Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve Análise do Smartphone Huawei P20 Pro
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 95 %
iluminação com acumulador: 569 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.3 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 1.6 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.31
| Huawei P20 Pro OLED, 2240x1080, 6.1" | Huawei P10 Plus LTPS, 2560x1440, 5.5" | Apple iPhone X Super AMOLED, 2436x1125, 5.8" | Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus Super AMOLED, 2960x1440, 6.2" | Google Pixel 2 XL P-OLED, 2880x1440, 6" | LG V30 OLED, 2880x1440, 6" | OnePlus 5T AMOLED, 2160x1080, 6" | HTC U11 Plus Super LCD 6, 2880x1440, 6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -38% | -4% | -38% | -64% | -136% | -39% | -55% | |
| Brightness middle | 569 | 568 0% | 600 5% | 565 -1% | 415 -27% | 432 -24% | 425 -25% | 361 -37% |
| Brightness | 578 | 562 -3% | 606 5% | 571 -1% | 420 -27% | 428 -26% | 423 -27% | 356 -38% |
| Brightness Distribution | 95 | 92 -3% | 94 -1% | 96 1% | 87 -8% | 87 -8% | 92 -3% | 90 -5% |
| Black Level * | 0.43 | 0.21 | ||||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.3 | 2.4 -85% | 1.2 8% | 2.3 -77% | 2.7 -108% | 4.18 -222% | 2.1 -62% | 2.5 -92% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 2.1 | 3.8 -81% | 3 -43% | 4.8 -129% | 4.3 -105% | 8.53 -306% | 3.4 -62% | 5.3 -152% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.6 | 2.5 -56% | 1.6 -0% | 1.9 -19% | 3.3 -106% | 5.3 -231% | 2.5 -56% | 1.7 -6% |
| Gamma | 2.31 95% | 2.37 93% | 2.23 99% | 2.16 102% | 2.36 93% | 2.33 94% | 2.32 95% | 2.21 100% |
| CCT | 6401 102% | 6779 96% | 6707 97% | 6332 103% | 6787 96% | 7487 87% | 6455 101% | 6580 99% |
| Contrast | 1321 | 1719 |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 238.1 Hz |  | |
The display backlight flickers at 238.1 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 238.1 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8747 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 12 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 11 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
| Lightmark - 1920x1080 1080p (sort by value) | |
| Huawei P20 Pro | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus | |
| HTC U11 Plus | |
| Google Pixel 2 XL | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (21.5 - 25.9, n=2) | |
| Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value) | |
| Huawei P20 Pro | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus | |
| Apple iPhone X | |
| HTC U11 Plus | |
| Google Pixel 2 XL | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (788 - 887, n=2) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (205 - 7616, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Apple iPhone X (IOS 11.1.1) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus (Samsung Browser 7.0) | |
| OnePlus 5T (Chrome 63) | |
| HTC U11 Plus (Chrome 63) | |
| Google Pixel 2 XL (Chrome 62) | |
| Huawei P10 Plus | |
| Huawei P20 Pro (Chrome 65) | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro (Chrome 61) | |
| LG V30 (Chrome 62) | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (33.1 - 58.6, n=8) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=204, last 2 years) | |
| Apple iPhone X (IOS 11.1.2) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus (Samsung Browser 7.0) | |
| OnePlus 5T (Chrome 63) | |
| Huawei P20 Pro (Chrome 65) | |
| HTC U11 Plus (Chrome 63) | |
| Google Pixel 2 XL (Chrome 62) | |
| LG V30 (Chrome 62) | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro (Chrome 61) | |
| Huawei P10 Plus (Chrome 58.0.3029.83) | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (6692 - 11838, n=8) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (3591 - 6221, n=8) | |
| Huawei P20 Pro (Chrome 65) | |
| LG V30 (Chrome 62) | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro (Chrome 61) | |
| Google Pixel 2 XL (Chrome 62) | |
| HTC U11 Plus (Chrome 63) | |
| Huawei P10 Plus (Chrome 58.0.3029.83) | |
| OnePlus 5T (Chrome 63) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus (Samsung Browser 7.0) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=161, last 2 years) | |
| Apple iPhone X (IOS 11.1.2) | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall | |
| Apple iPhone X (Safari Mobile 11.0) | |
| Google Pixel 2 XL (Chrome 62) | |
| Huawei P20 Pro (Chrome 65) | |
| OnePlus 5T (Chrome 63) | |
| HTC U11 Plus (Chrome 63) | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (119 - 187, n=8) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus (Samsung Browser 7.0) | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro (Chrome 61) | |
| Huawei P10 Plus | |
| LG V30 (Chrome 62) | |
* ... smaller is better
| Huawei P20 Pro | Huawei P10 Plus | Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus | OnePlus 5T | Google Pixel 2 XL | LG V30 | Average 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -2% | -24% | -26% | -20% | -41% | 8% | 232% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 832 | 733 -12% | 819 -2% | 699 -16% | 760 -9% | 669 -20% | 760 ? -9% | 1834 ? 120% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 196.7 | 182.6 -7% | 204.9 4% | 203.4 3% | 195.3 -1% | 193.2 -2% | 297 ? 51% | 1420 ? 622% |
