Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve Análise do Smartphone Huawei Mate Xs - Dobrável com desvantagens
Competing Devices
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Drive | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 82.6 % v7 (old) | 05/2020 | Huawei Mate Xs Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16 | 300 g | 512 GB UFS 3.0 Flash | 8.00" | 2480x2200 | |
| 86.4 % v7 (old) | 10/2019 | Samsung Galaxy Fold SD 855, Adreno 640 | 276 g | 512 GB UFS 3.0 Flash | 7.30" | 2152x1536 | |
| 82.5 % v7 (old) | 03/2020 | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip SD 855+, Adreno 640 | 183 g | 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash | 6.70" | 2636x1080 | |
| 87.1 % v7 (old) | 09/2019 | Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU | 226 g | 64 GB SSD | 6.50" | 2688x1242 | |
| 84.6 % v7 (old) | 10/2019 | LG G8X ThinQ SD 855, Adreno 640 | 192 g | 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.40" | 2340x1080 | |
| 89.4 % v7 (old) | 04/2020 | Huawei P40 Pro Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16 | 209 g | 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash | 6.58" | 2640x1200 |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max | |
| Samsung Galaxy Fold | |
| Huawei Mate Xs | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip | |
| LG G8X ThinQ | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Huawei Mate Xs | |
| Samsung Galaxy Fold | |
| LG G8X ThinQ | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip | |
| Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 99 %
iluminação com acumulador: 417 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.6 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
96.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.31
| Huawei Mate Xs OLED, 2480x2200, 8" | Samsung Galaxy Fold Infinity Flex-Display (Dynamic AMOLED, 7,3") und Super AMOLED (4,6"), 2152x1536, 7.3" | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip Dynamic AMOLED, 2636x1080, 6.7" | Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max OLED, 2688x1242, 6.5" | LG G8X ThinQ OLED, 2340x1080, 6.4" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 24% | 19% | 47% | -48% | |
| Brightness middle | 417 | 531 27% | 705 69% | 790 89% | 570 37% |
| Brightness | 418 | 532 27% | 709 70% | 790 89% | 581 39% |
| Brightness Distribution | 99 | 97 -2% | 97 -2% | 97 -2% | 90 -9% |
| Black Level * | |||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.6 | 2.3 12% | 3.1 -19% | 1.4 46% | 6.27 -141% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.7 | 3.7 52% | 5.4 30% | 3.4 56% | 9.75 -27% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2 | 1.5 25% | 2.7 -35% | 1.9 5% | 5.7 -185% |
| Gamma | 2.31 95% | 2.15 102% | 2.11 104% | 2.23 99% | 2.37 93% |
| CCT | 6276 104% | 6631 98% | 6264 104% | 6466 101% | 7309 89% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 242.7 Hz | ≤ 99 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 242.7 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 242.7 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 1.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 11 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 5.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 2.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 2.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 13 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
| PCMark for Android | |
| Work performance score (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Mate Xs | |
| Samsung Galaxy Fold | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip | |
| LG G8X ThinQ | |
| Huawei P40 Pro | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G (10628 - 14814, n=4) | |
| Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Mate Xs | |
| Samsung Galaxy Fold | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip | |
| LG G8X ThinQ | |
| Huawei P40 Pro | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G (8512 - 11509, n=4) | |
| AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Mate Xs | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip | |
| Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max | |
| LG G8X ThinQ | |
| Huawei P40 Pro | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G (450373 - 527856, n=4) | |
| VRMark - Amber Room (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Mate Xs | |
| Huawei P40 Pro | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G (4980 - 5037, n=2) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2523 - 10071, n=6, last 2 years) | |
| Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Mate Xs | |
| Huawei P40 Pro | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G (2076 - 2122, n=2) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (205 - 7616, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
| Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=162, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei P40 Pro (Huawei Browser 10.1) | |
| LG G8X ThinQ (Chrome 78) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip (Chrome 80) | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G (55.6 - 70, n=4) | |
| Huawei Mate Xs (Huawei Browser 10.1) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Fold (Samung Browser 10.1) | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1) | |
| Huawei P40 Pro (Huawei Browser 10.1) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip (Chrome 80) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Fold (Samsung Browser 10.1) | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G (103.2 - 116.6, n=4) | |
| LG G8X ThinQ (Chrome 78) | |
| Huawei Mate Xs (Huawei Browser 10.1) | |
| Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
| Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=148, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei P40 Pro (Huawei Browser 10.1) | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G (63 - 71.8, n=4) | |
| LG G8X ThinQ (Chome 78) | |
| Huawei Mate Xs (Huawei Browser 10.1) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip (Chrome 80) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Fold (Samsung Browser 10.1) | |
| WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
| Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=82, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Fold (Samsung Browser 10.1) | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G (95 - 124, n=3) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip (Chrome 80) | |
