Breve Análise do Smartphone Huawei P Smart 2020 - Confortável e obsoleto

Name: Huawei P Smart 2020
Brand: Huawei

Conhecido em roupas novas?

O Huawei P Smart 2020 vem com o Google Services e é muito parecido com o seu antecessor. Embora tenha recebido algumas novas cores e um pouco mais de armazenamento, as poucas pequenas alterações são suficientes o suficiente para manter o smartphone acessível atualizado?

Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 06/01/2020 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

ARM Android Touchscreen

Test device courtesy of Huawei Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Huawei P Smart 2020 (P Serie)

Processador

HiSilicon Kirin 710 8 x 2.2 GHz, Cortex-A73/-A53

Placa gráfica

ARM Mali-G51 MP4

Memória

4 GB

Pantalha

6.21 polegadas 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixel 415 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, IPS, Brilhante: sim, 60 Hz

Disco rígido

128 GB eMMC Flash, 128 GB

, 116 GB livre

Conexões

1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Porta de áudio de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: microSD de até 512 GB, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Sensores: Sensor de aceleração, sensor de proximidade, bússola

Funcionamento em rede

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.2, 2G (850/900/1800/1900), 3G (B1/B2/B5/B8), 4G (B1/B3/B7/B8/B20), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 8.2 x 155.3 x 73.5

Bateria

3400 mAh Lítio-Polímero

Sistema Operativo

Android 9.0 Pie

Camera

Primary Camera: 13 MPix f/1.8, phase comparison AF, LED flash, videos @1080p/30fps (camera 1); 2.0MP, depth sharpness (camera 2)
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix f/2.0

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: Alto-falante mono na borda inferior, Teclado: Teclado virtual, Carregador, cabo USB, fone, SIM tool, 24 Meses Garantia, LTE Cat 6 (300Mbps/50Mbps); rádio FM; LED de notificação (multi-colored), fanless

peso

163 g, Suprimento de energia: 62 g

Preço

199 Euro

Links

Huawei página inicial

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Comparison Devices

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Drive	Size	Resolution
76.6 % v7 ^(old)	06/2020	Huawei P Smart 2020 Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4	163 g	128 GB eMMC Flash	6.21"	2340x1080
75.7 % v7 ^(old)	06/2020	Nokia 5.3 SD 665, Adreno 610	185 g	64 GB eMMC Flash	6.55"	1600x720
80.7 % v7 ^(old)	05/2020	Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S SD 720G, Adreno 618	209 g	128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	6.67"	2400x1080
76.6 % v7 ^(old)	05/2020	Motorola Moto G8 SD 665, Adreno 610	188 g	64 GB eMMC Flash	6.40"	1560x720
84.9 % v6 ^(old)	01/2019	Huawei P Smart 2019 Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4	160 g	64 GB eMMC Flash	6.20"	2340x1080

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Adreno 618, SD 720G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	256 (247^min - 263^max) MBit/s +21%
Huawei P Smart 2019 Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash	226 (197^min - 262^max) MBit/s +7%
Huawei P Smart 2020 Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash	211 (175^min - 242^max) MBit/s
Nokia 5.3 Adreno 610, SD 665, 64 GB eMMC Flash	163 (25^min - 258^max) MBit/s -23%
Motorola Moto G8 Adreno 610, SD 665, 64 GB eMMC Flash	55.8 (40^min - 67^max) MBit/s -74%
iperf3 receive AX12
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Adreno 618, SD 720G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	286 (225^min - 321^max) MBit/s +43%
Huawei P Smart 2020 Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash	200 (126^min - 252^max) MBit/s
Huawei P Smart 2019 Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash	164 (28^min - 206^max) MBit/s -18%
Nokia 5.3 Adreno 610, SD 665, 64 GB eMMC Flash	145 (20^min - 215^max) MBit/s -27%
Motorola Moto G8 Adreno 610, SD 665, 64 GB eMMC Flash	54.4 (38^min - 57^max) MBit/s -73%

Huawei P Smart 2020; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø200 (126-252)

Huawei P Smart 2020; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø211 (175-242)

