Notebookcheck Logo

Breve Análise do Smartphone Huawei P Smart

How exactly is the Huawei P Smart smart? Why did we not think of that? Choosing 'smart' as name for a smartphone is just as in-your-face as naming a soccer team 'the team'. And it inadvertently raises the question: what exactly does 'smart' really mean?
Huawei P smart (P Serie)
Processador
HiSilicon Kirin 659 8 x 2.4 GHz, Cortex-A53, Kirin 659
Placa gráfica
ARM Mali-T830 MP2
Memória
3 GB 
, 16nm Octacore, 2.36GHz*4, 1.7GHz*4
Pantalha
5.65 polegadas 2:1, 2160 x 1080 pixel 428 PPI, capacitive 10-point multitouch, IPS, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB 
, 22.89 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: 3,5 mm Headset-Klinkenanschluss, Card Reader: MicroSD de até 256 GB, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Leitor de digitais, sensor de proximidade, bússola, gravidade, USB: OTG, DisplayPort
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM/GPRS/Edge: 850, B900, B1800, B1900; UMTS/HSPA+: 850, B900, B2100, B1900; LTE Band 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 7.45 x 150.1 x 72.05
Bateria
0 Wh, 3000 mAh Lítio-Polímero
Sistema Operativo
Android 8.0 Oreo
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix Duale Kamera, Autofokus, LED
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Alto-falante mono, Teclado: virtual, Carregador 5V/2A, cabo MicroUSB, guia de início rápido, panfleto de garantia, fones, protetor de tela, EMUI 8.0, 24 Meses Garantia, Miracast, USB OTG, MicroUSB 2.0, FM radio, head SAR: body SAR: 1.24 W/kg, fanless
peso
143 g, Suprimento de energia: 61 g
Preço
259 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size Comparison

156.2 mm 75.2 mm 7.5 mm 164 g152.5 mm 74.8 mm 8 mm 181 g150 mm 73.5 mm 9.5 mm 157 g151 mm 71.9 mm 7.6 mm 149 g150.1 mm 72.05 mm 7.45 mm 143 g147.2 mm 72.9 mm 7.6 mm 147 g146.5 mm 72.7 mm 7.9 mm 153 g135.4 mm 66.2 mm 7.9 mm 138 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g
Android navigation options
Android navigation options
quick start menu in lockscreen
quick start menu in lockscreen
quick start of apps via shortcut
quick start of apps via shortcut
for your convenience: a trash for deleted photos
for your convenience: a trash for deleted photos
split screen view for running two apps side-by-side
split screen view for running two apps side-by-side
 
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
Mali-T830 MP1, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
280 MBit/s +457%
BQ Aquaris X
Adreno 506, 626, 32 GB eMMC Flash
270 MBit/s +437%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
Mali-T830 MP1, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
225 MBit/s +347%
Motorola Moto G5s
Adreno 505, 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash
111 MBit/s +121%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 655, 16 GB eMMC Flash
53.9 MBit/s +7%
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 659, 64 GB eMMC Flash
53.3 MBit/s +6%
Huawei P smart
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 659, 32 GB eMMC Flash
50.3 MBit/s
Honor 9 Lite
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 659, 32 GB eMMC Flash
49.9 MBit/s -1%
iperf3 receive AX12
BQ Aquaris X
Adreno 506, 626, 32 GB eMMC Flash
333 MBit/s +544%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
Mali-T830 MP1, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
305 MBit/s +490%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
Mali-T830 MP1, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
251 MBit/s +385%
Motorola Moto G5s
Adreno 505, 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash
121 MBit/s +134%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 655, 16 GB eMMC Flash
54.5 MBit/s +5%
Honor 9 Lite
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 659, 32 GB eMMC Flash
52.6 MBit/s +2%
Huawei P smart
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 659, 32 GB eMMC Flash
51.7 MBit/s
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 659, 64 GB eMMC Flash
41.9 MBit/s -19%
Garmin Edge 500 - overview
Garmin Edge 500 - overview
Garmin Edge 500 - S-turn
Garmin Edge 500 - S-turn
Garmin Edge 500 - switchback
Garmin Edge 500 - switchback
Huawei P Smart - overview
Huawei P Smart - overview
Huawei P Smart - S-turn
Huawei P Smart - S-turn
Huawei P Smart - switchback
Huawei P Smart - switchback
dual-camera bokeh effect
dual-camera bokeh effect
dual-camera bokeh effect
dual-camera bokeh effect
front-facing camera bokeh effect
front-facing camera bokeh effect

