Notebookcheck Logo

Breve Análise do Smartphone Huawei Nova Plus

Finally 4k recording! Huawei's Nova Plus leaves a premium impression in the mainstream segment and is the first smartphone from the Chinese manufacturer with Ultra-HD video recording. However, Huawei does not use its own Kirin SoC, but a chip from Qualcomm. How does the smartphone perform in the competitive segment of up to 400 Euros (~$432)?
Android Smartphone Touchscreen
Huawei Nova Plus (Nova Serie)
Processador
Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8 x 2 GHz, Cortex-A53
Placa gráfica
Qualcomm Adreno 506
Memória
3 GB 
, LPDDR3
Pantalha
5.50 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 401 PPI, Multi-touch, 10 pontos, IPS, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB 
, 24.01 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Porta combinada para fones e microfones (3,5 mm), Card Reader: MicroSD até 128 GB (SDHC, SDXC), 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Hall Sensor, Sensor de digitais, Sensor de Proximidade, Sensor de luz ambiente, Bússola Digital, Sensor de gravidade, OTG, Wifi Direct
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 4.1, GSM/GPRS/Edge (850, 900, 1800 e 1900 MHz), UMTS/HSPA+ (900 e 2100 MHz), LTE Cat. 7 (banda 1, 3, 7, 8, 20 e 38), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 7.3 x 151.8 x 75.7
Bateria
14.7 Wh, 3340 mAh Lítio-Polímero, 4,4 V, Tempo de conversação 3G (de acordo com o fabricante): 25 h, Standby 2G (de acordo com o fabricante): 427 h, Standby 3G (de acordo com o fabricante): 448 h
Sistema Operativo
Android 6.0 Marshmallow
Camera
Primary Camera: 16 MPix (Autofocus, OIS, two-tone LED-flash, UHD video)
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix (Fixfocus)
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Alto falante mono, Teclado: virtual, Adaptador de força, Cabo USB, Ferramenta SIM, headset, EMUI 4.1, 24 Meses Garantia, USB Type-C, SAR body: 1,42 W/kg, SAR head: 1,41 W/kg, fanless
peso
162 g, Suprimento de energia: 67 g
Preço
429 Euro
Links
Huawei página inicial
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size Comparison

❌
156.4 mm 76.4 mm 7 mm 165 g152.6 mm 77.4 mm 7.7 mm 155 g152.7 mm 74.7 mm 7.35 mm 161 g151.7 mm 75 mm 7.9 mm 175 g151.8 mm 75.7 mm 7.3 mm 162 g145.5 mm 71 mm 7.45 mm 153 g144.8 mm 71 mm 7.3 mm 155 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
OnePlus 3
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
323 MBit/s +527%
ZTE Axon 7
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB eMMC Flash
298 MBit/s +479%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash
112 MBit/s +117%
Huawei Nova Plus
Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash
51.5 MBit/s
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash
31.2 MBit/s -39%
iperf3 receive AX12
ZTE Axon 7
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB eMMC Flash
337 MBit/s +531%
OnePlus 3
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
320 MBit/s +499%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash
121 MBit/s +127%
Huawei Nova Plus
Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash
53.4 MBit/s
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash
32.9 MBit/s -38%
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Huawei Nova Plus
Huawei Nova Plus
Huawei Nova Plus
Huawei Nova Plus
Huawei Nova Plus
Huawei Nova Plus

