Breve Análise do Smartphone Honor 7X
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro | |
| Huawei Y7 | |
| Huawei Honor 7X | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro | |
| Huawei Y7 | |
| Huawei Honor 7X | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 88 %
iluminação com acumulador: 533.2 cd/m²
Contraste: 1523:1 (Preto: 0.35 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.83 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 3.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 1.9
| Huawei Honor 7X IPS, 5.9", 2160x1080 | Honor 6X abgerundetes 2,5D-Glas, IPS, 5.5", 1920x1080 | Honor 7 IPS, 5.2", 1920x1080 | Doogee Mix AMOLED, 5.5", 1280x720 | Huawei Y7 IPS, 5.5", 1280x720 | Huawei Mate 10 Pro FullView, HDR, OLED, 6", 2160x1080 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Response Times | 16% | 86% | 6% | 86% | ||
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 47.2 ? | 41 ? 13% | 5.6 ? 88% | 59.2 ? -25% | 6.4 ? 86% | |
| Response Time Black / White * | 29.2 ? | 24 ? 18% | 4.8 ? 84% | 18.4 ? 37% | 4.4 ? 85% | |
| PWM Frequency | 62.5 | 2315 ? | 247.5 | |||
| Screen | -33% | -11% | -36% | -12% | 28% | |
| Brightness middle | 533.2 | 547 3% | 442 -17% | 358 -33% | 467 -12% | 629 18% |
| Brightness | 511 | 540 6% | 440 -14% | 354 -31% | 456 -11% | 636 24% |
| Brightness Distribution | 88 | 94 7% | 92 5% | 90 2% | 92 5% | 94 7% |
| Black Level * | 0.35 | 0.57 -63% | 0.23 34% | 0.39 -11% | ||
| Contrast | 1523 | 960 -37% | 1922 26% | 1197 -21% | ||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.83 | 5.1 -80% | 4.52 -60% | 4.9 -73% | 4.3 -52% | 1.7 40% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6.72 | 9.1 -35% | 11.8 -76% | 6.8 -1% | 3.6 46% | |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.7 | 6.2 -68% | 5.47 -48% | 3.9 -5% | 3.5 5% | 2.4 35% |
| Gamma | 1.9 116% | 2.09 105% | 2.27 97% | 2.33 94% | 2.35 94% | 2.15 102% |
| CCT | 6918 94% | 6546 99% | 7874 83% | 7260 90% | 7273 89% | 6337 103% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 99.7 | |||||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -9% /
-24% | -11% /
-11% | 25% /
-6% | -3% /
-9% | 57% /
43% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 29.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 12.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 16.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 76 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 47.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 34 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 13.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 80 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score | |
| Apple iPhone X | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro | |
| HTC U11 | |
| Huawei Nova 2 | |
| Huawei Honor 7X | |
| Honor 6X | |
| Motorola Moto G5s | |
| Honor 6A | |
| Huawei Y7 | |
| Bluboo S8 | |
| Leagoo Kiicaa Mix | |
| Huawei Y6 Pro 2017 | |
| Geekbench 4.4 | |
| Compute Metal Score 4.4 | |
| Apple iPhone X | |
| Compute RenderScript Score | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro | |
| HTC U11 | |
| Huawei Nova 2 | |
| Huawei Honor 7X | |
| Huawei Y7 | |
| Motorola Moto G5s | |
| Leagoo Kiicaa Mix | |
| Bluboo S8 | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
| Apple iPhone X | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro | |
| HTC U11 | |
| Huawei Nova 2 | |
| Huawei Honor 7X | |
| Huawei Y7 | |
| Leagoo Kiicaa Mix | |
| Honor 6A | |
| Motorola Moto G5s | |
| Huawei Y6 Pro 2017 | |
| Bluboo S8 | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
| Apple iPhone X | |
| HTC U11 | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro | |
| Huawei Nova 2 | |
| Huawei Honor 7X | |
| Huawei Y6 Pro 2017 | |
| Huawei Y7 | |
| Honor 6A | |
| Motorola Moto G5s | |
| Bluboo S8 | |
| Leagoo Kiicaa Mix | |
| GFXBench | |
| on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | |
| Apple iPhone X | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro | |
| Huawei Honor 7X | |
| 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
| Apple iPhone X | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro | |
| Huawei Honor 7X | |
| on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | |
| Apple iPhone X | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro | |
| Huawei Honor 7X | |
| 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | |
| Apple iPhone X | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro | |
| Huawei Honor 7X | |
| on screen Car Chase Onscreen | |
| Apple iPhone X | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro | |
| HTC U11 | |
| Huawei Y7 | |
| Honor 6A | |
| Huawei Nova 2 | |
| Honor 6X | |
