Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve Análise do Smartphone Honor View 10
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 88 %
iluminação com acumulador: 530 cd/m²
Contraste: 1514:1 (Preto: 0.35 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.4 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 2.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.25
| Honor View 10 IPS, 2160x1080, 6" | Huawei Mate 10 Pro OLED, 2160x1080, 6" | OnePlus 5T AMOLED, 2160x1080, 6" | Sony Xperia XZ Premium IPS, 3840x2160, 5.5" | Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus Super AMOLED, 2960x1440, 6.2" | Apple iPhone 8 Plus IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5" | LG V30 OLED, 2880x1440, 6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 17% | 0% | -16% | 19% | 14% | -51% | |
| Brightness middle | 530 | 629 19% | 425 -20% | 578 9% | 560 6% | 559 5% | 432 -18% |
| Brightness | 523 | 636 22% | 423 -19% | 568 9% | 562 7% | 538 3% | 428 -18% |
| Brightness Distribution | 88 | 94 7% | 92 5% | 92 5% | 93 6% | 90 2% | 87 -1% |
| Black Level * | 0.35 | 0.62 -77% | 0.38 -9% | ||||
| Contrast | 1514 | 932 -38% | 1471 -3% | ||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.4 | 1.7 29% | 2.1 12% | 2.8 -17% | 1.7 29% | 1.3 46% | 4.18 -74% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 5.5 | 3.6 35% | 3.4 38% | 5.1 7% | 3.4 38% | 2.7 51% | 8.53 -55% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.2 | 2.4 -9% | 2.5 -14% | 2.8 -27% | 1.6 27% | 1.8 18% | 5.3 -141% |
| Gamma | 2.25 98% | 2.15 102% | 2.32 95% | 2.15 102% | 2.13 103% | 2.25 98% | 2.33 94% |
| CCT | 6598 99% | 6337 103% | 6455 101% | 6728 97% | 6435 101% | 6797 96% | 7487 87% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 81.57 | ||||||
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 99.87 |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 25.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 8.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 17.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 57 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 53.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 26 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 27.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 89 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Honor View 10 | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro | |
| OnePlus 5T | |
| Sony Xperia XZ Premium | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| Apple iPhone 8 Plus | |
| LG V30 | |
| PCMark for Android | |
| Work performance score (sort by value) | |
| Honor View 10 | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro | |
| OnePlus 5T | |
| Sony Xperia XZ Premium | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| LG V30 | |
| Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value) | |
| Honor View 10 | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro | |
| OnePlus 5T | |
| Sony Xperia XZ Premium | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| LG V30 | |
| Geekbench 4.4 | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Honor View 10 | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro | |
| OnePlus 5T | |
| Sony Xperia XZ Premium | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| Apple iPhone 8 Plus | |
| LG V30 | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Honor View 10 | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro | |
| OnePlus 5T | |
| Sony Xperia XZ Premium | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| Apple iPhone 8 Plus | |
| LG V30 | |
| Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value) | |
| Honor View 10 | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro | |
| OnePlus 5T | |
| Sony Xperia XZ Premium | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| LG V30 | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
| T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Honor View 10 | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro | |
| OnePlus 5T | |
| Sony Xperia XZ Premium | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| Apple iPhone 8 Plus | |
| LG V30 | |
| 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Honor View 10 | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro | |
| OnePlus 5T | |
| Sony Xperia XZ Premium | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| Apple iPhone 8 Plus | |
| LG V30 | |
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
| Honor View 10 | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro | |
| OnePlus 5T | |
| Sony Xperia XZ Premium | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| Apple iPhone 8 Plus | |
| LG V30 | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Honor View 10 | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro | |
| OnePlus 5T | |
| Sony Xperia XZ Premium | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| Apple iPhone 8 Plus | |
| LG V30 | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Honor View 10 | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro | |
| OnePlus 5T | |
| Sony Xperia XZ Premium | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| Apple iPhone 8 Plus | |
| LG V30 | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Honor View 10 | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro | |
| OnePlus 5T | |
| Sony Xperia XZ Premium | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| Apple iPhone 8 Plus | |
| LG V30 | |
| GFXBench | |
| on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Honor View 10 | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro | |
| OnePlus 5T | |
| Sony Xperia XZ Premium | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| LG V30 | |
| 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Honor View 10 | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro | |
| OnePlus 5T | |
| Sony Xperia XZ Premium | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| LG V30 | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Apple iPhone 8 Plus | |