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
488
cd/m²		480
cd/m²		461
cd/m²
499
cd/m²		485
cd/m²		456
cd/m²
504
cd/m²		490
cd/m²		465
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 504 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 480.9 cd/m² Minimum: 4.51 cd/m²
iluminação: 90 %
iluminação com acumulador: 485 cd/m²
Contraste: 970:1 (Preto: 0.5 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 4.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.36
Huawei Nova Plus
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5"		OnePlus 3
Optic-AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5"		Honor 8
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2"		Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5"		ZTE Axon 7
AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.5"		Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
Super AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.2"		Lenovo Moto Z Play
AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5"
Screen
-8%
-9%
-1%
-20%
22%
25%
Brightness middle
485
419
-14%
451
-7%
658
36%
328
-32%
378
-22%
509
5%
Brightness
481
431
-10%
443
-8%
633
32%
334
-31%
380
-21%
511
6%
Brightness Distribution
90
84
-7%
93
3%
93
3%
88
-2%
91
1%
93
3%
Black Level *
0.5
0.4
20%
0.66
-32%
Contrast
970
1128
16%
997
3%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
4.2
4.1
2%
5.4
-29%
4.9
-17%
4.6
-10%
1.95
54%
2.2
48%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
7.9
12
-52%
9.9
-25%
9.1
-15%
14.7
-86%
3.09
61%
5.8
27%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
4.8
3.3
31%
6.7
-40%
5.8
-21%
2.8
42%
1.86
61%
2
58%
Gamma
2.36 93%
2.1 105%
2.33 94%
2.26 97%
2.29 96%
2.13 103%
2.25 98%
CCT
7568 86%
6550 99%
8262 79%
7840 83%
6612 98%
6376 102%
6768 96%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
89.38
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
100

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 12.4 ms rise
↘ 19.6 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 84 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
31 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 13 ms rise
↘ 18 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 37 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

