Breve Análise do Smartphone Honor 8A
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Xiaomi Redmi 7 | |
Wiko View 2 Go | |
Honor 7A | |
Huawei Y6 2019 | |
Honor 8A | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Huawei Y6 2019 | |
Honor 8A | |
Wiko View 2 Go | |
Xiaomi Redmi 7 | |
Honor 7A |
|
iluminação: 94 %
iluminação com acumulador: 522 cd/m²
Contraste: 1111:1 (Preto: 0.47 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 6.6 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
98.1% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.28
Honor 8A IPS, 1520x720, 6.1" | Honor 7A IPS, 1440x720, 5.7" | Xiaomi Redmi 7 IPS, 1520x720, 6.3" | Huawei Y6 2019 IPS LCD, 1560x720, 6.1" | Wiko View 2 Go IPS, 1512x720, 5.9" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | 7% | 2% | 7% | 7% | |
Brightness middle | 522 | 417 -20% | 444 -15% | 487 -7% | 465 -11% |
Brightness | 542 | 395 -27% | 441 -19% | 485 -11% | 462 -15% |
Brightness Distribution | 94 | 88 -6% | 90 -4% | 89 -5% | 84 -11% |
Black Level * | 0.47 | 0.18 62% | 0.45 4% | 0.35 26% | 0.32 32% |
Contrast | 1111 | 2317 109% | 987 -11% | 1391 25% | 1453 31% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4 | 6.46 -62% | 3.94 1% | 4.3 -8% | 4.76 -19% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 9.5 | 10.72 -13% | 6.72 29% | 10.1 -6% | 7.71 19% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 6.6 | 5.8 12% | 4.8 27% | 4.1 38% | 4.6 30% |
Gamma | 2.28 96% | 2.423 91% | 2.294 96% | 2.09 105% | 2.674 82% |
CCT | 7258 90% | 7839 83% | 7445 87% | 7312 89% | 6806 96% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
24.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 9.2 ms rise | |
↘ 15.6 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 54 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
48 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 20.4 ms rise | |
↘ 27.6 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 80 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
PCMark for Android | |
Work performance score (sort by value) | |
Honor 8A | |
Honor 7A | |
Xiaomi Redmi 7 | |
Huawei Y6 2019 | |
Wiko View 2 Go | |
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 (4040 - 7753, n=8) | |
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value) | |
Honor 8A | |
Honor 7A | |
Xiaomi Redmi 7 | |
Huawei Y6 2019 | |
Wiko View 2 Go | |
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 (3814 - 5794, n=11) |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value) | |
Honor 8A | |
Honor 7A | |
Xiaomi Redmi 7 | |
Huawei Y6 2019 | |
Wiko View 2 Go | |
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 (18 - 31, n=6) | |
Average of class Smartphone (23 - 165, n=170, last 2 years) | |
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Honor 8A | |
Honor 7A | |
Xiaomi Redmi 7 | |
Huawei Y6 2019 | |
Wiko View 2 Go | |
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 (19 - 23, n=6) | |
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=170, last 2 years) |
GFXBench 3.0 | |
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
Honor 8A | |
Honor 7A | |
Xiaomi Redmi 7 | |
Huawei Y6 2019 | |
Wiko View 2 Go | |
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 (9.1 - 20, n=6) | |
Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 165, n=170, last 2 years) | |
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Honor 8A | |
Honor 7A | |
Xiaomi Redmi 7 | |
Huawei Y6 2019 | |
Wiko View 2 Go | |
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 (9.8 - 12, n=6) | |
Average of class Smartphone (12 - 482, n=170, last 2 years) |
GFXBench 3.1 | |
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
Honor 8A | |
Honor 7A | |
Xiaomi Redmi 7 | |
Huawei Y6 2019 | |
Wiko View 2 Go | |
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 (6 - 14, n=6) | |
Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 158, n=170, last 2 years) | |
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Honor 8A | |
Honor 7A | |
Xiaomi Redmi 7 | |
Huawei Y6 2019 | |
Wiko View 2 Go | |
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 (5.8 - 8.1, n=6) | |
Average of class Smartphone (8.3 - 341, n=170, last 2 years) |
Basemark GPU 1.1 | |
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Honor 8A | |
Huawei Y6 2019 | |
Vulkan Medium Native (sort by value) | |
Honor 8A | |
Huawei Y6 2019 | |
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Honor 8A | |
Huawei Y6 2019 |
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
Honor 8A | |
Honor 7A | |
Xiaomi Redmi 7 | |
Huawei Y6 2019 | |
Wiko View 2 Go | |
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 () |
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value) | |
Honor 8A | |
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 () | |
Average of class Smartphone (205 - 7616, n=56, last 2 years) |
Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=162, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Redmi 7 (Chrome 73) | |
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 (13.6 - 17.3, n=4) | |
Huawei Y6 2019 | |
Honor 8A |
Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=148, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Redmi 7 (Chome 73) | |
