Notebookcheck Logo

Breve Análise do Smartphone Huawei P20 Lite

P20 de gama média O Huawei P20 Lite é ofuscado por seus irmãos maiores e sua concorrência também está bem posicionada nessa relação preço-desempenho. Independentemente disso, nossa análise mostra que os compradores deste smartphone de gama média recebem um bom dispositivo.
Huawei P20 Lite (P20 Serie)
Processador
HiSilicon Kirin 659 8 x 2.4 GHz, Cortex-A53
Placa gráfica
ARM Mali-T830 MP2
Memória
4 GB 
Pantalha
5.84 polegadas 18.7:9, 2280 x 1080 pixel 432 PPI, capacitiva, IPS, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB 
, 51 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Conector de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: microSD up to 256 GB (SIM slot 2), 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Proximity sensor, Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Compass, USB Type-C
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM, HSPA, 3G WCDMA: B1/B2/B5/B8, 4G FDD: B1/B3/B7/B8/B20, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 7.4 x 148.6 x 71.2
Bateria
3000 mAh Lítio-Polímero, Tempo de conversação 2G (de acordo com o fabricante): 30 h, Tempo de conversação 3G (de acordo com o fabricante): 17 h, Standby 2G (de acordo com o fabricante): 471 h, Standby 3G (de acordo com o fabricante): 454 h
Sistema Operativo
Android 8.0 Oreo
Camera
Primary Camera: 16 MPix Dual-camera 16 MP + 2 MP, f/2.2
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: mono, Teclado: virtual, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Carregador, cabo USB, Ferramenta SIM, Headset, Guia de início rápido, EMUI 8.0, 24 Meses Garantia, SAR value(head): 0,74 W/kg, SAR value(body): 1,22 W/kg, fanless
peso
145 g, Suprimento de energia: 20 g
Preço
370 EUR
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Huawei P20 Lite
Huawei P20 Lite
Huawei P20 Lite
Huawei P20 Lite
Huawei P20 Lite
Huawei P20 Lite
Huawei P20 Lite
Huawei P20 Lite
Huawei P20 Lite

Size Comparison

156.5 mm 75.3 mm 7.6 mm 165 g149.1 mm 72.9 mm 8.1 mm 142 g148.6 mm 71.2 mm 7.4 mm 145 g146.1 mm 71.4 mm 7.9 mm 159 g146.5 mm 72 mm 7.2 mm 146 g142 mm 70 mm 9.7 mm 171 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Sony Xperia XA2
Adreno 508, SD 630, 32 GB eMMC Flash
289 MBit/s +24%
HTC U11 Life
Adreno 508, SD 630, 32 GB eMMC Flash
274 MBit/s +18%
Huawei P20 Lite
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 659, 64 GB eMMC Flash
233 MBit/s
Huawei P10 Lite
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 658, 32 GB eMMC Flash
232 MBit/s 0%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
Mali-T830 MP3, Exynos 7880, 32 GB eMMC Flash
167 MBit/s -28%
iperf3 receive AX12
Sony Xperia XA2
Adreno 508, SD 630, 32 GB eMMC Flash
309 MBit/s +56%
Huawei P10 Lite
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 658, 32 GB eMMC Flash
229 MBit/s +16%
HTC U11 Life
Adreno 508, SD 630, 32 GB eMMC Flash
224 MBit/s +13%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
Mali-T830 MP3, Exynos 7880, 32 GB eMMC Flash
214 MBit/s +8%
Huawei P20 Lite
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 659, 64 GB eMMC Flash
198 MBit/s
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Huawei P20 Lite
Huawei P20 Lite
Huawei P20 Lite
Huawei P20 Lite
Huawei P20 Lite
Huawei P20 Lite

