Breve Análise do Smartphone Huawei P10

Name: Huawei P10
Brand: Huawei

O próximo por favor! Dez é mais que nove - e a Huawei desenvolveu o seu P10 de acordo com esta estratégia. Um SoC mais veloz, mais armazenamento, maior bateria, e uma melhor câmera. O design é arredondado e o leitor de digitais foi movido para a frente. Não é revolucionário, mas o fabricante chinês não apresenta fraquezas com o Huawei P10.

Daniel Schmidt, ✓ Tanja Hinum (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 03/27/2017 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android ARM Smartphone Touchscreen

Test device courtesy of Huawei Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Huawei P10 (P10 Serie)

Processador

HiSilicon Kirin 960 8 x 2.4 GHz, Cortex-A73/-A53

Placa gráfica

ARM Mali-G71 MP8

Memória

4 GB

, LPDDR4

Pantalha

5.10 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 432 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, 10 pontos de toque, Knuckle Touch, LTPS, Brilhante: sim

Disco rígido

64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 64 GB

, 49.66 GB livre

Conexões

1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Conector combinado de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: micro-SD máx. 256 GB (SDHC, SDXC), 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: proximidade, Hall, acelerômetro, sensor de posição e G, contador de passos, bússola digital, BeiDou, OTG, Wifi Direct, Miracast

Funcionamento em rede

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM/GPRS/Edge (850, 900, 1800 e 1900 MHz), UMTS/HSPA+ (bandas 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 19), LTE Cat. 12 (bandas 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 29, 38, 38, 40 e 41), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 6.98 x 145.3 x 69.3

Bateria

3200 mAh Lítio-Ion, Huawei SuperCharge, Tempo de conversação 3G (de acordo com o fabricante): 23 h, Standby 3G (de acordo com o fabricante): 359 h

Sistema Operativo

Android 7.0 Nougat

Camera

Primary Camera: 20 MPix MP monochrome + 12 MP RGB Leica dual-camera (Summarit-H 1:2.2/27 mm ASPH, hybrid zoom, hybrid-AF, OIS, 4K video recording, bi-color LED flash)
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix Câmera Leica (foco fixo)

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: Alto falante mono, Teclado: virtual, carregador, cabo USB, headset, capa, ferramenta SIM, guia de início rápido, cartão de garantia, EMUI 5.1, 36 Meses Garantia, USB Type-C, head SAR: 1.49 W/kg, body SAR: 0.54 W/kg, fanless

peso

144 g, Suprimento de energia: 102 g

Preço

599 Euro

Links

Huawei página inicial

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Third generation (left to right): Huawei P8, P9, and the new P10.

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Apple iPhone 7 A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 128 GB NVMe (Klaus I211)	485 MBit/s +41%
Huawei P10 Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	343 (154^min) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy S7 Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	335 MBit/s -2%
Huawei P9 Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash	185 MBit/s -46%
iperf3 receive AX12
Apple iPhone 7 A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 128 GB NVMe (Klaus I211)	532 MBit/s +73%
Huawei P10 Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	308 (48.8^min) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy S7 Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	281 MBit/s -9%
Huawei P9 Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash	279 MBit/s -9%

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

Huawei P10

LG G5

Samsung Galaxy J5 (2016)

Canon EOS 70D

click to load images

Huawei P10

LG G5

Samsung Galaxy J5 (2016)

Canon EOS 70D

click to load images

Huawei P10

LG G5

Samsung Galaxy J5 (2016)

Canon EOS 70D

The robin can hardly be recognized with the x10 zoom


602 cd/m²	553 cd/m²	523 cd/m²
604 cd/m²	547 cd/m²	519 cd/m²
589 cd/m²	550 cd/m²	521 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 604 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 556.4 cd/m² Minimum: 2.39 cd/m²
iluminação: 86 %
iluminação com acumulador: 547 cd/m²
Contraste: 1272:1 (Preto: 0.43 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.8 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 4.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.39

