Breve Análise do Smartphone Honor 5C

Name: Honor 5C
Brand: Honor

É uma honra. Um excelente tela e boa câmera em uma carcaça de metal – com um preço de menos de 200 Euros (~$223), o Honor 5C deixa uma excelente impressão. Esta análise revela se o smartphone de 5,2-polegadas é tão bom quanto parece.

Florian Wimmer, ✓ Stefanie Voigt (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 07/19/2016 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android ARM Smartphone Touchscreen

Test device courtesy of Honor Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Honor 5C (5 Serie)

Processador

HiSilicon Kirin 650 8 x 2 GHz, Cortex-A53

Placa gráfica

ARM Mali-T830 MP2

Memória

2048 MB

Pantalha

5.20 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 424 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, IPS, Brilhante: sim

Disco rígido

16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB

, 10.46 GB livre

Conexões

1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Conector combinado de áudio de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: micro-SD máx 128 GB (no segundo slot SIM), NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: accelerometer, proximity sensor, compass, WiFi Direct

Funcionamento em rede

802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 4.1 LE, GSM (850/900/1800/1900), UMTS (900/2100), LTE (B1/B3/B7/B8/B20); velocidade máxima 150 GBit/s (download), 50 GBit/s (upload); SAR rate: 1.12 W/kg (head), 0.42 W/kg (body), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 8.3 x 147.1 x 73.8

Bateria

11.4 Wh, 3000 mAh Lítio-Ion

Sistema Operativo

Android 6.0 Marshmallow

Camera

Primary Camera: 13 MPix f/2.0, AF, LED flash, videos @1080p/30fps
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix f/2.0

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: speaker on lower edge, Teclado: Teclado virtual, HiCare, Health, phone manager, bússola, gerenciador de arquivos, 24 Meses Garantia, Rádio FM, fanless

peso

156 g, Suprimento de energia: 47 g

Preço

199 Euro

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

	Honor 5C Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 650, 16 GB eMMC Flash	Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	Huawei P9 Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Networking		453%	326%
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m	49.8	303 508%	249 400%
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m	58.3	290 397%	205 252%

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

Honor 5C

Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge

Apple iPhone 6S Plus

Canon EOS 70D

click to load images

Honor 5C

Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge

Apple iPhone 6S Plus

Canon EOS 70D

click to load images

Honor 5C

Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge

Apple iPhone 6S Plus

Canon EOS 70D


509 cd/m²	497 cd/m²	481 cd/m²
491 cd/m²	515 cd/m²	505 cd/m²
492 cd/m²	497 cd/m²	499 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 515 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 498.4 cd/m² Minimum: 5.75 cd/m²
iluminação: 93 %
iluminação com acumulador: 515 cd/m²
Contraste: 1051:1 (Preto: 0.49 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 7.4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.28

	Honor 5C IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2"	HTC Desire 530 IPS, 1280x720, 5"	LG X Screen IPS, 1280x720, 5"	Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 AMOLED, 1280x720, 5.2"	OnePlus X Active Matrix OLED, 1920x1080, 5"	Huawei P9 Lite IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2"	Honor 5X IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5"
Screen		7%	-5%	6%	-18%	2%	13%
Brightness middle	515	375 -27%	392 -24%	289 -44%	312 -39%	505 -2%	535 4%
Brightness	498	376 -24%	376 -24%	291 -42%	314 -37%	468 -6%	521 5%
Brightness Distribution	93	91 -2%	90 -3%	96 3%	91 -2%	88 -5%	85 -9%
Black Level *	0.49	0.32 35%	0.27 45%			0.74 -51%	0.43 12%
Contrast	1051	1172 12%	1452 38%			682 -35%	1244 18%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	6.2	6 3%	7.5 -21%	4.7 24%	6.28 -1%	4.1 34%	4.88 21%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	11.4	9.5 17%	13.1 -15%	7.3 36%		5.8 49%	8.66 24%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	7.4	4.5 39%	9.9 -34%	3 59%	8.24 -11%	4.9 34%	5.2 30%
Gamma	2.28 ^96%	2.26 ^97%	2.07 ^106%	2.03 ^108%	2.12 ^104%	2.5 ^88%	2.26 ^97%
CCT	8664 ^75%	6975 ^93%	9704 ^67%	6291 ^103%	8145 ^80%	7116 ^91%	7766 ^84%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
23 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 10.8 ms rise
23 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 11.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 47 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
28.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 12.4 ms rise
28.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 16 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 34 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Honor 5C	53143 Points
OnePlus X	52463 Points -1%
HTC Desire 530	23561 Points -56%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	27232 Points -49%
LG X Screen	22955 Points -57%
Huawei P9 Lite	50366 Points -5%
Honor 5X	37152 Points -30%

