Notebookcheck Logo

Breve Análise do Smartphone Honor 8

Maravilha azul. O Honor 8 vem em uma atraente carcaça de 2,5D-glass e cores elegantes. Mas será que uma carcaça elegante e duas câmeras são suficiente para convencer os compradores na gama média altamente competitiva? Vamos descobrir em nosso teste.
Honor 8 (8 Serie)
Processador
HiSilicon Kirin 950 8 x 2.3 GHz, Cortex-A72/-A53
Placa gráfica
Memória
4 GB 
Pantalha
5.20 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 424 PPI, múltiplos-pontos, IPS, 16700000 colors, NTSC – 96%, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB 
, 24.08 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, 1 Infrared, Conexões Audio: 3,5 mm, Card Reader: micro-SD (TF) máx 128GB, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: acelerômetro, sensor de proximidade, bússola, giroscópio, sensor Hall, Miracast, DLNA, USB-OTG
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM (850/​900/​1800/​1900), WCDMA (UMTS, HSPA+) (850/900/1900/2100), LTE FDD (LTE ipload 75 MBit/s, LTE download 300 MBit/s); SAR rate (head): 1.5 W/kg, LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 7.45 x 145.5 x 71
Bateria
11.4 Wh, 3000 mAh Lítio-Polímero, Tempo de conversação 2G (de acordo com o fabricante): 28 h, Tempo de conversação 3G (de acordo com o fabricante): 15 h, Standby 2G (de acordo com o fabricante): 360 h, Standby 3G (de acordo com o fabricante): 360 h
Sistema Operativo
Android 6.0 Marshmallow
Camera
Primary Camera: 12 MPix CMOS, LED flash, f/2.2
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix f/2.4
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Alto falantes na borda inferior, Teclado: Teclado virtual, carregador,cabo USB-C, headset, ferramenta SIM, Administrador do telefone, HiCare, Designs, 24 Meses Garantia, fanless
peso
153 g, Suprimento de energia: 73 g
Preço
399 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size Comparison

152.7 mm 74.7 mm 7.35 mm 161 g147 mm 72.6 mm 8 mm 136 g145.5 mm 71 mm 7.45 mm 153 g145 mm 70.9 mm 6.95 mm 144 g143.6 mm 66.8 mm 7.9 mm 137 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g
Networking
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
OnePlus 3
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
286 MBit/s +13%
Honor 8
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash
253 MBit/s
Huawei P9
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash
249 MBit/s -2%
Sony Xperia XA
Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 16 GB eMMC Flash
92.5 MBit/s -63%
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
OnePlus 3
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
256 MBit/s +31%
Huawei P9
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash
205 MBit/s +5%
Honor 8
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash
195 MBit/s
Sony Xperia XA
Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 16 GB eMMC Flash
83.6 MBit/s -57%
GPS Honor 8 – overview
GPS Honor 8 – overview
GPS Honor 8 – crossing
GPS Honor 8 – crossing
GPS Honor 8 – bridge
GPS Honor 8 – bridge
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – overview
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – overview
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – crossing
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – crossing
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – bridge
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – bridge