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
orginal image
click to load images
554
cd/m²
531
cd/m²
512
cd/m²
552
cd/m²
528
cd/m²
495
cd/m²
546
cd/m²
517
cd/m²
493
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 554 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 525.3 cd/m² Minimum: 2.65 cd/m²
iluminação: 89 %
iluminação com acumulador: 528 cd/m²
Contraste: 1035:1 (Preto: 0.51 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.7 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 6.4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
97.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.22
Huawei P20 Lite
IPS, 2280x1080, 5.8"
HTC U11 Life
SLCD, 1920x1080, 5.2"
Huawei P10 Lite
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2"
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
Super AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.2"
Sony Xperia XA2
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2"
Screen
8%
8%
37%
-3%
Brightness middle
528
545
3%
507
-4%
539
2%
513
-3%
Brightness
525
526
0%
509
-3%
542
3%
506
-4%
Brightness Distribution
89
87
-2%
95
7%
93
4%
93
4%
Black Level *
0.51
0.42
18%
0.36
29%
0.42
18%
Contrast
1035
1298
25%
1408
36%
1221
18%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
4.7
4.9
-4%
5.1
-9%
1.6
66%
5
-6%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
8.9
8.5
4%
9
-1%
2.6
71%
11.4
-28%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
6.4
5.4
16%
6.1
5%
1.5
77%
7.8
-22%
Gamma
2.22 99%
2.31 95%
2.28 96%
2.28 96%
2.2 100%
CCT
7987 81%
7610 85%
8143 80%
6422 101%
7964 82%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 9.2 ms rise
↘ 16.4 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 0 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 22 ms rise
↘ 26.8 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 0 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei P20 Lite
68232 Points
HTC U11 Life
73617 Points +8%
Huawei P10 Lite
60438 Points -11%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
60603 Points -11%
Sony Xperia XA2
71552 Points +5%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (62810 - 68232, n=8)
65730 Points -4%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei P20 Lite
88550 Points
Sony Xperia XA2
89228 Points +1%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (81992 - 89639, n=6)
87019 Points -2%
PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Huawei P20 Lite
5704 Points
HTC U11 Life
5818 Points +2%
Huawei P10 Lite
5794 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
5035 Points -12%
Sony Xperia XA2
5844 Points +2%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (5704 - 6252, n=7)
5956 Points +4%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Huawei P20 Lite
4793 Points
HTC U11 Life
4835 Points +1%
Huawei P10 Lite
4464 Points -7%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
4060 Points -15%
Sony Xperia XA2
5006 Points +4%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (4615 - 4911, n=8)
4805 Points 0%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Huawei P20 Lite
1445 Points
HTC U11 Life
1368 Points -5%
Huawei P10 Lite
1229 Points -15%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
1408 Points -3%
Sony Xperia XA2
1563 Points +8%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (1334 - 1480, n=8)
1418 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (1196 - 11976, n=152, last 2 years)
6326 Points +338%
System (sort by value)
Huawei P20 Lite
3109 Points
HTC U11 Life
3215 Points +3%
Huawei P10 Lite
2642 Points -15%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
2593 Points -17%
Sony Xperia XA2
3256 Points +5%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (2899 - 3223, n=8)
3056 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (2368 - 16475, n=152, last 2 years)
10181 Points +227%
Memory (sort by value)
Huawei P20 Lite
1930 Points
HTC U11 Life
838 Points -57%
Huawei P10 Lite
1592 Points -18%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
1508 Points -22%
Sony Xperia XA2
1328 Points -31%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (1757 - 2011, n=8)
1910 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (962 - 12716, n=152, last 2 years)
6785 Points +252%
Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P20 Lite
848 Points
HTC U11 Life
1515 Points +79%
Huawei P10 Lite
829 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
1528 Points +80%
Sony Xperia XA2
1500 Points +77%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (836 - 859, n=8)
848 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (1017 - 58651, n=152, last 2 years)
17165 Points +1924%
Web (sort by value)
Huawei P20 Lite
858 Points
HTC U11 Life
858 Points 0%
Huawei P10 Lite
654 Points -24%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
659 Points -23%
Sony Xperia XA2
921 Points +7%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (724 - 919, n=8)
819 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone (841 - 2145, n=152, last 2 years)
1566 Points +83%
Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei P20 Lite
935 Points
HTC U11 Life
877 Points -6%
Huawei P10 Lite
913 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
773 Points -17%
Sony Xperia XA2
865 Points -7%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (869 - 946, n=8)
919 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (844 - 9574, n=82, last 2 years)
5486 Points +487%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei P20 Lite
3749 Points
HTC U11 Life
4193 Points +12%
Huawei P10 Lite
3460 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
4104 Points +9%
Sony Xperia XA2
4170 Points +11%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (3316 - 3805, n=8)
3608 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone (2630 - 30323, n=82, last 2 years)
15064 Points +302%
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Huawei P20 Lite
3116 Points
HTC U11 Life
3956 Points +27%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
3002 Points -4%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (2772 - 3148, n=8)
3045 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (5192 - 18534, n=58, last 2 years)
11998 Points +285%
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Huawei P20 Lite
12048 Points
HTC U11 Life
16859 Points +40%
Huawei P10 Lite
11135 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
13256 Points +10%
Sony Xperia XA2
