Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve Análise do Smartphone Huawei Mate 10
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 94 %
iluminação com acumulador: 704 cd/m²
Contraste: 2514:1 (Preto: 0.28 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.4 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 2.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.34
| Huawei Mate 10 IPS, 2560x1440, 5.9" | Huawei Mate 9 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.9" | Huawei Mate 10 Pro OLED, 2160x1080, 6" | HTC U Ultra SLCD 5, 2560x1440, 5.7" | Samsung Galaxy Note 8 Super AMOLED, 2960x1440, 6.3" | Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus Super AMOLED, 2960x1440, 6.2" | LG V30 OLED, 2880x1440, 6" | Google Pixel 2 XL P-OLED, 2880x1440, 6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -45% | 6% | -69% | -12% | 9% | -58% | -20% | |
| Brightness middle | 704 | 696 -1% | 629 -11% | 470 -33% | 530 -25% | 560 -20% | 432 -39% | 415 -41% |
| Brightness | 692 | 680 -2% | 636 -8% | 445 -36% | 536 -23% | 562 -19% | 428 -38% | 420 -39% |
| Brightness Distribution | 94 | 93 -1% | 94 0% | 88 -6% | 93 -1% | 93 -1% | 87 -7% | 87 -7% |
| Black Level * | 0.28 | 0.42 -50% | 0.22 21% | |||||
| Contrast | 2514 | 1657 -34% | 2136 -15% | |||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.4 | 4.3 -79% | 1.7 29% | 5.5 -129% | 2.6 -8% | 1.7 29% | 4.18 -74% | 2.7 -13% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.2 | 9.4 -124% | 3.6 14% | 11.9 -183% | 5.1 -21% | 3.4 19% | 8.53 -103% | 4.3 -2% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.8 | 4.8 -71% | 2.4 14% | 7.6 -171% | 2.7 4% | 1.6 43% | 5.3 -89% | 3.3 -18% |
| Gamma | 2.34 94% | 2.33 94% | 2.15 102% | 2.2 100% | 2.04 108% | 2.13 103% | 2.33 94% | 2.36 93% |
| CCT | 6423 101% | 7255 90% | 6337 103% | 7454 87% | 6206 105% | 6435 101% | 7487 87% | 6787 96% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 81.57 | |||||||
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 99.87 |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 13.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 14.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 68 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 46.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 22.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 23.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 78 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Mate 10 | |
| Huawei Mate 9 | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro | |
| HTC U Ultra | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 8 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| LG V30 | |
| Google Pixel 2 XL | |
| PCMark for Android | |
| Work performance score (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Mate 10 | |
| Huawei Mate 9 | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro | |
| HTC U Ultra | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 8 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| LG V30 | |
| Google Pixel 2 XL | |
| Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Mate 10 | |
| Huawei Mate 9 | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro | |
| HTC U Ultra | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 8 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| LG V30 | |
| Google Pixel 2 XL | |
| Geekbench 4.4 | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Mate 10 | |
| Huawei Mate 9 | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 8 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| LG V30 | |
| Google Pixel 2 XL | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Mate 10 | |
| Huawei Mate 9 | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 8 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| LG V30 | |
| Google Pixel 2 XL | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
| T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Mate 10 | |
| Huawei Mate 9 | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro | |
| HTC U Ultra | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 8 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| LG V30 | |
| Google Pixel 2 XL | |
| 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Mate 10 | |
| Huawei Mate 9 | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro | |
| HTC U Ultra | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 8 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| LG V30 | |
| Google Pixel 2 XL | |
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Mate 10 | |
| Huawei Mate 9 | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro | |
| HTC U Ultra | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 8 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| LG V30 | |
| Google Pixel 2 XL | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Mate 10 | |
| Huawei Mate 9 | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro | |
| HTC U Ultra | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 8 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| LG V30 | |
| Google Pixel 2 XL | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Mate 10 | |
| Huawei Mate 9 | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro | |
| HTC U Ultra | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 8 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| LG V30 | |
| Google Pixel 2 XL | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Mate 10 | |
| Huawei Mate 9 | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro | |
| HTC U Ultra | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 8 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| LG V30 | |
| Google Pixel 2 XL | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 8 (Samsung Browser 6.0) | |
| Huawei Mate 9 (Chrome 54) | |
| Google Pixel 2 XL (Chrome 62) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus (Samsung Browser 5.2) | |
| Huawei Mate 10 (Chrome Version 63) | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro (Chrome 61) | |
| LG V30 (Chrome 62) | |
| HTC U Ultra (Chrome 56) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus (Samsung Browser 5.2) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 8 (Samsung Browser 6.0) | |
| Huawei Mate 9 (Chrome 54) | |
| Google Pixel 2 XL (Chrome 62) | |
