Breve Análise do Smartphone Huawei Mate 10 Lite
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| HTC U Ultra | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | |
| BQ Aquaris X Pro | |
| Honor 9 | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Lite | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| Honor 9 | |
| HTC U Ultra | |
| BQ Aquaris X Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Lite | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 89 %
iluminação com acumulador: 467 cd/m²
Contraste: 1557:1 (Preto: 0.3 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 6.1 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.15
| Huawei Mate 10 Lite IPS, 2160x1080, 5.9" | Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 Super AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.2" | HTC U Ultra SLCD 5, 2560x1440, 5.7" | BQ Aquaris X Pro IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2" | ZTE Axon 7 AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.5" | Honor 9 IPS/LTPS, 1920x1080, 5.2" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 42% | -2% | -38% | -13% | 13% | |
| Brightness middle | 467 | 539 15% | 470 1% | 458 -2% | 328 -30% | 550 18% |
| Brightness | 457 | 542 19% | 445 -3% | 473 4% | 334 -27% | 535 17% |
| Brightness Distribution | 89 | 93 4% | 88 -1% | 88 -1% | 88 -1% | 92 3% |
| Black Level * | 0.3 | 0.22 27% | 0.51 -70% | 0.42 -40% | ||
| Contrast | 1557 | 2136 37% | 898 -42% | 1310 -16% | ||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5 | 1.6 68% | 5.5 -10% | 7.1 -42% | 4.6 8% | 3.3 34% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 8.2 | 2.6 68% | 11.9 -45% | 14.5 -77% | 14.7 -79% | 4.5 45% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 6.1 | 1.5 75% | 7.6 -25% | 10.5 -72% | 2.8 54% | 3.6 41% |
| Gamma | 2.15 102% | 2.28 96% | 2.2 100% | 2.28 96% | 2.29 96% | 2.38 92% |
| CCT | 7961 82% | 6422 101% | 7454 87% | 8951 73% | 6612 98% | 7226 90% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8702 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 12.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 15.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 68 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 43.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 19.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 23.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 69 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Lite | |
| Huawei Nova 2 | |
| HTC U Ultra | |
| BQ Aquaris X Pro | |
| Honor 9 | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | |
| PCMark for Android | |
| Work performance score (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Lite | |
| Huawei Nova 2 | |
| HTC U Ultra | |
| BQ Aquaris X Pro | |
| Honor 9 | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | |
| Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Lite | |
| Huawei Nova 2 | |
| HTC U Ultra | |
| BQ Aquaris X Pro | |
| Honor 9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | |
| Geekbench 4.4 | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Lite | |
| Huawei Nova 2 | |
| BQ Aquaris X Pro | |
| Honor 9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Lite | |
| Huawei Nova 2 | |
| BQ Aquaris X Pro | |
| Honor 9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | |
| Geekbench 4.0 | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Lite | |
| Huawei Nova 2 | |
| HTC U Ultra | |
| BQ Aquaris X Pro | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Lite | |
| Huawei Nova 2 | |
| HTC U Ultra | |
| BQ Aquaris X Pro | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
| T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Lite | |
| Huawei Nova 2 | |
| HTC U Ultra | |
| BQ Aquaris X Pro | |
| Honor 9 | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | |
| 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Lite | |
| Huawei Nova 2 | |
| HTC U Ultra | |
| BQ Aquaris X Pro | |
| Honor 9 | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | |
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Lite | |
| Huawei Nova 2 | |
| HTC U Ultra | |
| BQ Aquaris X Pro | |
| Honor 9 | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Lite | |
| Huawei Nova 2 | |
| HTC U Ultra | |
| BQ Aquaris X Pro | |
| Honor 9 | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Lite | |
| Huawei Nova 2 | |
| HTC U Ultra | |
| BQ Aquaris X Pro | |
| Honor 9 | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Lite | |
| Huawei Nova 2 | |
| HTC U Ultra | |
| BQ Aquaris X Pro | |
| Honor 9 | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | |
| GFXBench | |
| on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Lite | |
| Huawei Nova 2 | |
| HTC U Ultra | |
| BQ Aquaris X Pro | |
| Honor 9 | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | |
| 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Lite | |
| Huawei Nova 2 | |
| HTC U Ultra | |
| BQ Aquaris X Pro | |
| Honor 9 | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | |
| Lightmark - 1920x1080 1080p (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Nova 2 | |
| Basemark X 1.1 | |
| Medium Quality (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Nova 2 | |
| High Quality (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Nova 2 | |
| Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Nova 2 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | |
| Epic Citadel - Ultra High Quality (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Nova 2 | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Honor 9 (Chrome 59) | |
| HTC U Ultra (Chrome 56) | |
| ZTE Axon 7 (Chrome 53.0.2785.124) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 (Samsung Browser (Chrome 44)) | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Lite (Chrome 62) | |
| Huawei Nova 2 (Chrome 60.0.3112.116) | |
| BQ Aquaris X Pro (Chrome 59.0.3071.125) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Honor 9 (Chrome 59) | |
| ZTE Axon 7 (Chrome 53.0.2785.124) | |
| HTC U Ultra (Chrome 56) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 (Samsung Browser (Chrome 44)) | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Lite (Chrome 62) | |