16974 Points +41%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (10294 - 12278, n=8)
11543 Points -4%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Huawei P20 Lite
11713 Points
HTC U11 Life
18469 Points +58%
Huawei P10 Lite
10603 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
13314 Points +14%
Sony Xperia XA2
18534 Points +58%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (9936 - 11713, n=8)
11066 Points -6%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P20 Lite
13387 Points
HTC U11 Life
12919 Points -3%
Huawei P10 Lite
13510 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
13057 Points -2%
Sony Xperia XA2
13112 Points -2%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (11780 - 14930, n=8)
13618 Points +2%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Huawei P20 Lite
138 Points
HTC U11 Life
1336 Points +868%
Huawei P10 Lite
610 Points +342%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
1155 Points +737%
Sony Xperia XA2
1334 Points +867%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (125 - 627, n=8)
347 Points +151%
Average of class Smartphone (812 - 7285, n=26, last 2 years)
4204 Points +2946%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P20 Lite
109 Points
HTC U11 Life
1257 Points +1053%
Huawei P10 Lite
520 Points +377%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
1053 Points +866%
Sony Xperia XA2
1251 Points +1048%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (99 - 532, n=8)
288 Points +164%
Average of class Smartphone (756 - 9451, n=26, last 2 years)
4740 Points +4249%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P20 Lite
1760 Points
HTC U11 Life
1711 Points -3%
Huawei P10 Lite
1537 Points -13%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
1752 Points 0%
Sony Xperia XA2
1737 Points -1%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (1586 - 1788, n=8)
1707 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (1093 - 4349, n=26, last 2 years)
3303 Points +88%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Huawei P20 Lite
257 Points
HTC U11 Life
839 Points +226%
Huawei P10 Lite
396 Points +54%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
816 Points +218%
Sony Xperia XA2
811 Points +216%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (176 - 409, n=8)
308 Points +20%
Average of class Smartphone (286 - 17553, n=73, last 2 years)
3084 Points +1100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P20 Lite
207 Points
HTC U11 Life
729 Points +252%
Huawei P10 Lite
326 Points +57%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
710 Points +243%
Sony Xperia XA2
709 Points +243%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (140 - 338, n=8)
251 Points +21%
Average of class Smartphone (240 - 29890, n=73, last 2 years)
3263 Points +1476%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P20 Lite
1757 Points
HTC U11 Life
1779 Points +1%
Huawei P10 Lite
1592 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
1713 Points -3%
Sony Xperia XA2
1631 Points -7%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (1527 - 1827, n=8)
1696 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (858 - 7180, n=73, last 2 years)
3286 Points +87%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P20 Lite
19 fps
HTC U11 Life
29 fps +53%
Huawei P10 Lite
18 fps -5%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
33 fps +74%
Sony Xperia XA2
31 fps +63%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (16 - 20, n=8)
18.4 fps -3%
Average of class Smartphone (23 - 165, n=170, last 2 years)
86.1 fps +353%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P20 Lite
19 fps
HTC U11 Life
30 fps +58%
Huawei P10 Lite
17 fps -11%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
34 fps +79%
Sony Xperia XA2
30 fps +58%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (16 - 20, n=8)
18.8 fps -1%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=170, last 2 years)
283 fps +1389%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Huawei P20 Lite
8.9 fps
HTC U11 Life
14 fps +57%
Huawei P10 Lite
7.7 fps -13%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
15 fps +69%
Sony Xperia XA2
15 fps +69%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (6.7 - 8.9, n=8)
8.28 fps -7%
Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 165, n=170, last 2 years)
75.5 fps +748%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P20 Lite
8.7 fps
HTC U11 Life
14 fps +61%
Huawei P10 Lite
7.2 fps -17%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
15 fps +72%
Sony Xperia XA2
14 fps +61%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (7.3 - 8.8, n=8)
8.31 fps -4%
Average of class Smartphone (12 - 482, n=170, last 2 years)
167.1 fps +1821%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P20 Lite
5.6 fps
HTC U11 Life
9.8 fps +75%
Huawei P10 Lite
4.8 fps -14%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
9 fps +61%
Sony Xperia XA2
10 fps +79%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (4.5 - 5.6, n=8)
5.04 fps -10%
Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 158, n=170, last 2 years)
65.6 fps +1071%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P20 Lite
5.2 fps
HTC U11 Life
9.7 fps +87%
Huawei P10 Lite
4.2 fps -19%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
9.1 fps +75%
Sony Xperia XA2
9.7 fps +87%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (3.2 - 5.4, n=8)
4.81 fps -7%
Average of class Smartphone (8.3 - 341, n=170, last 2 years)
118.5 fps +2179%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P20 Lite
3.3 fps
HTC U11 Life
5.4 fps +64%
Huawei P10 Lite
3 fps -9%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
5.2 fps +58%
Sony Xperia XA2
6 fps +82%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (2.7 - 3.3, n=8)
2.96 fps -10%
Average of class Smartphone (5 - 119, n=171, last 2 years)
47.9 fps +1352%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P20 Lite
3.1 fps
HTC U11 Life
5.5 fps +77%
Huawei P10 Lite
2.8 fps -10%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
5.2 fps +68%
Sony Xperia XA2
5.5 fps +77%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (2.9 - 3.2, n=8)
3.06 fps -1%
Average of class Smartphone (3.1 - 216, n=170, last 2 years)
71.2 fps +2197%
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
258 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 ()
147 Points
Average of class Smartphone (205 - 7616, n=56, last 2 years)
2316 Points

