Breve Análise do Smartphone Huawei Mate 30 Pro: Um smartphone potente, mesmo sem Google

Name: Huawei Mate 30 Pro
Brand: Huawei

Spot on! Film off!

Com o Mate 30 Pro, a Huawei está focando na videografia pela primeira vez e não apenas deu ao seu smartphone de última geração o mais recente SoC Kirin, mas também um segundo sensor de 40 MP para fotos e gravações de vídeo de grande angular. Além disso, a empresa chinesa incorporou toda a tecnologia de ponta neste smartphone ou, pelo menos, a que ela pode se apossar.

Daniel Schmidt, 👁 Daniel Schmidt, ✓ Andrea Grüblinger (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 12/18/2019 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android ARM Phablet Smartphone Touchscreen

Test device courtesy of TradingShenzhen

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Mate 30 Serie)

Processador

HiSilicon Kirin 990 8 x - 2.9 GHz, Cortex-A76/-A55

Placa gráfica

ARM Mali-G76 MP16

Memória

8 GB

Pantalha

6.53 polegadas 18.37:9, 2400 x 1176 pixel 409 PPI, capacitiva, multitouch de 10 pontos, gestos com o nó dos dedos, native pen support, OLED, Corning Gorilla Glass 6, Brilhante: sim, HDR, 60 Hz

Disco rígido

256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash, 256 GB

, 237.75 GB livre

Conexões

1 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Conexões Audio: USB Type-C, Card Reader: Cartões de memória nano de até 256 GB, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Acelerômetro, barômetro, giroscópio, sensor hall, sensor de proximidade, USB Type-C

Funcionamento em rede

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.1, GSM/GPRS/Edge: 850, 900, 1,800 and 1,900 MHz. UMTS/HSPA+: Bandas 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 19. LTE: Bandas 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 , 7, 8, 9, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40., Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 8.8 x 158.1 x 73.1

Bateria

17.33 Wh, 4500 mAh Lítio-Polímero, 3.85 volts

Charging

wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge

Sistema Operativo

Android 10

Camera

Primary Camera: 40 MPix (Wide angle, f/1.6, 27 mm, 1/1.7") + 8 MPix (3x optical zoom, f/2.4, 80 mm, 1/4") + 40 MPix (SuperSensing video camera, f/1.8, 18 mm, 1/1.54") + 3D ToF, 7,680 FPS slow-motion; Camera2 API level: Limited
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix (f/2.0, 3D ToF)

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: Dois, Teclado: onscreen, Fonte de alimentação, cabo USB, SIM tool, fones, documentação, EMUI 10.0, 24 Meses Garantia, Dual-band GNSS: Beidou, Galileo, Glonass, GPS, fanless, waterproof

peso

198 g, Suprimento de energia: 125 g

Preço

1099 Euro

Links

Huawei página inicial

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Device Comparison

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Drive	Size	Resolution
89 % v7 ^(old)	12/2019	Huawei Mate 30 Pro Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16	198 g	256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	6.53"	2400x1176
86.9 % v7 ^(old)	10/2018	Huawei Mate 20 Pro Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10	189 g	128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	6.30"	3120x1440
87.1 % v7 ^(old)	09/2019	Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU	226 g	64 GB SSD	6.50"	2688x1242
87.5 % v7 ^(old)	09/2019	Samsung Galaxy Note10+ Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12	196 g	256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	6.80"	3040x1440
84.6 % v7 ^(old)	10/2019	LG G8X ThinQ SD 855, Adreno 640	192 g	128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	6.40"	2340x1080
86.9 % v7 ^(old)	11/2019	OnePlus 7T Pro SD 855+, Adreno 640	206 g	256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	6.67"	3120x1440

Size Comparison

OnePlus 7T Pro Samsung Galaxy Note10+ LG G8X ThinQ Huawei Mate 30 Pro Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Huawei Mate 20 Pro DIN A6 ❌