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
orginal image
click to load images
432
cd/m²
440
cd/m²
426
cd/m²
448
cd/m²
451
cd/m²
438
cd/m²
456
cd/m²
454
cd/m²
440
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 456 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 442.8 cd/m² Minimum: 2.46 cd/m²
iluminação: 93 %
iluminação com acumulador: 451 cd/m²
Contraste: 1128:1 (Preto: 0.4 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.4 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 6.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.33
Honor 8
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2"
Google Nexus 5X
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2"
OnePlus 3
Optic-AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5"
Sony Xperia XA
IPS, 1280x720, 5"
Huawei P9
IPS-NEO, JDI, 1920x1080, 5.2"
Screen
26%
6%
-14%
21%
Brightness middle
451
503
12%
419
-7%
518
15%
582
29%
Brightness
443
498
12%
431
-3%
475
7%
563
27%
Brightness Distribution
93
97
4%
84
-10%
81
-13%
91
-2%
Black Level *
0.4
0.38
5%
0.61
-53%
0.38
5%
Contrast
1128
1324
17%
849
-25%
1532
36%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
5.4
2.09
61%
4.1
24%
6.8
-26%
4.4
19%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
9.9
12
-21%
11.4
-15%
7.4
25%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
6.7
2.12
68%
3.3
51%
7
-4%
4.8
28%
Gamma
2.33 94%
2.27 97%
2.1 105%
2.35 94%
2.2 100%
CCT
8262 79%
6621 98%
6550 99%
8151 80%
6175 105%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
89.38
77.78
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
100
99.44

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
34 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 13 ms rise
↘ 21 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 90 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
48 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 22 ms rise
↘ 26 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 81 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Honor 8
94671 Points
OnePlus 3
142090 Points +50%
Sony Xperia XA
48331 Points -49%
Huawei P9
95743 Points +1%
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Honor 8
20235 Points
Google Nexus 5X
18898 Points -7%
OnePlus 3
30241 Points +49%
Sony Xperia XA
11156 Points -45%
Huawei P9
19854 Points -2%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Honor 8
22157 Points
Google Nexus 5X
22180 Points 0%
OnePlus 3
34023 Points +54%
Sony Xperia XA
10916 Points -51%
Huawei P9
21577 Points -3%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Honor 8
15531 Points
Google Nexus 5X
12451 Points -20%
OnePlus 3
21771 Points +40%
Sony Xperia XA
12138 Points -22%
Huawei P9
15517 Points 0%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Honor 8
1273 Points
Google Nexus 5X
1497 Points +18%
OnePlus 3
3424 Points +169%
Sony Xperia XA
603 Points -53%
Huawei P9
1237 Points -3%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Honor 8
1112 Points
Google Nexus 5X
1942 Points +75%
OnePlus 3
4633 Points +317%
Sony Xperia XA
525 Points -53%
Huawei P9
1080 Points -3%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Honor 8
2587 Points
Google Nexus 5X
831 Points -68%
OnePlus 3
1789 Points -31%
Sony Xperia XA
1259 Points -51%
Huawei P9
2510 Points -3%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Honor 8
43 fps
Google Nexus 5X
38 fps -12%
OnePlus 3
60 fps +40%
Sony Xperia XA
28 fps -35%
Huawei P9
43 fps 0%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Honor 8
41 fps
Google Nexus 5X
37 fps -10%
OnePlus 3
89 fps +117%
Sony Xperia XA
18 fps -56%
Huawei P9
40 fps -2%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Honor 8
19 fps
Google Nexus 5X
17 fps -11%
OnePlus 3
46 fps +142%
Sony Xperia XA
15 fps -21%
Huawei P9
19 fps 0%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Honor 8
19 fps
Google Nexus 5X
16 fps -16%
OnePlus 3
47 fps +147%
Sony Xperia XA
7.2 fps -62%
Huawei P9
18 fps -5%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Honor 8
11 fps
OnePlus 3
30 fps +173%
Sony Xperia XA
11 fps 0%
Huawei P9
11 fps 0%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Honor 8
10 fps
OnePlus 3
31 fps +210%
Sony Xperia XA
4.8 fps -52%
Huawei P9
10 fps 0%
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
Honor 8
6735 Points
Google Nexus 5X
4324 Points -36%
OnePlus 3
7101 Points +5%
Sony Xperia XA
4685 Points -30%
Huawei P9
7058 Points +5%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Honor 8
2034 Points
Google Nexus 5X
1318 Points -35%
OnePlus 3
2496 Points +23%
Sony Xperia XA
1043 Points -49%
Huawei P9
2025 Points 0%
System (sort by value)
Honor 8
3952 Points
Google Nexus 5X
1730 Points -56%
OnePlus 3
3537 Points -11%
Sony Xperia XA
2289 Points -42%
Huawei P9
3930 Points -1%
Memory (sort by value)
Honor 8
2556 Points
Google Nexus 5X
1115 Points -56%
OnePlus 3
2052 Points -20%
Sony Xperia XA
1076 Points -58%
Huawei P9
2627 Points +3%
Graphics (sort by value)
Honor 8
1703 Points
Google Nexus 5X
2038 Points +20%
OnePlus 3
4813 Points +183%
Sony Xperia XA
669 Points -61%
Huawei P9
1583 Points -7%
Web (sort by value)
Honor 8
994 Points
Google Nexus 5X
769 Points -23%
OnePlus 3
1112 Points +12%
Sony Xperia XA
717 Points -28%
Huawei P9
1029 Points +4%
Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Honor 8
1726 Points
OnePlus 3
1754 Points +2%
Huawei P9
1755 Points +2%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Honor 8
5481 Points
OnePlus 3
4097 Points -25%
Huawei P9
4904 Points -11%
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Honor 8
3101 Points
OnePlus 3
7085 Points +128%
Huawei P9
3077 Points -1%