Huawei Y6 2019 (Chrome) | |
Honor 8A (Chrome) | |
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 (13.7 - 16, n=4) |
WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=82, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Redmi 7 (Chrome 73) | |
Huawei Y6 2019 | |
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 (29 - 36, n=4) | |
Honor 8A (Chrome) |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=204, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Redmi 7 (Chrome 73) | |
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 (4347 - 5543, n=5) | |
Huawei Y6 2019 (Chrome) | |
Honor 8A (Chrome) | |
Honor 7A (Chrome 67) | |
Wiko View 2 Go (Chrome 71) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
Honor 7A (Chrome 67) | |
Wiko View 2 Go (Chrome 71) | |
Honor 8A (Chrome) | |
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 (9756 - 11323, n=5) | |
Huawei Y6 2019 | |
Xiaomi Redmi 7 (Chrome 73) | |
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=161, last 2 years) |
* ... smaller is better
Honor 8A | Honor 7A | Xiaomi Redmi 7 | Huawei Y6 2019 | Average 32 GB eMMC Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | -16% | 3% | 5% | -3% | 1047% | |
Sequential Read 256KB | 265 | 254.8 -4% | 298 12% | 279.3 5% | 242 ? -9% | 1834 ? 592% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 104 | 72.5 -30% | 84.7 -19% | 107.8 4% | 100.5 ? -3% | 1426 ? 1271% |
Random Read 4KB | 61 | 39.2 -36% | 73.6 21% | 69 13% | 43.2 ? -29% | 278 ? 356% |
Random Write 4KB | 15 | 9.4 -37% | 14.4 -4% | 15 0% | 22.4 ? 49% | 310 ? 1967% |
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 81.9 | 84.9 ? 4% | 85.9 ? 5% | 83.2 ? 2% | 71.8 ? -12% | |
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 61.8 | 65.4 ? 6% | 63.3 ? 2% | 64.4 ? 4% | 52.9 ? -14% |
GameBench PUBG (niedrige Grafikeinstellungen)
GameBench Asphalt 9 (niedrige Grafikeinstellungen)
Gamebench Shadow Fight 3 (niedrige Grafikeinstellungen)
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 34.6 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 31.7 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.6 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Honor 8A audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.2% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 23% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 44% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 49% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Honor 7A audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 58.8% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 58.8% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 58.8% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (113.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 86% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 13% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 96% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 4% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
desligado | 0.01 / 0.14 Watt |
Ocioso | 0.73 / 2.07 / 2.14 Watt |
Carga |
4.3 / 5.96 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Honor 8A 3020 mAh | Honor 7A 3000 mAh | Xiaomi Redmi 7 4000 mAh | Huawei Y6 2019 3020 mAh | Wiko View 2 Go 4000 mAh | Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -17% | 2% | 21% | 2% | 3% | -16% | |
Idle Minimum * | 0.73 | 1.3 -78% | 1 -37% | 0.59 19% | 0.8 -10% | 0.932 ? -28% | 0.895 ? -23% |
Idle Average * | 2.07 | 1.6 23% | 1.7 18% | 1.94 6% | 2 3% | 1.892 ? 9% | 1.447 ? 30% |
Idle Maximum * | 2.14 | 2.9 -36% | 2.1 2% | 1.96 8% | 2.3 -7% | 2.23 ? -4% | 1.608 ? 25% |
Load Average * | 4.3 | 3.7 14% | 3.3 23% | 2.82 34% | 3.6 16% | 3.3 ? 23% | 6.41 ? -49% |
Load Maximum * | 5.96 | 6.4 -7% | 5.6 6% | 3.57 40% | 5.4 9% | 5.2 ? 13% | 9.61 ? -61% |
* ... smaller is better
Honor 8A 3020 mAh | Honor 7A 3000 mAh | Xiaomi Redmi 7 4000 mAh | Huawei Y6 2019 3020 mAh | Wiko View 2 Go 4000 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -21% | -4% | -14% | -11% | |
H.264 | 917 | 902 -2% | 805 -12% | ||
WiFi v1.3 | 829 | 657 -21% | 848 2% | 732 -12% | 734 -11% |
Load | 301 | 268 -11% | 249 -17% | ||
Reader / Idle | 1489 |
Pro
Contra
O Honor 7A já foi muito bom, e o Honor 8A é ainda melhor. O design dividido é definitivamente uma questão de gosto, e teríamos preferido um toque e sensação mais premium. No entanto, considerando o preço do Honor 8A, não temos problemas com isso. A tela é decente e muito mais brilhante do que no ano passado, a memória interna de armazenamento duplicou em capacidade e o desempenho geral também melhorou.
O Honor 8A é um smartphone de nível de entrada sem falhas reais. Considerando o preço quase idêntico, oferece mais do que seu competidor interno mais proeminente, o Huawei Y6 (2019).
A câmera provavelmente será suficiente para a maioria dos usuários - se você quiser mais, terá que pagar mais, é simples assim. No geral, o Honor 8A é um ótimo smartphone de nível de entrada por menos de $200. O Y6 marrom da Huawei pode oferecer um design mais elegante, mas não conta com um leitor de digitais, em troca.
Honor 8A
-
10/31/2019 v7 (old)
Stefan Schomberg