Breve Análise do Smartphone Huawei P10 Lite
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Huawei P10 | |
| Huawei P10 Lite | |
| Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 | |
| Honor 6X | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Huawei P10 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 | |
| Huawei P10 Lite | |
| Honor 6X | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 95 %
iluminação com acumulador: 507 cd/m²
Contraste: 1408:1 (Preto: 0.36 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 6.1 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.28
| Huawei P10 Lite IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2" | Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 Super AMOLED, 1280x720, 4.7" | Honor 6X IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5" | Huawei Nova Plus IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5" | Lenovo Moto G4 Plus IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5" | Huawei P10 LTPS, 1920x1080, 5.1" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 34% | -10% | -4% | 1% | 2% | |
| Brightness middle | 507 | 574 13% | 547 8% | 485 -4% | 609 20% | 547 8% |
| Brightness | 509 | 576 13% | 540 6% | 481 -6% | 589 16% | 556 9% |
| Brightness Distribution | 95 | 94 -1% | 94 -1% | 90 -5% | 87 -8% | 86 -9% |
| Black Level * | 0.36 | 0.57 -58% | 0.5 -39% | 0.63 -75% | 0.43 -19% | |
| Contrast | 1408 | 960 -32% | 970 -31% | 967 -31% | 1272 -10% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.1 | 2.4 53% | 5.1 -0% | 4.2 18% | 3.8 25% | 4.8 6% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 9 | 3.8 58% | 9.1 -1% | 7.9 12% | 8.3 8% | 8.8 2% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 6.1 | 1.9 69% | 6.2 -2% | 4.8 21% | 3.1 49% | 4.5 26% |
| Gamma | 2.28 96% | 2.09 105% | 2.09 105% | 2.36 93% | 2.06 107% | 2.39 92% |
| CCT | 8143 80% | 6502 100% | 6546 99% | 7568 86% | 6725 97% | 7194 90% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 36 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 22 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 14 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 93 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 48 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 26 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 22 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 81 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Huawei P10 Lite | |
| Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 | |
| Honor 6X | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| Lenovo Moto G4 Plus | |
| Huawei P10 | |
| Geekbench 4.0 | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Huawei P10 Lite | |
| Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 | |
| Honor 6X | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| Huawei P10 | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Huawei P10 Lite | |
| Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 | |
| Honor 6X | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| Huawei P10 | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
| T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Huawei P10 Lite | |
| Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 | |
| Honor 6X | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| Lenovo Moto G4 Plus | |
| Huawei P10 | |
| 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Huawei P10 Lite | |
| Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 | |
| Honor 6X | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| Lenovo Moto G4 Plus | |
| Huawei P10 | |
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
| Huawei P10 Lite | |
| Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 | |
| Honor 6X | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| Lenovo Moto G4 Plus | |
| Huawei P10 | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Huawei P10 Lite | |
| Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 | |
| Honor 6X | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| Lenovo Moto G4 Plus | |
| Huawei P10 | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Huawei P10 Lite | |
| Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 | |
| Honor 6X | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| Lenovo Moto G4 Plus | |
| Huawei P10 | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Huawei P10 Lite | |
| Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 | |
| Honor 6X | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| Lenovo Moto G4 Plus | |
| Huawei P10 | |
| PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value) | |
| Huawei P10 Lite | |
| Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 | |
| Honor 6X | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| Lenovo Moto G4 Plus | |
| Huawei P10 | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Huawei P10 Lite | |
| Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 | |
| Honor 6X | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| Lenovo Moto G4 Plus | |
| Huawei P10 | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value) | |
| Huawei P10 Lite | |
| Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 | |
| Honor 6X | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| Lenovo Moto G4 Plus | |
| Huawei P10 | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value) | |
| Huawei P10 Lite | |
| Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 | |
| Honor 6X | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| Lenovo Moto G4 Plus | |
| Huawei P10 | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Huawei P10 Lite | |
| Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 | |
| Honor 6X | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| Lenovo Moto G4 Plus | |
| Huawei P10 | |
* ... smaller is better
| Huawei P10 Lite | Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 | Honor 6X | Huawei Nova Plus | Lenovo Moto G4 Plus | Huawei P10 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -19% | 9% | -10% | 9% | 174% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 264.3 | 199.7 -24% | 283.4 7% | 241.6 -9% | 271.4 3% | 738 179% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 129.2 | 45.96 -64% | 73.8 -43% | 82.1 -36% | 43.48 -66% | 189.8 47% |