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Huawei Mate 30 Pro Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	966 (923^min - 995^max) MBit/s
Huawei Mate 30 Pro Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	637 (584^min - 715^max) MBit/s -34%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	696 (647^min - 714^max) MBit/s -28%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	663 (289^min - 805^max) MBit/s -31%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	650 (6^min - 792^max) MBit/s -33%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD	589 (461^min - 625^max) MBit/s -39%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9825, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	558 (496^min - 582^max) MBit/s -42%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9825, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	534 (468^min - 587^max) MBit/s -45%
OnePlus 7T Pro Adreno 640, SD 855+, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	352 (311^min - 375^max) MBit/s -64%
LG G8X ThinQ Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	343 (290^min - 411^max) MBit/s -64%
iperf3 receive AX12
Huawei Mate 30 Pro Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	1010 (912^min - 1092^max) MBit/s
Huawei Mate 30 Pro Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	533 (468^min - 602^max) MBit/s -47%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	1001 (209^min - 1106^max) MBit/s -1%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	615 (532^min - 642^max) MBit/s -39%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	491 (100^min - 534^max) MBit/s -51%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9825, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	670 (326^min - 802^max) MBit/s -34%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9825, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	349 (310^min - 384^max) MBit/s -65%
LG G8X ThinQ Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	651 (539^min - 678^max) MBit/s -36%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD	580 (550^min - 597^max) MBit/s -43%
OnePlus 7T Pro Adreno 640, SD 855+, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	471 (347^min - 505^max) MBit/s -53%

Huawei Mate 30 Pro; iperf3 receive AX12; Nighthawk AX 12 (iperf 3.1.3): Ø1009 (912-1092)

Huawei Mate 30 Pro; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø533 (468-602)

Huawei Mate 30 Pro; iperf3 transmit AX12; Nighthawk AX 12 (iperf 3.1.3): Ø966 (923-995)

Huawei Mate 30 Pro; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø637 (584-715)

GPS test: Garmin Edge 500 - Circumnavigating around a lake

GPS test: Huawei Mate 30 Pro - Circumnavigating around a lake

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

Test chart @ 2,500 lux (Zoomed-in section)


603 cd/m²	598 cd/m²	616 cd/m²
603 cd/m²	592 cd/m²	614 cd/m²
608 cd/m²	600 cd/m²	612 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 616 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 605.1 cd/m² Minimum: 1.97 cd/m²
iluminação: 96 %
iluminação com acumulador: 592 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.5 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 2.6 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
98.1% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.16

	Huawei Mate 30 Pro OLED, 2400x1176, 6.5"	Huawei Mate 20 Pro OLED, 3120x1440, 6.3"	Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max OLED, 2688x1242, 6.5"	Samsung Galaxy Note10+ Dynamic AMOLED, 3040x1440, 6.8"	LG G8X ThinQ OLED, 2340x1080, 6.4"	OnePlus 7T Pro AMOLED, 3120x1440, 6.7"
Screen		18%	29%	7%	-60%	-3%
Brightness middle	592	576 -3%	790 33%	683 15%	570 -4%	606 2%
Brightness	605	582 -4%	790 31%	694 15%	581 -4%	611 1%
Brightness Distribution	96	90 -6%	97 1%	96 0%	90 -6%	95 -1%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	2.5	1.3 48%	1.4 44%	2.9 -16%	6.27 -151%	3.46 -38%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	5.5	3.5 36%	3.4 38%	4.8 13%	9.75 -77%	5.64 -3%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2.6	1.6 38%	1.9 27%	2.2 15%	5.7 -119%	2 23%
Gamma	2.16 ^102%	2.18 ^101%	2.23 ^99%	2.11 ^104%	2.37 ^93%	2.258 ^97%
CCT	6173 ^105%	6561 ^99%	6466 ^101%	6247 ^104%	7309 ^89%	6779 ^96%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