| Huawei Honor 7X | |
| Motorola Moto G5s | |
| Leagoo Kiicaa Mix | |
| 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | |
| Apple iPhone X | |
| HTC U11 | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro | |
| Huawei Nova 2 | |
| Huawei Honor 7X | |
| Honor 6X | |
| Huawei Y7 | |
| Honor 6A | |
| Motorola Moto G5s | |
| Leagoo Kiicaa Mix | |
| PCMark for Android | |
| Work 2.0 battery life | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro | |
| HTC U11 | |
| Computer Vision score | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro | |
| HTC U11 | |
| Huawei Honor 7X | |
| Bluboo S8 | |
| Leagoo Kiicaa Mix | |
| Storage score | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro | |
| Huawei Honor 7X | |
| Bluboo S8 | |
| Leagoo Kiicaa Mix | |
| Work 2.0 performance score | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro | |
| HTC U11 | |
| Huawei Honor 7X | |
| Huawei Nova 2 | |
| Huawei Y7 | |
| Honor 6A | |
| Motorola Moto G5s | |
| Huawei Y6 Pro 2017 | |
| Bluboo S8 | |
| Leagoo Kiicaa Mix | |
| Work performance score | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro | |
| HTC U11 | |
| Huawei Nova 2 | |
| Huawei Honor 7X | |
| Huawei Y7 | |
| Honor 6A | |
| Motorola Moto G5s | |
| Huawei Y6 Pro 2017 | |
| Honor 6X | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall | |
| Apple iPhone X | |
| HTC U11 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 8 | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro | |
| Huawei Honor 7X | |
| Huawei Nova 2 | |
| Honor 6X | |
| Leagoo Kiicaa Mix | |
| Honor 7 | |
| Motorola Moto G5s | |
| Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 | |
| Huawei Y7 | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Apple iPhone X | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 8 | |
| HTC U11 | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro | |
| Huawei Honor 7X | |
| Huawei Nova 2 | |
| Honor 7 | |
| Honor 6X | |
| Huawei Y7 | |
| Motorola Moto G5s | |
| Leagoo Kiicaa Mix | |
| Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Honor 7 | |
| Motorola Moto G5s | |
| Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 | |
| Leagoo Kiicaa Mix | |
| Huawei Y7 | |
| Honor 6X | |
| Huawei Nova 2 | |
| Huawei Honor 7X | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro | |
| HTC U11 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 8 | |
| Apple iPhone X | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Apple iPhone X | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 8 | |
| HTC U11 | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro | |
| Honor 7 | |
| Huawei Honor 7X | |
| Huawei Nova 2 | |
| Honor 6X | |
| Huawei Y7 | |
| Motorola Moto G5s | |
| Leagoo Kiicaa Mix | |
| Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 | |
* ... smaller is better
| SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Lenovo Miix 520-12IKB 81CG | |
| Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US | |
| Huawei Honor 7X | |
| Huawei Honor 7X 32 GB eMMC Flash | Huawei Mate 10 Pro 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | Honor 7 64 GB eMMC Flash | Honor 6X 32 GB eMMC Flash | Huawei Nova 2 64 GB eMMC Flash | Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 16 GB eMMC Flash | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | 254% | -48% | 8% | 21% | -15% | |
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 30.55 | 34.53 13% | 36.22 19% | 59.6 95% | ||
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 52.7 | 52 -1% | 68.9 31% | 70.3 33% | ||
| Random Write 4KB | 20.24 | 164.4 712% | 11.3 -44% | 45.05 123% | 25.41 26% | 9.5 -53% |
| Random Read 4KB | 81.4 | 132.3 63% | 24.92 -69% | 39.55 -51% | 69 -15% | 24 -71% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 127.9 | 208.7 63% | 87 -32% | 73.8 -42% | 192.8 51% | 51 -60% |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 265.3 | 732 176% | 140.6 -47% | 283.4 7% | 300.4 13% | 177.7 -33% |
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.9 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Huawei Honor 7X audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 11.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (11.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (34.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 83% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 92% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 6% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado |   0.27 / 0.39 Watt |
| Ocioso |  1.02 / 2.46 / 2.51 Watt |
| Carga |
