Breve Análise do Smartphone Huawei Mate 20
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 94 %
iluminação com acumulador: 782 cd/m²
Contraste: 2172:1 (Preto: 0.36 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.3 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 2.4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
97.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.22
| Huawei Mate 20 TFT-LCD (IPS), 2244x1080, 6.5" | HTC U12 Plus Super LCD 6, 2880x1440, 6" | Huawei Mate 20 Pro OLED, 3120x1440, 6.3" | Huawei Mate 10 IPS, 2560x1440, 5.9" | LG V30 OLED, 2880x1440, 6" | OnePlus 6T Optic AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.4" | Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition Super AMOLED, 2248x1080, 6.2" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -3% | 12% | 4% | -54% | -5% | -26% | |
| Brightness middle | 782 | 395 -49% | 576 -26% | 704 -10% | 432 -45% | 437 -44% | 429 -45% |
| Brightness | 784 | 402 -49% | 582 -26% | 692 -12% | 428 -45% | 442 -44% | 432 -45% |
| Brightness Distribution | 94 | 90 -4% | 90 -4% | 94 0% | 87 -7% | 95 1% | 88 -6% |
| Black Level * | 0.36 | 0.37 -3% | 0.28 22% | ||||
| Contrast | 2172 | 1068 -51% | 2514 16% | ||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.3 | 1.6 30% | 1.3 43% | 2.4 -4% | 4.18 -82% | 2.21 4% | 3.39 -47% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7 | 3.4 51% | 3.5 50% | 4.2 40% | 8.53 -22% | 4.27 39% | 5.25 25% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.4 | 1.1 54% | 1.6 33% | 2.8 -17% | 5.3 -121% | 2.1 12% | 3.3 -38% |
| Gamma | 2.22 99% | 2.14 103% | 2.18 101% | 2.34 94% | 2.33 94% | 2.307 95% | 2.238 98% |
| CCT | 6839 95% | 6536 99% | 6561 99% | 6423 101% | 7487 87% | 6353 102% | 7135 91% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 14880 Hz | ≤ 28 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 14880 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 28 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 14880 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8706 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 26 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 8.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 17.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 59 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 59.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 26.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 32.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 95 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
| AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Mate 20 | |
| HTC U12 Plus | |
| Huawei Mate 20 Pro | |
| OnePlus 6T | |
| Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (268359 - 322616, n=10) | |
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Mate 20 | |
| HTC U12 Plus | |
| Huawei Mate 20 Pro | |
| Huawei Mate 10 | |
| LG V30 | |
| OnePlus 6T | |
| Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (245662 - 254229, n=9) | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Huawei Mate 20 Pro (Chrome 69) | |
| Huawei Mate 20 (Chrome 70.0.3538.80) | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (93.2 - 109.9, n=9) | |
| HTC U12 Plus (Chrome 66) | |
| OnePlus 6T (Chrome 70) | |
| Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition (Chrome 69) | |
| Huawei Mate 10 (Chrome Version 63) | |
| LG V30 (Chrome 62) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=210, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei Mate 20 Pro (Chrome 69) | |
| Huawei Mate 20 (Chrome 70.0.3538.80) | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (20618 - 23285, n=10) | |
| OnePlus 6T (Chrome 70) | |
| HTC U12 Plus (Chrome 66) | |
| Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition (Chrome 69) | |
| Huawei Mate 10 (Chrome Version 63) | |
| LG V30 (Chrome 62) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Huawei Mate 10 (Chrome Version 63) | |
| LG V30 (Chrome 62) | |
| HTC U12 Plus (Chrome 66) | |
| Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition (Chrome 69) | |
| OnePlus 6T (Chrome 70) | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (1948 - 3098, n=10) | |
| Huawei Mate 20 Pro (Chrome 69) | |
| Huawei Mate 20 (Chrome 70.0.3538.80) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=167, last 2 years) | |
| WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
| Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei Mate 20 (Chrome 70.0.3538.80) | |
| Huawei Mate 20 Pro (Chrome 69) | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (86 - 124, n=10) | |
| HTC U12 Plus (Chrome 66) | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall | |
| Huawei Mate 20 Pro (Chrome 69) | |
| Huawei Mate 20 (Chrome 70.0.3538.80) | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (228 - 334, n=5) | |
| OnePlus 6T (Chrome 70) | |
| HTC U12 Plus (Chrome 66) | |
| Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition (Chrome 69) | |
| Huawei Mate 10 (Chrome Version 63) | |
| LG V30 (Chrome 62) | |
* ... smaller is better