245.1 Hz

≤ 99 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 245.1 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 245.1 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
3.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 1.6 ms rise
3.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 1.6 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 11 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
3.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 2 ms rise
3.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 1.6 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 10 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Geekbench 5.0
5.0 Single-Core (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	783 Points
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	685 Points -13%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	1344 Points +72%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288	805 Points +3%
LG G8X ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	746 Points -5%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	792 Points +1%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 ()	783 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (703 - 1668, n=10, last 2 years)	928 Points +19%
5.0 Multi-Core (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	3059 Points
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	2347 Points -23%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	3242 Points +6%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288	2177 Points -29%
LG G8X ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	2571 Points -16%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	2940 Points -4%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 ()	3059 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (1908 - 4353, n=10, last 2 years)	3014 Points -1%
OpenCL Score 5.0 (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	4442 Points
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	3460 Points -22%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288	4567 Points +3%
LG G8X ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	2305 Points -48%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	2716 Points -39%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 ()	4442 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (498 - 9123, n=6, last 2 years)	4173 Points -6%
Vulkan Score 5.0 (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	3222 Points
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	2245 Points -30%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288	2837 Points -12%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	2430 Points -25%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 ()	3222 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (261 - 7988, n=5, last 2 years)	3404 Points +6%
Metal Score 5.0 (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	6448 Points

Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	3898 Points
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	3378 Points -13%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288	4549 Points +17%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 (3865 - 3898, n=2)	3882 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (844 - 9574, n=84, last 2 years)	5609 Points +44%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	12280 Points
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	10024 Points -18%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288	10367 Points -16%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 (11885 - 12280, n=2)	12083 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (4134 - 34246, n=84, last 2 years)	15765 Points +28%
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	12228 Points
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	8938 Points -27%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288	11300 Points -8%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 (8892 - 12228, n=2)	10560 Points -14%
Average of class Smartphone (5192 - 28121, n=61, last 2 years)	12557 Points +3%

PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	13947 Points
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	12535 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288	11813 Points -15%
LG G8X ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	11795 Points -15%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	12645 Points -9%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 (10918 - 13947, n=2)	12433 Points -11%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	10322 Points
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	9225 Points -11%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288	9027 Points -13%
LG G8X ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	9259 Points -10%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	10442 Points +1%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 (8636 - 10322, n=2)	9479 Points -8%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	64626 Points
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	57047 Points -12%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	96826 Points +50%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288	54233 Points -16%
LG G8X ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	68517 Points +6%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	72173 Points +12%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 (42861 - 64626, n=2)	53744 Points -17%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	75073 Points
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	67730 Points -10%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	206190 Points +175%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288	66142 Points -12%
LG G8X ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	103509 Points +38%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	118129 Points +57%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 (64715 - 75073, n=2)	69894 Points -7%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	43459 Points
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	36755 Points -15%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	33898 Points -22%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288	33268 Points -23%
LG G8X ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	31384 Points -28%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	30561 Points -30%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 (19565 - 43459, n=2)	31512 Points -27%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	6815 Points
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	4996 Points -27%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	7893 Points +16%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288	4502 Points -34%
LG G8X ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	6780 Points -1%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	8165 Points +20%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 (4215 - 6815, n=2)	5515 Points -19%
Average of class Smartphone (812 - 7285, n=26, last 2 years)	4204 Points -38%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	7671 Points
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	5305 Points -31%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	11302 Points +47%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288	5043 Points -34%
LG G8X ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	9806 Points +28%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	10637 Points +39%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 (4256 - 7671, n=2)	5964 Points -22%
Average of class Smartphone (756 - 9451, n=26, last 2 years)	4740 Points -38%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	4900 Points
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	4150 Points -15%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	3839 Points -22%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288	3273 Points -33%
LG G8X ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3260 Points -33%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	4503 Points -8%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 (4056 - 4900, n=2)	4478 Points -9%
Average of class Smartphone (1093 - 4349, n=26, last 2 years)	3303 Points -33%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	7098 Points
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	5456 Points -23%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	Points -100%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288	4618 Points -35%
LG G8X ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	6795 Points -4%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	8605 Points +21%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 (4472 - 7098, n=2)	5785 Points -18%
Average of class Smartphone (883 - 23024, n=73, last 2 years)	11109 Points +57%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	7970 Points
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	5854 Points -27%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	Points -100%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288	5083 Points -36%
LG G8X ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	9724 Points +22%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	11448 Points +44%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 (4405 - 7970, n=2)	6188 Points -22%
Average of class Smartphone (840 - 45492, n=73, last 2 years)	19708 Points +147%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	5133 Points
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	4407 Points -14%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	Points -100%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288	3498 Points -32%
LG G8X ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3308 Points -36%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	4604 Points -10%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 (4702 - 5133, n=2)	4918 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone (1075 - 8749, n=73, last 2 years)	5001 Points -3%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	6048 Points
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	4201 Points -31%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	5471 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288	4940 Points -18%
LG G8X ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	5743 Points -5%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	6266 Points +4%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 (4334 - 6048, n=2)	5191 Points -14%
Average of class Smartphone (286 - 17553, n=70, last 2 years)	3006 Points -50%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	6478 Points
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	4206 Points -35%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	6088 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288	5712 Points -12%
LG G8X ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	6275 Points -3%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	7044 Points +9%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 (4425 - 6478, n=2)	5452 Points -16%
Average of class Smartphone (240 - 29890, n=70, last 2 years)	3166 Points -51%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	4909 Points
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	4183 Points -15%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	4038 Points -18%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288	3353 Points -32%
LG G8X ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	4429 Points -10%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	4519 Points -8%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 (4096 - 4909, n=2)	4503 Points -8%
Average of class Smartphone (858 - 7180, n=70, last 2 years)	3260 Points -34%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	6382 Points
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	4275 Points -33%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	Points -100%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288	5143 Points -19%
LG G8X ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	5851 Points -8%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	6916 Points +8%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 (4467 - 6382, n=2)	5425 Points -15%
Average of class Smartphone (317 - 22303, n=162, last 2 years)	8158 Points +28%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	6657 Points
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	4250 Points -36%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	Points -100%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288	6036 Points -9%
LG G8X ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	6857 Points +3%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	8006 Points +20%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 (4356 - 6657, n=2)	5507 Points -17%
Average of class Smartphone (267 - 40163, n=162, last 2 years)	12271 Points +84%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	5576 Points
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	4364 Points -22%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	Points -100%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288	3389 Points -39%
LG G8X ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3866 Points -31%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	4683 Points -16%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 (4756 - 5576, n=2)	5166 Points -7%
Average of class Smartphone (877 - 10259, n=162, last 2 years)	4723 Points -15%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	5570 Points
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288	4713 Points -15%
LG G8X ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	4838 Points -13%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	5509 Points -1%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 (4036 - 5570, n=2)	4803 Points -14%
Average of class Smartphone (365 - 6635, n=69, last 2 years)	2784 Points -50%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	6369 Points
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288	6186 Points -3%
LG G8X ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	5733 Points -10%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	6527 Points +2%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 (4156 - 6369, n=2)	5263 Points -17%
Average of class Smartphone (298 - 7971, n=69, last 2 years)	3009 Points -53%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	3870 Points
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288	2571 Points -34%
LG G8X ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3128 Points -19%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	3564 Points -8%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 (3658 - 3870, n=2)	3764 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (1667 - 4198, n=69, last 2 years)	2686 Points -31%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	60 fps
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	61 fps +2%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	59 fps -2%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288	58 fps -3%
LG G8X ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	60 fps 0%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	60 fps 0%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 (60 - 60, n=2)	60 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (23 - 166, n=174, last 2 years)	86.6 fps +44%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	152 fps
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	120 fps -21%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	287 fps +89%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288	95 fps -37%
LG G8X ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	151 fps -1%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	185 fps +22%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 (135 - 152, n=2)	143.5 fps -6%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=174, last 2 years)	296 fps +95%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	60 fps
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	42 fps -30%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	60 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288	56 fps -7%
LG G8X ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	60 fps 0%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	57 fps -5%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 (44 - 60, n=2)	52 fps -13%
Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 166, n=174, last 2 years)	76.1 fps +27%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	106 fps
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	73 fps -31%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	157 fps +48%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288	89 fps -16%
LG G8X ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	85 fps -20%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	111 fps +5%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 (64 - 106, n=2)	85 fps -20%
Average of class Smartphone (12 - 502, n=174, last 2 years)	175 fps +65%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	73 fps
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	26 fps -64%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	60 fps -18%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288	36 fps -51%
LG G8X ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	36 fps -51%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	40 fps -45%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 (34 - 73, n=2)	53.5 fps -27%
Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 166, n=174, last 2 years)	66.7 fps -9%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	56 fps
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	29 fps -48%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	100 fps +79%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288	65 fps +16%
LG G8X ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	51 fps -9%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	79 fps +41%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 (41 - 56, n=2)	48.5 fps -13%
Average of class Smartphone (8.3 - 365, n=174, last 2 years)	124.3 fps +122%

GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	34 fps
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	16 fps -53%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	48 fps +41%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288	18 fps -47%
LG G8X ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	33 fps -3%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	24 fps -29%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 (21 - 34, n=2)	27.5 fps -19%
Average of class Smartphone (5 - 154, n=175, last 2 years)	49.5 fps +46%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	41 fps
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	31 fps -24%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	63 fps +54%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288	28 fps -32%
LG G8X ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	36 fps -12%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	48 fps +17%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 (38 - 41, n=2)	39.5 fps -4%
Average of class Smartphone (3.1 - 216, n=174, last 2 years)	74.8 fps +82%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	40 fps
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	18 fps -55%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	58 fps +45%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288	27 fps -32%
LG G8X ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	38 fps -5%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	26 fps -35%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 (17 - 40, n=2)	28.5 fps -29%
Average of class Smartphone (3.6 - 166, n=207, last 2 years)	50.7 fps +27%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	49 fps
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	33 fps -33%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	75 fps +53%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288	48 fps -2%
LG G8X ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	42 fps -14%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	47 fps -4%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 (41 - 49, n=2)	45 fps -8%
Average of class Smartphone (2.3 - 321, n=207, last 2 years)	84.9 fps +73%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	26 fps
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	19 fps -27%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	46 fps +77%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288	17 fps -35%
LG G8X ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	25 fps -4%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	17 fps -35%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 (13 - 26, n=2)	19.5 fps -25%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 144, n=207, last 2 years)	38.9 fps +50%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	19 fps
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	13 fps -32%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	29 fps +53%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288	18 fps -5%
LG G8X ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	16 fps -16%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	19 fps 0%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 (17 - 19, n=2)	18 fps -5%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 129, n=207, last 2 years)	34 fps +79%

Basemark GPU 1.1
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	33.9 (9.36^min - 74.72^max) fps
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	25.57 (7.38^min - 46.96^max) fps -25%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288	39.13 (10.62^min - 99.35^max) fps +15%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	44.62 fps +32%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 ()	33.9 fps 0%
Vulkan Medium Native (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	31.12 (11.09^min - 63.1^max) fps
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	16.92 (6.06^min - 28.78^max) fps -46%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288	27.47 (12.07^min - 47.94^max) fps -12%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	28.5 fps -8%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 ()	31.1 fps 0%
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	29.22 (4.07^min - 95.16^max) fps
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	29.12 (9.74^min - 74.17^max) fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288	33.38 (8.52^min - 83.34^max) fps +14%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	45.28 fps +55%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 ()	29.2 fps 0%

AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	300617 Points
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	462516 Points
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288	347229 Points

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	250848 Points
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288	291772 Points

