Breve Análise do Smartphone Honor 9
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| Huawei P10 | |
| Honor 9 | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| Huawei P10 | |
| Honor 9 | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 92 %
iluminação com acumulador: 550 cd/m²
Contraste: 1310:1 (Preto: 0.42 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.3 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 3.6 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.38
| Honor 9 IPS/LTPS, 1920x1080, 5.2" | Sony Xperia XZ IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2" | Huawei P10 LTPS, 1920x1080, 5.1" | OnePlus 5 AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5" | Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5" | Honor 8 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2" | Xiaomi Mi 6 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -34% | -22% | 12% | -32% | -39% | -8% | |
| Brightness middle | 550 | 544 -1% | 547 -1% | 426 -23% | 658 20% | 451 -18% | 620 13% |
| Brightness | 535 | 521 -3% | 556 4% | 431 -19% | 633 18% | 443 -17% | 586 10% |
| Brightness Distribution | 92 | 93 1% | 86 -7% | 93 1% | 93 1% | 93 1% | 89 -3% |
| Black Level * | 0.42 | 0.37 12% | 0.43 -2% | 0.66 -57% | 0.4 5% | 0.28 33% | |
| Contrast | 1310 | 1470 12% | 1272 -3% | 997 -24% | 1128 -14% | 2214 69% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.3 | 5.8 -76% | 4.8 -45% | 1.6 52% | 4.9 -48% | 5.4 -64% | 4.8 -45% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.5 | 9.8 -118% | 8.8 -96% | 4.1 9% | 9.1 -102% | 9.9 -120% | 8.8 -96% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.6 | 7.2 -100% | 4.5 -25% | 1.7 53% | 5.8 -61% | 6.7 -86% | 5.3 -47% |
| Gamma | 2.38 92% | 2.18 101% | 2.39 92% | 2.25 98% | 2.26 97% | 2.33 94% | 2.25 98% |
| CCT | 7226 90% | 8619 75% | 7194 90% | 6329 103% | 7840 83% | 8262 79% | 7473 87% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 20 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 14 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 40 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 45.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 20.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 25.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 76 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Honor 9 | |
| Sony Xperia XZ | |
| Huawei P10 | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| Honor 8 | |
| PCMark for Android | |
| Work performance score (sort by value) | |
| Honor 9 | |
| Sony Xperia XZ | |
| Huawei P10 | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| Honor 8 | |
| Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value) | |
| Honor 9 | |
| Sony Xperia XZ | |
| Huawei P10 | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| Geekbench 4.4 | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Honor 9 | |
| Huawei P10 | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Honor 9 | |
| Huawei P10 | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
| T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Honor 9 | |
| Sony Xperia XZ | |
| Huawei P10 | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| Honor 8 | |
| 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Honor 9 | |
| Sony Xperia XZ | |
| Huawei P10 | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| Honor 8 | |
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
| Honor 9 | |
| Sony Xperia XZ | |
| Huawei P10 | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| Honor 8 | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Honor 9 | |
| Sony Xperia XZ | |
| Huawei P10 | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| Honor 8 | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Honor 9 | |
| Sony Xperia XZ | |
| Huawei P10 | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| Honor 8 | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Honor 9 | |
| Sony Xperia XZ | |
| Huawei P10 | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| Honor 8 | |
| GFXBench | |
| on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Honor 9 | |
| Sony Xperia XZ | |
| Huawei P10 | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| Honor 8 | |
| 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Honor 9 | |
| Sony Xperia XZ | |
| Huawei P10 | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| Honor 8 | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| Honor 8 | |
| Honor 9 | |
| Huawei P10 | |
| Sony Xperia XZ | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| Honor 8 | |
| Huawei P10 | |
| Honor 9 | |
| Sony Xperia XZ | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| Honor 9 | |
| Huawei P10 | |
| Honor 8 | |
| Sony Xperia XZ | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| Honor 8 | |
| Huawei P10 | |
| Honor 9 | |
| Sony Xperia XZ | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