Legend

 
Huawei P20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 659, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Honor 7X HiSilicon Kirin 659, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
HTC U11 Life Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Qualcomm Adreno 508, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei P10 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 658, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 Samsung Exynos 7880, ARM Mali-T830 MP3, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Sony Xperia XA2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Qualcomm Adreno 508, 32 GB eMMC Flash
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 (Samsung Browser (Chrome 44))
32.22 Points +38%
Huawei P10 Lite (Chrome 55.0.2883.91)
30.05 Points +28%
HTC U11 Life (Chrome 63)
28.99 Points +24%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (23.4 - 31.3, n=8)
28.1 Points +20%
Sony Xperia XA2 (Chrome 65.0.3325.109)
27.37 Points +17%
Huawei P20 Lite (Chrome 63)
23.42 Points
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=203, last 2 years)
37161 Points +787%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 (Samsung Browser (Chrome 44))
5256 Points +25%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (4191 - 5471, n=8)
4947 Points +18%
HTC U11 Life (Chrome 63)
4893 Points +17%
Sony Xperia XA2 (Chrome 65.0.3325.109)
4771 Points +14%
Huawei P10 Lite (Chrome 55.0.2883.91)
4589 Points +9%
Huawei P20 Lite
4191 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Huawei P20 Lite (Chrome 63)
10788 ms *
Sony Xperia XA2 (Chrome 65.0.3325.109)
10236 ms * +5%
HTC U11 Life (Chrome 63)
9493 ms * +12%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (8684 - 10788, n=8)
9440 ms * +12%
Huawei P10 Lite (Chrome 55.0.2883.91)
8591 ms * +20%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 (Samsung Browser (Chrome 44))
6442 ms * +40%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=160, last 2 years)
1568 ms * +85%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall
Sony Xperia XA2 (Chrome 65.0.3325.109)
106 Points +23%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (86 - 120, n=8)
103.6 Points +20%
HTC U11 Life (Chrome 63)
100 Points +16%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 (Samsung Browser (Chrome 44))
89 Points +3%
Huawei P20 Lite (Chrome 63)
86 Points
Huawei P10 Lite (Chrome 55.0.2883.91)
62 Points -28%

