Breve Análise do Smartphone Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
|
iluminação: 84 %
iluminação com acumulador: 427 cd/m²
Contraste: 2135:1 (Preto: 0.2 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.95 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 2.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
96.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.07
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019 IPS, 2340x1080, 6.2" | Huawei P Smart 2019 IPS, 2340x1080, 6.2" | Huawei P Smart Plus IPS/LTPS, 2340x1080, 6.3" | Motorola Moto G7 IPS, 2270x1080, 6.2" | Honor 10 Lite IPS, 2340x1080, 6.2" | Samsung Galaxy M20 PLS TFT, 2340x1080, 6.3" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | -8% | -73% | -69% | -27% | -76% | |
Brightness middle | 427 | 458 7% | 479 12% | 471 10% | 467 9% | 452 6% |
Brightness | 415 | 440 6% | 471 13% | 453 9% | 446 7% | 445 7% |
Brightness Distribution | 84 | 85 1% | 94 12% | 94 12% | 89 6% | 92 10% |
Black Level * | 0.2 | 0.35 -75% | 0.27 -35% | 0.5 -150% | 0.58 -190% | 0.41 -105% |
Contrast | 2135 | 1309 -39% | 1774 -17% | 942 -56% | 805 -62% | 1102 -48% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.95 | 1.4 28% | 6.24 -220% | 5.5 -182% | 1.5 23% | 5.3 -172% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.47 | 3.8 15% | 10.05 -125% | 7.95 -78% | 4.5 -1% | 9.5 -113% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.3 | 2.4 -4% | 7.4 -222% | 5 -117% | 2.4 -4% | 6.8 -196% |
Gamma | 2.07 106% | 2.22 99% | 2.39 92% | 2.326 95% | 2.22 99% | 2.23 99% |
CCT | 6414 101% | 6235 104% | 8942 73% | 7654 85% | 6387 102% | 8355 78% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 100 Hz | ≤ 10 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 100 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 10 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 100 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
20 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 9 ms rise | |
↘ 11 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 39 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
44 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 21 ms rise | |
↘ 23 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 71 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=162, last 2 years) | |
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (30 - 33, n=8) | |
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019 (Chrome 74) | |
Samsung Galaxy M20 (Samsung Brwoser 9.2) |
Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=148, last 2 years) | |
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (30.4 - 33.9, n=6) | |
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019 (Chome 74) | |
Samsung Galaxy M20 |
WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=82, last 2 years) | |
Huawei P Smart 2019 (Chrome 70) | |
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019 (Chrome 74) | |
Honor 10 Lite (Chrome 71) | |
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (52 - 69, n=11) | |
Huawei P Smart Plus (Chrome 71) | |
Motorola Moto G7 (Chrome 71) | |
Samsung Galaxy M20 |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=204, last 2 years) | |
Huawei P Smart 2019 (Chrome 70) | |
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019 (Chrome 74) | |
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (9041 - 10544, n=13) | |
Honor 10 Lite (Chrome 71) | |
Huawei P Smart Plus (Chrome 71) | |
Samsung Galaxy M20 | |
Motorola Moto G7 (Chrome 71) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
Motorola Moto G7 (Chrome 71) | |
Huawei P Smart Plus (Chrome 71) | |
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019 (Chrome 74) | |
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (3999 - 4853, n=13) | |
Honor 10 Lite (Chrome 71) | |
Huawei P Smart 2019 (Chrome 70) | |
Samsung Galaxy M20 | |
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=161, last 2 years) |
* ... smaller is better
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019 | Huawei P Smart 2019 | Huawei P Smart Plus | Motorola Moto G7 | Honor 10 Lite | Samsung Galaxy M20 | Average 64 GB eMMC Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | 5% | 27% | 21% | 3% | 2% | -3% | 561% | |
Sequential Read 256KB | 295.4 | 288.3 -2% | 303.2 3% | 297 1% | 288.5 -2% | 300 2% | 274 ? -7% | 1834 ? 521% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 152.8 | 191.4 25% | 200.5 31% | 216 41% | 190.6 25% | 137 -10% | 176.2 ? 15% | 1426 ? 833% |
