Breve Análise do Smartphone Honor 8
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
Size Comparison
Networking | |
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m | |
OnePlus 3 | |
Honor 8 | |
Huawei P9 | |
Sony Xperia XA | |
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m | |
OnePlus 3 | |
Huawei P9 | |
Honor 8 | |
Sony Xperia XA |
|
iluminação: 93 %
iluminação com acumulador: 451 cd/m²
Contraste: 1128:1 (Preto: 0.4 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.4 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 6.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.33
Honor 8 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2" | Google Nexus 5X IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2" | OnePlus 3 Optic-AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5" | Sony Xperia XA IPS, 1280x720, 5" | Huawei P9 IPS-NEO, JDI, 1920x1080, 5.2" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | 26% | 6% | -14% | 21% | |
Brightness middle | 451 | 503 12% | 419 -7% | 518 15% | 582 29% |
Brightness | 443 | 498 12% | 431 -3% | 475 7% | 563 27% |
Brightness Distribution | 93 | 97 4% | 84 -10% | 81 -13% | 91 -2% |
Black Level * | 0.4 | 0.38 5% | 0.61 -53% | 0.38 5% | |
Contrast | 1128 | 1324 17% | 849 -25% | 1532 36% | |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.4 | 2.09 61% | 4.1 24% | 6.8 -26% | 4.4 19% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 9.9 | 12 -21% | 11.4 -15% | 7.4 25% | |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 6.7 | 2.12 68% | 3.3 51% | 7 -4% | 4.8 28% |
Gamma | 2.33 94% | 2.27 97% | 2.1 105% | 2.35 94% | 2.2 100% |
CCT | 8262 79% | 6621 98% | 6550 99% | 8151 80% | 6175 105% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 89.38 | 77.78 | |||
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 100 | 99.44 |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
34 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 13 ms rise | |
↘ 21 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 90 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
48 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 22 ms rise | |
↘ 26 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 81 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
Honor 8 | |
OnePlus 3 | |
Sony Xperia XA | |
Huawei P9 |
3DMark | |
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value) | |
Honor 8 | |
Google Nexus 5X | |
OnePlus 3 | |
Sony Xperia XA | |
Huawei P9 | |
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value) | |
Honor 8 | |
Google Nexus 5X | |
OnePlus 3 | |
Sony Xperia XA | |
Huawei P9 | |
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value) | |
Honor 8 | |
Google Nexus 5X | |
OnePlus 3 | |
Sony Xperia XA | |
Huawei P9 | |
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value) | |
Honor 8 | |
Google Nexus 5X | |
OnePlus 3 | |
Sony Xperia XA | |
Huawei P9 | |
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value) | |
Honor 8 | |
Google Nexus 5X | |
OnePlus 3 | |
Sony Xperia XA | |
Huawei P9 | |
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value) | |
Honor 8 | |
Google Nexus 5X | |
OnePlus 3 | |
Sony Xperia XA | |
Huawei P9 |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value) | |
Honor 8 | |
Google Nexus 5X | |
OnePlus 3 | |
Sony Xperia XA | |
Huawei P9 | |
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Honor 8 | |
Google Nexus 5X | |
OnePlus 3 | |
Sony Xperia XA | |
Huawei P9 |
GFXBench 3.0 | |
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
Honor 8 | |
Google Nexus 5X | |
OnePlus 3 | |
Sony Xperia XA | |
Huawei P9 | |
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Honor 8 | |
Google Nexus 5X | |
OnePlus 3 | |
Sony Xperia XA | |
Huawei P9 |
GFXBench 3.1 | |
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
Honor 8 | |
OnePlus 3 | |
Sony Xperia XA | |
Huawei P9 | |
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Honor 8 | |
OnePlus 3 | |
Sony Xperia XA | |
Huawei P9 |
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value) | |
Honor 8 | |
Google Nexus 5X | |
OnePlus 3 | |
Sony Xperia XA | |
Huawei P9 |
Geekbench 4.0 | |
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
Honor 8 | |
OnePlus 3 | |
Huawei P9 | |
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
Honor 8 | |
OnePlus 3 | |
Huawei P9 | |
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value) | |
Honor 8 | |
OnePlus 3 | |
Huawei P9 |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value) | |
Honor 8 | |
Google Nexus 5X | |
OnePlus 3 | |
Sony Xperia XA | |
Huawei P9 |
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
Honor 8 | |
Google Nexus 5X | |
OnePlus 3 | |
Sony Xperia XA | |
Huawei P9 |
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value) | |
Honor 8 | |
Google Nexus 5X | |
OnePlus 3 | |
Sony Xperia XA | |
Huawei P9 |
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
Honor 8 | |
Google Nexus 5X | |
OnePlus 3 | |
Sony Xperia XA | |
Huawei P9 |
* ... smaller is better
AndroBench 3-5 | |
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value) | |
Honor 8 | |