| Huawei Mate 20 | HTC U12 Plus | Huawei Mate 20 Pro | Huawei Mate 10 | LG V30 | OnePlus 6T | Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition | Average 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -14% | 0% | -8% | -38% | -27% | -29% | -1% | 237% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 840 | 709 -16% | 853 2% | 790 -6% | 669 -20% | 735 -12% | 692 -18% | 760 ? -10% | 1894 ? 125% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 196.7 | 195.8 0% | 196.4 0% | 201.7 3% | 193.2 -2% | 204.4 4% | 205.2 4% | 297 ? 51% | 1476 ? 650% |
| Random Read 4KB | 157.9 | 118.1 -25% | 157.4 0% | 169.7 7% | 78.2 -50% | 138.5 -12% | 135.2 -14% | 152.9 ? -3% | 278 ? 76% |
| Random Write 4KB | 158.1 | 104.2 -34% | 157.8 0% | 105.3 -33% | 10.21 -94% | 22 -86% | 22.65 -86% | 131.6 ? -17% | 312 ? 97% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 83.2 ? | 84.3 ? 1% | 83.2 ? 0% | 80.6 ? -3% | 62.8 -25% | 76 ? -9% | |||
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 72.3 ? | 63.6 ? -12% | 72.4 ? 0% | 62.9 ? -13% | 47.2 -35% | 59.6 ? -18% |
Asphalt 9: Legends
PUBG Mobile
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.3 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36.4 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.3 °C / 90 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Huawei Mate 20 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 48% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 66% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 47% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 46% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 65% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado |   0.02 / 0.26 Watt |
| Ocioso |  0.69 / 2.28 / 2.52 Watt |
| Carga |
5.21 / 8.49 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Huawei Mate 20 4000 mAh | HTC U12 Plus 3500 mAh | Huawei Mate 20 Pro 4200 mAh | Huawei Mate 10 4000 mAh | LG V30 3300 mAh | OnePlus 6T 3700 mAh | Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition 3000 mAh | Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -7% | 4% | -5% | 24% | 18% | -50% | 4% | 0% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 0.69 | 0.77 -12% | 0.95 -38% | 0.89 -29% | 0.72 -4% | 0.7 -1% | 1.8 -161% | 0.802 ? -16% | 0.883 ? -28% |
| Idle Average * | 2.28 | 2.18 4% | 2.17 5% | 2.31 -1% | 1.37 40% | 1.1 52% | 2.9 -27% | 2.07 ? 9% | 1.467 ? 36% |
| Idle Maximum * | 2.52 | 2.21 12% | 2.25 11% | 2.38 6% | 1.41 44% | 2.1 17% | 3.5 -39% | 2.38 ? 6% | 1.621 ? 36% |
| Load Average * | 5.21 | 6.25 -20% | 4.47 14% | 4.87 7% | 3.46 34% | 4.2 19% | 4.8 8% | 4.87 ? 7% | 6.58 ? -26% |
| Load Maximum * | 8.49 | 10.16 -20% | 6.15 28% | 9.16 -8% | 7.83 8% | 8.3 2% | 11.2 -32% | 7.46 ? 12% | 9.91 ? -17% |
* ... smaller is better
| Huawei Mate 20 4000 mAh | HTC U12 Plus 3500 mAh | Huawei Mate 20 Pro 4200 mAh | Huawei Mate 10 4000 mAh | LG V30 3300 mAh | OnePlus 6T 3700 mAh | Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition 3000 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -35% | -10% | -7% | -10% | -5% | -23% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1892 | 1452 -23% | 1747 -8% | 1671 -12% | 1914 1% | 1936 2% | 1401 -26% |
| H.264 | 1030 | 464 -55% | 854 -17% | 1003 -3% | 822 -20% | 903 -12% | 921 -11% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 885 | 507 -43% | 767 -13% | 865 -2% | 774 -13% | 865 -2% | 694 -22% |
| Load | 287 | 230 -20% | 282 -2% | 259 -10% | 267 -7% | 261 -9% | 191 -33% |
Pro
Contra
O Huawei Mate 20 é um carro-chefe parecido ao seu irmão mais caro, o Mate 20 Pro. A Huawei equipou o Mate 20 com o seu SoC Kirin 980, o que torna o dispositivo tão poderoso quanto o modelo Pro. Além disso, a tela de resolução mais baixa do primeiro ajuda a conseguir uma excelente duração da bateria, enquanto a inclusão de um conector de fone de ouvido é um bônus bem-vindo. O Mate 20 carece de alguns dos recursos extravagantes do Mate 20 Pro, como a digitalização facial 3D, o sensor de digitais na tela ou o carregamento sem fio, o que pode frustrar algumas pessoas.
O Huawei Mate 20 é um smartphone fantástico, mas que renuncia a alguns dos recursos premium do Mate 20 Pro. No entanto, em nossa opinião, vale a pena economizar os 200-Euros (~$225).
Além disso, o Mate 20 usa uma matriz de câmeras triplas Leica inferior, que apresenta um desempenho notavelmente pior com pouca luz. No entanto, as câmeras ainda estão no mesmo nível do que outros carros-chefe de 2018 oferecem. No entanto, é um compromisso. Da mesma forma, a Huawei equipou o dispositivo com um monitor LCD plano, comparado ao painel OLED curvo do Mate 20 Pro. Finalmente, o dispositivo tem uma classificação IP inferior, para a qual não podemos oferecer explicações. O IP53 simplesmente não é bom o suficiente para um smartphone topo de gama lançado em 2018, particularmente quando muitos dos seus concorrentes são classificados como IP67/68. Nossas preocupações sobre a menor fonte de energia eram infundadas, embora o Mate 20 carregasse rapidamente. No geral, o Mate 20 tem uma excelente relação qualidade/preço e é uma excelente alternativa ao Mate 20 Pro, mas o primeiro não possui algumas das características mais comentadas do último.
Huawei Mate 20
- 11/27/2018 v6 (old)
Manuel Masiero
Price comparison