| Random Read 4KB | 72.5 | 22.32 -69% | 39.55 -45% | 35.64 -51% | 36.32 -50% | 168.4 132% |
| Random Write 4KB | 19.36 | 9.62 -50% | 45.05 133% | 30.12 56% | 35.79 85% | 152.3 687% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 53.4 | 75.5 41% | 52 -3% | 41.64 -22% | 74.4 39% | 54.2 1% |
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 32.7 | 50.1 53% | 34.53 6% | 33.32 2% | 46.92 43% | 32.19 -2% |
| Asphalt 8: Airborne | |||
| Configurações | Valor | ||
| high | 22 fps | ||
| very low | 30 fps | ||
| Dead Trigger 2 | |||
| Configurações | Valor | ||
| high | 51 fps | ||
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 34.9 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.2 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Huawei P10 Lite audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 48% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 67% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 27% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 63% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 78% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Honor 6X audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (29.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 74% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 85% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 12% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado |   0.14 / 0.17 Watt |
| Ocioso |  0.38 / 1.87 / 1.92 Watt |
| Carga |
3.82 / 4.9 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Huawei P10 Lite 3000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 2350 mAh | Honor 6X 3340 mAh | Huawei Nova Plus 3340 mAh | Lenovo Moto G4 Plus 3000 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 44% | -23% | 2% | -30% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 0.38 | 0.37 3% | 0.82 -116% | 0.49 -29% | 0.63 -66% |
| Idle Average * | 1.87 | 0.78 58% | 2 -7% | 1.63 13% | 1.91 -2% |
| Idle Maximum * | 1.92 | 0.84 56% | 2.03 -6% | 1.76 8% | 1.96 -2% |
| Load Average * | 3.82 | 1.52 60% | 3.34 13% | 2.98 22% | 3.88 -2% |
| Load Maximum * | 4.9 | 2.75 44% | 4.92 -0% | 4.99 -2% | 8.74 -78% |
* ... smaller is better
| Huawei P10 Lite 3000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 2350 mAh | Honor 6X 3340 mAh | Huawei Nova Plus 3340 mAh | Lenovo Moto G4 Plus 3000 mAh | Huawei P10 3200 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 65% | 47% | 30% | 0% | 4% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1410 | 2862 103% | 2250 60% | 2048 45% | 1226 -13% | 1540 9% |
| H.264 | 586 | 988 69% | 885 51% | 732 25% | 775 32% | 582 -1% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 665 | 668 0% | 957 44% | 820 23% | 735 11% | 966 45% |
| Load | 286 | 532 86% | 375 31% | 366 28% | 201 -30% | 176 -38% |
Pro
Contra
A Huawei não prometeu muito: O P10 Lite é uma verdadeira alternativa para o caro P10 de quase 600-Euros (~$636). Como o seu parente de gama alta, a gama média convence com uma excelente construção, que o faz parecer muito mais caro do que imaginaríamos considerando seu atual preço de rua de cerca de 350 Euros (~$371) no momento do teste. Embora o P10 Lite não possua a câmera Leica do Huawei P10, uma câmera de 12-Megapixels que ganha pontos com uma qualidade de imagem surpreendente demonstra ser uma alternativa digna.
Também gostamos da tela brilhante e dos recursos como o veloz WLAN, LTE Cat.6, bem como a opção de operar dois cartões SIM no smartphone, embora tenhamos que renunciar ao slot microSD por ele. As durações da bateria são razoáveis e devem bastar para que o usuário chegue até o final do dia sem problemas.
Se não for por um processador extra rápido e uma câmera Leica como no Huawei P10, pode valer a penas dar uma olhada no Huawei P10 Lite. Com 350 Euros (~$371), o smartphone de gama média de 5,2 polegadas oferece o preço de entrada mais acessível para a série de produtos P10.
A Huawei economizou na porta USB-2.0, que é o mais altigo conector Micro-USB em vez do Type-C. Infelizmente, não pode se instalar aplicativos no cartão microSD - uma pena, considerando o firmware extenso que reduz o armazenamento de 32 GB para apenas 20 GB. Pelo menos quase todos os aplicativos pré-instalados podem ser removidos do smartphone para liberar um pouco de espaço. Não há quase nada de errado com o desempenho do SoC. "Quase" porque ao utilizar o Huawei P10 Lite para jogos, os detalhes gráficos possivelmente devam ser reduzidos para que a tela possa rodá-lo fluentemente.
Huawei did not promise too much: The P10 Lite is a real alternative to the expensive, almost 600-Euro (~$636), P10. As its high-end relative, the mid-range convinces with an excellent build, which make it look considerably more expensive than one would imagine considering its current street price of around 350 Euros (~$371) at the time of testing. Though the P10 Lite doesn't have the Leica camera of the Huawei P10, a 12-Megapixel camera that scores with a surprisingly high image quality proves to be a worthy alternative.
We also liked the bright display and features like the fast WLAN, LTE Cat.6, as well as the option to operate two SIM cards in the smartphone, although one has to give up the microSD slot for it. The battery runtimes are reasonable and should last the user through a complete day without any problems.
If it doesn't have to be an extra fast processor and a Leica camera optics as in the Huawei P10, it is worth taking a look at the Huawei P10 Lite. At 350 Euros (~$371), the mid-range 5.2-inch smartphone offers the most affordable entry into the P10 product series.
Huawai saved on the USB-2.0 port, which with its older Micro-USB connector instead of Type-C, invites playing the jolly "oh, I got it upside down" game. Unfortunately, apps cannot be installed on the microSD card - a shame, considering the markedly extensive firmware that reduces the 32 GB storage to a mere 20 GB. At least almost all the pre-installed apps can be cleaned off the smartphone to free some storage. There is almost nothing wrong with the SoC performance. "Almost" since when you use the Huawei P10 Lite for gaming, the graphics details possibly have to be reduced for the display to keep running fluidly.
Huawei P10 Lite
- 04/12/2017 v6 (old)
Manuel Masiero
Price comparison