Geekbench 3
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Honor 5C	906 Points
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	473 Points -48%
LG X Screen	473 Points -48%
Huawei P9 Lite	883 Points -3%
Honor 5X	698 Points -23%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Honor 5C	3914 Points
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	1425 Points -64%
LG X Screen	1436 Points -63%
Huawei P9 Lite	3768 Points -4%
Honor 5X	3047 Points -22%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Honor 5C	11755 Points
OnePlus X	15051 Points +28%
HTC Desire 530	4261 Points -64%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	4400 Points -63%
LG X Screen	4352 Points -63%
Huawei P9 Lite	11769 Points 0%
Honor 5X	7852 Points -33%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Honor 5C	11319 Points
OnePlus X	14541 Points +28%
HTC Desire 530	3871 Points -66%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	3838 Points -66%
LG X Screen	3791 Points -67%
Huawei P9 Lite	11318 Points 0%
Honor 5X	7764 Points -31%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Honor 5C	13588 Points
OnePlus X	17156 Points +26%
HTC Desire 530	6583 Points -52%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	9022 Points -34%
LG X Screen	9033 Points -34%
Huawei P9 Lite	13676 Points +1%
Honor 5X	8174 Points -40%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Honor 5C	563 Points
OnePlus X	710 Points +26%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	53 Points -91%
LG X Screen	53 Points -91%
Huawei P9 Lite	554 Points -2%
Honor 5X	129 Points -77%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Honor 5C	480 Points
OnePlus X	643 Points +34%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	42 Points -91%
LG X Screen	42 Points -91%
Huawei P9 Lite	473 Points -1%
Honor 5X	103 Points -79%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Honor 5C	1418 Points
OnePlus X	1117 Points -21%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	709 Points -50%
LG X Screen	716 Points -50%
Huawei P9 Lite	1373 Points -3%
Honor 5X	1089 Points -23%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Honor 5C	383 Points
Huawei P9 Lite	369 Points -4%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Honor 5C	317 Points
Huawei P9 Lite	305 Points -4%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Honor 5C	1418 Points
Huawei P9 Lite	1370 Points -3%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Honor 5C	367 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Honor 5C	303 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Honor 5C	1440 Points

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Honor 5C	20 fps
OnePlus X	23 fps +15%
HTC Desire 530	8.9 fps -55%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	9.7 fps -51%
LG X Screen	9.6 fps -52%
Huawei P9 Lite	19 fps -5%
Honor 5X	14 fps -30%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Honor 5C	19 fps
OnePlus X	21 fps +11%
HTC Desire 530	4.8 fps -75%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	5.2 fps -73%
LG X Screen	5.1 fps -73%
Huawei P9 Lite	19 fps 0%
Honor 5X	14 fps -26%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Honor 5C	8.4 fps
OnePlus X	10 fps +19%
HTC Desire 530	4 fps -52%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	3.8 fps -55%
LG X Screen	4 fps -52%
Huawei P9 Lite	8.4 fps 0%
Honor 5X	5.9 fps -30%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Honor 5C	7.9 fps
OnePlus X	8.6 fps +9%
HTC Desire 530	1.7 fps -78%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	1.8 fps -77%
LG X Screen	1.8 fps -77%
Huawei P9 Lite	7.8 fps -1%
Honor 5X	5.4 fps -32%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Honor 5C	4.9 fps
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	fps -100%
Huawei P9 Lite	4.9 fps 0%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Honor 5C	4.5 fps
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	fps -100%
Huawei P9 Lite	4.5 fps 0%

PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
Honor 5C	5120 Points
OnePlus X	4450 Points -13%
HTC Desire 530	2922 Points -43%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	4126 Points -19%
LG X Screen	4031 Points -21%
Huawei P9 Lite	5339 Points +4%
Honor 5X	3794 Points -26%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Honor 5C	1225 Points
OnePlus X	1252 Points +2%
HTC Desire 530	149 Points -88%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	585 Points -52%
LG X Screen	521 Points -57%
Huawei P9 Lite	1197 Points -2%
Honor 5X	297 Points -76%
System (sort by value)
Honor 5C	2600 Points
OnePlus X	2225 Points -14%
HTC Desire 530	742 Points -71%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	1060 Points -59%
LG X Screen	1011 Points -61%
Huawei P9 Lite	2438 Points -6%
Honor 5X	1378 Points -47%
Memory (sort by value)
Honor 5C	1504 Points
OnePlus X	662 Points -56%
HTC Desire 530	300 Points -80%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	643 Points -57%
LG X Screen	491 Points -67%
Huawei P9 Lite	1346 Points -11%
Honor 5X	787 Points -48%
Graphics (sort by value)
Honor 5C	814 Points
OnePlus X	1975 Points +143%
HTC Desire 530	231 Points -72%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	312 Points -62%
LG X Screen	302 Points -63%
Huawei P9 Lite	818 Points 0%
Honor 5X	763 Points -6%
Web (sort by value)
Honor 5C	707 Points
OnePlus X	843 Points +19%
HTC Desire 530	10 Points -99%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	551 Points -22%
LG X Screen	491 Points -31%
Huawei P9 Lite	765 Points +8%
Honor 5X	9 Points -99%