| Huawei Mate Xs (Huawei Browser 10.1) | |
| LG G8X ThinQ (Chrome 78) | |
| Huawei P40 Pro | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=204, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Fold (Samsung Browser 10.1) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip (Chrome 80) | |
| Huawei P40 Pro (Huawei Browser 10.1) | |
| LG G8X ThinQ (Chrome 78) | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G (20917 - 23690, n=4) | |
| Huawei Mate Xs (Huawei Browser 10.1) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Huawei Mate Xs (Huawei Browser 10.1) | |
| LG G8X ThinQ (Chrome 78) | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G (1914 - 2287, n=4) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip (Chrome 80) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Fold (Samsung Browser 10.1) | |
| Huawei P40 Pro (Huawei Browser 10.1) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=161, last 2 years) | |
| Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1) | |
* ... smaller is better
| Huawei Mate Xs | Samsung Galaxy Fold | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip | LG G8X ThinQ | Huawei P40 Pro | Average 512 GB UFS 3.0 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -34% | -4% | -33% | 2% | 1% | 79% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 1767 | 1303 -26% | 1443 -18% | 705 -60% | 1775 0% | 1593 ? -10% | 1834 ? 4% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 402.7 | 394.5 -2% | 523 30% | 497.1 23% | 395.7 -2% | 565 ? 40% | 1426 ? 254% |
| Random Read 4KB | 202.9 | 158.4 -22% | 184.5 -9% | 160.5 -21% | 228.1 12% | 211 ? 4% | 278 ? 37% |
| Random Write 4KB | 259.1 | 34.41 -87% | 212.9 -18% | 30.2 -88% | 271.8 5% | 196.5 ? -24% | 310 ? 20% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 82.6 ? | 68.9 ? -17% | 82.3 ? 0% | 82.5 ? 0% | |||
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 72.1 ? | 47.7 ? -34% | 68.1 ? -6% | 69.8 ? -3% |
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 33.8 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 34 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.7 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Huawei Mate Xs audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.9% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 35% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 55% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy Fold audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 25% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado |   0.03 / 0.53 Watt |
| Ocioso |  2.22 / 3.94 / 4.01 Watt |
| Carga |
4.34 / 8.46 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Huawei Mate Xs 4500 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Fold 4235 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3300 mAh | Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max 3969 mAh | LG G8X ThinQ 4000 mAh | Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 43% | 43% | 31% | 32% | 31% | 24% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 2.22 | 0.6 73% | 0.59 73% | 0.92 59% | 1.1 50% | 1.24 ? 44% | 0.895 ? 60% |
| Idle Average * | 3.94 | 0.85 78% | 0.88 78% | 2.9 26% | 1.49 62% | 2.33 ? 41% | 1.447 ? 63% |
| Idle Maximum * | 4.01 | 1 75% | 0.95 76% | 2.94 27% | 1.76 56% | 2.49 ? 38% | 1.608 ? 60% |
| Load Average * | 4.34 | 4.47 -3% | 4.97 -15% | 3.65 16% | 4.2 3% | 3.55 ? 18% | 6.41 ? -48% |
| Load Maximum * | 8.46 | 9.02 -7% | 8.37 1% | 6.18 27% | 9.2 -9% | 7.09 ? 16% | 9.61 ? -14% |
* ... smaller is better
| Huawei Mate Xs 4500 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Fold 4235 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3300 mAh | Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max 3969 mAh | LG G8X ThinQ 4000 mAh | Huawei P40 Pro 4200 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 28% | 3% | 81% | 93% | 24% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1071 | 1724 61% | 1741 63% | 2618 144% | 1474 38% | |
| H.264 | 762 | 1027 35% | 527 -31% | 1346 77% | 1137 49% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 481 | 600 25% | 647 35% | 909 89% | 930 93% | 743 54% |
| Load | 357 | 316 -11% | 157 -56% | 408 14% | 198 -45% |
Pro
Contra
Veredicto - Dobrável caro
O Huawei Mate Xs é um bom smartphone dobrável que, com sua tela externa, escolheu uma abordagem diferente do conceito do Galaxy Fold. Como resultado, a tela e o protetor de tela são mais estressados do que os do dispositivo da Samsung. No entanto, esse não é um problema enorme, graças ao serviço de atendimento, desde que exista um centro de atendimento nas proximidades.
Tecnologicamente, o Mate Xs oferece muitos recursos avançados. Além do chipset 5G, isso também inclui a câmera e o armazenamento rápido. Apesar de sua capacidade já massiva, a última pode até ser expandida. A este respeito, os usuários serão limitados aos cartões de memória Nano da Huawei.
Embora o Huawei Mate Xs seja um atraente dobrável, ele ainda não parece ter madurado em todas as áreas.
Por cerca de US$ 2.700, o Huawei Mate Xs está longe de ser uma pechincha. Assim, os compradores podem esperar apenas o melhor, e a Huawei cumpre isso em muitos casos, além de não economizar muito nos acessórios. Embora esperássemos mais em termos de brilho máximo da tela, a falta dela não é uma grande surpresa, tendo em vista o consumo de energia razoavelmente alto e provavelmente um compromisso necessário para alcançar tempos de duração aceitáveis.
Além disso, criticamos o fabricante chinês pela qualidade de construção do telefone. A dobradiça range bastante alto e causa uma impressão menos robusta do que havíamos previsto. Além disso, a parte de trás da carcaça é muito flexível em algumas áreas.
Também existem limitações devido à guerra comercial com os EUA, como a omissão de serviços do Google. O EMUI 10.0 também não parece estar perfeitamente preparado para essa situação. Como, particularmente nos jogos, o software portado ainda não funciona perfeitamente, esperamos uma atualização rápida para a versão 10.1.
O Huawei Mate Xs certamente não é um dispositivo para todos. O preço alto provavelmente será suficiente para impedir a maioria dos possíveis compradores. Dito isto, ainda é um conceito atraente que, neste caso, foi emparelhado com muitos componentes poderosos, que o transformam em um smartphone exclusivo que certamente chamará a atenção.
Huawei Mate Xs
-
08/31/2022 v7 (old)
Daniel Schmidt
Price comparison
