Breve Análise do Smartphone Huawei Nova
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| Huawei Nova | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| Huawei Nova | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 94 %
iluminação com acumulador: 493 cd/m²
Contraste: 1120:1 (Preto: 0.44 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 3.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.39
| Huawei Nova IPS, 1920x1080, 5" | Lenovo Moto Z Play AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5" | Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5" | ZTE Axon 7 AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.5" | Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 Super AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.2" | Huawei Nova Plus IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 19% | -13% | -30% | 18% | -10% | |
| Brightness middle | 493 | 509 3% | 658 33% | 328 -33% | 378 -23% | 485 -2% |
| Brightness | 485 | 511 5% | 633 31% | 334 -31% | 380 -22% | 481 -1% |
| Brightness Distribution | 94 | 93 -1% | 93 -1% | 88 -6% | 91 -3% | 90 -4% |
| Black Level * | 0.44 | 0.66 -50% | 0.5 -14% | |||
| Contrast | 1120 | 997 -11% | 970 -13% | |||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.2 | 2.2 48% | 4.9 -17% | 4.6 -10% | 1.95 54% | 4.2 -0% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6.6 | 5.8 12% | 9.1 -38% | 14.7 -123% | 3.09 53% | 7.9 -20% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.8 | 2 47% | 5.8 -53% | 2.8 26% | 1.86 51% | 4.8 -26% |
| Gamma | 2.39 92% | 2.25 98% | 2.26 97% | 2.29 96% | 2.13 103% | 2.36 93% |
| CCT | 7438 87% | 6768 96% | 7840 83% | 6612 98% | 6376 102% | 7568 86% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 2500 Hz | ≤ 1 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 2500 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 1 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 2500 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 44 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 10.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 33.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 98 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 58.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 16 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 42.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 95 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Nova | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| Geekbench 4.0 | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Nova | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Nova | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
| T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Nova | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Nova | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Nova | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Nova | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Nova | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Nova | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Nova | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Nova | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Nova | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Nova | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Nova | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
* ... smaller is better
| Huawei Nova | Lenovo Moto Z Play | Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | ZTE Axon 7 | Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | Huawei Nova Plus | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | 1% | 30% | 54% | -38% | -19% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 248.3 | 254.8 3% | 282 14% | 406.5 64% | 209.4 -16% | 241.6 -3% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 75 | 73.1 -3% | 188 151% | 150.9 101% | 60.4 -19% | 82.1 9% |
| Random Read 4KB | 38.19 | 38.78 2% | 74 94% | 121.1 217% | 22.9 -40% | 35.64 -7% |
| Random Write 4KB | 44.63 | 45.58 2% | 7.4 -83% | 16.22 -64% | 11.2 -75% | 30.12 -33% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 79.5 | 74.6 -6% | 79.2 0% | 78.4 -1% | 41.64 -48% | |
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 47.69 | 50.6 6% | 50.1 5% | 51.3 8% | 33.32 -30% |
| Asphalt 8: Airborne | |||
| Configurações | Valor | ||
| high | 30 fps | ||
| very low | 30 fps | ||
| Dead Trigger 2 | |||
| Configurações | Valor | ||
| high | 53 fps | ||
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.4 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35.1 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.9 °C / 91 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Huawei Nova audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 31.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 7.6% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 62% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 78% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 33% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 39% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 58% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Huawei Nova Plus audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.5% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 37% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 56% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 37% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado |   0.01 / 0.09 Watt |
| Ocioso |  0.61 / 1.83 / 1.86 Watt |
| Carga |
3.71 / 5.19 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Huawei Nova 3020 mAh | Lenovo Moto Z Play 3510 mAh | Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL 3000 mAh | ZTE Axon 7 3250 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 2900 mAh | Huawei Nova Plus 3340 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 39% | -12% | -12% | -3% | 12% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 0.61 | 0.51 16% | 0.83 -36% | 0.64 -5% | 0.96 -57% | 0.49 20% |
| Idle Average * | 1.83 | 0.87 52% | 2.11 -15% | 0.84 54% | 1.64 10% | 1.63 11% |
| Idle Maximum * | 1.86 | 0.9 52% | 2.12 -14% | 0.87 53% | 1.71 8% | 1.76 5% |
| Load Average * | 3.71 | 1.69 54% | 3.41 8% | 6.02 -62% | 2.98 20% | 2.98 20% |
| Load Maximum * | 5.19 | 4 23% | 5.46 -5% | 10.45 -101% | 5.08 2% | 4.99 4% |
* ... smaller is better
| Huawei Nova 3020 mAh | Lenovo Moto Z Play 3510 mAh | Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL 3000 mAh | ZTE Axon 7 3250 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 2900 mAh | Huawei Nova Plus 3340 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 49% | 1% | -22% | 9% | 5% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1870 | 2540 36% | 1502 -20% | 1735 -7% | 2323 24% | 2048 10% |
| H.264 | 717 | 1190 66% | 905 26% | 704 -2% | 672 -6% | 732 2% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 873 | 824 -6% | 797 -9% | 411 -53% | 626 -28% | 820 -6% |
| Load | 328 | 652 99% | 352 7% | 245 -25% | 483 47% | 366 12% |
Pro
Contra
Como o Huawei Nova Plus, o Huawei Nova é um smartphone realmente bom com quase nenhuma desvantagem. Um painel Full HD muito brilhante, carcaça rígida e de alta qualidade, porta USB Type-C, suporte para dois cartões SIM, e um leitor de digitais confiável pertencem a seus pontos positivos. Embora a câmera principal de 12-megapixels possa oferecer uma resolução apenas um pouco inferior que a do Nova Plus e não tenha um estabilizador de imagem, tira boas fotos e vídeos - este último inclusive em formato Ultra HD, o qual é, de fato, muito raro na gama média. Apesar de sua bateria um pouco menor, o Huawei Nova convence com sua longa duração da bateria. Também gostamos do módulo de rádio mais do que o do Nova Plus dado que suporta mais frequências UMTS e se caracteriza por taxas SAR mais baixas.
A Huawei criou um pacote recomendável com o seu Nova de 5 polegadas. As diferenças com Nova Plus 80-Euros (~$85) mais caro são apenas marginais se não consideramos a tela menor.
Podemos adaptar a listas de "contras" do Huawei Nova Plus quase integramente. Em vez de dois slots dedicados, apenas está instalado um slot híbrido que o cartão SIM e micro-SD devem compartilhar. O desempenho do Wi-Fi é confuso devido à falta de suporte para redes de 5 GHz. Além disso, os aplicativos não podem ser movidos para o cartão micro-SD. Os compradores que possam viver com essas desvantagens menores e desejem economizar 80 Euros (~$85) em comparação com o Huawei Nova Plus descobrirão que o Huawei Nova é um smartphone recomendável que, de acordo com o seu fabricante, em breve será atualizado para Android 7 assim como o seu irmão de 5,5- polegadas.
Huawei Nova
- 01/09/2017 v6 (old)
Manuel Masiero
Price comparison