Legend

Honor 5C HiSilicon Kirin 650, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash

OnePlus X Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AA, Qualcomm Adreno 330, 16 GB eMMC Flash

HTC Desire 530 Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909, Qualcomm Adreno 304, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 16 GB eMMC Flash

LG X Screen Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Huawei P9 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 650, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Honor 5X Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v2, Qualcomm Adreno 405, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 | Octane V2 | WebXPRT 2015 | JetStream 1.1

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value)
Honor 5C	9111 ms *
OnePlus X	7264 ms * +20%
HTC Desire 530	17471 ms * -92%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	13046 ms * -43%
LG X Screen	12880 ms * -41%
Honor 5X	12510 ms * -37%
Huawei P9 Lite	9397 ms * -3%

Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
Honor 5C	4188 Points
OnePlus X	4810 Points +15%
HTC Desire 530	1796 Points -57%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	2730 Points -35%
LG X Screen	2650 Points -37%
Honor 5X	3595 Points -14%
Huawei P9 Lite	4756 Points +14%

WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value)
Honor 5C	73 Points
OnePlus X	85 Points +16%
HTC Desire 530	34 Points -53%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	47 Points -36%
Honor 5X	65 Points -11%
Huawei P9 Lite	67 Points -8%

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Honor 5C	27.93 Points
OnePlus X	28 Points 0%
HTC Desire 530	12.1 Points -57%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	16.8 Points -40%
LG X Screen	15.67 Points -44%
Honor 5X	21.92 Points -22%
Huawei P9 Lite	29.03 Points +4%

* ... smaller is better

AndroBench 3-5
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value)
Honor 5C	263 MB/s
OnePlus X	235.5 MB/s -10%
HTC Desire 530	127 MB/s -52%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	147 MB/s -44%
LG X Screen	131 MB/s -50%
Honor 5X	144 MB/s -45%
Huawei P9 Lite	283.5 MB/s +8%
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value)
Honor 5C	75.5 MB/s
OnePlus X	49.31 MB/s -35%
HTC Desire 530	55.8 MB/s -26%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	72 MB/s -5%
LG X Screen	72 MB/s -5%
Honor 5X	78 MB/s +3%
Huawei P9 Lite	46.24 MB/s -39%
Random Read 4KB (sort by value)
Honor 5C	61.7 MB/s
OnePlus X	16.31 MB/s -74%
HTC Desire 530	11.82 MB/s -81%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	21 MB/s -66%
LG X Screen	10 MB/s -84%
Honor 5X	17 MB/s -72%
Huawei P9 Lite	38.22 MB/s -38%
Random Write 4KB (sort by value)
Honor 5C	15.7 MB/s
OnePlus X	14.22 MB/s -9%
HTC Desire 530	8.96 MB/s -43%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	11.6 MB/s -26%
LG X Screen	8 MB/s -49%
Honor 5X	10 MB/s -36%
Huawei P9 Lite	15.35 MB/s -2%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
Honor 5C	51.9 MB/s
HTC Desire 530	35.56 MB/s -31%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	79.8 MB/s +54%
LG X Screen	75.3 MB/s +45%
Huawei P9 Lite	60.8 MB/s +17%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
Honor 5C	24.21 MB/s
HTC Desire 530	18.22 MB/s -25%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	46.61 MB/s +93%
LG X Screen	46.95 MB/s +94%
Huawei P9 Lite	25.1 MB/s +4%

Asphalt 8: Airborne
	Configurações	Valor
	high	26 fps

... comparado com

Dead Trigger 2
	Configurações	Valor
	high	30 fps

... comparado com

Carga Máxima

Inatividade


38.4 °C	38.1 °C	40.9 °C
38.4 °C	38.1 °C	42.2 °C
37.3 °C	37.6 °C	40.2 °C

Máximo: 42.2 °C
Médio: 39 °C


33.8 °C	34.6 °C	35.9 °C
34.4 °C	35.2 °C	35.6 °C
34.4 °C	35.1 °C	35.5 °C

Máximo: 35.9 °C
Médio: 34.9 °C

alimentação elétrica 36.3 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.4 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.2 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35.9 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 36.1 °C / 97 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.14 / 0.27 Watt
Ocioso	0.89 / 2.07 / 2.15 Watt
Carga	3.46 / 5.18 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Gossen Metrahit Energy