* ... smaller is better
| Honor 9 | Sony Xperia XZ | Huawei P10 | OnePlus 5 | Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | Honor 8 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -24% | 114% | 67% | 1% | -26% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 293 | 281 -4% | 738 152% | 748 155% | 282 -4% | 247.5 -16% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 204 | 138 -32% | 189.8 -7% | 201.5 -1% | 188 -8% | 119.3 -42% |
| Random Read 4KB | 55.7 | 71.5 28% | 168.4 202% | 141 153% | 74 33% | 34.16 -39% |
| Random Write 4KB | 32.7 | 10.5 -68% | 152.3 366% | 19.3 -41% | 7.4 -77% | 31.5 -4% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 68 | 33.5 -51% | 54.2 -20% | 79.2 16% | 53.7 -21% | |
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 34.64 | 29.8 -14% | 32.19 -7% | 50.1 45% | 23.59 -32% |
| Asphalt 8: Airborne | |||
| Configurações | Valor | ||
| high | 29 fps | ||
| very low | 29 fps | ||
| Dead Trigger 2 | |||
| Configurações | Valor | ||
| high | 45 fps | ||
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.4 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 34.1 °C / 93 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Honor 9 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 9.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 43% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 62% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Honor 8 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 11.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (28% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 70% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 83% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 14% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado |   0.07 / 0.21 Watt |
| Ocioso |  1.13 / 2.25 / 2.3 Watt |
| Carga |
4.89 / 7.99 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Honor 9 3200 mAh | Sony Xperia XZ 2900 mAh | Huawei P10 3200 mAh | OnePlus 5 3300 mAh | Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL 3000 mAh | Honor 8 3000 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -51% | -2% | 12% | 21% | 17% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 1.13 | 1.76 -56% | 0.83 27% | 0.73 35% | 0.83 27% | 0.78 31% |
| Idle Average * | 2.25 | 3.6 -60% | 2.1 7% | 1.44 36% | 2.11 6% | 1.89 16% |
| Idle Maximum * | 2.3 | 4.06 -77% | 2.18 5% | 1.5 35% | 2.12 8% | 2.02 12% |
| Load Average * | 4.89 | 7 -43% | 6.57 -34% | 6.91 -41% | 3.41 30% | 5.28 -8% |
| Load Maximum * | 7.99 | 9.52 -19% | 9.32 -17% | 8.51 -7% | 5.46 32% | 5.44 32% |
* ... smaller is better
| Honor 9 3200 mAh | Sony Xperia XZ 2900 mAh | Huawei P10 3200 mAh | OnePlus 5 3300 mAh | Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL 3000 mAh | Honor 8 3000 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -20% | 16% | 2% | 37% | -3% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1399 | 1125 -20% | 1540 10% | 1534 10% | 1502 7% | 1487 6% |
| H.264 | 564 | 502 -11% | 582 3% | 623 10% | 905 60% | 526 -7% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 516 | 438 -15% | 966 87% | 518 0% | 797 54% | 499 -3% |
| Load | 278 | 187 -33% | 176 -37% | 247 -11% | 352 27% | 255 -8% |
Pro
Contra
Sim, assim é a vida com filhas lindas: às vezes a mãe pode ficar ciumenta. Pelo menos, a Huawei não facilita as coisas para que o seu carro-chefe P10 se levante perante o Honor 9, um pouco mais fino. Por pouco mais de 100 Euros a menos (~ $118, dependendo do preço do dia), você realmente recebe muito pelo seu dinheiro com o Honor 9. Inclusive o OnePlus 5 deve ter cuidado.
Comparado com o Honor 8, a carcaça bonita melhorou novamente, o desempenho está no mesmo nível que o do Huawei P10, e as câmeras tiram fotos que são quase igual de boas. Somente no armazenamento rápido, na duração da bateria e na variedade e velocidades das conexões LTE, o Honor 9 fica atrás da do carro-chefe da Huawei. Além disso, a Huawei oferece uma garantia de 36 meses para o P10.
Carcaça linda, boa câmera, duração decente da bateria - dificilmente encontramos qualquer motivo para reclamar do Honor 9. Se o SoC não se afogasse sob carga, nossa recomendação ficaria ainda mais clara, mas mesmo assim, o Honor 9 oferece uma excelente relação preço-desempenho.
Você poderia culpar a Huawei por não prestar mais atenção à qualidade das chamadas, pois, no melhor dos casos é apenas medíocre. As altas temperaturas da carcaça e o só que se afoga durante cargas prolongadas, são irritantes. No entanto, além disso, devemos prestar homenagem ao Honor 9. É uma grande oferta na gama média que os interessados não devem passar.
Para aqueles que desejam economizar, o Honor 8, que, basicamente, oferece os mesmos módulos de câmera e não está muito atrás em termos de desempenho, é uma excelente barganha por cerca de 100 Euros (~$118) a menos.
Honor 9
- 08/17/2017 v6 (old)
Florian Wimmer
Price comparison