Legend

 
Honor 8 HiSilicon Kirin 950, ARM Mali-T880 MP4, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Google Nexus 5X Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992, Qualcomm Adreno 418, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
OnePlus 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
 
Sony Xperia XA Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei P9 HiSilicon Kirin 955, ARM Mali-T880 MP4, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value)
Honor 8
2979 ms *
Google Nexus 5X
4734 ms * -59%
OnePlus 3
2921 ms * +2%
Sony Xperia XA
9610 ms * -223%
Huawei P9
2923 ms * +2%
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
Honor 8
10692 Points
Google Nexus 5X
8202 Points -23%
OnePlus 3
9155 Points -14%
Sony Xperia XA
4046 Points -62%
Huawei P9
11783 Points +10%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value)
Honor 8
138 Points
Google Nexus 5X
107 Points -22%
OnePlus 3
122 Points -12%
Sony Xperia XA
72 Points -48%
Huawei P9
128 Points -7%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Honor 8
64 Points
Google Nexus 5X
45 Points -30%
OnePlus 3
54.4 Points -15%
Sony Xperia XA
27.5 Points -57%
Huawei P9
68.4 Points +7%

* ... smaller is better

AndroBench 3-5
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value)
Honor 8
247.5 MB/s
Google Nexus 5X
245.2 MB/s -1%
OnePlus 3
408.7 MB/s +65%
Sony Xperia XA
240.4 MB/s -3%
Huawei P9
281.3 MB/s +14%
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value)
Honor 8
119.3 MB/s
Google Nexus 5X
98.6 MB/s -17%
OnePlus 3
153.3 MB/s +28%
Sony Xperia XA
68.6 MB/s -42%
Huawei P9
72.2 MB/s -39%
Random Read 4KB (sort by value)
Honor 8
34.16 MB/s
Google Nexus 5X
24.8 MB/s -27%
OnePlus 3
137.6 MB/s +303%
Sony Xperia XA
22.05 MB/s -35%
Huawei P9
39 MB/s +14%
Random Write 4KB (sort by value)
Honor 8
31.5 MB/s
Google Nexus 5X
12.21 MB/s -61%
OnePlus 3
18.23 MB/s -42%
Sony Xperia XA
10.6 MB/s -66%
Huawei P9
47.45 MB/s +51%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
Honor 8
53.7 MB/s
Sony Xperia XA
72.9 MB/s +36%
Huawei P9
55 MB/s +2%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
Honor 8
23.59 MB/s
Sony Xperia XA
50.7 MB/s +115%
Huawei P9
24.83 MB/s +5%
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high30 fps
 very low30 fps
Dead Trigger 2
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high30 fps
Carga Máxima
 40.4 °C40.5 °C40.6 °C 
 39.8 °C39.7 °C40.3 °C 
 39.1 °C39.6 °C39.9 °C 
Máximo: 40.6 °C
Médio: 40 °C
37.5 °C38.3 °C39.9 °C
37.6 °C38.3 °C39.5 °C
37.5 °C38.9 °C38.9 °C
Máximo: 39.9 °C
Médio: 38.5 °C
alimentação elétrica  36 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.9 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 40 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.6 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.9 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 36.4 °C / 98 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.632.82525.430.43125.332.14032.933.35033.6366331.630.18028.427.81002725.412520.825.61602229.120021.339.625020.848.331521.254.240019.456.850019.559.163017.758.180017.961.1100017.864.4125017.365.8160017.467.4200016.770.3250017.271315018.277.1400017.979.1500017.673.5630017.772.1800017.8711000017.966.41250018.157.51600018.253.1SPL3084.7N1.353.4median 