| Huawei Nova 2 (Chrome 60.0.3112.116) | |
| BQ Aquaris X Pro (Chrome 59.0.3071.125) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Huawei Nova 2 (Chrome 60.0.3112.116) | |
| BQ Aquaris X Pro (Chrome 59.0.3071.125) | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Lite (Chrome 62) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 (Samsung Browser (Chrome 44)) | |
| HTC U Ultra (Chrome 56) | |
| Honor 9 (Chrome 59) | |
| ZTE Axon 7 (Chrome 53.0.2785.124) | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall | |
| ZTE Axon 7 (Chrome 53.0.2785.124) | |
| Honor 9 (Chrome 59) | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Lite (Chrome 62) | |
| Huawei Nova 2 (Chrome 60.0.3112.116) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 (Samsung Browser (Chrome 44)) | |
| BQ Aquaris X Pro (Chrome 59.0.3071.125) | |
* ... smaller is better
| Huawei Mate 10 Lite | Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | HTC U Ultra | BQ Aquaris X Pro | ZTE Axon 7 | Honor 9 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -8% | 64% | 15% | 74% | 49% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 286.8 | 182 -37% | 423.9 48% | 270.5 -6% | 406.5 42% | 293 2% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 99.8 | 77.1 -23% | 164.7 65% | 139.6 40% | 150.9 51% | 204 104% |
| Random Read 4KB | 31.5 | 22.41 -29% | 84.2 167% | 37.97 21% | 121.1 284% | 55.7 77% |
| Random Write 4KB | 15.26 | 12.13 -21% | 13.7 -10% | 12.07 -21% | 16.22 6% | 32.7 114% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 69.1 ? | 73.7 ? 7% | 82.8 ? 20% | 78.7 ? 14% | 78.4 ? 13% | 68 ? -2% |
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 35.35 ? | 56 ? 58% | 67.6 ? 91% | 49.77 ? 41% | 51.3 ? 45% | 34.64 ? -2% |
| Real Racing 3 | |||
| Configurações | Valor | ||
| high | 26 fps | ||
| Asphalt 8: Airborne | |||
| Configurações | Valor | ||
| high | 22 fps | ||
| very low | 30 fps | ||
| Dead Trigger 2 | |||
| Configurações | Valor | ||
| high | 30 fps | ||
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.5 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 31.3 °C / 88 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.8 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Huawei Mate 10 Lite audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 10.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 60% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 76% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 19% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
HTC U Ultra audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 12.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (29% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 74% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 85% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 12% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 9.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 49% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 68% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado |   0.02 / 0.11 Watt |
| Ocioso |  0.87 / 2.14 / 2.16 Watt |
| Carga |
3.7 / 5.48 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Lite 3340 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S8 3000 mAh | HTC U Ultra 3000 mAh | BQ Aquaris X Pro 3100 mAh | Honor 9 3200 mAh | ZTE Axon 7 3250 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 3000 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 20% | -38% | 6% | -24% | -1% | 33% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 0.87 | 0.78 10% | 1 -15% | 0.67 23% | 1.13 -30% | 0.64 26% | 0.64 26% |
| Idle Average * | 2.14 | 1.1 49% | 2.41 -13% | 1.7 21% | 2.25 -5% | 0.84 61% | 1.36 36% |
| Idle Maximum * | 2.16 | 1.16 46% | 2.46 -14% | 1.78 18% | 2.3 -6% | 0.87 60% | 1.4 35% |
| Load Average * | 3.7 | 4.15 -12% | 6.8 -84% | 4.42 -19% | 4.89 -32% | 6.02 -63% | 2.53 32% |
| Load Maximum * | 5.48 | 5.12 7% | 8.9 -62% | 6.3 -15% | 7.99 -46% | 10.45 -91% | 3.63 34% |
* ... smaller is better
| Huawei Mate 10 Lite 3340 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 3000 mAh | HTC U Ultra 3000 mAh | BQ Aquaris X Pro 3100 mAh | ZTE Axon 7 3250 mAh | Honor 9 3200 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 94% | 15% | 36% | 20% | 15% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1150 | 2418 110% | 1568 36% | 1840 60% | 1735 51% | 1399 22% |
| H.264 | 502 | 984 96% | 605 21% | 644 28% | 704 40% | 564 12% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 520 | 843 62% | 546 5% | 730 40% | 411 -21% | 516 -1% |
| Load | 223 | 467 109% | 214 -4% | 254 14% | 245 10% | 278 25% |
Pro
Contra
O membro menor e acessível da família Mate 10 revelou-se muito interessante. Infelizmente, a concorrência no seu campo escolhido é imensa, e a única característica do Mate 10 Lite realmente única é a sua tela de 5,9 polegadas 18:9 polegadas com uma excelente relação tela corpo. Outros recursos incluem o SIM híbrido, 4 GB de RAM, 64 GB de armazenamento interno que é expansível via microSD e câmeras duplas em ambos os lados do telefone. No geral, o pacote se sente como uma versão maior do Nova 2, e gostamos mais da câmera frontal do Mate 10 Lite que a besta de megapixels massiva do anterior.
Além de seu nome, o Mate 10 Lite tem pouco em comum com a série Mate em geral. No entanto, é um smartphone bastante decente.
O tamanho da tela ao lado do Huawei Mate 10 Lite tem pouco em comum com os outros dois membros da família Mate. Não tem NFC, a bateria é menor, o SoC é muito mais lento, a configuração da câmera dupla Leica está longe de ser notável, o aptX para áudio Bluetooth de alta resolução não é suportado e, em vez de Super Charge, ele só suporta QuickCharge.
Apesar de tudo, ele acabou por ser um smartphone bastante decente, particularmente para aqueles que preferem que suas telas de smartphone sejam grandes e maciças. Nós teríamos desejado menos compromissos quando comparados com seus dois irmãos maiores, e a duração da bateria poderia ter sido um pouco melhor para começar.
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
- 11/27/2017 v6 (old)
Daniel Schmidt
Price comparison
