Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve Análise do Smartphone Honor Play
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Razer Phone 2017 | |
| Nokia 7 Plus | |
| Motorola Moto Z3 Play | |
| Honor Play | |
| Xiaomi Black Shark | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Razer Phone 2017 | |
| Nokia 7 Plus | |
| Motorola Moto Z3 Play | |
| Honor Play | |
| Xiaomi Black Shark | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 89 %
iluminação com acumulador: 435 cd/m²
Contraste: 1115:1 (Preto: 0.39 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.89 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 4.1 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
96.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.251
| Honor Play IPS, 2340x1080, 6.3" | Razer Phone 2017 IGZO LCD, 120 Hz, Wide Color Gamut, 1440x2560, 5.7" | Xiaomi Black Shark IPS, 2160x1080, 6" | Motorola Moto Z3 Play AMOLED, 2160x1080, 6" | Nokia 7 Plus IPS, 2160x1080, 6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 12% | -22% | -34% | 9% | |
| Brightness middle | 435 | 436 0% | 549 26% | 446 3% | 458 5% |
| Brightness | 426 | 417 -2% | 541 27% | 451 6% | 463 9% |
| Brightness Distribution | 89 | 92 3% | 95 7% | 93 4% | 92 3% |
| Black Level * | 0.39 | 0.16 59% | 0.42 -8% | 0.22 44% | |
| Contrast | 1115 | 2725 144% | 1307 17% | 2082 87% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.89 | 3.88 -34% | 6.08 -110% | 6.58 -128% | 4 -38% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6.03 | 7.96 -32% | 10.69 -77% | 11.94 -98% | 7.4 -23% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.1 | 5.8 -41% | 6.6 -61% | 3.6 12% | 4.7 -15% |
| Gamma | 2.251 98% | 2.45 90% | 2.305 95% | 2.199 100% | 2.19 100% |
| CCT | 7408 88% | 7657 85% | 8399 77% | 7116 91% | 7425 88% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 83.3 Hz | ≤ 15 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 83.3 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 15 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 83.3 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 13 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 11 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 50 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 38 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 19 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 19 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 51 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Honor Play | |
| Xiaomi Black Shark | |
| Motorola Moto Z3 Play | |
| Nokia 7 Plus | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (173653 - 181973, n=8) | |
| AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Honor Play | |
| Razer Phone 2017 | |
| Xiaomi Black Shark | |
| Motorola Moto Z3 Play | |
| Nokia 7 Plus | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (152773 - 212278, n=6) | |
| PCMark for Android | |
| Work performance score (sort by value) | |
| Honor Play | |
| Razer Phone 2017 | |
| Motorola Moto Z3 Play | |
| Nokia 7 Plus | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (8115 - 9326, n=8) | |
| Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value) | |
| Honor Play | |
| Razer Phone 2017 | |
| Xiaomi Black Shark | |
| Motorola Moto Z3 Play | |
| Nokia 7 Plus | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (6293 - 7046, n=8) | |
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
| Honor Play | |
| Razer Phone 2017 | |
| Xiaomi Black Shark | |
| Motorola Moto Z3 Play | |
| Nokia 7 Plus | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (26 - 56, n=8) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 165, n=170, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Honor Play | |
| Razer Phone 2017 | |
| Xiaomi Black Shark | |
| Motorola Moto Z3 Play | |
| Nokia 7 Plus | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (23 - 66, n=8) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (12 - 482, n=170, last 2 years) | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Honor Play | |
| Razer Phone 2017 | |
| Xiaomi Black Shark | |
| Motorola Moto Z3 Play | |
| Nokia 7 Plus | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (18 - 39, n=8) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 158, n=170, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Honor Play | |
| Razer Phone 2017 | |
| Xiaomi Black Shark | |
| Motorola Moto Z3 Play | |
| Nokia 7 Plus | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (19 - 39, n=8) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (8.3 - 341, n=170, last 2 years) | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Razer Phone 2017 (Chrome 65) | |
| Nokia 7 Plus (Chrome 60) | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (33.1 - 58.6, n=8) | |
| Motorola Moto Z3 Play (Chrome 67) | |
| Honor Play (Chrome 68) | |
| Xiaomi Black Shark | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=204, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Black Shark (Firefox 61) | |
| Razer Phone 2017 (Chrome 65) | |
| Nokia 7 Plus (Chrome 60) | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (6692 - 11838, n=8) | |
| Motorola Moto Z3 Play (Chrome 67) | |
| Honor Play (Chrome 68) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Honor Play (Chrome 68) | |
| Motorola Moto Z3 Play (Chrome 67) | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (3591 - 6221, n=8) | |