17.9median 61.1Delta1.410.734.429.632.434.42729.531.32728.125.831.728.131.432.22631.445.74539.445.72929.636.22926.324.428.626.325.726.725.425.724.321.621.324.328.923.423.328.939.229.622.539.249.94022.449.957.846.221.357.859.450.218.459.462.452.417.562.466.655.317.566.667.454.817.267.468.853.716.868.871.955.817.371.973.55617.473.575.357.716.675.376.758.817.376.779.36117.679.381.263.517.681.278.160.617.778.174.657.517.474.674.357.117.774.372.85617.972.868.85118.168.860.942.218.160.987.970.529.887.96825.51.368median 68.8median 54.8median 17.7median 68.810.38.51.710.340.136.832.440.1382731.33834.330.631.734.334.529.72634.544.138.139.444.140.529.736.240.53331.428.63326.827.625.426.826.924.421.326.93724.823.33745.529.522.545.551.636.222.451.657.341.721.357.359.746.618.459.766.452.517.566.468.45217.568.469.952.517.269.971.853.816.871.872.554.817.372.575.256.917.475.278.459.716.678.477.659.717.377.678.260.817.678.281.363.817.681.378.561.817.778.575.958.817.475.976.259.417.776.274.357.517.974.370.354.818.170.354.437.618.154.488.671.129.888.67325.81.373median 71.8median 53.8median 17.7median 71.810.910.71.710.9hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHonor 8Huawei P9OnePlus 3
Honor 8 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 11.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (28% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 70% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 83% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 14% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Huawei P9 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 31.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.9% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 50% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 68% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

OnePlus 3 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 39% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 58% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.07 / 0.3 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.78 / 1.89 / 2.02 Watt
Carga midlight 5.28 / 5.44 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Gossen Metrahit Energy
Honor 8
3000 mAh
Google Nexus 5X
 mAh
OnePlus 3
3000 mAh
Sony Xperia XA
2300 mAh
Huawei P9
3000 mAh
Power Consumption
3%
-2%
15%
0%
Idle Minimum *
0.78
0.55
29%
0.57
27%
0.72
8%
0.77
1%
Idle Average *
1.89
1.44
24%
1.24
34%
1.5
21%
2.36
-25%
Idle Maximum *
2.02
1.9
6%
1.36
33%
1.57
22%
2.37
-17%
Load Average *
5.28
3.36
36%
5.92
-12%
3.48
34%
3.09
41%
Load Maximum *
5.44
9.76
-79%
10.53
-94%
6.04
-11%
5.35
2%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
24h 47min
WiFi Websurfing
8h 19min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
8h 46min
Carga (máximo brilho)
4h 15min
Honor 8
3000 mAh
Google Nexus 5X
 mAh
OnePlus 3
3000 mAh
Sony Xperia XA
2300 mAh
Huawei P9
3000 mAh
Battery Runtime
1%
31%
-31%
1%
Reader / Idle
1487
1775
19%
1338
-10%
775
-48%
1514
2%
H.264
526
555
6%
847
61%
460
-13%
568
8%
WiFi v1.3
499
412
-17%
840
68%
353
-29%
569
14%
Load
255
245
-4%
268
5%
170
-33%
206
-19%

