Breve Análise do Smartphone Honor 7A
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Sony Xperia L1 | |
| Umidigi A1 Pro | |
| Huawei Y6 2018 | |
| Lenovo Moto E4 Plus | |
| Honor 7A | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Sony Xperia L1 | |
| Umidigi A1 Pro | |
| Huawei Y6 2018 | |
| Honor 7A | |
| Lenovo Moto E4 Plus | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 88 %
iluminação com acumulador: 417 cd/m²
Contraste: 2317:1 (Preto: 0.18 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.46 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 5.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
89.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.423
| Honor 7A IPS, 1440x720, 5.7" | Huawei Y6 2018 IPS, 1440x720, 5.7" | Umidigi A1 Pro IPS, 1440x720, 5.5" | Lenovo Moto E4 Plus IPS, 1280x720, 5.5" | Sony Xperia L1 IPS, 1280x720, 5.5" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -17% | -2% | -9% | -19% | |
| Brightness middle | 417 | 483 16% | 594 42% | 425 2% | 479 15% |
| Brightness | 395 | 460 16% | 570 44% | 425 8% | 478 21% |
| Brightness Distribution | 88 | 88 0% | 86 -2% | 93 6% | 94 7% |
| Black Level * | 0.18 | 0.4 -122% | 0.22 -22% | 0.37 -106% | 0.58 -222% |
| Contrast | 2317 | 1208 -48% | 2700 17% | 1149 -50% | 826 -64% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 6.46 | 5.8 10% | 6.63 -3% | 4.7 27% | 4.5 30% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 10.72 | 12.6 -18% | 13.99 -31% | 8.3 23% | 7.5 30% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.8 | 5 14% | 9.2 -59% | 4.6 21% | 4.1 29% |
| Gamma | 2.423 91% | 2.6 85% | 2.24 98% | 2.17 101% | 2.03 108% |
| CCT | 7839 83% | 7709 84% | 8663 75% | 7445 87% | 7139 91% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 4.42 |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected | ≤ 25 % brightness setting |  | |
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 13 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 11 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 50 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 55 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 32 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 23 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 91 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Honor 7A | |
| Huawei Y6 2018 | |
| Umidigi A1 Pro | |
| Lenovo Moto E4 Plus | |
| Sony Xperia L1 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (42798 - 47066, n=16) | |
| AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Honor 7A | |
| Huawei Y6 2018 | |
| Umidigi A1 Pro | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (44992 - 59990, n=11) | |
| PCMark for Android | |
| Work performance score (sort by value) | |
| Honor 7A | |
| Huawei Y6 2018 | |
| Umidigi A1 Pro | |
| Lenovo Moto E4 Plus | |
| Sony Xperia L1 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (3347 - 5290, n=18) | |
| Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value) | |
| Honor 7A | |
| Huawei Y6 2018 | |
| Umidigi A1 Pro | |
| Lenovo Moto E4 Plus | |
| Sony Xperia L1 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (3408 - 3892, n=16) | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Honor 7A | |
| Huawei Y6 2018 | |
| Umidigi A1 Pro | |
| Lenovo Moto E4 Plus | |
| Sony Xperia L1 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (4.3 - 11, n=17) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 158, n=169, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Honor 7A | |
| Huawei Y6 2018 | |
| Umidigi A1 Pro | |
| Lenovo Moto E4 Plus | |
| Sony Xperia L1 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (2.2 - 4.9, n=17) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (8.3 - 341, n=169, last 2 years) | |
| GFXBench | |
| on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Honor 7A | |
| Huawei Y6 2018 | |
| Umidigi A1 Pro | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (2.4 - 5.9, n=17) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (5 - 119, n=170, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Honor 7A | |
| Huawei Y6 2018 | |
| Umidigi A1 Pro | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (2.4 - 2.7, n=17) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (3.1 - 216, n=169, last 2 years) | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (17.6 - 21.5, n=16) | |
| Huawei Y6 2018 (Chrome 66) | |
| Honor 7A (Chrome 67) | |
| Umidigi A1 Pro (Chrome 66) | |
| Sony Xperia L1 (Chrome 59) | |
| Lenovo Moto E4 Plus (Chrome 60) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=203, last 2 years) | |
| Honor 7A (Chrome 67) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (2604 - 3438, n=18) | |
| Umidigi A1 Pro (Chrome 66) | |
| Sony Xperia L1 (Chrome 59) | |
| Huawei Y6 2018 (Chrome 66) | |