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
orginal image
click to load images
reference card
reference card
reference card (magnified)
shifted to the right
shifted to the right
floating keyboard
floating keyboard
landscape mode, split
landscape mode, split
size adjustment
size adjustment
keyboard menu
keyboard menu
individual keyboard design
individual keyboard design
594
cd/m²
584
cd/m²
568
cd/m²
587
cd/m²
573
cd/m²
561
cd/m²
568
cd/m²
548
cd/m²
527
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 594 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 567.8 cd/m² Minimum: 4.34 cd/m²
iluminação: 89 %
iluminação com acumulador: 573 cd/m²
Contraste: 910:1 (Preto: 0.63 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 4.6 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.24
Huawei P smart
IPS, 2160x1080, 5.7"
Honor 9 Lite
IPS, 2160x1080, 5.7"
Huawei P8 lite 2017
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2"
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
IPS, 2160x1080, 5.9"
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
Super AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5"
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
Super AMOLED, 1280x720, 4.7"
Motorola Moto G5s
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2"
BQ Aquaris X
LTPS IPS , 1920x1080, 5.2"
Screen
11%
-5%
1%
15%
25%
-3%
-2%
Brightness middle
573
627
9%
575
0%
467
-18%
454
-21%
574
0%
490
-14%
675
18%
Brightness
568
622
10%
559
-2%
457
-20%
463
-18%
576
1%
502
-12%
702
24%
Brightness Distribution
89
82
-8%
91
2%
89
0%
86
-3%
94
6%
92
3%
91
2%
Black Level *
0.63
0.41
35%
0.39
38%
0.3
52%
0.43
32%
0.59
6%
Contrast
910
1529
68%
1474
62%
1557
71%
1140
25%
1144
26%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
4.2
4.5
-7%
5.2
-24%
5
-19%
2
52%
2.4
43%
5.7
-36%
4.5
-7%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
6.4
7
-9%
10.3
-61%
8.2
-28%
5.3
17%
3.8
41%
7.8
-22%
9.1
-42%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
4.6
5.1
-11%
7.2
-57%
6.1
-33%
1.7
63%
1.9
59%
4.7
-2%
6.4
-39%
Gamma
2.24 98%
2.26 97%
2.4 92%
2.15 102%
2.1 105%
2.09 105%
2.4 92%
2.24 98%
CCT
7157 91%
7201 90%
7224 90%
7961 82%
6394 102%
6502 100%
7526 86%
7478 87%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
18 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5 ms rise
↘ 13 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 36 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
40 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 17 ms rise
↘ 23 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 57 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei P smart
66353 Points
Honor 9 Lite
67727 Points +2%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
56798 Points -14%
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
63195 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
47339 Points -29%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
45549 Points -31%
Motorola Moto G5s
46370 Points -30%
BQ Aquaris X
63428 Points -4%
PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Huawei P smart
5817 Points
Honor 9 Lite
5887 Points +1%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
4419 Points -24%
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
6024 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
4920 Points -15%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
5000 Points -14%
Motorola Moto G5s
4669 Points -20%
BQ Aquaris X
5792 Points 0%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Huawei P smart
4874 Points
Honor 9 Lite
4911 Points +1%
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
4847 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
3722 Points -24%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
3756 Points -23%
Motorola Moto G5s
3604 Points -26%
BQ Aquaris X
4891 Points 0%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Huawei P smart
1480 Points
Honor 9 Lite
1423 Points -4%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
435 Points -71%
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
1398 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
353 Points -76%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
1000 Points -32%
Motorola Moto G5s
848 Points -43%
BQ Aquaris X
1333 Points -10%
System (sort by value)
Huawei P smart
3223 Points
Honor 9 Lite
3058 Points -5%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
2694 Points -16%
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
2983 Points -7%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
2368 Points -27%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
2185 Points -32%
Motorola Moto G5s
1553 Points -52%
BQ Aquaris X
3551 Points +10%
Memory (sort by value)
Huawei P smart
1889 Points
Honor 9 Lite
1757 Points -7%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
1658 Points -12%
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
1998 Points +6%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
1265 Points -33%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
1296 Points -31%
Motorola Moto G5s
656 Points -65%
BQ Aquaris X
1039 Points -45%
Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P smart
857 Points
Honor 9 Lite
859 Points 0%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
826 Points -4%
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
849 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
533 Points -38%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
529 Points -38%
Motorola Moto G5s
723 Points -16%
BQ Aquaris X
1014 Points +18%
Web (sort by value)
Huawei P smart
919 Points
Honor 9 Lite
888 Points -3%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
10 Points -99%
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
753 Points -18%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
10 Points -99%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
666 Points -28%
Motorola Moto G5s
703 Points -24%
BQ Aquaris X
843 Points -8%
Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei P smart
946 Points
Honor 9 Lite
945 Points 0%
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
914 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
736 Points -22%
Motorola Moto G5s
630 Points -33%
BQ Aquaris X
929 Points -2%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei P smart
3732 Points
Honor 9 Lite
3730 Points 0%
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
3631 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
3777 Points +1%
Motorola Moto G5s
2270 Points -39%
BQ Aquaris X
4522 Points +21%
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Huawei P smart
3117 Points
Honor 9 Lite
3117 Points 0%
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
3015 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
2371 Points -24%
Motorola Moto G5s
1871 Points -40%
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Huawei P smart
11912 Points
Honor 9 Lite
12278 Points +3%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
11611 Points -3%
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
10294 Points -14%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
8318 Points -30%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
8550 Points -28%
Motorola Moto G5s
9491 Points -20%
