Breve Análise do Smartphone Honor View 20
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Huawei Mate 20 | |
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 | |
ZTE Axon 9 Pro | |
OnePlus 6T | |
Google Pixel 3 XL | |
Honor View 20 | |
Honor View 10 | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 | |
ZTE Axon 9 Pro | |
Google Pixel 3 XL | |
OnePlus 6T | |
Huawei Mate 20 | |
Honor View 20 | |
Honor View 10 |
|
iluminação: 94 %
iluminação com acumulador: 492 cd/m²
Contraste: 1230:1 (Preto: 0.4 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.4 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 3.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
97.5% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.06
Honor View 20 LTPS, 2310x1080, 6.4" | Honor View 10 IPS, 2160x1080, 6" | Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 OLED, 2340x1080, 6.4" | ZTE Axon 9 Pro AMOLED, 2248x1080, 6.2" | OnePlus 6T Optic AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.4" | Google Pixel 3 XL AMOLED, 2960x1440, 6.3" | Huawei Mate 20 TFT-LCD (IPS), 2244x1080, 6.5" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | 9% | 28% | 1% | 7% | -3% | 26% | |
Brightness middle | 492 | 530 8% | 599 22% | 521 6% | 437 -11% | 410 -17% | 782 59% |
Brightness | 475 | 523 10% | 593 25% | 517 9% | 442 -7% | 413 -13% | 784 65% |
Brightness Distribution | 94 | 88 -6% | 96 2% | 96 2% | 95 1% | 97 3% | 94 0% |
Black Level * | 0.4 | 0.35 12% | 0.36 10% | ||||
Contrast | 1230 | 1514 23% | 2172 77% | ||||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.4 | 2.4 -0% | 1.4 42% | 2.9 -21% | 2.21 8% | 3.16 -32% | 2.3 4% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 5.2 | 5.5 -6% | 3.2 38% | 5.5 -6% | 4.27 18% | 5.5 -6% | 7 -35% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.2 | 2.2 31% | 2 37% | 2.7 16% | 2.1 34% | 1.7 47% | 2.4 25% |
Gamma | 2.06 107% | 2.25 98% | 2.25 98% | 2.01 109% | 2.307 95% | 2.219 99% | 2.22 99% |
CCT | 7125 91% | 6598 99% | 6496 100% | 6288 103% | 6353 102% | 6653 98% | 6839 95% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 7 ms rise | |
↘ 17 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 50 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
54 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 23 ms rise | |
↘ 31 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 90 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
Honor View 20 | |
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 | |
ZTE Axon 9 Pro | |
OnePlus 6T | |
Google Pixel 3 XL | |
Huawei Mate 20 | |
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (268359 - 322616, n=10) |
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
Honor View 20 | |
Honor View 10 | |
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 | |
ZTE Axon 9 Pro | |
OnePlus 6T | |
Google Pixel 3 XL | |
Huawei Mate 20 | |
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (245662 - 254229, n=9) |
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
Honor View 20 (Chrome 71) | |
Huawei Mate 20 (Chrome 70.0.3538.80) | |
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (93.2 - 109.9, n=9) | |
OnePlus 6T (Chrome 70) | |
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 (Chrome 70) | |
Google Pixel 3 XL (Chrome 70) | |
ZTE Axon 9 Pro (Chrome 71) | |
Honor View 10 (Chrome 63) |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=204, last 2 years) | |
Honor View 20 (Chrome 71) | |
Huawei Mate 20 (Chrome 70.0.3538.80) | |
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (20618 - 23285, n=10) | |
OnePlus 6T (Chrome 70) | |
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 (Chrome 70) | |
Google Pixel 3 XL (Chrome 70) | |
ZTE Axon 9 Pro (Chrome 71) | |
Honor View 10 (Chrome 63) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
Honor View 10 (Chrome 63) | |
Google Pixel 3 XL (Chrome 70) | |
ZTE Axon 9 Pro (Chrome 71) | |
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 (Chrome 70) | |
OnePlus 6T (Chrome 70) | |
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (1948 - 3098, n=10) | |
Honor View 20 (Chrome 71) | |
Huawei Mate 20 (Chrome 70.0.3538.80) | |
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=163, last 2 years) |
WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years) | |
Huawei Mate 20 (Chrome 70.0.3538.80) | |
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (86 - 124, n=10) | |
Google Pixel 3 XL (Chrome 70) | |
Honor View 20 (Chrome 71) | |
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 (Chrome 70) |
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall | |
Huawei Mate 20 (Chrome 70.0.3538.80) | |
Google Pixel 3 XL (Chrome 70) | |
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (228 - 334, n=5) | |
Honor View 20 (Chrome 71) | |
OnePlus 6T (Chrome 70) | |
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 (Chrome 70) | |
Honor View 10 (Chrome 63) |
* ... smaller is better