| Huawei Mate 10 (Chrome Version 63) | |
| LG V30 (Chrome 62) | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro (Chrome 61) | |
| HTC U Ultra (Chrome 56) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| HTC U Ultra (Chrome 56) | |
| Huawei Mate 10 (Chrome Version 63) | |
| LG V30 (Chrome 62) | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro (Chrome 61) | |
| Google Pixel 2 XL (Chrome 62) | |
| Huawei Mate 9 (Chrome 54) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus (Samsung Browser 5.2) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 8 (Samsung Browser 6.0) | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall | |
| Google Pixel 2 XL (Chrome 62) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 8 (Samsung Browser 6.0) | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro (Chrome 61) | |
| Huawei Mate 10 (Chrome Version 63) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus (Samsung Browser 5.2) | |
| Huawei Mate 9 (Chrome 54) | |
| LG V30 (Chrome 62) | |
* ... smaller is better
| Huawei Mate 10 | Huawei Mate 9 | Huawei Mate 10 Pro | HTC U Ultra | Samsung Galaxy Note 8 | Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | LG V30 | Google Pixel 2 XL | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -46% | 8% | -32% | -22% | -23% | -35% | -22% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 790 | 594 -25% | 732 -7% | 423.9 -46% | 797 1% | 788 0% | 669 -15% | 760 -4% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 201.7 | 142.9 -29% | 208.7 3% | 164.7 -18% | 205.9 2% | 194.2 -4% | 193.2 -4% | 195.3 -3% |
| Random Read 4KB | 169.7 | 94.7 -44% | 132.3 -22% | 84.2 -50% | 122.5 -28% | 127.2 -25% | 78.2 -54% | 170.6 1% |
| Random Write 4KB | 105.3 | 8.77 -92% | 164.4 56% | 13.7 -87% | 14.55 -86% | 15.27 -85% | 10.21 -90% | 17.84 -83% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 80.6 ? | 54 ? -33% | 82.8 ? 3% | 67.9 ? -16% | 71.1 ? -12% | 62.8 -22% | ||
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 62.9 ? | 29.53 ? -53% | 67.6 ? 7% | 59.3 ? -6% | 57.2 ? -9% | 47.2 -25% |
| Asphalt 8: Airborne | |||
| Configurações | Valor | ||
| high | 29 fps | ||
| very low | 30 fps | ||
| Dead Trigger 2 | |||
| Configurações | Valor | ||
| high | 30 fps | ||
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.3 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35.8 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.7 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Huawei Mate 10 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 9.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 47% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 46% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 65% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
HTC U Ultra audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 12.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (29% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 73% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 85% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 12% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Google Pixel 2 XL audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 25% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 45% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 48% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado |   0.03 / 0.22 Watt |
| Ocioso |  0.89 / 2.31 / 2.38 Watt |
| Carga |
4.87 / 9.16 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Huawei Mate 10 4000 mAh | Huawei Mate 9 4000 mAh | Huawei Mate 10 Pro 4000 mAh | HTC U Ultra 3000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Note 8 3300 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus 3500 mAh | LG V30 3300 mAh | Google Pixel 2 XL 3520 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 6% | 25% | -11% | 28% | 35% | 29% | 6% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 0.89 | 0.78 12% | 0.85 4% | 1 -12% | 0.73 18% | 0.68 24% | 0.72 19% | 1.28 -44% |
| Idle Average * | 2.31 | 2.13 8% | 1.15 50% | 2.41 -4% | 1.44 38% | 1.13 51% | 1.37 41% | 1.87 19% |
| Idle Maximum * | 2.38 | 2.17 9% | 1.23 48% | 2.46 -3% | 1.53 36% | 1.16 51% | 1.41 41% | 1.89 21% |
| Load Average * | 4.87 | 6.32 -30% | 4.12 15% | 6.8 -40% | 4.56 6% | 4.69 4% | 3.46 29% | 3.73 23% |
| Load Maximum * | 9.16 | 6.49 29% | 8.42 8% | 8.9 3% | 5.09 44% | 5.24 43% | 7.83 15% | 8.08 12% |
* ... smaller is better
| Huawei Mate 10 4000 mAh | Huawei Mate 9 4000 mAh | Huawei Mate 10 Pro 4000 mAh | HTC U Ultra 3000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Note 8 3300 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus 3500 mAh | LG V30 3300 mAh | Google Pixel 2 XL 3520 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -10% | 12% | -25% | -29% | -10% | -3% | -12% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1671 | 1538 -8% | 1744 4% | 1568 -6% | 1134 -32% | 1565 -6% | 1914 15% | 1706 2% |
| H.264 | 1003 | 947 -6% | 929 -7% | 605 -40% | 662 -34% | 742 -26% | 822 -18% | 672 -33% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 865 | 758 -12% | 818 -5% | 546 -37% | 474 -45% | 736 -15% | 774 -11% | 581 -33% |
| Load | 259 | 219 -15% | 398 54% | 214 -17% | 246 -5% | 275 6% | 267 3% | 302 17% |
Pro
Contra
O Huawei Mate 10 é um excelente smartphone. Algumas poucas restrições - o interruptor de volume frouxo (no nosso caso, pelo menos), a falta de uma certificação IP 67, o ajuste de brilho baseado no contexto, o pós-processamento das fotos - realmente não prejudicam o conceito geral.
O Mate 10 “regular” é, sem dúvida, o sucessor legítimo do popular Mate 9. Como um dos sucessos de 2017, o smartphone certamente é digno de consideração - apesar de não estar oficialmente disponível na Alemanha.
Temos de admitir que nos esforçamos para entender por que a Huawei decidiu não vender o Mate 10 regular na Alemanha e muitos outros países. O phablet possui algumas vantagens sobre a versão Pro: o Mate 10 vem com um conector para fones de 3,5 mm, tem uma resolução QHD, e permite a expansão de armazenamento usando cartões SD. Como tal, deve atrair uma gama de usuários mais ampla. Graças ao formato 16:9, o phablet de 6 polegadas é uma verdadeira alternativa no segmento de gama alta.
Huawei Mate 10
-
01/02/2018 v6 (old)
Marcus Herbrich
Price comparison
