Breve Análise do Smartphone Huawei P Smart
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 89 %
iluminação com acumulador: 573 cd/m²
Contraste: 910:1 (Preto: 0.63 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 4.6 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.24
| Huawei P smart IPS, 2160x1080, 5.7" | Honor 9 Lite IPS, 2160x1080, 5.7" | Huawei P8 lite 2017 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2" | Huawei Mate 10 Lite IPS, 2160x1080, 5.9" | Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 Super AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5" | Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 Super AMOLED, 1280x720, 4.7" | Motorola Moto G5s IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2" | BQ Aquaris X LTPS IPS , 1920x1080, 5.2" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 11% | -5% | 1% | 15% | 25% | -3% | -2% | |
| Brightness middle | 573 | 627 9% | 575 0% | 467 -18% | 454 -21% | 574 0% | 490 -14% | 675 18% |
| Brightness | 568 | 622 10% | 559 -2% | 457 -20% | 463 -18% | 576 1% | 502 -12% | 702 24% |
| Brightness Distribution | 89 | 82 -8% | 91 2% | 89 0% | 86 -3% | 94 6% | 92 3% | 91 2% |
| Black Level * | 0.63 | 0.41 35% | 0.39 38% | 0.3 52% | 0.43 32% | 0.59 6% | ||
| Contrast | 910 | 1529 68% | 1474 62% | 1557 71% | 1140 25% | 1144 26% | ||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.2 | 4.5 -7% | 5.2 -24% | 5 -19% | 2 52% | 2.4 43% | 5.7 -36% | 4.5 -7% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6.4 | 7 -9% | 10.3 -61% | 8.2 -28% | 5.3 17% | 3.8 41% | 7.8 -22% | 9.1 -42% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.6 | 5.1 -11% | 7.2 -57% | 6.1 -33% | 1.7 63% | 1.9 59% | 4.7 -2% | 6.4 -39% |
| Gamma | 2.24 98% | 2.26 97% | 2.4 92% | 2.15 102% | 2.1 105% | 2.09 105% | 2.4 92% | 2.24 98% |
| CCT | 7157 91% | 7201 90% | 7224 90% | 7961 82% | 6394 102% | 6502 100% | 7526 86% | 7478 87% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8702 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 18 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 13 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 36 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 40 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 17 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 23 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 58 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Huawei P smart | |
| Honor 9 Lite | |
| Huawei P8 lite 2017 | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Lite | |
| Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 | |
| Motorola Moto G5s | |
| BQ Aquaris X | |
| Geekbench 4.4 | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Huawei P smart | |
| Honor 9 Lite | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Lite | |
| Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 | |
| Motorola Moto G5s | |
| BQ Aquaris X | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Huawei P smart | |
| Honor 9 Lite | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Lite | |
| Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 | |
| Motorola Moto G5s | |
| BQ Aquaris X | |
| Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value) | |
| Huawei P smart | |
| Honor 9 Lite | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Lite | |
| Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 | |
| Motorola Moto G5s | |
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
| Huawei P smart | |
| Honor 9 Lite | |
| Huawei P8 lite 2017 | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Lite | |
| Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 | |
| Motorola Moto G5s | |
| BQ Aquaris X | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Huawei P smart | |
| Honor 9 Lite | |
| Huawei P8 lite 2017 | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Lite | |
| Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 | |
| Motorola Moto G5s | |
| BQ Aquaris X | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Huawei P smart | |
| Honor 9 Lite | |
| Huawei P8 lite 2017 | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Lite | |
| Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 | |
| Motorola Moto G5s | |
| BQ Aquaris X | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Huawei P smart | |
| Honor 9 Lite | |
| Huawei P8 lite 2017 | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Lite | |
| Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 | |
| Motorola Moto G5s | |
| BQ Aquaris X | |
| Lightmark - 1920x1080 1080p (sort by value) | |
| Huawei P8 lite 2017 | |
| Basemark X 1.1 | |
| Medium Quality (sort by value) | |
| Huawei P8 lite 2017 | |
| High Quality (sort by value) | |
| Huawei P8 lite 2017 | |
| Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value) | |
| Huawei P8 lite 2017 | |
| Epic Citadel - Ultra High Quality (sort by value) | |
| Huawei P8 lite 2017 | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Lite (Chrome 62) | |
| Huawei P8 lite 2017 (Chrome 55) | |
| BQ Aquaris X (Chrome Version 60) | |
| Huawei P smart (Chrome 64) | |
| Honor 9 Lite (Chrome 63) | |
| Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 (Samsung Browser 5.4) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 (Chrome 56.0.2924.87) | |
| Motorola Moto G5s (Chrome 62) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Lite (Chrome 62) | |
| BQ Aquaris X (Chrome Version 60) | |
| Honor 9 Lite (Chrome 63) | |
| Huawei P8 lite 2017 (Chrome 55) | |
| Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 (Samsung Browser 5.4) | |
| Huawei P smart (Chrome 64) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 (Chrome 56.0.2924.87) | |
| Motorola Moto G5s (Chrome 62) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Motorola Moto G5s (Chrome 62) | |
| Honor 9 Lite (Chrome 63) | |
| Huawei P smart (Chrome 64) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 (Chrome 56.0.2924.87) | |
| BQ Aquaris X (Chrome Version 60) | |
