Breve Análise do Smartphone Honor 9 Lite
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos | |
| BQ Aquaris X | |
| Nokia 6 | |
| Motorola Moto G5s | |
| Huawei P smart | |
| Honor 9 Lite | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| BQ Aquaris X | |
| Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos | |
| Motorola Moto G5s | |
| Nokia 6 | |
| Honor 9 Lite | |
| Huawei P smart | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 82 %
iluminação com acumulador: 627 cd/m²
Contraste: 1529:1 (Preto: 0.41 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.5 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 5.1 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.26
| Honor 9 Lite IPS, 2160x1080, 5.7" | Huawei P smart IPS, 2160x1080, 5.7" | BQ Aquaris X LTPS IPS , 1920x1080, 5.2" | Nokia 6 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5" | Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos Super AMOLED, 1280x720, 5.2" | ZTE Blade V8 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2" | Huawei P10 Lite IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2" | Motorola Moto G5s IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -10% | -12% | -20% | 4% | -14% | -10% | -11% | |
| Brightness middle | 627 | 573 -9% | 675 8% | 512 -18% | 448 -29% | 482 -23% | 507 -19% | 490 -22% |
| Brightness | 622 | 568 -9% | 702 13% | 501 -19% | 451 -27% | 448 -28% | 509 -18% | 502 -19% |
| Brightness Distribution | 82 | 89 9% | 91 11% | 94 15% | 91 11% | 79 -4% | 95 16% | 92 12% |
| Black Level * | 0.41 | 0.63 -54% | 0.59 -44% | 0.36 12% | 0.64 -56% | 0.36 12% | 0.43 -5% | |
| Contrast | 1529 | 910 -40% | 1144 -25% | 1422 -7% | 753 -51% | 1408 -8% | 1140 -25% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.5 | 4.2 7% | 4.5 -0% | 6.4 -42% | 2.7 40% | 4 11% | 5.1 -13% | 5.7 -27% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7 | 6.4 9% | 9.1 -30% | 10.9 -56% | 9.8 -40% | 6.5 7% | 9 -29% | 7.8 -11% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.1 | 4.6 10% | 6.4 -25% | 7.2 -41% | 1.6 69% | 3.4 33% | 6.1 -20% | 4.7 8% |
| Gamma | 2.26 97% | 2.24 98% | 2.24 98% | 2.28 96% | 2.06 107% | 2.13 103% | 2.28 96% | 2.4 92% |
| CCT | 7201 90% | 7157 91% | 7478 87% | 7904 82% | 6557 99% | 6774 96% | 8143 80% | 7526 86% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 18 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 13 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 36 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 40 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 17 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 23 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 57 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Honor 9 Lite | |
| Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos | |
| BQ Aquaris X | |
| Nokia 6 | |
| ZTE Blade V8 | |
| Huawei P10 Lite | |
| Motorola Moto G5s | |
| Huawei P smart | |
| Huawei Honor 7X | |
| Huawei Nova 2 | |
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
| Honor 9 Lite | |
| Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos | |
| BQ Aquaris X | |
| Nokia 6 | |
| ZTE Blade V8 | |
| Huawei P10 Lite | |
| Motorola Moto G5s | |
| Huawei P smart | |
| Huawei Honor 7X | |
| Huawei Nova 2 | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Honor 9 Lite | |
| Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos | |
| BQ Aquaris X | |
| Nokia 6 | |
| ZTE Blade V8 | |
| Huawei P10 Lite | |
| Motorola Moto G5s | |
| Huawei P smart | |
| Huawei Honor 7X | |
| Huawei Nova 2 | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Honor 9 Lite | |
| Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos | |
| BQ Aquaris X | |
| Nokia 6 | |
| ZTE Blade V8 | |
| Huawei P10 Lite | |
| Motorola Moto G5s | |
| Huawei P smart | |
| Huawei Honor 7X | |
| Huawei Nova 2 | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Honor 9 Lite | |
| Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos | |
| BQ Aquaris X | |
| Nokia 6 | |
| ZTE Blade V8 | |
| Huawei P10 Lite | |
| Motorola Moto G5s | |
| Huawei P smart | |
| Huawei Honor 7X | |
| Huawei Nova 2 | |
| Lightmark - 1920x1080 1080p (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Honor 7X | |
| Huawei Nova 2 | |
| Basemark X 1.1 | |
| Medium Quality (sort by value) | |
| ZTE Blade V8 | |
| Huawei Honor 7X | |
| Huawei Nova 2 | |
| High Quality (sort by value) | |
| ZTE Blade V8 | |
| Huawei Honor 7X | |
| Huawei Nova 2 | |
| Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value) | |
| ZTE Blade V8 | |
| Huawei Nova 2 | |
| Epic Citadel - Ultra High Quality (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Nova 2 | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Huawei P10 Lite (Chrome 55.0.2883.91) | |
| BQ Aquaris X (Chrome Version 60) | |
| Huawei P smart (Chrome 64) | |
| Honor 9 Lite (Chrome 63) | |
| Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos (Samsung Browser 5.4) | |
| Motorola Moto G5s (Chrome 62) | |
| Nokia 6 (Chrome 59.0.3071.125) | |
| ZTE Blade V8 (Chrome 57.0.2987.132) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos (Samsung Browser 5.4) | |
| BQ Aquaris X (Chrome Version 60) | |
| Honor 9 Lite (Chrome 63) | |
| Huawei P10 Lite (Chrome 55.0.2883.91) | |
| Huawei P smart (Chrome 64) | |
| Motorola Moto G5s (Chrome 62) | |
| Nokia 6 (Chrome 59.0.3071.125) | |
