | 556 -26% | 525 -30% | 578 -23% | 428 -43% | 527 -30% |
| Brightness Distribution | 96 | 91 -5% | 91 -5% | 86 -10% | 89 -7% | 95 -1% | 87 -9% | 96 0% |
| Black Level * | 0.37 | 0.44 -19% | 0.43 -16% | 0.51 -38% | ||||
| Contrast | 2035 | 1373 -33% | 1272 -37% | 1035 -49% | ||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.3 | 1.2 8% | 1.7 -31% | 4.8 -269% | 4.7 -262% | 1.3 -0% | 4.18 -222% | 1.4 -8% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 2.3 | 2.3 -0% | 4 -74% | 8.8 -283% | 8.9 -287% | 2.1 9% | 8.53 -271% | 4 -74% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.7 | 1.6 6% | 1.3 24% | 4.5 -165% | 6.4 -276% | 1.6 6% | 5.3 -212% | 1.6 6% |
| Gamma | 2.18 101% | 2.25 98% | 2.3 96% | 2.39 92% | 2.22 99% | 2.31 95% | 2.33 94% | 2.16 102% |
| CCT | 66.76 9736% | 6688 97% | 6483 100% | 7194 90% | 7987 81% | 6401 102% | 7487 87% | 6358 102% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 21.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 8.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 13.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 43 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 43.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 21.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 22 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 69 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Huawei P20 | |
| Apple iPhone 8 | |
| Google Pixel 2 | |
| Huawei P10 | |
| Huawei P20 Lite | |
| Huawei P20 Pro | |
| LG V30 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S9 | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (173653 - 181973, n=8) | |
| AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Huawei P20 | |
| Google Pixel 2 | |
| Huawei P10 | |
| Huawei P20 Lite | |
| Huawei P20 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy S9 | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (152773 - 212278, n=6) | |
| PCMark for Android | |
| Work performance score (sort by value) | |
| Huawei P20 | |
| Google Pixel 2 | |
| Huawei P10 | |
| Huawei P20 Lite | |
| Huawei P20 Pro | |
| LG V30 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S9 | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (8115 - 9326, n=8) | |
| Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value) | |
| Huawei P20 | |
| Google Pixel 2 | |
| Huawei P10 | |
| Huawei P20 Lite | |
| Huawei P20 Pro | |
| LG V30 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S9 | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (6293 - 7046, n=8) | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Apple iPhone 8 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S9 (Samsung Browser 7.0) | |
| Google Pixel 2 (Chrome 62) | |
| Huawei P20 Pro (Chrome 65) | |
| Huawei P10 (Chrome 56) | |
| Huawei P20 (Chrome 66.0.3359.126) | |
| LG V30 (Chrome 62) | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (33.1 - 58.6, n=8) | |
| Huawei P20 Lite (Chrome 63) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=204, last 2 years) | |
| Apple iPhone 8 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S9 (Samsung Browser 7.0) | |
| Huawei P20 Pro (Chrome 65) | |
| Huawei P20 (Chrome 66.0.3359.126) | |
| Google Pixel 2 (Chrome 62) | |
| LG V30 (Chrome 62) | |
| Huawei P10 (Chrome 56) | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (6692 - 11838, n=8) | |
| Huawei P20 Lite | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Huawei P20 Lite (Chrome 63) | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (3591 - 6221, n=8) | |
| Huawei P20 (Chrome 66.0.3359.126) | |
| Huawei P20 Pro (Chrome 65) | |
| LG V30 (Chrome 62) | |
| Google Pixel 2 (Chrome 62) | |
| Huawei P10 (Chrome 56) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S9 (Samsung Browser 7.0) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=161, last 2 years) | |
| Apple iPhone 8 | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall | |
| Apple iPhone 8 | |
| Google Pixel 2 (Chrome 62) | |
| Huawei P20 Pro (Chrome 65) | |
| Huawei P20 (Chrome 66.0.3359.126) | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (119 - 187, n=8) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S9 (Samsung Browser 7.0) | |
| LG V30 (Chrome 62) | |
| Huawei P10 (Chrome 56) | |
| Huawei P20 Lite (Chrome 63) | |
* ... smaller is better
| Huawei P20 | Google Pixel 2 | Huawei P10 | Huawei P20 Lite | Huawei P20 Pro | LG V30 | Samsung Galaxy S9 | Average 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -20% | -1% | -46% | 0% | -40% | -23% | 8% | 236% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 827 | 758 -8% | 738 -11% | 293.9 -64% | 832 1% | 669 -19% | 815 -1% | 760 ? -8% | 1847 ? 123% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 193.6 | 196.2 1% | 189.8 -2% | 198.3 2% | 196.7 2% | 193.2 0% | 206.9 7% | 297 ? 53% | 1436 ? 642% |
| Random Read 4KB | 147 | 173.1 18% | 168.4 15% | 48.19 -67% | 144.3 -2% | 78.2 -47% | 131 -11% | 152.9 ? 4% | 277 ? 88% |