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

Huawei P Smart 2020

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max

OnePlus 8T

Olympus E-M10 II

click to load images

Huawei P Smart 2020

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max

OnePlus 8T

Olympus E-M10 II

click to load images

Huawei P Smart 2020

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max

OnePlus 8T

Olympus E-M10 II

ColorChecker Huawei P Smart 2020: 5.59 ∆E min: 1.33 - max: 10.35 ∆E


423 cd/m²	427 cd/m²	427 cd/m²
440 cd/m²	446 cd/m²	443 cd/m²
484 cd/m²	472 cd/m²	474 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 484 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 448.4 cd/m² Minimum: 2.166 cd/m²
iluminação: 87 %
iluminação com acumulador: 446 cd/m²
Contraste: 875:1 (Preto: 0.51 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.22 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 6.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.5% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.43

	Huawei P Smart 2020 IPS, 2340x1080, 6.2"	Nokia 5.3 IPS, 1600x720, 6.6"	Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S IPS, 2400x1080, 6.7"	Motorola Moto G8 IPS, 1560x720, 6.4"	Huawei P Smart 2019 IPS, 2340x1080, 6.2"
Screen		1%	22%	35%	34%
Brightness middle	446	523 17%	622 39%	504 13%	458 3%
Brightness	448	482 8%	612 37%	452 1%	440 -2%
Brightness Distribution	87	86 -1%	94 8%	83 -5%	85 -2%
Black Level *	0.51	0.46 10%	0.56 -10%	0.28 45%	0.35 31%
Contrast	875	1137 30%	1111 27%	1800 106%	1309 50%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	5.22	6.22 -19%	3.98 24%	3.84 26%	1.4 73%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	8.66	10.56 -22%	7.33 15%	6.1 30%	3.8 56%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	6.8	8 -18%	4.5 34%	2.7 60%	2.4 65%
Gamma	2.43 ^91%	2.226 ^99%	2.206 ^100%	2.235 ^98%	2.22 ^99%
CCT	7956 ^82%	8856 ^73%	7361 ^88%	7125 ^91%	6235 ^104%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)			114.9

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

344 Hz

≤ 10 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 344 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 10 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 344 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
26 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 15 ms rise
26 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 11 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 59 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
42 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 25 ms rise
42 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 17 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 64 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