* ... smaller is better

Huawei P20 LiteHTC U11 LifeHuawei P10 LiteSamsung Galaxy A5 2017Sony Xperia XA2Average 64 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-18%
-26%
-44%
-23%
-12%
490%
Sequential Read 256KB
293.9
268
-9%
264.3
-10%
182
-38%
271.5
-8%
Sequential Write 256KB
198.3
120
-39%
129.2
-35%
77.1
-61%
127.4
-36%
176.2 ?(40 - 274, n=203)
-11%
Random Read 4KB
48.19
39.3
-18%
72.5
50%
22.41
-53%
43.07
-11%
Random Write 4KB
71.1
50.2
-29%
19.36
-73%
12.13
-83%
13.82
-81%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
83.5 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
82.8 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-1%
53.4 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-36%
73.7 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-12%
86 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
3%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
69 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
59.8 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-13%
32.7 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-53%
56 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-19%
64.8 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-6%
Dead Trigger 2
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high30 fps
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high29 fps
 very low29 fps
Carga Máxima
 35.8 °C36.2 °C32 °C 
 36.1 °C36 °C34.6 °C 
 34.8 °C35.7 °C34.1 °C 
Máximo: 36.2 °C
Médio: 35 °C
31.7 °C31.9 °C35.6 °C
32.1 °C32.4 °C36.8 °C
32 °C33.4 °C36.3 °C
Máximo: 36.8 °C
Médio: 33.6 °C
alimentação elétrica  28.6 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.2 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36.8 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.2422532.941.83137.230.44031.736.65039.641.86328.331.48027.331.510026.934.212526.731.41602429.620020.938.325020.947.631519.546.640018.55450017.562.863017.559.480015.758.9100015.863125016.666.4160015.869.3200015.471.3250015.573.431501674.8400015.875.950001676.5630016.371.2800016.371.61000016.271.31250016.467.51600016.459.6SPL28.684.1N1.153.6median 16.4median 63Delta2.211.328.627.224.929.624.624.826.428.830.828.623.62020.222.219.920.717.625.119.142.319.142.917.449.716.95316.857.215.159.216.560.615.664.41567.615.568.715.373.215.775.715.575.315.575.515.47715.875.61674.415.873.516.17116.16717.357.427.985.6159.9median 16median 670.711.535.245.132.941.137.238.931.736.639.642.728.33427.33026.930.226.736.32441.720.946.520.950.619.551.718.557.517.556.917.556.615.760.915.870.316.675.715.878.515.479.615.581.21679.415.8781674.416.377.316.381.316.283.816.468.316.455.328.690.21.176median 16.4median 70.32.212.5hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHuawei P20 LiteSony Xperia XA2HTC U11 Life
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Huawei P20 Lite audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 10.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 60% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 76% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 19% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Sony Xperia XA2 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.5% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 49% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 67% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