4.16 / 5.87 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Huawei Honor 7X Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash, IPS, 2160x1080, 5.9" | Apple iPhone X A11 Bionic, A11 Bionic GPU, 64 GB eMMC Flash, Super AMOLED, 2436x1125, 5.8" | Huawei Mate 10 Pro Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, OLED, 2160x1080, 6" | Honor 7 Kirin 935, Mali-T628 MP4, 64 GB eMMC Flash, IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2" | Motorola Moto G5s 430, Adreno 505, 32 GB eMMC Flash, IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2" | Honor 6X Kirin 655, Mali-T830 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash, IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 3% | 16% | -35% | 17% | 19% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 1.02 | 1.03 -1% | 0.85 17% | 1.7 -67% | 0.67 34% | 0.82 20% |
| Idle Average * | 2.46 | 2.4 2% | 1.15 53% | 2.9 -18% | 1.4 43% | 2 19% |
| Idle Maximum * | 2.51 | 2.6 -4% | 1.23 51% | 3.3 -31% | 1.52 39% | 2.03 19% |
| Load Average * | 4.16 | 2.96 29% | 4.12 1% | 4.9 -18% | 4.56 -10% | 3.34 20% |
| Load Maximum * | 5.87 | 6.6 -12% | 8.42 -43% | 8.2 -40% | 7.05 -20% | 4.92 16% |
* ... smaller is better
| Huawei Honor 7X Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, Wh | Apple iPhone X A11 Bionic, A11 Bionic GPU, Wh | Huawei Mate 10 Pro Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 15.3 Wh | Honor 7 Kirin 935, Mali-T628 MP4, 12 Wh | Motorola Moto G5s 430, Adreno 505, 11.4 Wh | Honor 6X Kirin 655, Mali-T830 MP2, Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -3% | 60% | -9% | 1% | 78% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1111 | 1292 16% | 1744 57% | 888 -20% | 1233 11% | 2250 103% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 664 | 564 -15% | 818 23% | 484 -27% | 518 -22% | 957 44% |
| Load | 199 | 180 -10% | 398 100% | 241 21% | 225 13% | 375 88% |
Pro
Contra
Os smartphones Android da faixa de $200 a $250 USD são bastante comuns de fabricantes chineses como Leagoo, Xiaomi, Bluboo, Oppo e Vivo. O que torna o Honor 7X tão especial em comparação com o dilúvio de outras alternativas baratas é o forte empurrão de marketing mundial da Huawei. Ao contrário da maioria dos outros smartphones das marcas acima mencionadas, o Honor 7X é realmente compatível com redes 4G LTE nos EUA, está mais amplamente disponível sem necessidade de importação e tem o apoio financeiro do maior fabricante chinês de smartphones. Juntas, essas vantagens criam um maior nível de controle de qualidade que os donos fora da Ásia geralmente não recebem de marcas chinesas menos conhecidas. O Huawei é muito menos que uma aposta pelo pequeno investimento.
Há um valor tremendo no Honor 7X. O preço de compra baixo oferece aos usuários uma tela FHD de 5,93 polegadas com o mesmo formato de 18:9 encontrada nos últimos carros-chefe que custam quase 5 vezes mais. O leitor de digitais, os slots SIM duplos de 4G, o armazenamento expansível e o conector de áudio de 3,5 mm são recursos que, mesmo algumas alternativas mais caras, não possuem. O formato muito fino é outra surpresa, pois se parece ao caro Mate 10 Pro até as dimensões e colocação dos botões e portas. O resultado final é um smartphone que se sente mais caro do que o preço de varejo.
Alguns cantos tiveram que ser cortados, embora eles, felizmente, parecem limitados a recursos estranhos em vez de qualidade de hardware. Os proprietários não terão NFC, IR, 802.11ac, chamadas Wi-Fi, carregamento sem fio e USB Type-C enquanto alguns recursos EMUI específicos são omitidos, incluindo Hotspot e Dock de Navegação. Nessa perspectiva, a experiência dos barebones não é inesperada e provavelmente não irá dissuadir o público-alvo consciente do orçamento.
Mais decepcionantes são os tempos de resposta mais lentos da tela, a falta de carga rápida e os benefícios mínimos de desempenho bruto do Kirin 659 sobre o Kirin 655 no Honor 6X. O Ghosting é mais prevalente ao navegar e o tempo de carga de mais de 2 horas pode ser uma dor de cabeça para usuários pesados. O Honor 7X não se sente necessariamente mais lento ou mais rápido do que o seu antecessor imediato, para melhor ou pior. As câmeras de alta qualidade, um fone de ouvido mais potente e uma luz de fundo potencialmente mais brilhante completam nossa lista do que gostaríamos de ver no eventual sucessor.
O Honor 7X está sendo referido por muitos na imprensa como o melhor smartphone Android que pode se comprar com $200 e não podemos discordar. Os usuários norte-americanos, em particular, terão dificuldade para encontrar um smartphone Android tão barato com um conjunto de recursos equivalente, sem recorrer a importações. Esperamos que as futuras iterações abordem o perceptível ghosting e a carga lenta, sem necessidade de mover o preço além do necessário.
Huawei Honor 7X
- 01/09/2018 v6 (old)
Allen Ngo, Daniel Schmidt
Price comparison
