Breve Análise do Smartphone Honor 8 Pro
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
Size Comparisons
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
Huawei P10 | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
OnePlus 3T | |
HTC U Play | |
Honor 8 Pro | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
Huawei P10 | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
OnePlus 3T | |
HTC U Play | |
Honor 8 Pro |
|
iluminação: 91 %
iluminação com acumulador: 541 cd/m²
Contraste: 1803:1 (Preto: 0.3 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.27
Honor 8 Pro IPS, 2560x1440, 5.7" | Huawei P10 LTPS, 1920x1080, 5.1" | Huawei P9 Plus AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5" | HTC U Play Super LCD, 1920x1080, 5.2" | HTC 10 Super LCD 5, 2560x1440, 5.2" | Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Super AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.5" | Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus Super AMOLED, 2960x1440, 6.2" | OnePlus 3T Optic-AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5" | Lenovo Moto Z AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.5" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | -19% | -34% | -20% | -6% | 30% | 29% | -59% | 13% | |
Brightness middle | 541 | 547 1% | 361 -33% | 424 -22% | 445 -18% | 554 2% | 560 4% | 421 -22% | 485 -10% |
Brightness | 514 | 556 8% | 366 -29% | 432 -16% | 434 -16% | 552 7% | 562 9% | 430 -16% | 490 -5% |
Brightness Distribution | 91 | 86 -5% | 87 -4% | 90 -1% | 93 2% | 96 5% | 93 2% | 84 -8% | 92 1% |
Black Level * | 0.3 | 0.43 -43% | 0.25 17% | 0.36 -20% | |||||
Contrast | 1803 | 1272 -29% | 1696 -6% | 1236 -31% | |||||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.2 | 4.8 -50% | 5.1 -59% | 5.7 -78% | 2.8 12% | 1.59 50% | 1.7 47% | 7.1 -122% | 2.1 34% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.2 | 8.8 -22% | 10 -39% | 10.8 -50% | 5.8 19% | 2.56 64% | 3.4 53% | 15.3 -113% | 5.5 24% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4 | 4.5 -13% | 5.5 -38% | 4.1 -3% | 3.7 7% | 2.01 50% | 1.6 60% | 6.8 -70% | 2.6 35% |
Gamma | 2.27 97% | 2.39 92% | 2.24 98% | 2.32 95% | 2.31 95% | 2.01 109% | 2.13 103% | 2.23 99% | 2.23 99% |
CCT | 7120 91% | 7194 90% | 7388 88% | 7359 88% | 7164 91% | 6321 103% | 6435 101% | 7866 83% | 6843 95% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 82.12 | 81.57 | 88.14 | ||||||
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 99.98 | 99.87 | 100 |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 10 ms rise | |
↘ 14 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 50 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
52.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 30.8 ms rise | |
↘ 22 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 88 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
Honor 8 Pro | |
Huawei P10 | |
Huawei P9 Plus | |
HTC U Play | |
HTC 10 | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
OnePlus 3T | |
Lenovo Moto Z |
Geekbench 4.0 | |
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
Huawei P10 | |
HTC U Play | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
OnePlus 3T | |
Lenovo Moto Z | |
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
Huawei P10 | |
HTC U Play | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
OnePlus 3T | |
Lenovo Moto Z |
Geekbench 4.4 | |
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
Honor 8 Pro | |
Huawei P10 | |
HTC 10 | |
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
Honor 8 Pro | |
Huawei P10 | |
HTC 10 | |
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value) | |
Honor 8 Pro | |
Huawei P10 | |
Huawei P9 Plus | |
HTC U Play | |
HTC 10 | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
OnePlus 3T | |
Lenovo Moto Z | |
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Honor 8 Pro | |
Huawei P10 | |
Huawei P9 Plus | |
HTC U Play | |
HTC 10 | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
OnePlus 3T | |
Lenovo Moto Z |
GFXBench 3.0 | |
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
Honor 8 Pro | |
Huawei P10 | |
Huawei P9 Plus | |
