Breve Análise do Smartphone Huawei Mate 8
Huawei Mate 8 (Mate Serie)
Processador
HiSilicon Kirin 950 8 x 2.3 GHz, Cortex-A72/-A53
Placa gráfica
Memória
3 GB
Pantalha
6.00 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel, capacitiva, IPS-NEO, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB
, 24.7 GB livre
peso
185 g, Suprimento de energia: 70 g
Preço
599 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 527 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 513.1 cd/m² Minimum: 8.43 cd/m²iluminação: 94 %
iluminação com acumulador: 514 cd/m²
Contraste: 1469:1 (Preto: 0.35 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.08 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 5.49 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.84% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
79.95% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
90.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
89.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.08
| Huawei Mate 8 Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash | Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash | Google Nexus 6P Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash | Apple iPhone 6S Plus A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe) | Microsoft Lumia 950 XL Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash | Asus Zenfone 2 Deluxe ZE551ML PowerVR G6430, Z3580, 128 GB eMMC Flash | Motorola Moto X Style Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 8% | 15% | 0% | 6% | -27% | -6% | |
| Brightness middle | 514 | 335.7 -35% | 363 -29% | 583 13% | 297 -42% | 425 -17% | 538 5% |
| Brightness | 513 | 332 -35% | 365 -29% | 560 9% | 297 -42% | 395 -23% | 528 3% |
| Brightness Distribution | 94 | 89 -5% | 90 -4% | 91 -3% | 93 -1% | 88 -6% | 92 -2% |
| Black Level * | 0.35 | 0.46 -31% | 0.5 -43% | 0.66 -89% | |||
| Contrast | 1469 | 1267 -14% | 850 -42% | 815 -45% | |||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.08 | 2.33 54% | 2.34 54% | 3.55 30% | 2.67 47% | 7.05 -39% | 2.63 48% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 8.28 | 3.98 52% | |||||
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.49 | 2.15 61% | 1.03 81% | 3.88 29% | 2.81 49% | 6.38 -16% | 3.24 41% |
| Gamma | 2.08 106% | 2.15 102% | 2.23 99% | 2.2 100% | 2.08 106% | 1.63 135% | 2.17 101% |
| CCT | 7254 90% | 6184 105% | 6429 101% | 7280 89% | 6379 102% | 6776 96% | 6906 94% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 79.95 | 59.05 -26% | 66.31 -17% | ||||
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 99.84 | 92.8 -7% | 99.79 0% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 38 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 9.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 28.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 95 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 44 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 19 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 25 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 71 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Geekbench 3 | PCMark for Android | 3DMark | GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | GFXBench 3.0 | GFXBench 3.1 | Smartbench 2012 | BaseMark OS II | Linpack Android / IOS | Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal | Basemark X 1.1 | Lightmark | Epic Citadel
| Geekbench 3 | |
| 32 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Asus Zenfone 2 Deluxe ZE551ML | |
| 32 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Asus Zenfone 2 Deluxe ZE551ML | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Mate 8 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ | |
| Google Nexus 6P | |
| Apple iPhone 6S Plus | |
| Motorola Moto X Style | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Mate 8 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ | |
| Google Nexus 6P | |
| Apple iPhone 6S Plus | |
| Motorola Moto X Style | |
| PCMark for Android | |
| Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Mate 8 | |
| Work performance score (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Mate 8 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ | |
| Google Nexus 6P | |
| Motorola Moto X Style | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
| T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Mate 8 | |
| Google Nexus 6P | |
| Apple iPhone 6S Plus | |
| Microsoft Lumia 950 XL | |
| Asus Zenfone 2 Deluxe ZE551ML | |
| Motorola Moto X Style | |
| 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Mate 8 | |
| Google Nexus 6P | |
| Apple iPhone 6S Plus | |
| Microsoft Lumia 950 XL | |
| Asus Zenfone 2 Deluxe ZE551ML | |
| Motorola Moto X Style | |
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Mate 8 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ | |
| Google Nexus 6P | |
| Apple iPhone 6S Plus | |
| Microsoft Lumia 950 XL | |
| Asus Zenfone 2 Deluxe ZE551ML | |
| Motorola Moto X Style | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Mate 8 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ | |
| Google Nexus 6P | |
| Apple iPhone 6S Plus | |
| Microsoft Lumia 950 XL | |
| Asus Zenfone 2 Deluxe ZE551ML | |
| Motorola Moto X Style | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Mate 8 | |
| Google Nexus 6P | |
| Apple iPhone 6S Plus | |
| Motorola Moto X Style | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Mate 8 | |
| Google Nexus 6P | |
| Apple iPhone 6S Plus | |
| Motorola Moto X Style | |
| Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Mate 8 | |
| Apple iPhone 6S Plus | |
| Motorola Moto X Style | |
| Basemark X 1.1 | |
| High Quality (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Mate 8 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ | |
| Medium Quality (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Mate 8 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ | |
| Microsoft Lumia 950 XL | |
| Lightmark - 1920x1080 1080p (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Mate 8 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ | |
| Epic Citadel | |
