Breve Análise do Smartphone Honor 6A
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
Size Comparison
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Lenovo Moto G5 | |
Nokia 3 | |
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 | |
Honor 6A | |
Huawei Y6 2017 | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Lenovo Moto G5 | |
Nokia 3 | |
Honor 6A | |
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 | |
Huawei Y6 2017 |
|
iluminação: 94 %
iluminação com acumulador: 480 cd/m²
Contraste: 1116:1 (Preto: 0.43 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 3.1 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.4
Honor 6A IPS, 1280x720, 5" | Lenovo Moto G5 IPS, 1920x1080, 5" | Huawei Y6 2017 IPS, 1280x720, 5" | Nokia 3 IPS, 1280x720, 5" | Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 PLS, 1280x720, 5" | Sony Xperia XA IPS, 1280x720, 5" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | 21% | 27% | -23% | 11% | -34% | |
Brightness middle | 480 | 660 38% | 438 -9% | 481 0% | 502 5% | 518 8% |
Brightness | 462 | 625 35% | 432 -6% | 469 2% | 494 7% | 475 3% |
Brightness Distribution | 94 | 92 -2% | 90 -4% | 84 -11% | 89 -5% | 81 -14% |
Black Level * | 0.43 | 0.29 33% | 0.13 70% | 0.22 49% | 0.35 19% | 0.61 -42% |
Contrast | 1116 | 2276 104% | 3369 202% | 2186 96% | 1434 28% | 849 -24% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.2 | 4.9 6% | 4.8 8% | 8.1 -56% | 4.6 12% | 6.8 -31% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 8 | 7.6 5% | 11.4 -43% | 15.4 -93% | 8 -0% | 11.4 -43% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.1 | 4.8 -55% | 3.2 -3% | 8.5 -174% | 2.5 19% | 7 -126% |
Gamma | 2.4 92% | 2.18 101% | 2.23 99% | 2.16 102% | 2.29 96% | 2.35 94% |
CCT | 6688 97% | 7357 88% | 7090 92% | 9014 72% | 6351 102% | 8151 80% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 2232 Hz | ≤ 20 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 2232 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 20 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 2232 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
21.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 9.2 ms rise | |
↘ 12 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 43 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
36.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 19.6 ms rise | |
↘ 17.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 49 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
Honor 6A | |
Lenovo Moto G5 | |
Huawei Y6 2017 | |
Nokia 3 | |
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 | |
Sony Xperia XA |
PCMark for Android | |
Work performance score (sort by value) | |
Honor 6A | |
Lenovo Moto G5 | |
Huawei Y6 2017 | |
Nokia 3 | |
Sony Xperia XA | |
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value) | |
Honor 6A | |
Lenovo Moto G5 | |
Huawei Y6 2017 | |
Nokia 3 | |
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 |
Geekbench 4.4 | |
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
Honor 6A | |
Lenovo Moto G5 | |
Huawei Y6 2017 | |
Nokia 3 | |
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 | |
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
Honor 6A | |
Lenovo Moto G5 | |
Huawei Y6 2017 | |
Nokia 3 | |
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 | |
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value) | |
Lenovo Moto G5 | |
Huawei Y6 2017 | |
Nokia 3 | |
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value) | |
Honor 6A | |
Lenovo Moto G5 | |
Huawei Y6 2017 | |
Nokia 3 | |
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 | |
Sony Xperia XA | |
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Honor 6A | |
Lenovo Moto G5 | |
Huawei Y6 2017 | |
Nokia 3 | |
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 | |
Sony Xperia XA |
GFXBench 3.0 | |
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
Honor 6A | |
Lenovo Moto G5 | |
Huawei Y6 2017 | |
Nokia 3 | |
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 | |
Sony Xperia XA | |
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Honor 6A | |
Lenovo Moto G5 | |
Huawei Y6 2017 | |
Nokia 3 | |
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 | |
Sony Xperia XA |
GFXBench 3.1 | |
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
Honor 6A | |
Lenovo Moto G5 | |
Huawei Y6 2017 | |
Nokia 3 | |
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 | |
Sony Xperia XA | |
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Honor 6A | |
Lenovo Moto G5 | |
Huawei Y6 2017 | |
Nokia 3 | |
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 | |
Sony Xperia XA |
GFXBench | |
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value) | |
Honor 6A | |
Lenovo Moto G5 | |
Huawei Y6 2017 | |
Sony Xperia XA | |
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Honor 6A | |
Lenovo Moto G5 | |
Huawei Y6 2017 | |
Sony Xperia XA |
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
Sony Xperia XA (Chrome 51) | |
Honor 6A (Chrome 55.0.2883.91) | |
Lenovo Moto G5 (Chrome 57) | |
Huawei Y6 2017 (Chrome 60) | |