VRMark - Amber Room (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	4997 Score
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	5025 Score +1%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288	4985 Score 0%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	4986 Score 0%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 ()	4997 Score 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2523 - 10071, n=6, last 2 years)	5819 Score +16%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	5389 Points
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	4687 Points -13%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	5607 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288	4637 Points -14%
LG G8X ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	4841 Points -10%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	4992 Points -7%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 (4738 - 5389, n=2)	5064 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone (1196 - 12993, n=157, last 2 years)	6460 Points +20%
System (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	9309 Points
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	8604 Points -8%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	14189 Points +52%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288	7965 Points -14%
LG G8X ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	9113 Points -2%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	9294 Points 0%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 (8215 - 9309, n=2)	8762 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone (2368 - 17953, n=157, last 2 years)	10308 Points +11%
Memory (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	6130 Points
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	6283 Points +2%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	2350 Points -62%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288	4646 Points -24%
LG G8X ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	5140 Points -16%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	5091 Points -17%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 (6130 - 6751, n=2)	6441 Points +5%
Average of class Smartphone (962 - 18911, n=157, last 2 years)	7016 Points +14%
Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	10112 Points
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	6273 Points -38%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	16996 Points +68%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288	9092 Points -10%
LG G8X ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	9339 Points -8%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	10618 Points +5%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 (8775 - 10112, n=2)	9444 Points -7%
Average of class Smartphone (1017 - 58651, n=157, last 2 years)	17782 Points +76%
Web (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	1462 Points
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	1424 Points -3%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	1745 Points +19%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288	1374 Points -6%
LG G8X ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	1256 Points -14%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	1236 Points -15%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 (1032 - 1462, n=2)	1247 Points -15%
Average of class Smartphone (841 - 2363, n=157, last 2 years)	1574 Points +8%

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1)	129.1 Points +96%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=169, last 2 years)	124.4 Points +89%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)	65.9 Points
LG G8X ThinQ (Chrome 78)	63.1 Points -4%
OnePlus 7T Pro (Chrome 78)	62.4 Points -5%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 (55.1 - 65.9, n=2)	60.5 Points -8%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro (Chrome 74)	48.44 Points -26%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ (Samung Browser 9.2)	42.69 Points -35%

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1)	301.9 Points +161%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)	115.5 Points
OnePlus 7T Pro (Chrome 78)	115.4 Points 0%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro (Chrome 69)	109.2 Points -5%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 (101.2 - 115.5, n=2)	108.4 Points -6%
LG G8X ThinQ (Chrome 78)	106.7 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ (Samsung Browser 9.2)	84.5 Points -27%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1)	153 runs/min +106%
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=152, last 2 years)	143.9 runs/min +94%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)	74.1 runs/min
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 (63.9 - 74.1, n=2)	69 runs/min -7%
LG G8X ThinQ (Chome 78)	66.8 runs/min -10%
OnePlus 7T Pro (Chome 78)	66.4 runs/min -10%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro (Chrome 71)	58.6 runs/min -21%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ (Samsung Browser 9.2)	runs/min -100%

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1)	181 Points +52%
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years)	150.2 Points +26%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro (Chrome 69)	124 Points +4%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)	119 Points
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ (Samsung Browser 9.2)	118 Points -1%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 (97 - 119, n=2)	108 Points -9%
OnePlus 7T Pro (Chrome 78)	93 Points -22%
LG G8X ThinQ (Chrome 78)	90 Points -24%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1)	49388 Points +110%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=210, last 2 years)	38550 Points +64%
OnePlus 7T Pro (Chrome 78)	23999 Points +2%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)	23568 Points
LG G8X ThinQ (Chrome 78)	23506 Points 0%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro (Chrome 69)	23285 Points -1%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 (19885 - 23568, n=2)	21727 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ (Samsung Browser 9.2)	19135 Points -19%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ (Samsung Browser 9.2)	2528 ms * -29%
LG G8X ThinQ (Chrome 78)	2201 ms * -12%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 (1963 - 2345, n=2)	2154 ms * -10%
OnePlus 7T Pro (Chrome 78)	2134 ms * -9%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)	1963 ms *
Huawei Mate 20 Pro (Chrome 69)	1952 ms * +1%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=167, last 2 years)	1523 ms * +22%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1)	571 ms * +71%