HTC U11 Life audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.5% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 9% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 9% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 59% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 75% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.02 / 0.26 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.98 / 2 / 2.11 Watt
Carga midlight 3.9 / 5.62 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Huawei P20 Lite
3000 mAh
HTC U11 Life
2600 mAh
Huawei P10 Lite
3000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
3000 mAh
Sony Xperia XA2
3300 mAh
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
11%
18%
34%
27%
-34%
-16%
Idle Minimum *
0.98
0.63
36%
0.38
61%
0.64
35%
0.39
60%
1.265 ?(0.62 - 2.8, n=8)
-29%
Idle Average *
2
2.1
-5%
1.87
6%
1.36
32%
1.61
19%
2.96 ?(1.59 - 8.46, n=8)
-48%
Idle Maximum *
2.11
2.15
-2%
1.92
9%
1.4
34%
1.62
23%
Load Average *
3.9
3.34
14%
3.82
2%
2.53
35%
3.12
20%
5.05 ?(3.23 - 11.1, n=8)
-29%
Load Maximum *
5.62
4.83
14%
4.9
13%
3.63
35%
4.92
12%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
12h 30min
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 63)
9h 42min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
7h 50min
Carga (máximo brilho)
4h 07min
Huawei P20 Lite
3000 mAh
HTC U11 Life
2600 mAh
Huawei P10 Lite
3000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
3000 mAh
Sony Xperia XA2
3300 mAh
Battery Runtime
65%
36%
116%
93%
Reader / Idle
750
1820
143%
1410
88%
2418
222%
2503
234%
H.264
470
798
70%
586
25%
984
109%
766
63%
WiFi v1.3
582
725
25%
665
14%
843
45%
886
52%
Load
247
303
23%
286
16%
467
89%
298
21%

Pro

+ Câmera dupla de 16+2 MP
+ Câmera frontal de 16 MP
+ Veloz armazenamento interno
+ Design atraente
+ Tela quase sem marcos

Contra

- Duração da bateria desnecessariamente curta
- Alto-falantes balanceados
- Resultados de benchmark moderados
Review: Huawei P20 Lite. Test device provided by:
Review: Huawei P20 Lite. Test device provided by:

O Huawei P20 Lite apresenta-se como um sólido smartphone de gama média na nossa análise, mas não consegue diferenciar-se da concorrência em termos de desempenho. A câmera dupla de 16 MP tira boas fotos e o sistema como um todo funciona sem problemas, embora isso já seja algo ao qual já estamos acostumados com smartphones de outros fabricantes. O design pode ser o único fator decisivo para uma compra e, embora sua tela quase sem bordas e o entalhe não sejam exclusivos, eles não são encontrados com frequência nessa faixa de preços.

O Huawei P20 Lite é um smartphone para aqueles sem a necessidade de aplicativos 3D complexos que estão procurando um dispositivo do dia-a-dia que tenha bom desempenho e um design atraente.

Os compradores em potencial podem esperar por um smartphone com Android atualizado e desempenho fluente do sistema. O rápido armazenamento interno e o moderno SoC oferecem uma experiência fluente. O desempenho gráfico pode ser insuficiente para jogadores de smartphones ou usuários de aplicativos 3D complexos. No entanto, esta é uma fraqueza que o P20 Lite compartilha com seu predecessor. Considerando a capacidade de 3000 mAh, a duração da bateria é um pouco curta, mas ainda é suficiente para quase 10 horas de uso intensivo do dispositivo.

Huawei P20 Lite - 05/08/2018 v6 (old)
Mike Wobker

Acabamento
88%
Teclado
71 / 75 → 94%
Mouse
91%
Conectividade
45 / 60 → 75%
Peso
93%
Bateria
91%
Pantalha
87%
Desempenho do jogos
18 / 63 → 29%
Desempenho da aplicação
53 / 70 → 76%
Temperatura
92%
Ruído
100%
Audio
69 / 91 → 76%
Camera
65%
Médio
74%
84%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Huawei P20 Lite
Mike Wobker, 2018-05-23 (Update: 2018-06- 1)