| Random Write 4KB | 161.5 | 18.03 -89% | 152.3 -6% | 71.1 -56% | 160.5 -1% | 10.21 -94% | 23.07 -86% | 131.6 ? -19% | 308 ? 91% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 54.2 ? | 83.5 ? | 62.8 | 79.2 ? | 76 ? | ||||
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 32.19 ? | 69 ? | 47.2 | 67.2 ? | 59.6 ? |
| Dead Trigger 2 | |||
| Configurações | Valor | ||
| high | 59 fps | ||
| Asphalt 8: Airborne | |||
| Configurações | Valor | ||
| high | 30 fps | ||
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.7 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35.9 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.7 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Huawei P20 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 39% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 58% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Huawei P20 Lite audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 10.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 60% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 76% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 19% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Huawei P20 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 28% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 48% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado |   0.05 / 0.22 Watt |
| Ocioso |  0.67 / 2.05 / 2.11 Watt |
| Carga |
6.15 / 8.09 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Huawei P20 3400 mAh | Apple iPhone 8 1821 mAh | Google Pixel 2 2700 mAh | Huawei P10 3200 mAh | Huawei P20 Lite 3000 mAh | Huawei P20 Pro 4000 mAh | LG V30 3300 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S9 3000 mAh | Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 24% | 12% | -10% | 5% | 31% | 21% | 36% | -10% | -2% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 0.67 | 0.54 19% | 0.99 -48% | 0.83 -24% | 0.98 -46% | 0.84 -25% | 0.72 -7% | 0.65 3% | 0.978 ? -46% | 0.895 ? -34% |
| Idle Average * | 2.05 | 1.63 20% | 1.35 34% | 2.1 -2% | 2 2% | 1.54 25% | 1.37 33% | 0.81 60% | 2.12 ? -3% | 1.453 ? 29% |
| Idle Maximum * | 2.11 | 1.67 21% | 1.37 35% | 2.18 -3% | 2.11 -0% | 1.57 26% | 1.41 33% | 0.92 56% | 2.51 ? -19% | 1.613 ? 24% |
| Load Average * | 6.15 | 2.74 55% | 3.25 47% | 6.57 -7% | 3.9 37% | 2.47 60% | 3.46 44% | 4.76 23% | 5.01 ? 19% | 6.5 ? -6% |
| Load Maximum * | 8.09 | 7.78 4% | 8.56 -6% | 9.32 -15% | 5.62 31% | 2.49 69% | 7.83 3% | 5.16 36% | 8.1 ? -0% | 9.86 ? -22% |
* ... smaller is better
| Huawei P20 3400 mAh | Apple iPhone 8 1821 mAh | Google Pixel 2 2700 mAh | Huawei P10 3200 mAh | Huawei P20 Lite 3000 mAh | Huawei P20 Pro 4000 mAh | LG V30 3300 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S9 3000 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -22% | -32% | -17% | -37% | -1% | -3% | -37% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1888 | 1629 -14% | 1457 -23% | 1540 -18% | 750 -60% | 1727 -9% | 1914 1% | 1182 -37% |
| H.264 | 810 | 698 -14% | 564 -30% | 582 -28% | 470 -42% | 784 -3% | 822 1% | 609 -25% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 818 | 585 -28% | 575 -30% | 966 18% | 582 -29% | 744 -9% | 774 -5% | 474 -42% |
| Load | 295 | 202 -32% | 161 -45% | 176 -40% | 247 -16% | 345 17% | 267 -9% | 164 -44% |
Pro
Contra
O Huawei P20 é um excelente smartphone de gama alta e marca muitas caixas certas. Além do excelente desempenho do sistema, o smartphone de 5,8 polegadas convence com boa qualidade de construção, o mais recente sistema operacional Android e uma tela brilhante. Esta última apresenta cores precisas e é especial graças ao seu formato incomum de 18,7: 9 (2240 x 1080 pixels). LTE Cat. 18, a porta USB-C com USB 31. Gen. 1 funcionalidade, longos tempos de duração da bateria, a PSU de carga rápida fornecida e, no nosso caso, um módulo de duplo SIM com dupla VoLTE/VoWiFi, são outras vantagens.
O Huawei P20 tem uma das melhores câmeras de smartphone que você pode obter agora. O Huawei P20 Pro é ainda (ligeiramente) melhor, mas é 250 euros mais caro.
Queremos mencionar uma vantagem específica: Graças à sua câmera dupla Leica, o Huawei P20 tira fotos excelentes sem muito esforço do usuário - basta apontar e disparar, a IA da câmera cuida do resto. O “pequeno” Huawei é definitivamente uma recomendação para os entusiastas da câmera, embora o Huawei P20 Pro ofereça ainda mais recursos com sua câmera tripla Leica. No entanto, o modelo top é cerca de 250 Euros mais caro que o P20 e não é mais rápido, já que ambos os smartphones são equipados com o mesmo SoC Kirin SoC.
Ainda existem algumas falhas. Perdemos uma certificação IP para o Huawei P20, que está disponível no Huawei P20 Pro (IP67) à prova de água e poeira. Nem todo usuário vai gostar da decisão de remover o slot microSD e o conector de 3,5 mm para fones de ouvido.
Huawei P20
- 05/04/2018 v6 (old)
Manuel Masiero
Price comparison