AnTuTu v6 | Geekbench 4.0 | 3DMark | GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | GFXBench 3.0 | GFXBench 3.1 | GFXBench | PCMark for Android | BaseMark OS II
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei Nova Plus
64601 Points
ZTE Axon 7
122524 Points +90%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
41676 Points -35%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
62484 Points -3%
Honor 8
94671 Points +47%
OnePlus 3
142090 Points +120%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
61345 Points -5%
Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei Nova Plus
845 Points
ZTE Axon 7
1280 Points +51%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
820 Points -3%
Honor 8
1726 Points +104%
OnePlus 3
1754 Points +108%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
795 Points -6%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei Nova Plus
3156 Points
ZTE Axon 7
3867 Points +23%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
4042 Points +28%
Honor 8
5481 Points +74%
OnePlus 3
4097 Points +30%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
2525 Points -20%
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Huawei Nova Plus
13882 Points
ZTE Axon 7
23319 Points +68%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
7903 Points -43%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
13955 Points +1%
Honor 8
20235 Points +46%
OnePlus 3
30241 Points +118%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
13920 Points 0%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Huawei Nova Plus
13412 Points
ZTE Axon 7
24310 Points +81%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
7542 Points -44%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
13466 Points 0%
Honor 8
22157 Points +65%
OnePlus 3
34023 Points +154%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
13437 Points 0%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei Nova Plus
15823 Points
ZTE Axon 7
20408 Points +29%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
9495 Points -40%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
15984 Points +1%
Honor 8
15531 Points -2%
OnePlus 3
21771 Points +38%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
15923 Points +1%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Huawei Nova Plus
844 Points
ZTE Axon 7
2698 Points +220%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
336 Points -60%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
842 Points 0%
Honor 8
1273 Points +51%
OnePlus 3
3424 Points +306%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
827 Points -2%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei Nova Plus
733 Points
ZTE Axon 7
4619 Points +530%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
275 Points -62%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
719 Points -2%
Honor 8
1112 Points +52%
OnePlus 3
4633 Points +532%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
725 Points -1%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Huawei Nova Plus
1795 Points
ZTE Axon 7
1099 Points -39%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
1479 Points -18%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
2112 Points +18%
Honor 8
2587 Points +44%
OnePlus 3
1789 Points 0%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
1631 Points -9%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Nova Plus
23 fps
ZTE Axon 7
53 fps +130%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
14 fps -39%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
21 fps -9%
Honor 8
43 fps +87%
OnePlus 3
60 fps +161%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
23 fps 0%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Nova Plus
23 fps
ZTE Axon 7
88 fps +283%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
14 fps -39%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
23 fps 0%
Honor 8
41 fps +78%
OnePlus 3
89 fps +287%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
23 fps 0%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Huawei Nova Plus
10 fps
ZTE Axon 7
28 fps +180%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
3.8 fps -62%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
9.7 fps -3%
Honor 8
19 fps +90%
OnePlus 3
46 fps +360%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
10 fps 0%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Nova Plus
9.9 fps
ZTE Axon 7
39 fps +294%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
3.8 fps -62%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
9.9 fps 0%
Honor 8
19 fps +92%
OnePlus 3
47 fps +375%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
10 fps +1%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Nova Plus
6.6 fps
ZTE Axon 7
16 fps +142%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
6.1 fps -8%
Honor 8
11 fps +67%
OnePlus 3
30 fps +355%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
6.7 fps +2%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Nova Plus
6.2 fps
ZTE Axon 7
31 fps +400%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
6.2 fps 0%
Honor 8
10 fps +61%
OnePlus 3
31 fps +400%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
6.2 fps 0%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Nova Plus
3.4 fps
ZTE Axon 7
9.8 fps +188%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
3.4 fps 0%
Honor 8
6.9 fps +103%
OnePlus 3
18 fps +429%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
3.7 fps +9%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Nova Plus
3.7 fps
ZTE Axon 7
18 fps +386%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
3.4 fps -8%
Honor 8
6.3 fps +70%
OnePlus 3
18 fps +386%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
3.4 fps -8%
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
Huawei Nova Plus
5724 Points
ZTE Axon 7
4970 Points -13%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
4008 Points -30%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
6785 Points +19%
Honor 8
6735 Points +18%
OnePlus 3
7101 Points +24%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
6767 Points +18%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Huawei Nova Plus
1262 Points
ZTE Axon 7
2165 Points +72%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
810 Points -36%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
1215 Points -4%
Honor 8
2034 Points +61%
OnePlus 3
2496 Points +98%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
1019 Points -19%
System (sort by value)
Huawei Nova Plus
2132 Points
ZTE Axon 7
3307 Points +55%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
2153 Points +1%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
2923 Points +37%
Honor 8
3952 Points +85%
OnePlus 3
3537 Points +66%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
2069 Points -3%
Memory (sort by value)
Huawei Nova Plus
1553 Points
ZTE Axon 7
1489 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
554 Points -64%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
1042 Points -33%
Honor 8
2556 Points +65%
OnePlus 3
2052 Points +32%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
795 Points -49%
Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei Nova Plus
1015 Points
ZTE Axon 7
4631 Points +356%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
488 Points -52%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
1019 Points 0%
Honor 8
1703 Points +68%
OnePlus 3
4813 Points +374%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
1013 Points 0%
Web (sort by value)
Huawei Nova Plus
754 Points
ZTE Axon 7
963 Points +28%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
741 Points -2%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
702 Points -7%
Honor 8
994 Points +32%
OnePlus 3
1112 Points +47%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
649 Points -14%

Legend

 
Huawei Nova Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
ZTE Axon 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 Samsung Exynos 7580 Octa, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Honor 8 HiSilicon Kirin 950, ARM Mali-T880 MP4, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
OnePlus 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
 
Lenovo Moto Z Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 32 GB eMMC Flash
WebXPRT 2015 | Octane V2 | JetStream 1.1 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value)
Huawei Nova Plus
Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash
83 Points
ZTE Axon 7
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB eMMC Flash
111 Points +34%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
64 Points -23%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash
84 Points +1%
Honor 8
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash
138 Points +66%
OnePlus 3
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
122 Points +47%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash
83 Points 0%
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei Nova Plus
Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash
4730 Points
ZTE Axon 7
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB eMMC Flash
8062 Points +70%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
3611 Points -24%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash
4905 Points +4%
Honor 8
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash
10692 Points +126%
OnePlus 3
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
9155 Points +94%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash
4979 Points +5%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei Nova Plus
Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash
31.3 Points
ZTE Axon 7
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB eMMC Flash
44.75 Points +43%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
22 Points -30%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash
31.12 Points -1%
Honor 8
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash
64 Points +104%
OnePlus 3
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
54.4 Points +74%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash
31.8 Points +2%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value)
Huawei Nova Plus
Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash
8028 ms *
ZTE Axon 7
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB eMMC Flash
3097 ms * +61%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
11887 ms * -48%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash
8041 ms * -0%
Honor 8
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash
2979 ms * +63%
OnePlus 3
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
2921 ms * +64%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash
8169 ms * -2%