BQ Aquaris X
14034 Points +18%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Huawei P smart
11262 Points
Honor 9 Lite
11712 Points +4%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
11147 Points -1%
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
9936 Points -12%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
7456 Points -34%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
7793 Points -31%
Motorola Moto G5s
9626 Points -15%
BQ Aquaris X
13330 Points +18%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P smart
14930 Points
Honor 9 Lite
14780 Points -1%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
13590 Points -9%
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
11780 Points -21%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
12955 Points -13%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
12954 Points -13%
Motorola Moto G5s
9045 Points -39%
BQ Aquaris X
17124 Points +15%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Huawei P smart
284 Points
Honor 9 Lite
230 Points -19%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
606 Points +113%
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
627 Points +121%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
340 Points +20%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
490 Points +73%
Motorola Moto G5s
555 Points +95%
BQ Aquaris X
849 Points +199%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P smart
229 Points
Honor 9 Lite
184 Points -20%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
516 Points +125%
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
532 Points +132%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
278 Points +21%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
407 Points +78%
Motorola Moto G5s
483 Points +111%
BQ Aquaris X
724 Points +216%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P smart
1787 Points
Honor 9 Lite
1788 Points 0%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
1547 Points -13%
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
1667 Points -7%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
1535 Points -14%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
1699 Points -5%
Motorola Moto G5s
1158 Points -35%
BQ Aquaris X
2139 Points +20%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Huawei P smart
316 Points
Honor 9 Lite
312 Points -1%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
389 Points +23%
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
353 Points +12%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
247 Points -22%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
312 Points -1%
Motorola Moto G5s
295 Points -7%
BQ Aquaris X
465 Points +47%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P smart
256 Points
Honor 9 Lite
253 Points -1%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
321 Points +25%
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
289 Points +13%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
199 Points -22%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
253 Points -1%
Motorola Moto G5s
243 Points -5%
BQ Aquaris X
380 Points +48%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P smart
1827 Points
Honor 9 Lite
1748 Points -4%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
1532 Points -16%
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
1527 Points -16%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
1522 Points -17%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
1670 Points -9%
Motorola Moto G5s
1199 Points -34%
BQ Aquaris X
2179 Points +19%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P smart
18 fps
Honor 9 Lite
18 fps 0%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
19 fps +6%
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
16 fps -11%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
12 fps -33%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
19 fps +6%
Motorola Moto G5s
16 fps -11%
BQ Aquaris X
22 fps +22%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P smart
19 fps
Honor 9 Lite
19 fps 0%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
18 fps -5%
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
16 fps -16%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
12 fps -37%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
12 fps -37%
Motorola Moto G5s
16 fps -16%
BQ Aquaris X
23 fps +21%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Huawei P smart
8.3 fps
Honor 9 Lite
8.4 fps +1%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
8.5 fps +2%
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
6.7 fps -19%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
5.1 fps -39%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
9.8 fps +18%
Motorola Moto G5s
7.4 fps -11%
BQ Aquaris X
9.7 fps +17%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P smart
8.7 fps
Honor 9 Lite
8.6 fps -1%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
7.9 fps -9%
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
7.3 fps -16%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
5.1 fps -41%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
5 fps -43%
Motorola Moto G5s
7.1 fps -18%
BQ Aquaris X
9.8 fps +13%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P smart
5.2 fps
Honor 9 Lite
5 fps -4%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
5 fps -4%
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
4.5 fps -13%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
3.2 fps -38%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
7.3 fps +40%
Motorola Moto G5s
5 fps -4%
BQ Aquaris X
6.3 fps +21%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P smart
5.3 fps
Honor 9 Lite
3.2 fps -40%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
4.6 fps -13%
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
4.8 fps -9%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
3.3 fps -38%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
3.2 fps -40%
Motorola Moto G5s
4.6 fps -13%
BQ Aquaris X
6.4 fps +21%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P smart
2.9 fps
Honor 9 Lite
2.9 fps 0%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
3 fps +3%
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
2.7 fps -7%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
1.9 fps -34%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
3.9 fps +34%
Motorola Moto G5s
2.7 fps -7%
BQ Aquaris X
3.5 fps +21%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P smart
3.2 fps
Honor 9 Lite
3.2 fps 0%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
2.8 fps -12%
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
2.9 fps -9%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
1.9 fps -41%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
1.9 fps -41%
Motorola Moto G5s
2.5 fps -22%
BQ Aquaris X
3.5 fps +9%
Lightmark - 1920x1080 1080p (sort by value)
Huawei P8 lite 2017
4.33 fps
Basemark X 1.1
Medium Quality (sort by value)
Huawei P8 lite 2017
15988 Points
High Quality (sort by value)
Huawei P8 lite 2017
8323 Points
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value)
Huawei P8 lite 2017
145 Points
Epic Citadel - Ultra High Quality (sort by value)
Huawei P8 lite 2017
43 fps