3DMark | VRMark | Geekbench 4.4 | BaseMark OS II

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2020 HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	16976 Points
Nokia 5.3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	24065 Points +42%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	38671 Points +128%
Motorola Moto G8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	24745 Points +46%
Huawei P Smart 2019 HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	16754 Points -1%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (12120 - 22168, n=12)	19147 Points +13%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2020 HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	19251 Points
Nokia 5.3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	15403 Points -20%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	52700 Points +174%
Motorola Moto G8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	24828 Points +29%
Huawei P Smart 2019 HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	19510 Points +1%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (2177 - 22605, n=12)	18746 Points -3%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2020 HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	12009 Points
Nokia 5.3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	20320 Points +69%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	20019 Points +67%
Motorola Moto G8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	24457 Points +104%
Huawei P Smart 2019 HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	11212 Points -7%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (11158 - 22668, n=12)	16572 Points +38%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2020 HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	1124 Points
Nokia 5.3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1795 Points +60%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	3501 Points +211%
Motorola Moto G8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1758 Points +56%
Huawei P Smart 2019 HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	812 Points -28%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (673 - 1503, n=15)	1218 Points +8%
Average of class Smartphone (812 - 7285, n=26, last 2 years)	4204 Points +274%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2020 HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	979 Points
Nokia 5.3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1663 Points +70%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	3647 Points +273%
Motorola Moto G8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1632 Points +67%
Huawei P Smart 2019 HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	683 Points -30%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (568 - 1355, n=15)	1072 Points +9%
Average of class Smartphone (756 - 9451, n=26, last 2 years)	4740 Points +384%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2020 HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	2328 Points
Nokia 5.3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2482 Points +7%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	3070 Points +32%
Motorola Moto G8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2405 Points +3%
Huawei P Smart 2019 HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	2381 Points +2%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (1907 - 2654, n=15)	2422 Points +4%
Average of class Smartphone (1093 - 4349, n=26, last 2 years)	3303 Points +42%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2020 HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	1385 Points
Nokia 5.3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1810 Points +31%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	3669 Points +165%
Motorola Moto G8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1783 Points +29%
Huawei P Smart 2019 HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	1379 Points 0%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (844 - 1534, n=15)	1395 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (883 - 23024, n=73, last 2 years)	11109 Points +702%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2020 HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	1251 Points
Nokia 5.3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1692 Points +35%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	3803 Points +204%
Motorola Moto G8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1669 Points +33%
Huawei P Smart 2019 HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	1225 Points -2%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (740 - 1378, n=15)	1250 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (840 - 45492, n=73, last 2 years)	19708 Points +1475%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2020 HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	2221 Points
Nokia 5.3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2396 Points +8%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	3267 Points +47%
Motorola Moto G8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2347 Points +6%
Huawei P Smart 2019 HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	2459 Points +11%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (1656 - 2723, n=15)	2358 Points +6%
Average of class Smartphone (1075 - 8749, n=73, last 2 years)	5001 Points +125%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2020 HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	859 Points
Nokia 5.3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1152 Points +34%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	2507 Points +192%
Motorola Moto G8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1093 Points +27%
Huawei P Smart 2019 HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	834 Points -3%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (550 - 1002, n=15)	891 Points +4%
Average of class Smartphone (286 - 17553, n=73, last 2 years)	3084 Points +259%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2020 HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	728 Points
Nokia 5.3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	999 Points +37%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	2369 Points +225%
Motorola Moto G8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	945 Points +30%
Huawei P Smart 2019 HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	703 Points -3%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (457 - 857, n=15)	755 Points +4%
Average of class Smartphone (240 - 29890, n=73, last 2 years)	3263 Points +348%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2020 HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	2325 Points
Nokia 5.3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2476 Points +6%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	3152 Points +36%
Motorola Moto G8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2409 Points +4%
Huawei P Smart 2019 HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	2392 Points +3%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (1924 - 2716, n=15)	2429 Points +4%
Average of class Smartphone (858 - 7180, n=73, last 2 years)	3286 Points +41%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2020 HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	967 Points
Nokia 5.3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1148 Points +19%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	2680 Points +177%
Motorola Moto G8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1138 Points +18%
Huawei P Smart 2019 HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	966 Points 0%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (563 - 1351, n=15)	965 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (317 - 20131, n=160, last 2 years)	7767 Points +703%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2020 HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	831 Points
Nokia 5.3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	999 Points +20%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	2551 Points +207%
Motorola Moto G8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	990 Points +19%
Huawei P Smart 2019 HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	838 Points +1%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (470 - 1194, n=15)	831 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (267 - 33376, n=160, last 2 years)	11536 Points +1288%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2020 HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	2257 Points
Nokia 5.3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2409 Points +7%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	3256 Points +44%
Motorola Moto G8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2379 Points +5%
Huawei P Smart 2019 HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	2085 Points -8%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (1851 - 2789, n=15)	2350 Points +4%
Average of class Smartphone (877 - 8480, n=160, last 2 years)	4613 Points +104%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2020 HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	940 Points
Nokia 5.3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1140 Points +21%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	2353 Points +150%
Motorola Moto G8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1052 Points +12%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (927 - 1365, n=6)	1061 Points +13%
Average of class Smartphone (365 - 6635, n=72, last 2 years)	2846 Points +203%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2020 HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	803 Points
Nokia 5.3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	995 Points +24%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	2257 Points +181%
Motorola Moto G8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	914 Points +14%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (796 - 1220, n=6)	924 Points +15%
Average of class Smartphone (298 - 8601, n=72, last 2 years)	3095 Points +285%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2020 HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	2329 Points
Nokia 5.3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2321 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	2765 Points +19%
Motorola Moto G8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2240 Points -4%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (2196 - 2345, n=6)	2293 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (1667 - 4198, n=72, last 2 years)	2704 Points +16%

VRMark - Amber Room (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2020 HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	1146 Score
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	2416 Score +111%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (961 - 1146, n=3)	1047 Score -9%
Average of class Smartphone (2523 - 10071, n=6, last 2 years)	5819 Score +408%

Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2020 HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	1550 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	2620 Points +69%
Motorola Moto G8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1495 Points -4%
Huawei P Smart 2019 HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	1527 Points -1%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (1523 - 1614, n=11)	1560 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (844 - 9574, n=82, last 2 years)	5486 Points +254%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2020 HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	5430 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	6263 Points +15%
Motorola Moto G8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	5134 Points -5%
Huawei P Smart 2019 HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	5407 Points 0%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (5266 - 5615, n=11)	5454 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2630 - 30323, n=82, last 2 years)	15064 Points +177%
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2020 HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	3256 Points
Huawei P Smart 2019 HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	3157 Points -3%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (2631 - 4083, n=11)	3514 Points +8%
Average of class Smartphone (5192 - 18534, n=58, last 2 years)	11998 Points +268%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2020 HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	2208 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	3542 Points +60%
Motorola Moto G8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2318 Points +5%
Huawei P Smart 2019 HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	2159 Points -2%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (2140 - 2445, n=13)	2255 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone (1196 - 11976, n=151, last 2 years)	6297 Points +185%
System (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2020 HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	5132 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	6828 Points +33%
Motorola Moto G8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	4391 Points -14%
Huawei P Smart 2019 HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	5074 Points -1%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (4826 - 5568, n=13)	5208 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (2368 - 16475, n=151, last 2 years)	10163 Points +98%
Memory (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2020 HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	3098 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	4295 Points +39%
Motorola Moto G8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2780 Points -10%
Huawei P Smart 2019 HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	2972 Points -4%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (2823 - 4360, n=13)	3181 Points +3%
Average of class Smartphone (962 - 12716, n=151, last 2 years)	6767 Points +118%
Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2020 HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	1488 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	3807 Points +156%
Motorola Moto G8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1932 Points +30%
Huawei P Smart 2019 HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	1469 Points -1%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (1450 - 1489, n=13)	1470 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (1017 - 58651, n=151, last 2 years)	16908 Points +1036%
Web (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2020 HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	1021 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	1410 Points +38%
Motorola Moto G8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1224 Points +20%
Huawei P Smart 2019 HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	982 Points -4%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (982 - 1212, n=13)	1092 Points +7%
Average of class Smartphone (841 - 2145, n=151, last 2 years)	1564 Points +53%

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=161, last 2 years)	120.4 Points +291%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S (Chrome 81)	48.53 Points +58%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (30 - 33, n=8)	31.5 Points +2%
Huawei P Smart 2020 (Chrome 81)	30.78 Points
Motorola Moto G8 (Chrome 81)	29.12 Points -5%

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S (Chrome 81)	89.5 Points +78%
Huawei P Smart 2020 (Chrome 81)	50.3 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (47 - 55.1, n=10)	50.2 Points 0%
Huawei P Smart 2019 (Chrome 70)	49.67 Points -1%
Motorola Moto G8 (Chrome 81)	33.38 Points -34%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=146, last 2 years)	136.2 runs/min +348%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S (Chome 81)	44.1 runs/min +45%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (30.4 - 33.9, n=6)	31.9 runs/min +5%
Huawei P Smart 2020 (Chome 81)	30.4 runs/min
Motorola Moto G8 (Chome 81)	25.4 runs/min -16%

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years)	148.7 Points +139%
Huawei P Smart 2019 (Chrome 70)	69 Points +11%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S (Chrome 81)	69 Points +11%
Huawei P Smart 2020 (Chrome 81)	62.1 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (52 - 69, n=11)	61.7 Points -1%
Motorola Moto G8 (Chrome 81)	38 Points -39%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=203, last 2 years)	37161 Points +283%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S (Chrome 81)	17303 Points +78%
Huawei P Smart 2019 (Chrome 70)	9708 Points 0%
Huawei P Smart 2020 (Chrome 81)	9699 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (9041 - 10544, n=13)	9659 Points 0%
Motorola Moto G8 (Chrome 81)	6133 Points -37%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Motorola Moto G8 (Chrome 81)	6719 ms * -68%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (3999 - 4853, n=13)	4223 ms * -6%
Huawei P Smart 2020 (Chrome 81)	4000 ms *
Huawei P Smart 2019 (Chrome 70)	3999 ms * -0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S (Chrome 81)	2794 ms * +30%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=160, last 2 years)	1568 ms * +61%