Pro

+ Carcaça muito elegante
+ Muito sólido
+ Dual-SIM
+ NFC, USB OTG
+ Porta de infravermelhos
+ Wi-Fi veloz
+ Boas fotos da câmera
+ Leitor de digitais muito veloz
+ Softkey
+ Ampla gama de cores da tela
+ Alto desempenho
+ Bons alto falantes
+ Durações práticas da bateria

Contra

- Sem App2SD
- Diversidade de redes medíocre
- GPS, às vezes lento
- Qualidade moderada do microfone
- Tonalidade extremamente azul da tela
- Forte afogamento sob uso intenso
- Consumo de energia relativamente alto
In review: Honor 8. Review sample courtesy of Honor Germany.
In review: Honor 8. Review sample courtesy of Honor Germany.

A Huawei teve que cortar as asas do Honor 8 para evitar que se torne uma ameaça para o seu próprio modelo top,  Huawei P9. O exclusivo e elegante design, o funcionamento veloz e preciso, e o alto desempenho deixam a dúvida de por que teríamos que gastar pelos menos 100 Euros (~$112) a mais no Huawei P9.

Por isso, a Huawei removeu a opção de tirar foto em branco e preto sem um filtro, instala um SoC um pouco antigo e utiliza uma tela com qualidade algo inferior, para pelo menos separar o Honor 8 do modelo premium até certo grau. No entanto, as diferenças são marginais no uso cotidiano, e a porta de infravermelhos inclusive é um ponto extra a favor do Honor 8.

A câmera baseia-se na mesma tecnologia e no mesmo sensor de imagens que o Huawei P9. A única coisa que falta  é o logotipo Leica. Embora as fotos não sejam tão boas quanto as doHuawei P9, ainda são aceitáveis para uma câmera de smartphone. Completamente independente do seu irmão maior Huawei, a carcaça muito elegante e sólida, veloz leitor de digitais com função de softkey, e a boa configuração tornam o visual do Honor, muito impressionante. Ele não tem nada que esconder na gama média superior. No entanto, o OnePlus 3 oferece uma tela maior, mais poder, e uma duração de bateria ainda mais longa,pelo mesmo valor.

O Honor 8 é um excelente smartphone de gama média-alta que poderia ser o smartphone indicado para muitas pessoas com sua carcaça, desempenho, e funcionamento veloz. Ele inclusive se aproxima perigosamente ao Huawei P9 por 100 Euros (~$112) menos.

A maior parte das críticas se devem ao adware generosamente pré-carregado, o módulo GPS relativamente lento, e ao afogamento do SoC durante uso intenso prolongado. Além disso, o microfone é medíocre, e a tela tem uma forte tonalidade azul.

Em total, o Honor 8 deixou uma impressão muito positiva, e não deve temer nenhum a aparelho de comparação da gama média-alta. Os usuários que nem sempre desejam ter as últimas tecnologias em seus smartphones definitivamente deveriam dar uma chance ao Honor 8.

Honor 8 - 09/28/2016 v5.1 (old)
Florian Wimmer

Acabamento
91%
Teclado
69 / 75 → 92%
Mouse
95%
Conectividade
52 / 60 → 86%
Peso
92%
Bateria
90%
Pantalha
85%
Desempenho do jogos
47 / 63 → 75%
Desempenho da aplicação
59 / 70 → 84%
Temperatura
85%
Ruído
100%
Audio
62 / 91 → 68%
Camera
73%
Médio
77%
87%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Honor 8
Florian Wimmer, 2016-10-15 (Update: 2016-10-29)