Random Read 4KB | 40.3 | 45.66 13% | 102.5 154% | 69.3 72% | 45.15 12% | 64 59% | 59.4 ? 47% | 278 ? 590% |
Random Write 4KB | 77.3 | 70.7 -9% | 74 -4% | 75.6 -2% | 66.1 -14% | 44 -43% | 32 ? -59% | 310 ? 301% |
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 76.3 ? | 76.2 ? 0% | 76.9 ? 1% | 86.9 ? 14% | 75.8 ? -1% | 81.5 ? 7% | 77.4 ? 1% | |
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 66.7 ? | 66.9 ? 0% | 51.9 ? -22% | 66.8 ? 0% | 67 ? 0% | 65.3 ? -2% | 58.3 ? -13% |
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.5 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.6 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 66% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 66% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 66% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (121.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 89% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 2% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 97% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Huawei P Smart Plus audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 48% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 66% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
desligado | 0 / 0.1 Watt |
Ocioso | 0.8 / 1.2 / 2.3 Watt |
Carga |
4.5 / 7.3 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019 3400 mAh | Huawei P Smart 2019 3400 mAh | Huawei P Smart Plus 3340 mAh | Motorola Moto G7 3000 mAh | Honor 10 Lite 3400 mAh | Samsung Galaxy M20 5000 mAh | Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -17% | -47% | -17% | -22% | -15% | -27% | -15% | |
Idle Minimum * | 0.8 | 0.84 -5% | 1.3 -63% | 1.1 -38% | 1 -25% | 0.94 -18% | 1.058 ? -32% | 0.895 ? -12% |
Idle Average * | 1.2 | 2.21 -84% | 2.5 -108% | 1.8 -50% | 2.19 -83% | 2.37 -98% | 2.2 ? -83% | 1.447 ? -21% |
Idle Maximum * | 2.3 | 2.23 3% | 3.6 -57% | 2.6 -13% | 2.2 4% | 2.42 -5% | 2.57 ? -12% | 1.608 ? 30% |
Load Average * | 4.5 | 4.2 7% | 5 -11% | 4.2 7% | 4.64 -3% | 3.83 15% | 4.61 ? -2% | 6.41 ? -42% |
Load Maximum * | 7.3 | 7.86 -8% | 7 4% | 6.8 7% | 7.7 -5% | 5.07 31% | 7.6 ? -4% | 9.61 ? -32% |
* ... smaller is better
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019 3400 mAh | Huawei P Smart 2019 3400 mAh | Huawei P Smart Plus 3340 mAh | Motorola Moto G7 3000 mAh | Honor 10 Lite 3400 mAh | Samsung Galaxy M20 5000 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -4% | -2% | 27% | -7% | 61% | |
Reader / Idle | 1346 | 1293 -4% | 1548 15% | 1533 14% | 1904 41% | |
H.264 | 536 | 464 -13% | 819 53% | 502 -6% | 1121 109% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 523 | 506 -3% | 512 -2% | 798 53% | 484 -7% | 928 77% |
Load | 249 | 257 3% | 219 -12% | 178 -29% | 288 16% |
Pro
Contra
Veredicto – Para a pequena sobretaxa é a melhor escolha
Testando o Huawei P Smart Plus (2019). Unidade de teste fornecida pela cyberport.
A política e modelos da Huawei este ano não é bem clara: Por que o fabricante traz dois dispositivos para o mercado que além da câmera só diferem em detalhes e também têm quase o mesmo preço? O Huawei P Smart Plus (2019) não é um smartphone ruim e, com sua WLAN e câmera tripla mais rápidas, também apresenta algumas melhorias em relação ao seu antecessor.
Por outro lado, o GPS poderia ter sido mais preciso e o risco e a traseira suscetível a arranhões e impressões digitais, também não são ideais. Todos os dispositivos desta série também têm alguma atualização em termos de duração da bateria, mesmo que o consumo de energia não seja muito alto. Portanto, é provavelmente o gerenciamento de energia que deixa algum espaço para melhorias.
O Huawei P Smart Plus (2019) é um smartphone de gama média com uma câmara tripla que dificilmente difere do seu modelo de irmão.
Então, qual você deve escolher, o Huawei P Smart Plus (2019) ou o Huawei P Smart (2019)? Em termos de preço, a diferença é quase insignificante. Devido a isso e às muitas semelhanças e melhor câmera, gostaríamos ter o modelo Plus.
No entanto, também existem algumas boas alternativas este ano. Você pode obter mais duração da bateria com o Motorola Moto G7 ou o Samsung Galaxy M20. E com o Huawei P Smart do ano passado você inclusive pode economizar alguns Euros adicionais e obter mais memória de trabalho, mas também tem que se contentar com uma câmera menos flexível.
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
-
05/23/2019 v6 (old)
Florian Schmitt