	Huawei P10 LTPS, 1920x1080, 5.1"	Huawei P9 IPS-NEO, JDI, 1920x1080, 5.2"	Huawei P8 IPS-NEO, 1920x1080, 5.2"	Samsung Galaxy S7 SAMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.1"	Apple iPhone 7 IPS, 1334x750, 4.7"	Sony Xperia XZ IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2"	HTC 10 Super LCD 5, 2560x1440, 5.2"
Screen		8%	3%	21%	31%	-8%	9%
Brightness middle	547	582 6%	453 -17%	350 -36%	556 2%	544 -1%	445 -19%
Brightness	556	563 1%	439 -21%	351 -37%	519 -7%	521 -6%	434 -22%
Brightness Distribution	86	91 6%	91 6%	98 14%	90 5%	93 8%	93 8%
Black Level *	0.43	0.38 12%	0.28 35%		0.34 21%	0.37 14%	0.36 16%
Contrast	1272	1532 20%	1618 27%		1635 29%	1470 16%	1236 -3%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	4.8	4.4 8%	4.7 2%	2.04 57%	1.3 73%	5.8 -21%	2.8 42%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	8.8	7.4 16%		3.25 63%	2.6 70%	9.8 -11%	5.8 34%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	4.5	4.8 -7%	5.03 -12%	1.63 64%	1.9 58%	7.2 -60%	3.7 18%
Gamma	2.39 ^92%	2.2 ^100%	2.27 ^97%	2.07 ^106%	2.26 ^97%	2.18 ^101%	2.31 ^95%
CCT	7194 ^90%	6175 ^105%	7439 ^87%	6391 ^102%	6818 ^95%	8619 ^75%	7164 ^91%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)		77.78	72.04	86.86	63.15
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)		99.44		99.35	99.71

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
16 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 5.2 ms rise
16 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 10.8 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 33 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
39.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 19.6 ms rise
39.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 20 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 57 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei P10	140084 Points
Huawei P9	95743 Points -32%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	128749 Points -8%
Apple iPhone 7	142532 Points +2%
Lenovo Moto Z	129197 Points -8%
Sony Xperia XZ	129317 Points -8%
HTC 10	131866 Points -6%
Huawei Mate 9	124087 Points -11%
OnePlus 3T	159866 Points +14%

Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei P10	1935 Points
Huawei P9	1755 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	1840 Points -5%
Apple iPhone 7	3490 Points +80%
Lenovo Moto Z	1480 Points -24%
Sony Xperia XZ	1647 Points -15%
Huawei Mate 9	1947 Points +1%
OnePlus 3T	1881 Points -3%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei P10	6036 Points
Huawei P9	4904 Points -19%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	5503 Points -9%
Apple iPhone 7	5585 Points -7%
Lenovo Moto Z	3946 Points -35%
Sony Xperia XZ	3701 Points -39%
Huawei Mate 9	5629 Points -7%
OnePlus 3T	4236 Points -30%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Huawei P10	27692 Points
Huawei P9	19854 Points -28%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	28671 Points +4%
Apple iPhone 7	37676 Points +36%
Lenovo Moto Z	25135 Points -9%
Sony Xperia XZ	28603 Points +3%
HTC 10	27176 Points -2%
Huawei Mate 9	27364 Points -1%
OnePlus 3T	30810 Points +11%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Huawei P10	35964 Points
Huawei P9	21577 Points -40%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	33031 Points -8%
Apple iPhone 7	63974 Points +78%
Lenovo Moto Z	26659 Points -26%
Sony Xperia XZ	32056 Points -11%
HTC 10	30061 Points -16%
Huawei Mate 9	35626 Points -1%
OnePlus 3T	34494 Points -4%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P10	15341 Points
Huawei P9	15517 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	19610 Points +28%
Apple iPhone 7	15450 Points +1%
Lenovo Moto Z	20948 Points +37%
Sony Xperia XZ	20772 Points +35%
HTC 10	20344 Points +33%
Huawei Mate 9	15104 Points -2%
OnePlus 3T	22426 Points +46%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Huawei P10	2649 Points
Huawei P9	1237 Points -53%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	2710 (2421^min) Points +2%
Apple iPhone 7	2964 Points +12%
Lenovo Moto Z	3023 Points +14%
Sony Xperia XZ	3275 Points +24%
HTC 10	3157 Points +19%
Huawei Mate 9	2367 Points -11%
OnePlus 3T	2577 Points -3%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P10	2816 Points
Huawei P9	1080 Points -62%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	3015 (2895^min) Points +7%
Apple iPhone 7	4057 Points +44%
Lenovo Moto Z	3718 Points +32%
Sony Xperia XZ	4522 Points +61%
HTC 10	4581 Points +63%
Huawei Mate 9	2448 Points -13%
OnePlus 3T	3310 Points +18%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P10	2193 Points
Huawei P9	2510 Points +14%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	2002 (1539^min) Points -9%
Apple iPhone 7	1525 Points -30%
Lenovo Moto Z	1828 Points -17%
Sony Xperia XZ	1667 Points -24%
HTC 10	1512 Points -31%
Huawei Mate 9	2123 Points -3%
OnePlus 3T	1452 Points -34%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Huawei P10	2274 Points
Huawei P9	974 Points -57%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	2204 (1923^min) Points -3%
Lenovo Moto Z	2190 Points -4%
Sony Xperia XZ	2548 Points +12%
HTC 10	2495 Points +10%
Huawei Mate 9	2240 Points -1%
OnePlus 3T	2221 Points -2%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P10	2409 Points
Huawei P9	829 Points -66%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	2229 (2043^min) Points -7%
Lenovo Moto Z	2336 Points -3%
Sony Xperia XZ	2853 Points +18%
HTC 10	2889 Points +20%
Huawei Mate 9	2294 Points -5%
OnePlus 3T	2418 Points 0%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P10	1902 Points
Huawei P9	2503 Points +32%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	2121 (1594^min) Points +12%
Lenovo Moto Z	1797 Points -6%
Sony Xperia XZ	1667 Points -12%
HTC 10	1688 Points -11%
Huawei Mate 9	2117 Points +11%
OnePlus 3T	1728 Points -9%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P10	55 fps
Huawei P9	43 fps -22%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	51 fps -7%
Apple iPhone 7	57.7 fps +5%
Lenovo Moto Z	53 fps -4%
Sony Xperia XZ	88 fps +60%
HTC 10	43 fps -22%
Huawei Mate 9	60 fps +9%
OnePlus 3T	59 fps +7%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P10	69 fps
Huawei P9	40 fps -42%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	81 fps +17%
Apple iPhone 7	110.3 fps +60%
Lenovo Moto Z	77 fps +12%
Sony Xperia XZ	88 fps +28%
HTC 10	73 fps +6%
Huawei Mate 9	80 fps +16%
OnePlus 3T	91 fps +32%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Huawei P10	32 fps
Huawei P9	19 fps -41%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	27 fps -16%
Apple iPhone 7	58.5 fps +83%
Lenovo Moto Z	26 fps -19%
Sony Xperia XZ	39 fps +22%
HTC 10	24 fps -25%
Huawei Mate 9	37 fps +16%
OnePlus 3T	45 fps +41%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P10	30 fps
Huawei P9	18 fps -40%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	38 fps +27%
Apple iPhone 7	60.7 fps +102%
Lenovo Moto Z	41 fps +37%
Sony Xperia XZ	40 fps +33%
HTC 10	39 fps +30%
Huawei Mate 9	34 fps +13%
OnePlus 3T	46 fps +53%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P10	25 fps
Huawei P9	11 fps -56%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	15 fps -40%
Apple iPhone 7	59.4 fps +138%
Lenovo Moto Z	15 fps -40%
Sony Xperia XZ	31 fps +24%
HTC 10	14 fps -44%
Huawei Mate 9	28 fps +12%
OnePlus 3T	32 fps +28%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P10	24 fps
Huawei P9	10 fps -58%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	28 fps +17%
Apple iPhone 7	42.2 fps +76%
Lenovo Moto Z	27 fps +13%
Sony Xperia XZ	31 fps +29%
HTC 10	24 fps 0%
Huawei Mate 9	24 fps 0%
OnePlus 3T	32 fps +33%

PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Huawei P10	7341 Points
Huawei P9	7058 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	4660 Points -37%
Lenovo Moto Z	7637 Points +4%
Sony Xperia XZ	5058 Points -31%
HTC 10	5809 Points -21%
Huawei Mate 9	7403 Points +1%
OnePlus 3T	5664 Points -23%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Huawei P10	6206 Points
Huawei P9	5226 Points -16%
Sony Xperia XZ	5616 Points -10%
HTC 10	4549 Points -27%
Huawei Mate 9	6299 Points +1%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Huawei P10	2621 Points
Huawei P9	2025 Points -23%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	2074 Points -21%
Apple iPhone 7	2999 Points +14%
Lenovo Moto Z	2356 Points -10%
Sony Xperia XZ	2165 Points -17%
HTC 10	2193 Points -16%
Huawei Mate 9	2772 Points +6%
OnePlus 3T	2218 Points -15%
System (sort by value)
Huawei P10	3830 Points
Huawei P9	3930 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	4080 Points +7%
Apple iPhone 7	6097 Points +59%
Lenovo Moto Z	3398 Points -11%
Sony Xperia XZ	3047 Points -20%
HTC 10	2806 Points -27%
Huawei Mate 9	3616 Points -6%
OnePlus 3T	3130 Points -18%
Memory (sort by value)
Huawei P10	2778 Points
Huawei P9	2627 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	2072 Points -25%
Apple iPhone 7	1257 Points -55%
Lenovo Moto Z	2190 Points -21%
Sony Xperia XZ	1434 Points -48%
HTC 10	1772 Points -36%
Huawei Mate 9	3850 Points +39%
OnePlus 3T	1954 Points -30%
Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P10	4115 Points
Huawei P9	1583 Points -62%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	2203 Points -46%
Apple iPhone 7	6896 Points +68%
Lenovo Moto Z	4321 Points +5%
Sony Xperia XZ	4716 Points +15%
HTC 10	5009 Points +22%
Huawei Mate 9	3939 Points -4%
OnePlus 3T	4444 Points +8%
Web (sort by value)
Huawei P10	1077 Points
Huawei P9	1029 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	994 Points -8%
Apple iPhone 7	1531 Points +42%
Lenovo Moto Z	959 Points -11%
Sony Xperia XZ	1066 Points -1%
HTC 10	928 Points -14%
Huawei Mate 9	1076 Points 0%
OnePlus 3T	891 Points -17%

Lightmark - 1920x1080 1080p (sort by value)
Huawei P10	23.56 fps
Huawei P9	7.9 fps -66%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	13.31 fps -44%
Lenovo Moto Z	24.33 fps +3%
Huawei Mate 9	19.14 fps -19%

Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value)
Huawei P10	664 Points
Huawei P9	328 Points -51%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	733 Points +10%
Apple iPhone 7	1322 Points +99%
Apple iPhone 7	1059 Points +59%
Lenovo Moto Z	542 Points -18%
HTC 10	608 Points -8%
Huawei Mate 9	699 Points +5%

Epic Citadel - Ultra High Quality (sort by value)
Huawei P10	60.5 fps
Huawei P9	58.6 fps -3%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	60 fps -1%
Lenovo Moto Z	59.8 fps -1%
Huawei Mate 9	60.5 fps 0%

Legend

Huawei P10 HiSilicon Kirin 960, ARM Mali-G71 MP8, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash

Huawei P9 HiSilicon Kirin 955, ARM Mali-T880 MP4, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Samsung Exynos 8890 Octa, ARM Mali-T880 MP12, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash

Apple iPhone 7 Apple A10 Fusion, Apple A10 Fusion GPU / PowerVR, 128 GB NVMe

Lenovo Moto Z Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Sony Xperia XZ Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 32 GB eMMC Flash

HTC 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Huawei Mate 9 HiSilicon Kirin 960, ARM Mali-G71 MP8, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash

OnePlus 3T Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash

WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value)
Huawei P10	136 Points
Huawei P9	128 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	163 Points +20%
Apple iPhone 7	202 Points +49%
Lenovo Moto Z	112 Points -18%
Sony Xperia XZ	90 Points -34%
HTC 10	108 Points -21%
Huawei Mate 9	152 Points +12%
OnePlus 3T	135 Points -1%

BaseMark OS II - Web (sort by value)
Huawei P10	1077 Points
Huawei P9	1029 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	994 Points -8%
Apple iPhone 7	1531 Points +42%
Lenovo Moto Z	959 Points -11%
Sony Xperia XZ	1066 Points -1%
HTC 10	928 Points -14%
Huawei Mate 9	1076 Points 0%
OnePlus 3T	891 Points -17%

Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei P10	10236 Points
Huawei P9	11783 Points +15%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	13191 Points +29%
Apple iPhone 7	24875 Points +143%
Lenovo Moto Z	7771 Points -24%
Sony Xperia XZ	9069 Points -11%
HTC 10	8905 Points -13%
Huawei Mate 9	11897 Points +16%
OnePlus 3T	9798 Points -4%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value)
Huawei P10	3129 ms *
Huawei P9	2923 ms * +7%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	2564 ms * +18%
Apple iPhone 7	1113 ms * +64%
Lenovo Moto Z	3155 ms * -1%
Sony Xperia XZ	2768 ms * +12%
HTC 10	3146 ms * -1%
Huawei Mate 9	2734 ms * +13%
OnePlus 3T	2719 ms * +13%

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei P10	57.9 Points
Huawei P9	68.4 Points +18%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	75.1 Points +30%
Apple iPhone 7	165.9 Points +187%
Lenovo Moto Z	47.5 Points -18%
Sony Xperia XZ	54.2 Points -6%
HTC 10	52.1 Points -10%
Huawei Mate 9	68.6 Points +18%
OnePlus 3T	54.5 Points -6%

Vellamo 3.x - Browser (sort by value)
Huawei P10	7346 Points
Huawei P9	6580 (6523^min) Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	7198 (6255^min) Points -2%
Lenovo Moto Z	5344 Points -27%
Huawei Mate 9	7565 Points +3%

* ... smaller is better

	Huawei P10	Huawei P9	Lenovo Moto Z	Sony Xperia XZ	HTC 10	Samsung Galaxy S7	LG G5	ZTE Axon 7
AndroBench 3-5		-49%	-8%	-48%	-20%	-16%	-20%	-13%
Sequential Read 256KB	738	281.3 -62%	439.7 -40%	281 -62%	275.1 -63%	483.8 -34%	427.6 -42%	406.5 -45%
Sequential Write 256KB	189.8	72.2 -62%	168.3 -11%	138 -27%	115.6 -39%	145.7 -23%	141.3 -26%	150.9 -20%
Random Read 4KB	168.4	39 -77%	117.2 -30%	71.5 -58%	29.92 -82%	85.9 -49%	89.3 -47%	121.1 -28%
Random Write 4KB	152.3	47.45 -69%	74.9 -51%	10.5 -93%	15.89 -90%	16.01 -89%	16.22 -89%	16.22 -89%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard	54.2	55 1%	78.5 45%	33.5 -38%	83.3 54%	72.3 33%	78.5 45%	78.4 45%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard	32.19	24.83 -23%	45.64 42%	29.8 -7%	65.4 103%	53.6 67%	45.53 41%	51.3 59%

Carga Máxima

Inatividade


44.6 °C	43.1 °C	43 °C
43.9 °C	43.1 °C	43.6 °C
42.6 °C	41.6 °C	42.6 °C

Máximo: 44.6 °C
Médio: 43.1 °C


37.3 °C	38.4 °C	40.9 °C
37.2 °C	39.6 °C	40.5 °C
37.8 °C	39.4 °C	40.7 °C

Máximo: 40.9 °C
Médio: 39.1 °C

alimentação elétrica 33.4 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.3 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 43.1 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.6 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.9 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.1 °C / 90 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

Huawei P10 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 49% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 67% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple iPhone 7 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 33% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 53% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 31% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 51% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.06 / 0.19 Watt
Ocioso	0.83 / 2.1 / 2.18 Watt
Carga	6.57 / 9.32 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Huawei P10 3200 mAh	Huawei P9 3000 mAh	HTC 10 3000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S7 3000 mAh	Apple iPhone 7 1960 mAh	Lenovo ZUK Z2 3500 mAh	Xiaomi Mi 5s 3200 mAh
Power Consumption		16%	8%	34%	36%	-1%	20%
Idle Minimum *	0.83	0.77 7%	0.68 18%	0.68 18%	0.54 35%	1.31 -58%	0.4 52%
Idle Average *	2.1	2.36 -12%	1.49 29%	1.02 51%	1.51 28%	2.03 3%	1.7 19%
Idle Maximum *	2.18	2.37 -9%	1.91 12%	1.14 48%	1.54 29%	2.08 5%	1.81 17%
Load Average *	6.57	3.09 53%	7.4 -13%	4.73 28%	3.75 43%	5.45 17%	5.84 11%
Load Maximum *	9.32	5.35 43%	9.71 -4%	7.16 23%	5.01 46%	6.75 28%	9.12 2%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		25h 40min
WiFi Websurfing		16h 06min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		9h 42min
Carga (máximo brilho)		2h 56min