* ... smaller is better

Huawei Nova Plus
Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash		ZTE Axon 7
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB eMMC Flash		Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash		Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash		Honor 8
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash		OnePlus 3
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash		Lenovo Moto Z Play
Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash
AndroBench 3-5
81%
-35%
53%
8%
101%
31%
Sequential Read 256KB
241.6
406.5
68%
209.4
-13%
282
17%
247.5
2%
408.7
69%
254.8
5%
Sequential Write 256KB
82.1
150.9
84%
60.4
-26%
188
129%
119.3
45%
153.3
87%
73.1
-11%
Random Read 4KB
35.64
121.1
240%
22.9
-36%
74
108%
34.16
-4%
137.6
286%
38.78
9%
Random Write 4KB
30.12
16.22
-46%
11.2
-63%
7.4
-75%
31.5
5%
18.23
-39%
45.58
51%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
41.64
78.4
88%
79.2
90%
53.7
29%
74.6
79%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
33.32
51.3
54%
50.1
50%
23.59
-29%
50.6
52%
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high28 fps
 very low29 fps
Carga Máxima
 34.9 °C34.9 °C36.6 °C 
 34.5 °C35.3 °C39.2 °C 
 33.5 °C34.2 °C39 °C 
Máximo: 39.2 °C
Médio: 35.8 °C
31.4 °C32.3 °C33.2 °C
32.2 °C32.8 °C33.2 °C
31.5 °C32.7 °C32.9 °C
Máximo: 33.2 °C
Médio: 32.5 °C
alimentação elétrica  30.4 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.2 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.8 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.2 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33.2 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.2 °C / 90 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.6422525.437.63125.331.44032.936.35033.651.76331.634.38028.431.71002736.912520.8261602229.920021.341.825020.853.931521.259.440019.463.650019.567.463017.766.180017.970.1100017.869.8125017.373.4160017.474.6200016.776.7250017.277.2315018.278.9400017.979.6500017.676630017.772.9800017.873.21000017.971.11250018.164.51600018.257.2SPL3087.4N1.368.4median 17.9median 69.8Delta1.48.431.632.825.430.425.332.132.933.333.63631.630.128.427.82725.420.825.62229.121.339.620.848.321.254.219.456.819.559.117.758.117.961.117.864.417.365.817.467.416.770.317.27118.277.117.979.117.673.517.772.117.87117.966.418.157.518.253.13084.71.353.4median 17.9median 61.11.410.740.136.832.440.1382731.33834.330.631.734.334.529.72634.544.138.139.444.140.529.736.240.53331.428.63326.827.625.426.826.924.421.326.93724.823.33745.529.522.545.551.636.222.451.657.341.721.357.359.746.618.459.766.452.517.566.468.45217.568.469.952.517.269.971.853.816.871.872.554.817.372.575.256.917.475.278.459.716.678.477.659.717.377.678.260.817.678.281.363.817.681.378.561.817.778.575.958.817.475.976.259.417.776.274.357.517.974.370.354.818.170.354.437.618.154.488.671.129.888.67325.81.373median 71.8median 53.8median 17.7median 71.810.910.71.710.9hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHuawei Nova PlusHonor 8OnePlus 3
Huawei Nova Plus audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.5% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 36% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 56% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 37% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Honor 8 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 11.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (28% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 70% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 83% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 14% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