* ... smaller is better

	Huawei P Smart 2020	Nokia 5.3	Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S	Motorola Moto G8	Huawei P Smart 2019	Average 128 GB eMMC Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		31%	70%	27%	7%	17%	569%
Sequential Read 256KB	282.1	299.5 6%	496.6 76%	301 7%	288.3 2%	283 ?(106.7 - 511, n=76) 0%	1839 ?(226 - 4512, n=192, last 2 years) 552%
Sequential Write 256KB	168.3	243.2 45%	214.8 28%	239 42%	191.4 14%	194.6 ?(72.3 - 314, n=76) 16%	1425 ?(57.5 - 3908, n=192, last 2 years) 747%
Random Read 4KB	41.2	109.1 165%	137 233%	57.3 39%	45.66 11%	82.7 ?(8.63 - 247, n=76) 101%	277 ?(22.2 - 483, n=192, last 2 years) 572%
Random Write 4KB	61.1	45.2 -26%	123.6 102%	128.1 110%	70.7 16%	55.1 ?(3.84 - 159.9, n=76) -10%	309 ?(9.4 - 753, n=192, last 2 years) 406%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard	76.1 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	77.3 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 2%	74.5 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -2%	68.7 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -10%	76.2 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 0%	78.1 ?(29.2 - 153.8, n=34) 3%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard	67 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	60.7 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -9%	54.9 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -18%	48.7 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -27%	66.9 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 0%	61.8 ?(26.1 - 81.9, n=34) -8%

Huawei P Smart 2020; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 0.18.0: Ø29.9 (27-31)

Huawei P Smart 2020; PUBG Mobile; HD; 0.18.0: Ø29.7 (24-32)

Huawei P Smart 2020; Asphalt 9: Legends; Standard / low; 2.2.2a: Ø29 (19-31)

Huawei P Smart 2020; Asphalt 9: Legends; High Quality; 2.2.2a: Ø29.2 (19-31)

Carga Máxima

Inatividade


43.8 °C	40.2 °C	38.4 °C
44.3 °C	40 °C	39.3 °C
43.4 °C	40.3 °C	38.7 °C

Máximo: 44.3 °C
Médio: 40.9 °C


38.8 °C	40.3 °C	43.5 °C
38.7 °C	40.6 °C	45.3 °C
38.5 °C	40.6 °C	44.7 °C

Máximo: 45.3 °C
Médio: 41.2 °C

alimentação elétrica 41 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.9 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 40.9 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.3 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.3 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.5 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Huawei P Smart 2020 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 69% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 82% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 14% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 64.7% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 64.7% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 64.7% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (119.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 87% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 3% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 96% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0 / 0.1 Watt
Ocioso	1 / 2.1 / 2.5 Watt
Carga	4.3 / 7.5 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Huawei P Smart 2020 3400 mAh	Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S 5020 mAh	Motorola Moto G8 4000 mAh	Huawei P Smart 2019 3400 mAh	Average HiSilicon Kirin 710	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		-14%	-5%	4%	-4%	-1%
Idle Minimum *	1	1.5 -50%	1.3 -30%	0.84 16%	1.058 ?(0.8 - 2.3, n=13) -6%	0.894 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=152, last 2 years) 11%
Idle Average *	2.1	2.1 -0%	2 5%	2.21 -5%	2.2 ?(1.2 - 3, n=13) -5%	1.456 ?(0.6 - 4.26, n=152, last 2 years) 31%
Idle Maximum *	2.5	2.5 -0%	2.8 -12%	2.23 11%	2.57 ?(2.2 - 4.2, n=13) -3%	1.616 ?(0.83 - 4.45, n=152, last 2 years) 35%
Load Average *	4.3	5.2 -21%	3.9 9%	4.2 2%	4.61 ?(4.06 - 6, n=13) -7%	6.45 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=147, last 2 years) -50%
Load Maximum *	7.5	7.5 -0%	7.2 4%	7.86 -5%	7.6 ?(6.13 - 9.4, n=13) -1%	9.8 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=147, last 2 years) -31%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		22h 05min
WiFi Websurfing		8h 43min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		8h 9min
Carga (máximo brilho)		4h 24min