Legend

 
Huawei P smart HiSilicon Kirin 659, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Honor 9 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 659, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei P8 lite 2017 HiSilicon Kirin 655, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei Mate 10 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 659, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa, ARM Mali-T830 MP1, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa, ARM Mali-T830 MP1, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Motorola Moto G5s Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Qualcomm Adreno 505, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
BQ Aquaris X Qualcomm Snapdragon 626, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 32 GB eMMC Flash
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Huawei Mate 10 Lite (Chrome 62)
30.23 Points +14%
Huawei P8 lite 2017 (Chrome 55)
29.5 Points +11%
BQ Aquaris X (Chrome Version 60)
27.1 Points +2%
Huawei P smart (Chrome 64)
26.63 Points
Honor 9 Lite (Chrome 63)
26.42 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 (Samsung Browser 5.4)
25.97 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 (Chrome 56.0.2924.87)
23.28 Points -13%
Motorola Moto G5s (Chrome 62)
18.66 Points -30%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Huawei Mate 10 Lite (Chrome 62)
5096 Points +13%
BQ Aquaris X (Chrome Version 60)
4786 Points +6%
Honor 9 Lite (Chrome 63)
4742 Points +5%
Huawei P8 lite 2017 (Chrome 55)
4630 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 (Samsung Browser 5.4)
4560 Points +1%
Huawei P smart (Chrome 64)
4497 Points
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 (Chrome 56.0.2924.87)
3799 Points -16%
Motorola Moto G5s (Chrome 62)
3035 Points -33%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Motorola Moto G5s (Chrome 62)
13057 ms * -35%
Honor 9 Lite (Chrome 63)
10250 ms * -6%
Huawei P smart (Chrome 64)
9698 ms *
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 (Chrome 56.0.2924.87)
9669 ms * -0%
BQ Aquaris X (Chrome Version 60)
8825 ms * +9%
Huawei P8 lite 2017 (Chrome 55)
8768 ms * +10%
Huawei Mate 10 Lite (Chrome 62)
8694 ms * +10%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 (Samsung Browser 5.4)
6821 ms * +30%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall
Honor 9 Lite (Chrome 63)
108 Points +17%
Huawei Mate 10 Lite (Chrome 62)
104 Points +13%
Huawei P smart (Chrome 64)
92 Points
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 (Samsung Browser 5.4)
75 Points -18%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 (Chrome 56.0.2924.87)
64 Points -30%
Huawei P8 lite 2017 (Chrome 55)
62 Points -33%
Motorola Moto G5s (Chrome 62)
61 Points -34%