	Huawei P10 3200 mAh	Huawei P9 3000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S7 3000 mAh	Apple iPhone 7 1960 mAh	HTC 10 3000 mAh	Lenovo ZUK Z2 3500 mAh	Lenovo Moto Z 2600 mAh
Battery Runtime		-7%	14%	-9%	-12%	-43%	9%
Reader / Idle	1540	1514 -2%	1810 18%	1770 15%	1273 -17%		1371 -11%
H.264	582	568 -2%	892 53%	722 24%	648 11%		724 24%
WiFi v1.3	966	569 -41%	456 -53%	517 -46%	413 -57%	546 -43%	407 -58%
Load	176	206 17%	242 38%	126 -28%	203 15%		320 82%

Pro

+ Design elegante e materiais de alta-qualidade

+ SoC incrivelmente veloz

+ Generoso armazenamento UFS 2.1

+ Veloz LTE Cat. 12 com cobertura de frequência ampla

+ Boa câmera com zoom híbrido

+ Boa duração da bateria

+ Armazenamento expansível

+ Bom alto falante

+ Até três anos de garantia

+ SuperCharge

+ Boa tela que...

Contra

- ...infelizmente tem uma resolução de apenas 1080p

- Pior razão de tela-corpo

- Firmware inchado

- Lento Wi-Fi ac

- Slot microSD lento

- Sem MHL ou SlimPort

- Afogamentos durante uso intenso

In review: Huawei P10 (VTR-L09). Review sample courtesy of Huawei.

A Huawei mais uma vez apresenta um excelente produto que não recebe muitas críticas com o seu smartphone P10 lifestyle. O atual produto de gama alta na linha é a edição P10 Plus . No entanto, o modelo menor também oferece alguns recursos de primeira categoria, como o armazenamento UFS 2.1, LTE Cat.12, e o incrivelmente veloz SoC Kirin 960 que a concorrência somente oferece em produtos consideravelmente mais caros.

Mais uma vez, gostamos da dual-camera Leica. Embora tenha mais espaço para melhorar tecnicamente, tira fotos incríveis com um toque muito original. O modo vertical integrado também é muito bom e permite um jogo atraente com a profundidade de campo. A duração da bateria também foi melhorada.

O Huawei P10 é um desenvolvimento muito bem sucedido que convence com uma boa câmera e duração de bateria melhorada.

No entanto, considerando que o Huawei P10 é um produto de gama premium, encontramos algumas desvantagens. O módulo Wi-Fi comparativamente fraco, o lento slot micro-SD, e a única tela Full HD disponível não são apropriadas para a faixa de preços em que o P10 entra. A Sony pode ostentar com uma tela Ultra HD e HDR este ano, e o LG G6 também receberá um painel HDR. A Huawei terá que fazer uma atualização aqui, em produtos futuros.

A Huawei também ganha pontos com o serviço. O serviço VIP que estende a garantia para três anos, entre outras coisas, não é apenas amigável para o cliente, mas também demonstra que a empresa confia em seu produto. A Huawei novamente criou um excelente smartphone que possui muitas fortalezas, e que é um desenvolvimento mais consistente do em relação ao seu antecessor.

Huawei P10 - 2017-07-11 07/11/2017 v6 ^(old)
Daniel Schmidt

Acabamento

92%

Teclado

71 / 75 → 94%

Mouse

96%

Conectividade

51 / 60 → 84%

Peso

93%

Bateria

95%

Pantalha

87%

Desempenho do jogos

58 / 63 → 92%

Desempenho da aplicação

58 / 70 → 83%

Temperatura

85%

Ruído

100%

Audio

75 / 91 → 82%

Camera

78%

Médio

80%

89%

Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Huawei P10

Daniel Schmidt, 2017-03-27 (Update: 2024-11- 4)

Breve Análise do Smartphone Huawei P10

Size Comparison

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

Huawei P10 audio analysis

Apple iPhone 7 audio analysis

Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge audio analysis

Pro

Contra

More articles related to this device

Price comparison