Honor View 20 | Honor View 10 | Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 | ZTE Axon 9 Pro | OnePlus 6T | Google Pixel 3 XL | Huawei Mate 20 | Average 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | -7% | -36% | -34% | -33% | -17% | -4% | 11% | 197% | |
Sequential Read 256KB | 847 | 810 -4% | 675 -20% | 719 -15% | 735 -13% | 633 -25% | 840 -1% | 826 ? -2% | 1867 ? 120% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 250.1 | 194.3 -22% | 206.8 -17% | 196.4 -21% | 204.4 -18% | 228.6 -9% | 196.7 -21% | 358 ? 43% | 1451 ? 480% |
Random Read 4KB | 168.9 | 144.3 -15% | 133.2 -21% | 141.3 -16% | 138.5 -18% | 120.8 -28% | 157.9 -7% | 166.6 ? -1% | 279 ? 65% |
Random Write 4KB | 138.9 | 160 15% | 19.54 -86% | 22.52 -84% | 22 -84% | 132.7 -4% | 158.1 14% | 141.5 ? 2% | 311 ? 124% |
PUBG Mobile
Real Racing 3
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 32.1 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 32.1 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.8 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Honor View 20 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 34% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 53% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Huawei Mate 20 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 48% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 66% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Google Pixel 3 XL audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 73.5% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 73.5% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 73.5% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (124.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 93% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 98% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 0% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
desligado | 0.02 / 0.27 Watt |
Ocioso | 0.97 / 2.58 / 2.63 Watt |
Carga |
5.24 / 8.73 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Honor View 20 4000 mAh | Honor View 10 3750 mAh | Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 3200 mAh | ZTE Axon 9 Pro 4000 mAh | OnePlus 6T 3700 mAh | Google Pixel 3 XL 3430 mAh | Huawei Mate 20 4000 mAh | Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 2% | 43% | 20% | 26% | 19% | 10% | 14% | 11% | |
Idle Minimum * | 0.97 | 1.05 -8% | 0.49 49% | 0.86 11% | 0.7 28% | 0.7 28% | 0.69 29% | 0.802 ? 17% | 0.885 ? 9% |
Idle Average * | 2.58 | 2.36 9% | 0.67 74% | 1.1 57% | 1.1 57% | 1.4 46% | 2.28 12% | 2.07 ? 20% | 1.451 ? 44% |
Idle Maximum * | 2.63 | 2.41 8% | 0.87 67% | 1.21 54% | 2.1 20% | 2 24% | 2.52 4% | 2.38 ? 10% | 1.608 ? 39% |
Load Average * | 5.24 | 4.93 6% | 3.64 31% | 5.02 4% | 4.2 20% | 4.8 8% | 5.21 1% | 4.87 ? 7% | 6.55 ? -25% |
Load Maximum * | 8.73 | 9.04 -4% | 9.04 -4% | 10.82 -24% | 8.3 5% | 9.5 -9% | 8.49 3% | 7.46 ? 15% | 9.92 ? -14% |
* ... smaller is better
Honor View 20 4000 mAh | Honor View 10 3750 mAh | Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 3200 mAh | ZTE Axon 9 Pro 4000 mAh | OnePlus 6T 3700 mAh | Google Pixel 3 XL 3430 mAh | Huawei Mate 20 4000 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -5% | -14% | -32% | 1% | -7% | 7% | |
Reader / Idle | 1928 | 1671 -13% | 1810 -6% | 1936 0% | 1725 -11% | 1892 -2% | |
H.264 | 932 | 819 -12% | 836 -10% | 903 -3% | 724 -22% | 1030 11% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 969 | 679 -30% | 719 -26% | 661 -32% | 865 -11% | 691 -29% | 885 -9% |
Load | 222 | 305 37% | 194 -13% | 261 18% | 299 35% | 287 29% |
Pro
Contra
O Honor View 20 é um excelente carro-chefe. Não é de tão bom valor para o dinheiro como o Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, mas está disponível na Europa e conta com uma certificação DRM Widevine Nível 1, o que significa que você pode transmitir conteúdo HD em serviços como o Amazon Video, Google Play Video e Netflix.
No entanto, se você não estiver com um orçamento apertado, então recomendamos que você considere o View 20, pois combina a elegância de carros-chefes mais caros, mas ainda assim é um sucesso. O seu Kirin 980 coloca-o na mesma página que os mais caros Mate 20 e Mate 20 Pro, enquanto também consegue acompanhar os seus concorrentes Snapdragon 845. Além disso, possui excelentes câmeras e uma relação tela-corpo maior do que a maioria dos carros-chefes atuais.
O Honor View 20 é um smartphone fantástico com uma excelente câmera, design inovador e desempenho suficiente para desafiar os mais poderosos carros-chefe modernos.
A inclusão de USB 3.1, 8 GB de RAM, 256 GB de armazenamento interno, um conector para fones de ouvido, um sensor de IV e funcionalidade dual-SIM, também é bem-vinda. Tenha em mente que alguns outros carros-chefe têm todos esses recursos, especialmente os três últimos.
O View 20 tem suas fraquezas, mas elas empalidecem ao lado da longa lista de pontos positivos. No geral, a Honor forneceu um smartphone topo de gama a um preço razoável e um que se destaca do pacote mais estabelecido.
Honor View 20
- 02/07/2019 v6 (old)
Inge Schwabe