* ... smaller is better

Huawei P smartHonor 9 LiteHuawei P8 lite 2017Huawei Mate 10 LiteSamsung Galaxy J7 2017Samsung Galaxy A3 2017Motorola Moto G5sBQ Aquaris X
AndroBench 3-5
39%
-50%
-27%
-36%
-41%
4%
-23%
Sequential Read 256KB
269.4
269.6
0%
165.8
-38%
286.8
6%
198.5
-26%
199.7
-26%
259
-4%
266.4
-1%
Sequential Write 256KB
121.1
138.2
14%
42
-65%
99.8
-18%
53
-56%
45.96
-62%
77.5
-36%
75.3
-38%
Random Read 4KB
66.1
68.4
3%
38.7
-41%
31.5
-52%
25.86
-61%
22.32
-66%
40.6
-39%
37.47
-43%
Random Write 4KB
21.3
66.8
214%
8
-62%
15.26
-28%
10.54
-51%
9.62
-55%
46.2
117%
11.85
-44%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
82.3 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
83.1 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
1%
53.1 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-35%
69.1 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-16%
76.1 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-8%
75.5 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-8%
84.1 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
2%
84.3 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
2%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
72.4 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
71.9 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-1%
32.1 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-56%
35.35 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-51%
63.9 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-12%
50.1 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-31%
62.3 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-14%
62.6 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-14%
Dead Trigger 2
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high58 fps
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high18 fps

no benchmarks found

Carga Máxima
 35.5 °C35.7 °C34.6 °C 
 35.7 °C34.7 °C34.7 °C 
 34 °C34 °C35.3 °C 
Máximo: 35.7 °C
Médio: 34.9 °C
30.3 °C31.8 °C33.2 °C
30.6 °C31.8 °C34.1 °C
31 °C31.2 °C32.8 °C
Máximo: 34.1 °C
Médio: 31.9 °C
alimentação elétrica  26.6 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20.6 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.9 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.7 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 34.1 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.2 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.239.92532.935.73137.238.44031.738.45039.6436328.3328027.332.110026.932.712526.735.21602433.120020.939.125020.943.931519.546.340018.555.750017.560.163017.561.780015.761.8100015.867125016.671.2160015.870.7200015.472250015.570.131501674.1400015.87950001677.1630016.372.8800016.3731000016.273.41250016.467.41600016.457.6SPL28.685.2N1.157.7median 16.4median 67Delta2.210.835.242.632.941.437.237.631.739.639.637.828.331.827.330.626.931.226.729.92432.820.939.620.945.819.549.818.557.317.558.417.559.815.762.315.866.216.66915.870.415.472.415.574.81676.415.878.31676.116.374.616.376.816.279.916.472.716.460.428.686.51.162.1median 16.4median 66.22.211.831.630.825.430.525.331.232.930.733.631.731.628.828.422.6272620.836.82240.221.349.220.853.721.257.119.462.619.567.417.767.817.969.517.870.717.372.117.474.616.775.217.275.518.277.917.981.417.67917.775.617.875.417.971.318.162.618.255.83087.11.370.5median 17.9median 70.51.410.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHuawei P smartHuawei Mate 10 LiteSamsung Galaxy J7 2017
Huawei P smart audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.6% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.2% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 50% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 68% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Huawei Mate 10 Lite audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 10.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 60% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 76% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 19% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 29% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 49% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.01 / 0.23 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.62 / 1.76 / 1.87 Watt
Carga midlight 4.47 / 6.39 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Huawei P smart
3000 mAh
Honor 9 Lite
3000 mAh
Huawei P8 lite 2017
3000 mAh
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
3340 mAh
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
3600 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
2350 mAh
Motorola Moto G5s
3000 mAh
BQ Aquaris X
3100 mAh
Power Consumption
-2%
-42%
-9%
46%
55%
4%
-13%
Idle Minimum *
0.62
0.85
-37%
1.44
-132%
0.87
-40%
0.39
37%
0.37
40%
0.67
-8%
1.12
-81%
Idle Average *
1.76
2
-14%
2.47
-40%
2.14
-22%
1.06
40%
0.78
56%
1.4
20%
2.16
-23%
Idle Maximum *
1.87
2.04
-9%
2.58
-38%
2.16
-16%
1.08
42%
0.84
55%
1.52
19%
2.18
-17%
Load Average *
4.47
3.23
28%
4.55
-2%
3.7
17%
1.82
59%
1.52
66%
4.56
-2%
2.94
34%
Load Maximum *
6.39
4.93
23%
6.3
1%
5.48
14%
3.21
50%
2.75
57%
7.05
-10%
5.1
20%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
16h 25min
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 64)
9h 25min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
10h 15min
Carga (máximo brilho)
3h 22min
Huawei P smart
3000 mAh
Honor 9 Lite
3000 mAh
Huawei P8 lite 2017
3000 mAh
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
3340 mAh
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
3600 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
2350 mAh
Motorola Moto G5s
3000 mAh
BQ Aquaris X
3100 mAh
Battery Runtime
8%
22%
0%
99%
108%
8%
5%
Reader / Idle
985
965
-2%
1326
35%
1150
17%
1950
98%
2862
191%
1233
25%
H.264
615
622
1%
644
5%
502
-18%
1096
78%
988
61%
645
5%
WiFi v1.3
565
601
6%
604
7%
520
-8%
904
60%
668
18%
518
-8%
592
5%
Load
202
253
25%
283
40%
223
10%
525
160%
532
163%
225
11%