| Nokia 7 Plus (Chrome 60) | |
| Razer Phone 2017 (Chrome 65) | |
| Xiaomi Black Shark (Firefox 61) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=161, last 2 years) | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall | |
| Xiaomi Black Shark (Firefox 61) | |
| Nokia 7 Plus (Chrome 60) | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (119 - 187, n=8) | |
| Motorola Moto Z3 Play | |
| Honor Play (Chrome 68) | |
* ... smaller is better
| Honor Play | Razer Phone 2017 | Xiaomi Black Shark | Motorola Moto Z3 Play | Nokia 7 Plus | Average 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -22% | -12% | -31% | -37% | -16% | 239% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 895 | 732 -18% | 742 -17% | 271.7 -70% | 283.1 -68% | 696 ? -22% | 1834 ? 105% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 188.3 | 202.5 8% | 199.6 6% | 182.5 -3% | 211.6 12% | 224 ? 19% | 1426 ? 657% |
| Random Read 4KB | 142.4 | 142.5 0% | 127.2 -11% | 60.6 -57% | 54.7 -62% | 137.2 ? -4% | 278 ? 95% |
| Random Write 4KB | 155.5 | 14.3 -91% | 114.1 -27% | 84.1 -46% | 19.62 -87% | 84.7 ? -46% | 310 ? 99% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 82.8 ? | 79.4 -4% | 83.7 1% | 82.2 -1% | 68.6 ? -17% | ||
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 71.9 ? | 52.5 -27% | 62.7 -13% | 62.3 -13% | 52.2 ? -27% |
| PUBG Mobile | |||
| Configurações | Valor | ||
| Smooth | 32 fps | ||
| HD | 32 fps | ||
| Arena of Valor | |||
| Configurações | Valor | ||
| min | 55 fps | ||
| high HD | 54 fps | ||
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.5 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.7 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.6 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Honor Play audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 61.4% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 61.4% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 61.4% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (122.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 90% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 2% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 97% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Razer Phone 2017 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 22% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado |   0.2 / 0.6 Watt |
| Ocioso |  1.4 / 2.6 / 4.3 Watt |
| Carga |
6.5 / 8.2 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Honor Play 3750 mAh | Razer Phone 2017 4000 mAh | Xiaomi Black Shark 4000 mAh | Motorola Moto Z3 Play 3000 mAh | Nokia 7 Plus 3800 mAh | Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 24% | 27% | 30% | 33% | 23% | 25% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 1.4 | 0.83 41% | 0.8 43% | 1.3 7% | 0.65 54% | 0.978 ? 30% | 0.895 ? 36% |
| Idle Average * | 2.6 | 2.11 19% | 1.5 42% | 2 23% | 1.76 32% | 2.12 ? 18% | 1.447 ? 44% |
| Idle Maximum * | 4.3 | 2.24 48% | 2.3 47% | 2.7 37% | 1.78 59% | 2.51 ? 42% | 1.608 ? 63% |
| Load Average * | 6.5 | 4.94 24% | 4.8 26% | 3.7 43% | 4.47 31% | 5.01 ? 23% | 6.41 ? 1% |
| Load Maximum * | 8.2 | 9.08 -11% | 10.1 -23% | 5.1 38% | 9.13 -11% | 8.1 ? 1% | 9.61 ? -17% |
* ... smaller is better
| Honor Play 3750 mAh | Razer Phone 2017 4000 mAh | Xiaomi Black Shark 4000 mAh | Motorola Moto Z3 Play 3000 mAh | Nokia 7 Plus 3800 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 7% | 6% | -15% | -9% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1723 | 1753 2% | 1245 -28% | 1703 -1% | |
| H.264 | 759 | 747 -2% | 648 -15% | 706 -7% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 710 | 762 7% | 711 0% | 595 -16% | 672 -5% |
| Load | 204 | 253 24% | 199 -2% | 158 -23% |
Pro
Contra
O Honor Play não é feito para jogadores hardcore que querem tirar o máximo de quadros possíveis de seus smartphones. Ele está direcionado a um grupo maior de usuários de telefones celulares que querem um dispositivo de boa aparência que também permita que eles joguem jogos mais exigentes de maneira confiável. O Honor Play conseguiu cumprir estes requisitos: Seu desempenho é totalmente suficiente, sua tela tem cores precisas, não há atrasos ao reagir a entradas e oferece uma longa duração de bateria.
No entanto, não espere muito dos recursos que cheiram a marketing: O efeito de som 3D para fones de ouvido é muito divertido, assim como o recurso de som no PUBG. O último, no entanto, ainda é limitado a certos jogos no momento. O tempo dirá se mais jogos irão suportá-lo no futuro. O software também não oferece uma vibe de jogos particularmente forte - a Xiaomi e a Razer tornam isso muito mais claro quando lidamos com um smartphone de jogos dedicado.
O Honor Play é um smartphone de jogos discreto com uma boa relação preço/desempenho para necessidades médias.
No geral, isso nos deixa com um ótimo smartphone de gama média disponível por um bom preço, como seria de se esperar de um Honor. Todos os gamers com requisitos normais que ocasionalmente querem jogar um jogo mais exigente, mas não estão muito preocupados com gráficos, devem ficar muito satisfeitos com este dispositivo. Se você está procurando um modo de 120 Hz ou um design de jogos mais chamativo, você terá que procurar um pouco mais. Por outro lado, o Honor Play é mais discreto. Se você quiser jogar jogos durante uma reunião chata, o Honor Play pode ser uma boa escolha.
Honor Play
-
09/14/2018 v6 (old)
Florian Wimmer
Price comparison