| OnePlus 5T (Chrome 63) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus (Samsung Browser 5.2) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ Premium (Chrome 59) | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro (Chrome 61) | |
| LG V30 (Chrome 62) | |
| Honor View 10 (Chrome 63) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Apple iPhone 8 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus (Samsung Browser 5.2) | |
| OnePlus 5T (Chrome 63) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ Premium (Chrome 59) | |
| LG V30 (Chrome 62) | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro (Chrome 61) | |
| Honor View 10 (Chrome 63) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Honor View 10 (Chrome 63) | |
| LG V30 (Chrome 62) | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro (Chrome 61) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ Premium (Chrome 59) | |
| OnePlus 5T (Chrome 63) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus (Samsung Browser 5.2) | |
| Apple iPhone 8 Plus | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall | |
| Apple iPhone 8 Plus | |
| OnePlus 5T (Chrome 63) | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro (Chrome 61) | |
| Honor View 10 (Chrome 63) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus (Samsung Browser 5.2) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ Premium (Chrome 59) | |
| LG V30 (Chrome 62) | |
* ... smaller is better
| Honor View 10 | Huawei Mate 10 Pro | OnePlus 5T | Sony Xperia XZ Premium | Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | Apple iPhone 8 Plus | LG V30 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -2% | -25% | -43% | -22% | -35% | ||
| Sequential Read 256KB | 810 | 732 -10% | 699 -14% | 687 -15% | 788 -3% | 669 -17% | |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 194.3 | 208.7 7% | 203.4 5% | 194 0% | 194.2 0% | 193.2 -1% | |
| Random Read 4KB | 144.3 | 132.3 -8% | 138.1 -4% | 74.1 -49% | 127.2 -12% | 78.2 -46% | |
| Random Write 4KB | 160 | 164.4 3% | 20 -87% | 17.2 -89% | 15.27 -90% | 10.21 -94% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 81 ? | 36.79 ? -55% | 71.1 ? -12% | 62.8 -22% | |||
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 65.1 ? | 33.31 ? -49% | 57.2 ? -12% | 47.2 -27% |
| Asphalt 8: Airborne | |||
| Configurações | Valor | ||
| high | 29 fps | ||
| very low | 30 fps | ||
| Dead Trigger 2 | |||
| Configurações | Valor | ||
| high | 30 fps | ||
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.4 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.6 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Honor View 10 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 11.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 48% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 66% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 7.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 61% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 77% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado |   0.02 / 0.31 Watt |
| Ocioso |  1.05 / 2.36 / 2.41 Watt |
| Carga |
4.93 / 9.04 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Honor View 10 3750 mAh | Huawei Mate 10 Pro 4000 mAh | OnePlus 5T 3300 mAh | Sony Xperia XZ Premium 3230 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus 3500 mAh | Apple iPhone 8 Plus 2691 mAh | LG V30 3300 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 28% | 33% | 9% | 37% | 9% | 31% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 1.05 | 0.85 19% | 0.58 45% | 0.62 41% | 0.68 35% | 0.72 31% | 0.72 31% |
| Idle Average * | 2.36 | 1.15 51% | 1.44 39% | 2.44 -3% | 1.13 52% | 2.45 -4% | 1.37 42% |
| Idle Maximum * | 2.41 | 1.23 49% | 1.53 37% | 2.59 -7% | 1.16 52% | 2.52 -5% | 1.41 41% |
| Load Average * | 4.93 | 4.12 16% | 3.17 36% | 4.94 -0% | 4.69 5% | 3.84 22% | 3.46 30% |
| Load Maximum * | 9.04 | 8.42 7% | 8.54 6% | 7.91 12% | 5.24 42% | 9.02 -0% | 7.83 13% |
* ... smaller is better
| Honor View 10 3750 mAh | Huawei Mate 10 Pro 4000 mAh | OnePlus 5T 3300 mAh | Sony Xperia XZ Premium 3230 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus 3500 mAh | Apple iPhone 8 Plus 2691 mAh | LG V30 3300 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 17% | -2% | -5% | -4% | -5% | 4% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1671 | 1744 4% | 1754 5% | 1754 5% | 1565 -6% | 2085 25% | 1914 15% |
| H.264 | 819 | 929 13% | 799 -2% | 802 -2% | 742 -9% | 733 -11% | 822 0% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 679 | 818 20% | 718 6% | 695 2% | 736 8% | 657 -3% | 774 14% |
| Load | 305 | 398 30% | 257 -16% | 236 -23% | 275 -10% | 211 -31% | 267 -12% |
Pro
Contra
O Honor View 10 é muito moderno, com seus marcos estreitos e grande tela. Considerando os componentes de gama alta do dispositivo, seu preço acessível de pouco menos de £500 (o dispositivo atualmente não está disponível nos EUA) o torna muito atraente para os caçadores de pechinchas. E o dispositivo da marca de marketing direto da Huawei faz muitas coisas bem: Tem uma carcaça estável, muitas opções de entrada, alto-falantes decentes e uma entrada de áudio de 3,5 mm, um módulo LTE rápido, infravermelho e boas câmeras que podem tirar fotos muito boas. O desempenho é decente, mas o dispositivo é ocasionalmente limitado pelo superaquecimento. Mas o Honor View 10 também possui algumas desvantagens - o módulo Wi-Fi lento, por exemplo, bem como a unidade de GPS hesitante e o alto consumo de energia.
Alto desempenho a baixo preço: O Honor View 10 é um pouco aparado, mas pode se tornar um verdadeiro rival para o Huawei Mate 10 Pro. Se você quiser economizar algumas centenas de dólares, mas ainda está procurando por um alto desempenho e uma boa câmera, você não ficará desapontado com o View 10.
No geral, temos que dizer que a Huawei reduziu o seu smartphone nas áreas certas para ainda fazer um concorrente contra dispositivos significativamente mais caros. Se você está procurando um desempenho de alto nível por um bom preço, definitivamente deve dar uma olhada no Honor View 10. Embora o OnePlus 5T ofereça ainda uma experiência ainda mais completa.
Honor View 10
-
01/30/2018 v6 (old)
Florian Wimmer
Price comparison