| Huawei P8 lite 2017 (Chrome 55) | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Lite (Chrome 62) | |
| Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 (Samsung Browser 5.4) | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall | |
| Honor 9 Lite (Chrome 63) | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Lite (Chrome 62) | |
| Huawei P smart (Chrome 64) | |
| Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 (Samsung Browser 5.4) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 (Chrome 56.0.2924.87) | |
| Huawei P8 lite 2017 (Chrome 55) | |
| Motorola Moto G5s (Chrome 62) | |
* ... smaller is better
| Huawei P smart | Honor 9 Lite | Huawei P8 lite 2017 | Huawei Mate 10 Lite | Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 | Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 | Motorola Moto G5s | BQ Aquaris X | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | 39% | -50% | -27% | -36% | -41% | 4% | -23% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 269.4 | 269.6 0% | 165.8 -38% | 286.8 6% | 198.5 -26% | 199.7 -26% | 259 -4% | 266.4 -1% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 121.1 | 138.2 14% | 42 -65% | 99.8 -18% | 53 -56% | 45.96 -62% | 77.5 -36% | 75.3 -38% |
| Random Read 4KB | 66.1 | 68.4 3% | 38.7 -41% | 31.5 -52% | 25.86 -61% | 22.32 -66% | 40.6 -39% | 37.47 -43% |
| Random Write 4KB | 21.3 | 66.8 214% | 8 -62% | 15.26 -28% | 10.54 -51% | 9.62 -55% | 46.2 117% | 11.85 -44% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 82.3 ? | 83.1 ? 1% | 53.1 ? -35% | 69.1 ? -16% | 76.1 ? -8% | 75.5 ? -8% | 84.1 ? 2% | 84.3 ? 2% |
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 72.4 ? | 71.9 ? -1% | 32.1 ? -56% | 35.35 ? -51% | 63.9 ? -12% | 50.1 ? -31% | 62.3 ? -14% | 62.6 ? -14% |
| Dead Trigger 2 | |||
| Configurações | Valor | ||
| high | 58 fps | ||
| Asphalt 8: Airborne | |||
| Configurações | Valor | ||
| high | 18 fps | ||
no benchmarks found
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.7 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 34.1 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.2 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Huawei P smart audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.6% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.2% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 50% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 68% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Huawei Mate 10 Lite audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 10.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 60% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 76% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 19% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 29% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 49% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado |   0.01 / 0.23 Watt |
| Ocioso |  0.62 / 1.76 / 1.87 Watt |
| Carga |
4.47 / 6.39 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Huawei P smart 3000 mAh | Honor 9 Lite 3000 mAh | Huawei P8 lite 2017 3000 mAh | Huawei Mate 10 Lite 3340 mAh | Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 3600 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 2350 mAh | Motorola Moto G5s 3000 mAh | BQ Aquaris X 3100 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -2% | -42% | -9% | 46% | 55% | 4% | -13% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 0.62 | 0.85 -37% | 1.44 -132% | 0.87 -40% | 0.39 37% | 0.37 40% | 0.67 -8% | 1.12 -81% |
| Idle Average * | 1.76 | 2 -14% | 2.47 -40% | 2.14 -22% | 1.06 40% | 0.78 56% | 1.4 20% | 2.16 -23% |
| Idle Maximum * | 1.87 | 2.04 -9% | 2.58 -38% | 2.16 -16% | 1.08 42% | 0.84 55% | 1.52 19% | 2.18 -17% |
| Load Average * | 4.47 | 3.23 28% | 4.55 -2% | 3.7 17% | 1.82 59% | 1.52 66% | 4.56 -2% | 2.94 34% |
| Load Maximum * | 6.39 | 4.93 23% | 6.3 1% | 5.48 14% | 3.21 50% | 2.75 57% | 7.05 -10% | 5.1 20% |
* ... smaller is better
| Huawei P smart 3000 mAh | Honor 9 Lite 3000 mAh | Huawei P8 lite 2017 3000 mAh | Huawei Mate 10 Lite 3340 mAh | Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 3600 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 2350 mAh | Motorola Moto G5s 3000 mAh | BQ Aquaris X 3100 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 8% | 22% | 0% | 99% | 108% | 8% | 5% | |
| Reader / Idle | 985 | 965 -2% | 1326 35% | 1150 17% | 1950 98% | 2862 191% | 1233 25% | |
| H.264 | 615 | 622 1% | 644 5% | 502 -18% | 1096 78% | 988 61% | 645 5% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 565 | 601 6% | 604 7% | 520 -8% | 904 60% | 668 18% | 518 -8% | 592 5% |
| Load | 202 | 253 25% | 283 40% | 223 10% | 525 160% | 532 163% | 225 11% |
Pro
Contra
O Huawei P Smart é como uma campanha de imagem para os smartphones de gama média. Suas especificações de hardware relevantes, como CPU, GPU ou capacidades celulares, são iguais às de outros smartphones de gama média, como o P8 Lite, Mate 10 Lite e Honor 9 Lite. O Mate 10 Lite oferece mais RAM e memória de armazenamento, mas também é mais caro do que o P Smart. E, ao contrário do Mate 10 Lite, o P Smart não está sujeito a uma comparação direta com um modelo top com o mesmo nome, porém, melhor equipado. Por conseguinte, a nossa pergunta inicial no início desta análise em relação à nomenclatura do dispositivo pode ser melhor respondida como apreciação da classe média.
O Huawei P Smart é um smartphone decente de gama média, sem ambições de enfrentar qualquer um dos carros-chefes bem conhecidos.
A relação preço-desempenho é decente e também é o desempenho geral - não é o mais rápido, mas no geral, está na metade superior. O sistema operacional e o EMUI estão atualizados. O chassi de alumínio de alta qualidade com sua relação muito boa de tela-corpo é adequado para as ambições do P Smart, mas não esconde o fato de que há duas desvantagens principais: a escolha altamente limitada de frequências celulares e a curta duração da bateria sob uso intenso.
Huawei P smart
- 10/31/2019 v7 (old)
Inge Schwabe
Price comparison