| ZTE Blade V8 (Chrome 57.0.2987.132) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Motorola Moto G5s (Chrome 62) | |
| ZTE Blade V8 (Chrome 57.0.2987.132) | |
| Nokia 6 (Chrome 59.0.3071.125) | |
| Honor 9 Lite (Chrome 63) | |
| Huawei P smart (Chrome 64) | |
| BQ Aquaris X (Chrome Version 60) | |
| Huawei P10 Lite (Chrome 55.0.2883.91) | |
| Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos (Samsung Browser 5.4) | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall | |
| Honor 9 Lite (Chrome 63) | |
| Huawei P smart (Chrome 64) | |
| Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos (Samsung Browser 5.4) | |
| Huawei P10 Lite (Chrome 55.0.2883.91) | |
| Motorola Moto G5s (Chrome 62) | |
| Nokia 6 (Chrome 59.0.3071.125) | |
| ZTE Blade V8 (Chrome 57.0.2987.132) | |
* ... smaller is better
| Honor 9 Lite | Huawei P smart | Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos | BQ Aquaris X | Nokia 6 | Motorola Moto G5s | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -14% | -48% | -31% | -33% | -22% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 269.6 | 269.4 0% | 204.4 -24% | 266.4 -1% | 273.1 1% | 259 -4% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 138.2 | 121.1 -12% | 52 -62% | 75.3 -46% | 77.1 -44% | 77.5 -44% |
| Random Read 4KB | 68.4 | 66.1 -3% | 24.07 -65% | 37.47 -45% | 33.8 -51% | 40.6 -41% |
| Random Write 4KB | 66.8 | 21.3 -68% | 9.9 -85% | 11.85 -82% | 11.34 -83% | 46.2 -31% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 83.1 ? | 82.3 ? -1% | 72.2 ? -13% | 84.3 ? 1% | 84.6 2% | 84.1 ? 1% |
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 71.9 ? | 72.4 ? 1% | 44.21 ? -39% | 62.6 ? -13% | 56.6 -21% | 62.3 ? -13% |
| Asphalt 8: Airborne - high | |
| Nokia 6 | |
| Huawei P10 Lite | |
| Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos | |
| ZTE Blade V8 | |
| Huawei P smart | |
| Honor 9 Lite | |
| Dead Trigger 2 - high | |
| Huawei P smart | |
| Huawei P10 Lite | |
| Nokia 6 | |
| ZTE Blade V8 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos | |
| Honor 9 Lite | |
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 34.6 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33.2 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.4 °C / 89 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Honor 9 Lite audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 49% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 67% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 18% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 40% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Nokia 6 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 24% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 70% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado |   0.01 / 0.26 Watt |
| Ocioso |  0.85 / 2 / 2.04 Watt |
| Carga |
3.23 / 4.93 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Honor 9 Lite 3000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos 3000 mAh | BQ Aquaris X 3100 mAh | Nokia 6 3000 mAh | ZTE Blade V8 2730 mAh | Motorola Moto G5s 3000 mAh | Huawei P smart 3000 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 42% | -8% | 3% | 1% | -2% | -4% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 0.85 | 0.52 39% | 1.12 -32% | 0.63 26% | 0.98 -15% | 0.67 21% | 0.62 27% |
| Idle Average * | 2 | 1.17 41% | 2.16 -8% | 1.75 12% | 1.76 12% | 1.4 30% | 1.76 12% |
| Idle Maximum * | 2.04 | 1.24 39% | 2.18 -7% | 1.87 8% | 1.79 12% | 1.52 25% | 1.87 8% |
| Load Average * | 3.23 | 1.66 49% | 2.94 9% | 3.56 -10% | 2.89 11% | 4.56 -41% | 4.47 -38% |
| Load Maximum * | 4.93 | 2.94 40% | 5.1 -3% | 5.85 -19% | 5.62 -14% | 7.05 -43% | 6.39 -30% |
* ... smaller is better
| Honor 9 Lite 3000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos 3000 mAh | BQ Aquaris X 3100 mAh | Nokia 6 3000 mAh | ZTE Blade V8 2730 mAh | Motorola Moto G5s 3000 mAh | Huawei P smart 3000 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 52% | -1% | 16% | 5% | 2% | -6% | |
| Reader / Idle | 965 | 1564 62% | 1695 76% | 964 0% | 1233 28% | 985 2% | |
| H.264 | 622 | 917 47% | 542 -13% | 545 -12% | 645 4% | 615 -1% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 601 | 738 23% | 592 -1% | 670 11% | 700 16% | 518 -14% | 565 -6% |
| Load | 253 | 449 77% | 228 -10% | 297 17% | 225 -11% | 202 -20% |
Pro
Contra
O Honor conseguiu criar um bom smartphone de gama média: O 9 Lite. Ele impressiona com a sua tela brilhante, câmera dupla decente e desempenho fluente do sistema. Além disso, tem um ótimo design com opções de cores atraentes.
As durações das baterias dos smartphones são boas, mas poderiam ter sido ainda melhores com uma melhor otimização. Infelizmente, o 9 Lite ainda tem uma porta Micro-USB e o Wi-Fi é relativamente lento. Mas o seu LTE é bastante veloz.
O Honor 9 Lite faz um bom trabalho com sua tela brilhante, LTE rápido e quatro câmeras. Os jogadores, por outro lado, nem sempre ficarão tão satisfeitos com isso.
Em comparação direta com a Huawei P smart, ficamos felizes em ver que nossa unidade de teste teve um desempenho um pouco melhor devido à sua tela mais brilhante e melhores câmeras frontais, além de ser um pouco mais barata. Se você não gosta da ideia de um smartphone com uma parte traseira de vidro, você deve ir para o P smart, que tem uma carcaça de alumínio.
Honor 9 Lite
- 03/09/2018 v6 (old)
Daniel Schmidt
Price comparison