HTC U Play | |
HTC 10 | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
OnePlus 3T | |
Lenovo Moto Z | |
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Honor 8 Pro | |
Huawei P10 | |
Huawei P9 Plus | |
HTC U Play | |
HTC 10 | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
OnePlus 3T | |
Lenovo Moto Z |
GFXBench 3.1 | |
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
Honor 8 Pro | |
Huawei P10 | |
Huawei P9 Plus | |
HTC U Play | |
HTC 10 | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
OnePlus 3T | |
Lenovo Moto Z | |
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Honor 8 Pro | |
Huawei P10 | |
Huawei P9 Plus | |
HTC U Play | |
HTC 10 | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
OnePlus 3T | |
Lenovo Moto Z |
GFXBench | |
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Honor 8 Pro | |
Huawei P10 | |
Huawei P9 Plus | |
HTC U Play | |
HTC 10 | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
OnePlus 3T | |
Lenovo Moto Z | |
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value) | |
Honor 8 Pro | |
Huawei P10 | |
Huawei P9 Plus | |
HTC U Play | |
HTC 10 | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
OnePlus 3T | |
Lenovo Moto Z |
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value) | |
Honor 8 Pro | |
Huawei P10 | |
Huawei P9 Plus | |
HTC U Play | |
HTC 10 | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
OnePlus 3T | |
Lenovo Moto Z |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
Huawei P9 Plus | |
Huawei P10 | |
Honor 8 Pro | |
OnePlus 3T | |
HTC 10 | |
Lenovo Moto Z | |
HTC U Play |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
HTC U Play | |
Honor 8 Pro | |
Lenovo Moto Z | |
HTC 10 | |
Huawei P10 | |
Huawei P9 Plus | |
OnePlus 3T | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus |
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
Huawei P9 Plus | |
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
Honor 8 Pro | |
Huawei P10 | |
OnePlus 3T | |
HTC 10 | |
Lenovo Moto Z | |
HTC U Play |
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
Honor 8 Pro | |
Huawei P10 | |
OnePlus 3T | |
Huawei P9 Plus | |
Lenovo Moto Z | |
HTC 10 |
* ... smaller is better
Honor 8 Pro Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | Huawei P10 Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | Huawei P9 Plus Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 64 GB eMMC Flash | HTC U Play Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 32 GB eMMC Flash | HTC 10 Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash | Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash | Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus Mali-G71 MP20, Exynos 8895, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | OnePlus 3T Adreno 530, SD 821, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash | Lenovo Moto Z Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | 0% | -39% | -51% | -19% | -16% | 1% | -33% | -7% | |
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 32.16 | 32.19 0% | 24.95 -22% | 23.6 -27% | 65.4 103% | 50.4 57% | 57.2 78% | 45.64 42% | |
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 54.2 | 54.2 0% | 62.5 15% | 36.8 -32% | 83.3 54% | 76.4 41% | 71.1 31% | 78.5 45% | |
Random Write 4KB | 151.6 | 152.3 0% | 51.2 -66% | 52.7 -65% | 15.89 -90% | 15.79 -90% | 15.27 -90% | 74.4 -51% | 74.9 -51% |
Random Read 4KB | 166.4 | 168.4 1% | 39.33 -76% | 32 -81% | 29.92 -82% | 86.7 -48% | 127.2 -24% | 123.6 -26% | 117.2 -30% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 187.1 | 189.8 1% | 140.4 -25% | 135.5 -28% | 115.6 -38% | 145.1 -22% | 194.2 4% | 165.3 -12% | 168.3 -10% |
Sequential Read 256KB | 738 | 738 0% | 284.3 -61% | 197.3 -73% | 275.1 -63% | 487.3 -34% | 788 7% | 436.4 -41% | 439.7 -40% |
Dead Trigger 2 | |||
Configurações | Valor | ||
high | 30 fps |
Asphalt 8: Airborne | |||
Configurações | Valor | ||
high | 29 fps | ||
very low | 29 fps |