* ... smaller is better

	Huawei Mate 30 Pro	Huawei Mate 20 Pro	Samsung Galaxy Note10+	LG G8X ThinQ	OnePlus 7T Pro	Average 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		-28%	-7%	-33%	-33%	-5%	79%
Sequential Read 256KB	1781	853 -52%	1504 -16%	705 -60%	1489 -16%	1547 ?(983 - 1789, n=22) -13%	1882 ?(226 - 4512, n=197, last 2 years) 6%
Sequential Write 256KB	401.8	196.4 -51%	588 46%	497.1 24%	405 1%	575 ?(387 - 915, n=22) 43%	1467 ?(57.5 - 3908, n=197, last 2 years) 265%
Random Read 4KB	226.4	157.4 -30%	196.2 -13%	160.5 -29%	169 -25%	210 ?(168.5 - 265, n=22) -7%	278 ?(22.2 - 483, n=197, last 2 years) 23%
Random Write 4KB	259.2	157.8 -39%	183.6 -29%	30.2 -88%	26 -90%	188.5 ?(24.8 - 272, n=22) -27%	310 ?(9.4 - 753, n=197, last 2 years) 20%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard	82.5 ?(Nano Memory Card)	83.2 ?(Huawei NanoSD 128 GB) 1%	71 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -14%	68.9 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -16%		70.6 ?(34.7 - 82.5, n=5) -14%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard	69.2 ?(Nano Memory Card)	72.4 ?(Huawei NanoSD 128 GB) 5%	59.5 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -14%	47.7 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -31%		59.8 ?(30.7 - 71.7, n=5) -14%

Huawei Mate 30 Pro; PUBG Mobile; PUBG Mobile (0.15.0): Ø39.9 (30-41)

Huawei Mate 30 Pro; Asphalt 9: Legends; Asphalt 9 (1.8.1a): Ø29.7 (16-31)

Huawei Mate 30 Pro; Dead Trigger 2; Dead Trigger 2 (1.6.3): Ø60 (58-61)

Carga Máxima

Inatividade


39.8 °C	39.4 °C	36.6 °C
38.2 °C	38.2 °C	34.7 °C
36.8 °C	35.9 °C	34.3 °C

Máximo: 39.8 °C
Médio: 37.1 °C


31.8 °C	35.6 °C	41 °C
32.4 °C	34.4 °C	39.5 °C
31.3 °C	34.8 °C	37.3 °C

Máximo: 41 °C
Médio: 35.3 °C

alimentação elétrica 27.6 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20.4 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.1 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.8 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.5 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Huawei Mate 30 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 9.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 10.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (28.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 71% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 84% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 13% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 23% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 44% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 49% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.01 / 0.17 Watt
Ocioso	0.87 / 1.75 / 1.83 Watt
Carga	3.85 / 6.64 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Huawei Mate 30 Pro 4500 mAh	Huawei Mate 20 Pro 4200 mAh	Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max 3969 mAh	Samsung Galaxy Note10+ 4300 mAh	LG G8X ThinQ 4000 mAh	OnePlus 7T Pro 4085 mAh	Average HiSilicon Kirin 990	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		-13%	-24%	-25%	-11%	-73%	-65%	-18%
Idle Minimum *	0.87	0.95 -9%	0.92 -6%	0.7 20%	1.1 -26%	2.1 -141%	1.425 ?(0.87 - 1.98, n=2) -64%	0.882 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=157, last 2 years) -1%
Idle Average *	1.75	2.17 -24%	2.9 -66%	1.81 -3%	1.49 15%	3 -71%	3.71 ?(1.75 - 5.66, n=2) -112%	1.448 ?(0.6 - 4.26, n=157, last 2 years) 17%
Idle Maximum *	1.83	2.25 -23%	2.94 -61%	1.92 -5%	1.76 4%	3.5 -91%	3.76 ?(1.83 - 5.69, n=2) -105%	1.603 ?(0.83 - 4.45, n=157, last 2 years) 12%
Load Average *	3.85	4.47 -16%	3.65 5%	7.57 -97%	4.2 -9%	5.3 -38%	5.41 ?(3.85 - 6.96, n=2) -41%	6.57 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=152, last 2 years) -71%
Load Maximum *	6.64	6.15 7%	6.18 7%	9.34 -41%	9.2 -39%	8.3 -25%	6.81 ?(6.64 - 6.98, n=2) -3%	9.92 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=152, last 2 years) -49%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		36h 14min
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 78)		13h 43min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		18h 18min
Carga (máximo brilho)		3h 39min