| Lenovo Moto E4 Plus (Chrome 60) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Lenovo Moto E4 Plus (Chrome 60) | |
| Huawei Y6 2018 (Chrome 66) | |
| Umidigi A1 Pro (Chrome 66) | |
| Honor 7A (Chrome 67) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (10396 - 14709, n=18) | |
| Sony Xperia L1 (Chrome 59) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=160, last 2 years) | |
* ... smaller is better
| Honor 7A | Huawei Y6 2018 | Umidigi A1 Pro | Lenovo Moto E4 Plus | Sony Xperia L1 | Average 16 GB eMMC Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -3% | -11% | 8% | -49% | -34% | 1571% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 254.8 | 254.3 0% | 269.2 6% | 194.4 -24% | 181.9 -29% | 164.5 ? -35% | 1839 ? 622% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 72.5 | 65.6 -10% | 44.4 -39% | 42 -42% | 40.2 -45% | 43 ? -41% | 1425 ? 1866% |
| Random Read 4KB | 39.2 | 38.8 -1% | 29.6 -24% | 19.15 -51% | 13.6 -65% | 21.7 ? -45% | 277 ? 607% |
| Random Write 4KB | 9.4 | 9 -4% | 10.2 9% | 29.4 213% | 5.9 -37% | 8.08 ? -14% | 309 ? 3187% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 84.9 ? | 84.9 ? 0% | 81 ? -5% | 66.3 -22% | 37.81 ? -55% | 59.1 ? -30% | |
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 65.4 ? | 64 ? -2% | 58.8 ? -10% | 46.6 -29% | 26.25 ? -60% | 39.8 ? -39% |
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.9 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.3 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.8 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Honor 7A audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 58.8% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 58.8% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 58.8% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (113.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 86% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 12% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 96% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 4% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Huawei Y6 2018 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 10.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 68% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 81% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 15% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado |   0.03 / 0.05 Watt |
| Ocioso |  1.3 / 1.6 / 2.9 Watt |
| Carga |
3.7 / 6.4 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Honor 7A 3000 mAh | Umidigi A1 Pro 3150 mAh | Huawei Y6 2018 3000 mAh | Lenovo Moto E4 Plus 5000 mAh | Sony Xperia L1 2620 mAh | Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -23% | -29% | 20% | -8% | 3% | -9% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 1.3 | 1.8 -38% | 1.7 -31% | 0.89 32% | 0.89 32% | 0.918 ? 29% | 0.894 ? 31% |
| Idle Average * | 1.6 | 2.3 -44% | 2.5 -56% | 1.87 -17% | 2.05 -28% | 2.01 ? -26% | 1.456 ? 9% |
| Idle Maximum * | 2.9 | 3.2 -10% | 3.2 -10% | 1.98 32% | 2.18 25% | 2.28 ? 21% | 1.616 ? 44% |
| Load Average * | 3.7 | 4.7 -27% | 5.2 -41% | 3.04 18% | 6.02 -63% | 3.97 ? -7% | 6.45 ? -74% |
| Load Maximum * | 6.4 | 6 6% | 6.8 -6% | 4.01 37% | 6.94 -8% | 6.46 ? -1% | 9.8 ? -53% |
* ... smaller is better
| Honor 7A 3000 mAh | Umidigi A1 Pro 3150 mAh | Huawei Y6 2018 3000 mAh | Lenovo Moto E4 Plus 5000 mAh | Sony Xperia L1 2620 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -7% | -2% | 20% | -14% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 657 | 608 -7% | 643 -2% | 788 20% | 567 -14% |
| Reader / Idle | 1329 | 1398 | |||
| H.264 | 702 | 656 | |||
| Load | 279 | 223 |
Pro
Contra
O Honor 7A não se destaca com suas características particulares (alguém realmente tem 7 amigos que possuem um Honor 7A e se encontram com eles para criar um sistema de som de smartphones?), mas sim com seus pequenos marcos da tela, o alto desempenho, a boa duração da bateria e o GPS preciso. A câmera também tira fotos aceitáveis, mesmo se estiverem bastante escuras. Assim, o Honor 7A pontua mais nas virtudes essenciais que satisfazem na vida cotidiana, do que em características que são boas para o marketing, mas raramente usadas.
O fato do Honor 7A ser bastante acessível faz com que o bom desempenho em muitas áreas seja muito mais notável. É claro que também há pontos fracos, como a tela não sendo particularmente brilhante, uma tonalidade azul perceptível de fábrica, e a carcaça de plástico que está bem, mas definitivamente não ganhará prêmio algum. Mas esses são pequenos detalhes em comparação com o bom desempenho nas disciplinas básicas.
O Honor 7A é capaz de convencer em muitas áreas: Ele oferece muito desempenho e boa duração de bateria por um preço acessível, entre outras coisas.
No geral, o Honor 7A é um smartphone acessível com uma excelente relação preço-desempenho.
Honor 7A
- 07/09/2018 v6 (old)
Florian Wimmer
Price comparison