Google Nexus 5X | |
OnePlus 3 | |
Sony Xperia XA | |
Huawei P9 | |
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value) | |
Honor 8 | |
Google Nexus 5X | |
OnePlus 3 | |
Sony Xperia XA | |
Huawei P9 | |
Random Read 4KB (sort by value) | |
Honor 8 | |
Google Nexus 5X | |
OnePlus 3 | |
Sony Xperia XA | |
Huawei P9 | |
Random Write 4KB (sort by value) | |
Honor 8 | |
Google Nexus 5X | |
OnePlus 3 | |
Sony Xperia XA | |
Huawei P9 | |
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (sort by value) | |
Honor 8 | |
Sony Xperia XA | |
Huawei P9 | |
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (sort by value) | |
Honor 8 | |
Sony Xperia XA | |
Huawei P9 |
Asphalt 8: Airborne | |||
Configurações | Valor | ||
high | 30 fps | ||
very low | 30 fps |
Dead Trigger 2 | |||
Configurações | Valor | ||
high | 30 fps |
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.6 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.9 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 36.4 °C / 98 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Honor 8 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 11.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (28% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 70% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 83% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 14% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Huawei P9 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 31.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.9% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 50% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 68% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
OnePlus 3 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 39% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 58% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
desligado | 0.07 / 0.3 Watt |
Ocioso | 0.78 / 1.89 / 2.02 Watt |
Carga |
5.28 / 5.44 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Gossen Metrahit Energy |
Honor 8 3000 mAh | Google Nexus 5X mAh | OnePlus 3 3000 mAh | Sony Xperia XA 2300 mAh | Huawei P9 3000 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 3% | -2% | 15% | 0% | |
Idle Minimum * | 0.78 | 0.55 29% | 0.57 27% | 0.72 8% | 0.77 1% |
Idle Average * | 1.89 | 1.44 24% | 1.24 34% | 1.5 21% | 2.36 -25% |
Idle Maximum * | 2.02 | 1.9 6% | 1.36 33% | 1.57 22% | 2.37 -17% |
Load Average * | 5.28 | 3.36 36% | 5.92 -12% | 3.48 34% | 3.09 41% |
Load Maximum * | 5.44 | 9.76 -79% | 10.53 -94% | 6.04 -11% | 5.35 2% |
* ... smaller is better
Honor 8 3000 mAh | Google Nexus 5X mAh | OnePlus 3 3000 mAh | Sony Xperia XA 2300 mAh | Huawei P9 3000 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 1% | 31% | -31% | 1% | |
Reader / Idle | 1487 | 1775 19% | 1338 -10% | 775 -48% | 1514 2% |
H.264 | 526 | 555 6% | 847 61% | 460 -13% | 568 8% |
WiFi v1.3 | 499 | 412 -17% | 840 68% | 353 -29% | 569 14% |
Load | 255 | 245 -4% | 268 5% | 170 -33% | 206 -19% |
Pro
Contra
A Huawei teve que cortar as asas do Honor 8 para evitar que se torne uma ameaça para o seu próprio modelo top, Huawei P9. O exclusivo e elegante design, o funcionamento veloz e preciso, e o alto desempenho deixam a dúvida de por que teríamos que gastar pelos menos 100 Euros (~$112) a mais no Huawei P9.
Por isso, a Huawei removeu a opção de tirar foto em branco e preto sem um filtro, instala um SoC um pouco antigo e utiliza uma tela com qualidade algo inferior, para pelo menos separar o Honor 8 do modelo premium até certo grau. No entanto, as diferenças são marginais no uso cotidiano, e a porta de infravermelhos inclusive é um ponto extra a favor do Honor 8.
A câmera baseia-se na mesma tecnologia e no mesmo sensor de imagens que o Huawei P9. A única coisa que falta é o logotipo Leica. Embora as fotos não sejam tão boas quanto as doHuawei P9, ainda são aceitáveis para uma câmera de smartphone. Completamente independente do seu irmão maior Huawei, a carcaça muito elegante e sólida, veloz leitor de digitais com função de softkey, e a boa configuração tornam o visual do Honor, muito impressionante. Ele não tem nada que esconder na gama média superior. No entanto, o OnePlus 3 oferece uma tela maior, mais poder, e uma duração de bateria ainda mais longa,pelo mesmo valor.
O Honor 8 é um excelente smartphone de gama média-alta que poderia ser o smartphone indicado para muitas pessoas com sua carcaça, desempenho, e funcionamento veloz. Ele inclusive se aproxima perigosamente ao Huawei P9 por 100 Euros (~$112) menos.
A maior parte das críticas se devem ao adware generosamente pré-carregado, o módulo GPS relativamente lento, e ao afogamento do SoC durante uso intenso prolongado. Além disso, o microfone é medíocre, e a tela tem uma forte tonalidade azul.
Em total, o Honor 8 deixou uma impressão muito positiva, e não deve temer nenhum a aparelho de comparação da gama média-alta. Os usuários que nem sempre desejam ter as últimas tecnologias em seus smartphones definitivamente deveriam dar uma chance ao Honor 8.
Honor 8
- 09/28/2016 v5.1 (old)
Florian Wimmer