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 (Chrome 59) | |
Nokia 3 (Chrome 59) |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Sony Xperia XA (Chrome 51) | |
Honor 6A (Chrome 55.0.2883.91) | |
Huawei Y6 2017 (Chrome 60) | |
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 (Chrome 59) | |
Lenovo Moto G5 (Chrome 57) | |
Nokia 3 (Chrome 59) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
Nokia 3 (Chrome 59) | |
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 (Chrome 59) | |
Huawei Y6 2017 (Chrome 60) | |
Lenovo Moto G5 (Chrome 57) | |
Honor 6A (Chrome 55.0.2883.91) | |
Sony Xperia XA (Chrome 51) |
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall | |
Sony Xperia XA (Chrome 51) | |
Huawei Y6 2017 (Chrome 60) | |
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 (Chrome 59) | |
Lenovo Moto G5 (Chrome 57) | |
Nokia 3 (Chrome 59) | |
Honor 6A (Chrome 55.0.2883.91) |
* ... smaller is better
Honor 6A | Lenovo Moto G5 | Huawei Y6 2017 | Nokia 3 | Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 | Sony Xperia XA | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | 78% | 19% | -18% | -2% | 11% | |
Sequential Read 256KB | 123.6 | 230.6 87% | 202.6 64% | 181 46% | 177.7 44% | 240.4 94% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 64.1 | 45.6 -29% | 66.9 4% | 34 -47% | 51 -20% | 68.6 7% |
Random Read 4KB | 50.2 | 37.6 -25% | 25.93 -48% | 17.7 -65% | 24 -52% | 22.05 -56% |
Random Write 4KB | 6.94 | 37.9 446% | 20.54 196% | 5.5 -21% | 9.5 37% | 10.6 53% |
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 83.9 ? | 78.5 ? -6% | 48.4 -42% | 64.3 -23% | 70.3 -16% | 72.9 ? -13% |
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 63.1 ? | 58 ? -8% | 26.4 -58% | 62.9 0% | 59.6 -6% | 50.7 ? -20% |
Dead Trigger 2 | |||
Configurações | Valor | ||
high | 52 fps |
Asphalt 8: Airborne | |||
Configurações | Valor | ||
high | 30 fps | ||
very low | 30 fps |
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.1 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38.6 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 34.5 °C / 94 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Honor 6A audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 35.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 61% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 77% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 19% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Nokia 3 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 39.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (29% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 73% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 85% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 12% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 49% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 67% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
desligado | 0.01 / 0.16 Watt |
Ocioso | 1.33 / 2.53 / 2.54 Watt |
Carga |
3.84 / 6.12 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Honor 6A 3020 mAh | Lenovo Moto G5 2800 mAh | Nokia 3 2630 mAh | Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 2400 mAh | Sony Xperia XA 2300 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 25% | 39% | 26% | 27% | |
Idle Minimum * | 1.33 | 0.73 45% | 0.67 50% | 0.82 38% | 0.72 46% |
Idle Average * | 2.53 | 1.64 35% | 1.35 47% | 1.94 23% | 1.5 41% |
Idle Maximum * | 2.54 | 1.68 34% | 1.39 45% | 2.06 19% | 1.57 38% |
Load Average * | 3.84 | 3.46 10% | 3.1 19% | 3.31 14% | 3.48 9% |
Load Maximum * | 6.12 | 6.13 -0% | 4.02 34% | 3.89 36% | 6.04 1% |
* ... smaller is better
Honor 6A 3020 mAh | Lenovo Moto G5 2800 mAh | Huawei Y6 2017 3000 mAh | Nokia 3 2630 mAh | Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 2400 mAh | Sony Xperia XA 2300 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -28% | -11% | -21% | -6% | -49% | |
Reader / Idle | 2010 | 1243 -38% | 1522 -24% | 1258 -37% | 1425 -29% | 775 -61% |
H.264 | 732 | 616 -16% | 693 -5% | 628 -14% | 819 12% | 460 -37% |
WiFi v1.3 | 790 | 561 -29% | 654 -17% | 552 -30% | 722 -9% | 353 -55% |
Load | 295 | 207 -30% | 302 2% | 283 -4% | 305 3% | 170 -42% |
Pro
Contra
Com o 6A, a linha Honor conseguiu manter o seu ideal de produzir smartphones que são de bom valor pelo seu dinheiro. O Android de 5 polegadas, disponível por $200 e menos, tem muito a oferecer: uma carcaça bem construída, feita de plástico e metal, uma tela HD brilhante e bem ajustada, longos tempos de duração da bateria e desempenho rápido do sistema.
Embora o Honor 6A seja "apenas" um aparelho acessível de nível de entrada, oferece um desempenho comparativamente alto e muitos recursos.
O Honor, no entanto, economizou no armazenamento disponível, e apenas a metade dos 16 GB originais de armazenamento está efetivamente disponível para o usuário. A câmera de 13 MP também não é particularmente excitante e você tem que aceitar uma qualidade de imagem medíocre. O Honor também poderia trabalhar em suas correções de segurança do Android, já que tinham mais de 3 meses no momento do teste.
Honor 6A
- 09/11/2017 v6 (old)
Manuel Masiero