	Huawei P Smart 2020 3400 mAh	Nokia 5.3 4000 mAh	Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S 5020 mAh	Motorola Moto G8 4000 mAh	Huawei P Smart 2019 3400 mAh
Battery Runtime		67%	91%	64%	-3%
Reader / Idle	1325		2263 71%	1953 47%	1293 -2%
H.264	489		1269 160%	1048 114%	464 -5%
WiFi v1.3	523	876 67%	1187 127%	988 89%	506 -3%
Load	264		279 6%	276 5%	257 -3%

Pro

+ Confortável e leve

+ Boa qualidade de voz

+ Alto-falante reparável

+ WLAN veloz

+ Muito armazenamento

Contra

- Android 9 e patches de segurança datados

- Poucas frequências LTE

- Uma só lente para as fotos

- A tela poderia ter sido mais brilhante

- Esquenta bastante

- Problemas com alguns aplicativos

- Duração da bateria relativamente curta

- Cintilação PWM com baixo brilho

Veredicto - Uma pequena atualização para uma grande diferença de preço

In review: Huawei P Smart 2020. Test unit provided by Huawei Germany.

Huawei's P Smart series is popular. Isso é compreensível, porque até agora a série oferecia muito pelo dinheiro. Isso também possibilita que o P Smart 2020 ainda pareça bastante atual, embora haja poucas mudanças em comparação com o antecessor.

Mas os primeiros sinais de desgaste tornaram-se visíveis: Enquanto a câmera ainda tira fotos sólidas, ela não possui a capacidade de zoom, oferecida por muitos dispositivos dessa faixa de preço neste momento. Você também procurará em vão recursos modernos, como uma porta USB-C, VoLTE ou LTE mais rápido, com mais bandas de frequência. Introduzir um smartphone com o Android 9 em 2020 sem que fique claro que ele obterá o Android 10 também é questionável.

A bateria pequena acaba sendo uma bênção ou uma maldição, dependendo do usuário. Aqueles que querem fugir do carregamento diário de seus smartphones não terão muita chance, a menos que o usem com moderação. Por outro lado, a bateria pequena permite uma recarga mais rápida e um peso bastante baixo.

Para quem gosta de fino e leve, o Huawei P Smart 2020 ainda pode ser recomendado. Mas aqueles que valorizam uma bateria de longa duração e o software moderno devem procurar outra coisa.

A localização é bastante precisa, a WLAN é bastante rápida, o desempenho é correto e os 128 GB de armazenamento também são um ponto positivo para o smartphone.

No entanto, o Huawei P Smart 2020 também tem um problema adicional: Este se chama P Smart 2019 e é basicamente o mesmo smartphone com um pouco menos de armazenamento por muito menos dinheiro. Portanto, se você quiser economizar, talvez queira comprar o predecessor. Embora o sucessor ainda seja um smartphone sólido de gama média acessível, ele não se sente mais tão atual quanto outros modelos nesta faixa de preço.

Huawei P Smart 2020 - 05/30/2020 v7 ^(old)
Florian Schmitt

Acabamento

77%

Teclado

65 / 75 → 87%

Mouse

94%

Conectividade

42 / 70 → 60%

Peso

91%

Bateria

79%

Pantalha

83%

Desempenho do jogos

30 / 64 → 47%

Desempenho da aplicação

56 / 86 → 65%

Temperatura

86%

Ruído

100%

Audio

60 / 90 → 67%

Camera

55%

Médio

71%

77%

Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Mark Riege - Translator - 534 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2018

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Huawei P Smart 2020 - Confortável e obsoleto

Florian Schmitt, 2020-06- 1 (Update: 2020-06- 3)

Comparison Devices

Size Comparison

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

Huawei P Smart 2020 audio analysis

Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S audio analysis

Pro

Contra

Veredicto - Uma pequena atualização para uma grande diferença de preço

More articles related to this device

Price comparison