	Huawei Mate 30 Pro 4500 mAh	Huawei Mate 20 Pro 4200 mAh	Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max 3969 mAh	Samsung Galaxy Note10+ 4300 mAh	LG G8X ThinQ 4000 mAh	OnePlus 7T Pro 4085 mAh
Battery Runtime		-5%	35%	-10%	13%	5%
Reader / Idle	2174	1747 -20%	2618 20%	1585 -27%		2015 -7%
H.264	1098	854 -22%	1346 23%	934 -15%		957 -13%
WiFi v1.3	823	767 -7%	909 10%	532 -35%	930 13%	912 11%
Load	219	282 29%	408 86%	305 39%		283 29%

Pro

+ SoC potente

+ Armazenamento rápido e expansível

+ Módulos de comunicação velozes

+ Boa tela com opções de entrada excepcionais

+ Certificação IP68

+ Carregamento rápido (com e sem fio)

+ Localização precisa

+ Ótima qualidade das chamadas

Contra

- SIM apenas híbrido

- Cartão de memória nano, em vez de microSD

- Sem aptX ou aptX HD

- Sem serviços Google

- Qualidade média do alto falante

Veredicto - A Huawei flexiona seus músculos

The Huawei Mate 30 Pro smartphone review. Test device courtesy of TradingShenzen.

Com o Mate 30 Pro, a Huawei conseguiu mais uma vez entregar um smartphone muito poderoso e de alta qualidade. Infelizmente, a empresa chinesa fez cortes em várias áreas. A curvatura da tela é certamente única no momento e oferece algumas alternativas interessantes de entrada, que também funcionam bem na vida cotidiana. No entanto, isso ocorre às custas da resolução e da precisão das cores. O último não é digno de um smartphone a esse preço. Também gostaríamos de ver uma tela de 90 ou 120 Hz no Mate 30 Pro e, pelo menos, usar a opção de escurecimento DC. Infelizmente, nenhuma delas é possível.

Um destaque do smartphone da Huawei são suas câmeras quádruplas. Em particular, o sensor adicional de 40 MP faz com que gravações de vídeo e fotos com grande angular sejam realmente atraentes em condições de pouca luz. Durante o dia, recomendamos que a Huawei ajuste a qualidade de seu aplicativo de câmera padrão, pois preferimos a reprodução de cores de muitos de seus concorrentes.

O Huawei Mate 30 Pro é um smartphone poderoso, mas também revela alguns pontos fracos.

O alto-falante abaixo da tela é, em qualquer caso, uma solução melhor do que a porta USB Tipo C, embora a qualidade do som no volume máximo deixe muito a desejar. A integração do suporte para a M-Pen também é excelente, embora a Huawei queira melhorar a facilidade de uso de sua caneta ativa. Em resumo, escrever com a caneta não se sente natural e a rejeição da palma não é ótima.

Em suma, a Huawei conseguiu criar um smartphone muito bom que certamente não decepcionará os fãs. Quem escolher a versão chinesa deve ter em mente que ela não possui certificação DRM, nem Google Play Services. Este último deve ser instalado manualmente e, mesmo assim, alguns serviços como o Google Pay provavelmente não funcionarão até o final da disputa comercial entre a China e os EUA.

Huawei Mate 30 Pro - 08/31/2022 v7 ^(old)
Daniel Schmidt

Acabamento

95%

Teclado

67 / 75 → 89%

Mouse

97%

Conectividade

68 / 70 → 98%

Peso

88%

Bateria

90%

Pantalha

91%

Desempenho do jogos

56 / 64 → 88%

Desempenho da aplicação

81 / 86 → 94%

Temperatura

91%

Ruído

100%

Audio

68 / 90 → 75%

Camera

81%

Médio

83%

89%

Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Alex Alderson - Senior Tech Writer - 11421 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2018

contact me via: @aldersonaj

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Huawei Mate 30 Pro: Um smartphone potente, mesmo sem Google

Daniel Schmidt, 2019-12-18 (Update: 2024-11- 4)

Device Comparison

Size Comparison

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

Huawei Mate 30 Pro audio analysis

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max audio analysis

Pro

Contra

Veredicto - A Huawei flexiona seus músculos

More articles related to this device

Price comparison