OnePlus 3 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 39% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 58% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.03 / 0.11 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.49 / 1.63 / 1.76 Watt
Carga midlight 2.98 / 4.99 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Huawei Nova Plus
3340 mAh		OnePlus 3
3000 mAh		Honor 8
3000 mAh		Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
3000 mAh		ZTE Axon 7
3250 mAh		Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
2900 mAh
Power Consumption
-36%
-35%
-28%
-29%
-19%
Idle Minimum *
0.49
0.57
-16%
0.78
-59%
0.83
-69%
0.64
-31%
0.96
-96%
Idle Average *
1.63
1.24
24%
1.89
-16%
2.11
-29%
0.84
48%
1.64
-1%
Idle Maximum *
1.76
1.36
23%
2.02
-15%
2.12
-20%
0.87
51%
1.71
3%
Load Average *
2.98
5.92
-99%
5.28
-77%
3.41
-14%
6.02
-102%
2.98
-0%
Load Maximum *
4.99
10.53
-111%
5.44
-9%
5.46
-9%
10.45
-109%
5.08
-2%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
34h 08min
WiFi Websurfing
13h 40min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
12h 12min
Carga (máximo brilho)
6h 06min
Huawei Nova Plus
3340 mAh		OnePlus 3
3000 mAh		Honor 8
3000 mAh		Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
3000 mAh		ZTE Axon 7
3250 mAh		Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
2900 mAh		Lenovo Moto Z Play
3510 mAh
Battery Runtime
-11%
-31%
-3%
-26%
3%
41%
Reader / Idle
2048
1338
-35%
1487
-27%
1502
-27%
1735
-15%
2323
13%
2540
24%
H.264
732
847
16%
526
-28%
905
24%
704
-4%
672
-8%
1190
63%
WiFi v1.3
820
840
2%
499
-39%
797
-3%
411
-50%
626
-24%
824
0%
Load
366
268
-27%
255
-30%
352
-4%
245
-33%
483
32%
652
78%

Pro

+ Alta qualidade de construção
+ USB Tipo C
+ Boa tela
+ Leitor de digitais confiável
+ Boas câmeras
+ Longas durações da bateria

Contra

- Valor SAR alto
- Sem WLAN 2,4 GHz
- Sem App2SD/o micro-SD não pode ser formatado como armazenamento interno
- Sual-SIM híbrido apenas
In review: Huawei Nova Plus. Test model courtesy of Huawei Germany.
In review: Huawei Nova Plus. Test model courtesy of Huawei Germany.

O Huawei Nova Plus é um smartphone realmente bom e somente conseguimos encontrar apenas algumas desvantagens reais. Além da tela brilhante você recebe duas câmeras realmente boas. Os fanáticos das "selfies" desfrutarão da câmera frontal, em particular. Você também recebe uma poderosa bateria, que, de fato, mantém sua promessa e energiza o smartphone durante um dia ou mais.

Você terá que fazer alguns compromissos menores em termos de qualidade de construção, embora estas sejam críticas em um nível muito alto. Também é desafortunado que os aplicativos não possam ser armazenados em um cartão microSD e o slot também é relativamente lento. O Wi-Fi de 5,0 GHz também deve ser um problema nesta faixa de preços.

O Huawei Nova Plus oferece um potente pacote com boas câmeras e longas durações da bateria.

Ainda podemos recomendar o Nova Plus, porque traz im pacote conveniente. No entanto, não faz nenhum mal dar uma olhada nos rivais nesta faixa de preços.

Huawei Nova Plus - 12/02/2016 v5.1 (old)
Daniel Schmidt

Acabamento
86%
Teclado
69 / 75 → 92%
Mouse
96%
Conectividade
42 / 60 → 70%
Peso
91%
Bateria
95%
Pantalha
86%
Desempenho do jogos
33 / 63 → 52%
Desempenho da aplicação
50 / 70 → 72%
Temperatura
89%
Ruído
100%
Audio
60 / 91 → 66%
Camera
75%
Médio
75%
86%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Huawei Nova Plus
Daniel Schmidt, 2016-12-16 (Update: 2017-01- 2)