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.8 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.2 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.3 °C / 92 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Honor 8 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.4% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 49% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 67% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Huawei P10 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 49% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 67% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
OnePlus 3T audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 33% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 53% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
desligado | 0.02 / 0.24 Watt |
Ocioso | 0.98 / 2.27 / 2.36 Watt |
Carga |
6.58 / 10.12 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Honor 8 Pro 4000 mAh | Huawei P10 3200 mAh | Huawei P9 Plus 3400 mAh | HTC U Play 2500 mAh | HTC 10 3000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge 3600 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus 3500 mAh | OnePlus 3T 3400 mAh | Lenovo Moto Z 2600 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 8% | 35% | 23% | 15% | 33% | 42% | 15% | 40% | |
Idle Minimum * | 0.98 | 0.83 15% | 0.87 11% | 0.92 6% | 0.68 31% | 0.63 36% | 0.68 31% | 0.61 38% | 0.66 33% |
Idle Average * | 2.27 | 2.1 7% | 1.2 47% | 1.84 19% | 1.49 34% | 1.1 52% | 1.13 50% | 1.77 22% | 1.01 56% |
Idle Maximum * | 2.36 | 2.18 8% | 1.27 46% | 2 15% | 1.91 19% | 1.56 34% | 1.16 51% | 1.81 23% | 1.09 54% |
Load Average * | 6.58 | 6.57 -0% | 4.69 29% | 4.3 35% | 7.4 -12% | 5.95 10% | 4.69 29% | 6.67 -1% | 3.97 40% |
Load Maximum * | 10.12 | 9.32 8% | 5.63 44% | 6.2 39% | 9.71 4% | 6.7 34% | 5.24 48% | 10.98 -8% | 8.34 18% |
* ... smaller is better
Honor 8 Pro 4000 mAh | Huawei Mate 9 4000 mAh | Huawei P10 3200 mAh | Huawei P9 Plus 3400 mAh | HTC U Play 2500 mAh | HTC 10 3000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus 3500 mAh | OnePlus 3T 3400 mAh | Lenovo Moto Z 2600 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 26% | 16% | 14% | -6% | -7% | 26% | 16% | 14% | |
Reader / Idle | 1378 | 1538 12% | 1540 12% | 1446 5% | 1302 -6% | 1273 -8% | 1565 14% | 1423 3% | 1371 -1% |
H.264 | 675 | 947 40% | 582 -14% | 776 15% | 514 -24% | 648 -4% | 742 10% | 810 20% | 724 7% |
WiFi v1.3 | 573 | 758 32% | 966 69% | 530 -8% | 473 -17% | 413 -28% | 736 28% | 494 -14% | 407 -29% |
Load | 181 | 219 21% | 176 -3% | 263 45% | 223 23% | 203 12% | 275 52% | 282 56% | 320 77% |
Pro
Contra
O Honor 8 Pro é um smartphone de gama alta bem construído com excelente desempenho do sistema e com visual de sucesso. Comparado com aparelhos atuais e alguns dos aparelhos de gama alta do ano passado, temos que nos conformar com menos em muitas áreas, apesar de sua ampla memória de trabalho de 6 GB.
No Honor 8 Pro, (ainda) não vemos a excelente razão preço-desempenho pela qual os aparelhos Honor são conhecidos. Os smartphones de gama alta do ano passado (como o Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge) algumas vezes oferecem um melhor pacote geral por menos dinheiro, considerando que esses aparelhos já passaram pela maior queda de seus preços.
Recursos como Bluetooth 4.2 em vez de 5.0, a unidade gráfica comparativamente "fraca", uma câmera frontal sem autofoco, e o padrão USB-2.0 diferencia o Honor 8 Pro dos atuais smartphones carros chefe de outros fabricantes. Além disso, a bateria não pode ser carregada sem fio, e o aparelho não é certificado de acordo com o padrão IP e, portanto, não é protegido contra a poeira e água. As bordas da carcaça são um pouco grandes e o formato da tela com a frente é relativamente ineficiente, pelo menos para um aparelho do ano 2017.
Em resumo, o Honor 8 Pro é um smartphone muito bem sucedido e uma alternativa recomendável aos aparelhos Huawei P10. No entanto, em nossa opinião, não é um ataque nos melhores smartphones carros chefe de 2017.
Sem importar isso, a política da Huawei de remover componentes deixa um mal sabor – se todos os compradores do Honor-8-Pro sentirão o prazer do moderno armazenamento UFS-2.1 ainda é questionável.
Honor 8 Pro
-
05/04/2017 v6 (old)
Marcus Herbrich