| Ultra High Quality (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Mate 8 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ | |
| High Quality (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ | |
| High Performance (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ | |
Sunspider | WebXPRT 2015 | JetStream 1.1 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1 | Octane V2 | Google V8 Ver. 7 | Browsermark
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Mate 8 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ | |
| Google Nexus 6P | |
| Apple iPhone 6S Plus | |
| Microsoft Lumia 950 XL | |
| Motorola Moto X Style | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Mate 8 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ | |
| Google Nexus 6P | |
| Apple iPhone 6S Plus | |
| Microsoft Lumia 950 XL | |
| Asus Zenfone 2 Deluxe ZE551ML | |
| Motorola Moto X Style | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Mate 8 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ | |
| Google Nexus 6P | |
| Apple iPhone 6S Plus | |
| Microsoft Lumia 950 XL | |
| Asus Zenfone 2 Deluxe ZE551ML | |
| Motorola Moto X Style | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Mate 8 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ | |
| Google Nexus 6P | |
| Apple iPhone 6S Plus | |
| Microsoft Lumia 950 XL | |
| Asus Zenfone 2 Deluxe ZE551ML | |
| Motorola Moto X Style | |
| Google V8 Ver. 7 - Google V8 Ver. 7 Score (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Mate 8 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ | |
| Google Nexus 6P | |
| Apple iPhone 6S Plus | |
| Microsoft Lumia 950 XL | |
| Motorola Moto X Style | |
| Browsermark - 2.1 (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Mate 8 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ | |
| Apple iPhone 6S Plus | |
| Microsoft Lumia 950 XL | |
* ... smaller is better
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.4 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37.5 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.9 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37.5 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.9 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Consumo de energia
| desligado |   0.07 / 0.3 Watt |
| Ocioso |  0.85 / 2.07 / 2.28 Watt |
| Carga |
3.91 / 4.69 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Gossen Metrahit Energy | |
| Huawei Mate 8 Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash | Google Nexus 6P Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash | Apple iPhone 6S Plus A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe) | Microsoft Lumia 950 XL Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash | Asus Zenfone 2 Deluxe ZE551ML PowerVR G6430, Z3580, 128 GB eMMC Flash | Motorola Moto X Style Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -19% | 7% | -110% | -20% | -7% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 0.85 | 0.83 2% | 0.5 41% | 2.85 -235% | 1.1 -29% | 0.7 18% |
| Idle Average * | 2.07 | 1.09 47% | 1.9 8% | 2.95 -43% | 2.2 -6% | 2.2 -6% |
| Idle Maximum * | 2.28 | 1.17 49% | 2.2 4% | 3.26 -43% | 2.4 -5% | 2.3 -1% |
| Load Average * | 3.91 | 7.49 -92% | 3.2 18% | 8.92 -128% | 4.2 -7% | 3.9 -0% |
| Load Maximum * | 4.69 | 9.51 -103% | 6.4 -36% | 9.39 -100% | 7.2 -54% | 6.8 -45% |
* ... smaller is better
| Huawei Mate 8 Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash | Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash | Google Nexus 6P Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash | Apple iPhone 6S Plus A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe) | Microsoft Lumia 950 XL Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash | Asus Zenfone 2 Deluxe ZE551ML PowerVR G6430, Z3580, 128 GB eMMC Flash | Motorola Moto X Style Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -26% | -29% | -26% | -42% | -51% | -42% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1872 | 1459 -22% | 1447 -23% | 1655 -12% | 1078 -42% | 1141 -39% | |
| H.264 | 963 | 533 -45% | 714 -26% | 611 -37% | 383 -60% | ||
| WiFi v1.3 | 865 | 501 -42% | 375 -57% | 513 -41% | 369 -57% | 420 -51% | 400 -54% |
| Load | 256 | 223 -13% | 280 9% | 197 -23% | 179 -30% | 219 -14% |
Pro
+ Ótima carcaça
+ Tela brilhante
+ Excelente desempenho
+ Muito boas durações da bateria
+ Dual-SIM
+ Expansão da memória via microSD
+ Leitor de digitais
+ Sem bloatware
Contra
- Grandes desvios de cores da tela
- Câmera frontal ruim
- Preço alto
- GPS medíocre
- Leve afogamento sob carga contínua
- Alto falante
O Huawei Mate 8 deixou uma impressão muito boa durante nossa análise, com o seu nobre chassi e o seu alto desempenho. É um aparelho bastante grande com sua tela de 6-polegadas, mas o manuseio ainda é confortável graças ao marco fino. Além do alto desempenho, também estamos convencidos pela eficiência do novo SoC Kirin 950, porque as durações são massivas em combinação com a bateria de 4000-mAh. Você normalmente deveria ser capaz e conseguir dois dias com uma carga. O manuseio do Android 6.0 com o software EMUI 4.0 próprio da Huawei é sempre muito fluente e o fabricante também dispensa bloatware desnecessário.
Portanto, poderá o Mate 8 competir com outros aparelhos de gama alta? Não exatamente, porque há mais potencial em alguns pontos. O painel FHD exibe desvios de cores bastante altos, você não pode gravar vídeos em 4K, o módulo GPS poderia ser mais preciso e o suporte para dois SIMs também poderia ser melhor, porque apenas um desses dois slots permitem conexões de dados móveis. Alguns destes recursos provavelmente sejam suportados pelo carro chefe que chegará em breve, o Huawei P9, que deveria ser lançado em Março. O Mate 8 ainda é um ótimo aparelho. Não há motivo pelo qual você não deveria comprá-lo se estiver procurando um smartphone nobre com uma enorme tela e longas durações da bateria.
A carcaça, o desempenho e a estamina do novo Huawei Mate 8 são excelentes, mas alguns rivais oferecem mais no que diz respeito aos recursos.
Esta é uma versão reduzida da análise original. Você pode ler a análise completa em inglês aqui
Huawei Mate 8
- 04/13/2016 v5 (old)
Andreas Osthoff
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado
Price comparison