Pro

+ Desempenho adequado
+ Android 8
+ Versão mais recente do EMUI
+ Dual SIM
+ Relação tela-corpo decente
+ Divisão de tela
+ Leitor de digitais com funcionalidades adicionais
+ Câmera principal dupla com efeito bokeh
+ Selfies com efeito bokeh
+ DisplayPort
+ Headset

Contra

- Carece de importantes bandas 3G e 4G LTE (particularmente aquelas usadas nos Estados Unidos)
- Sem ac-Wi-Fi
- Alto falante mono
- Sem USB-C
- Estamina pobre
- Leitor de digitais virado para trás inutilizável com o telefone colocado sobre a mesa
- Carcaça suscetível a impressões digitais


In review: Huawei P Smart (FIG-LX1). Review unit courtesy of Huawei Germany.
In review: Huawei P Smart (FIG-LX1). Review unit courtesy of Huawei Germany.

O Huawei P Smart é como uma campanha de imagem para os smartphones de gama média. Suas especificações de hardware relevantes, como CPU, GPU ou capacidades celulares, são iguais às de outros smartphones de gama média, como o P8 Lite, Mate 10 Lite e Honor 9 Lite. O Mate 10 Lite oferece mais RAM e memória de armazenamento, mas também é mais caro do que o P Smart. E, ao contrário do Mate 10 Lite, o P Smart não está sujeito a uma comparação direta com um modelo top com o mesmo nome, porém, melhor equipado. Por conseguinte, a nossa pergunta inicial no início desta análise em relação à nomenclatura do dispositivo pode ser melhor respondida como apreciação da classe média.

O Huawei P Smart é um smartphone decente de gama média, sem ambições de enfrentar qualquer um dos carros-chefes bem conhecidos.

A relação preço-desempenho é decente e também é o desempenho geral - não é o mais rápido, mas no geral, está na metade superior. O sistema operacional e o EMUI estão atualizados. O chassi de alumínio de alta qualidade com sua relação muito boa de tela-corpo é adequado para as ambições do P Smart, mas não esconde o fato de que há duas desvantagens principais: a escolha altamente limitada de frequências celulares e a curta duração da bateria sob uso intenso.

Huawei P smart - 10/31/2019 v7 (old)
Inge Schwabe

Acabamento
87%
Teclado
69 / 75 → 92%
Mouse
91%
Conectividade
41 / 70 → 58%
Peso
93%
Bateria
86%
Pantalha
85%
Desempenho do jogos
6 / 64 → 9%
Desempenho da aplicação
46 / 86 → 54%
Temperatura
92%
Ruído
100%
Audio
72 / 90 → 80%
Camera
52%
Médio
71%
77%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Huawei P Smart
Inge Schwabe, 2018-03- 8 (Update: 2018-03-13)