| Random Read 4KB | 144.3 | 173.1 20% | 129.7 -10% | 138.1 -4% | 170.6 18% | 78.2 -46% | 152.9 ? 6% | 276 ? 91% |
| Random Write 4KB | 160.5 | 149.8 -7% | 22.74 -86% | 20 -88% | 17.84 -89% | 10.21 -94% | 131.6 ? -18% | 309 ? 93% |
| Real Racing 3 | |||
| Configurações | Valor | ||
| high | 51 fps | ||
| World of Tanks Blitz | |||
| Configurações | Valor | ||
| high, 0xAA, 0xAF | 60 fps | ||
| Shadow Fight 3 | |||
| Configurações | Valor | ||
| minimal | 60 fps | ||
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.6 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 34.3 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.6 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Huawei P20 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 28% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 48% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 29% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple iPhone X audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 20% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 71% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 41% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado |   0.01 / 0.28 Watt |
| Ocioso |  0.84 / 1.54 / 1.57 Watt |
| Carga |
2.47 / 2.49 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Huawei P20 Pro 4000 mAh | Huawei P10 Plus 3750 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus 3500 mAh | Apple iPhone X 2716 mAh | HTC U11 Plus 3930 mAh | Google Pixel 2 XL 3520 mAh | LG V30 3300 mAh | Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -132% | -21% | -66% | -55% | -74% | -44% | -88% | -91% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 0.84 | 1.03 -23% | 0.68 19% | 1.03 -23% | 0.51 39% | 1.28 -52% | 0.72 14% | 0.978 ? -16% | 0.895 ? -7% |
| Idle Average * | 1.54 | 2.61 -69% | 0.95 38% | 2.4 -56% | 1.62 -5% | 1.87 -21% | 1.37 11% | 2.12 ? -38% | 1.454 ? 6% |
| Idle Maximum * | 1.57 | 2.83 -80% | 1.09 31% | 2.6 -66% | 1.87 -19% | 1.89 -20% | 1.41 10% | 2.51 ? -60% | 1.616 ? -3% |
| Load Average * | 2.47 | 7.03 -185% | 4.58 -85% | 2.96 -20% | 3.92 -59% | 3.73 -51% | 3.46 -40% | 5.01 ? -103% | 6.44 ? -161% |
| Load Maximum * | 2.49 | 10.08 -305% | 5.16 -107% | 6.6 -165% | 8.27 -232% | 8.08 -224% | 7.83 -214% | 8.1 ? -225% | 9.77 ? -292% |
* ... smaller is better
| Huawei P20 Pro 4000 mAh | Huawei P10 Plus 3750 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus 3500 mAh | HTC U11 Plus 3930 mAh | Apple iPhone X 2716 mAh | Google Pixel 2 XL 3520 mAh | LG V30 3300 mAh | OnePlus 5T 3300 mAh | Huawei Mate 10 Pro 4000 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -14% | -24% | -16% | -29% | -12% | -1% | -6% | 11% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1727 | 1655 -4% | 1343 -22% | 1625 -6% | 1292 -25% | 1706 -1% | 1914 11% | 1754 2% | 1744 1% |
| H.264 | 784 | 756 -4% | 674 -14% | 611 -22% | 634 -19% | 672 -14% | 822 5% | 799 2% | 929 18% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 744 | 760 2% | 521 -30% | 607 -18% | 564 -24% | 581 -22% | 774 4% | 718 -3% | 818 10% |
| Load | 345 | 174 -50% | 237 -31% | 291 -16% | 180 -48% | 302 -12% | 267 -23% | 257 -26% | 398 15% |
Pro
Contra
O Huawei P20 Pro é um excelente smartphone. O P20 Pro baseia-se em grande parte no Mate 10 Pro, o último dos quais faz algumas coisas melhor do que o P20 Pro. O Mate 10 Pro tem um design mais esteticamente agradável, maior duração da bateria, melhor qualidade das chamadas, tudo por €250 (~$305) a menos no momento da redação deste artigo. A grande vantagem para o P20 Pro é a sua câmera Leica Tripla, que derrota o Mate 10 Pro e a concorrência.
A Huawei definiu novos padrões para fotografia móvel com a sua câmera Leica tripla. O P20 Pro é o dispositivo contra o qual todas as outras câmeras de smartphones serão comparadas.
O Huawei P20 Pro possui hardware premium além de sua excelente câmera. O Kirin 970 é um SoC rápido, há muito armazenamento interno, uma porta USB rápida, Wi-Fi MIMO veloz, certificação IP67, desempenho LTE potente, suporte para aptX HD. Tudo isso vem com uma grande bateria de 4.000 mAh e uma tela impressionante. No entanto, há algumas desvantagens que valem a pena mencionar. O P20 Pro poderia ter um desempenho melhor do que o Wi-Fi de 2,4 GHz e, do mesmo modo, gostaríamos de um conector de fone de ouvido de 3,5 mm e um armazenamento expansível. Também esperávamos uma tela de 1.440p para um dispositivo lançado a esse preço em 2018.
Apesar disso, a qualidade da Câmera Tripla Leica brilha. O P20 Pro não tira apenas ótimas fotos, mas o software é flexível o suficiente para tirar fotos impressionantes, independentemente do que você faça, mesmo em condições de pouca luz. Gravação de vídeo poderia ser melhor, embora isso seja um reclamo de alto nível. Por exemplo, o P20 Pro não pode gravar a 60 FPS em Ultra HD, nem 60 FPS em Full HD é impressionante, apesar de melhorar o desempenho do seu antecessor. No geral, o P20 Pro atualmente tem uma melhor câmera que qualquer smartphone.
Huawei P20 Pro
- 04/19/2018 v6 (old)
Daniel Schmidt
Price comparison