	Honor 5C 3000 mAh	HTC Desire 530 2200 mAh	OnePlus X mAh	Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 3100 mAh	Huawei P9 Lite 3000 mAh	Honor 5X 3000 mAh
Power Consumption		-37%	37%	32%	0%	-15%
Idle Minimum *	0.89	1.58 -78%	0.6 33%	0.61 31%	0.73 18%	0.87 2%
Idle Average *	2.07	2.59 -25%	0.91 56%	1.41 32%	2.09 -1%	2.08 -0%
Idle Maximum *	2.15	2.66 -24%	1.12 48%	1.51 30%	2.11 2%	2.22 -3%
Load Average *	3.46	5.22 -51%	3.04 12%	2.56 26%	4.15 -20%	5.26 -52%
Load Maximum *	5.18	5.67 -9%	3.2 38%	3.1 40%	5.05 3%	6.34 -22%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		16h 37min
WiFi Websurfing		9h 44min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		10h 02min
Carga (máximo brilho)		2h 36min

	Honor 5C 3000 mAh	LG X Screen 2300 mAh	HTC Desire 530 2200 mAh	OnePlus X mAh	Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 3100 mAh	Honor 5X 3000 mAh	Huawei P9 Lite 3000 mAh
Battery Runtime		2%	5%	23%	59%	2%	28%
Reader / Idle	997	976 -2%	1117 12%	968 -3%	1599 60%	1053 6%	1404 41%
H.264	602		457 -24%	514 -15%	658 9%	602 0%	568 -6%
WiFi v1.3	584	553 -5%	425 -27%	549 -6%	643 10%	643 10%	604 3%
Load	156	177 13%	250 60%	339 117%	402 158%	144 -8%	272 74%

Pro

+ Painel Full HD excelente

+ Preço-desempenho

+ Boas fotos com boas condições de iluminação

+ Android moderno

+ NFC

+ Alto desempenho

+ Boa qualidade das chamadas

+ Boa duração da bateria

+ Dual-SIM

Contra

- Carcaça lisa

- Bateria não removível

- Ora, um segundo SIM, ora micro-SD

- Sem USB OTG

- Sem App2SD

- Frequências wireless limitadas

- Muito bloatware

- Qualidade pobre da câmera em situações de baixa iluminação

- Relativamente pesado

In review: Honor 5C. Review sample courtesy of Honor Germany.

O OnePlus X foi uma grande sensação entre os smartphones acessíveis de gama média ao mesmo tempo. O Honor 5C é igual de surpreendente: Componentes de alta qualidade estão escondidos e á primeira vista as especificações não são realmente espetaculares, o qual torna o nosso modelo de teste um rival para aparelhos com preço bastante mais alto.

Exemplo 1 - a câmera: As fotos são nítidas, mas não tanto, oferece boas reprodução das cores e a câmera frontal também tira boas selfies. Embora gimmicks como os vídeos 4 K não estejam disponíveis, e a câmera não seja a melhor em condições de baixa iluminação, apresenta um ótimo desempenho para a faixa de preços.

Exemplo 2 - a tela: Full HD, brilho alto, IPS - o que mais poderíamos querer, especialmente desde que o preço de três dígitos ainda comece com um "1". É claro que o nível de preto poderia ser mais baixo e uma tonalidade azul seja visível, mas isto também é aceitável nesta faixa de preços. O alto desempenho, longa duração da bateria e boa qualidade das chamadas também são pontos positivos.

O Honor 5C é um rival digno e acessível para o OnePlus X. Nosso modelo de teste ultrapassa claramente o que é esperado desta faixa de preços, particularmente em termos de qualidade de componentes.

Os usuários que precisam se seu smartphone com frequência em outros continentes não irão muito longe com as poucas redes wireless. Os compradores que desejam Wi-Fi de alta velocidade também ficarão decepcionados. Além disso, a bateria não pode ser removida. O dual-SIM é bom ter, mas ter que escolher entre um segundo SIM ou um cartão micro-SD também é uma pena.

E mais uma vez estamos na região de preços de menos de 200 Euros (~$223), e aqui, a razão de preço-desempenho do Honor 5C e atualmente, simplesmente imbatível. Uma evidente recomendação de compra.

Esta é uma versão reduzida da análise original. Você pode ler a análise completa em inglês aqui.

Honor 5C - 2016-07-06 07/06/2016 v5.1 ^(old)
Florian Wimmer

Acabamento

86%

Teclado

60 / 75 → 80%

Mouse

93%

Conectividade

39 / 60 → 66%

Peso

92%

Bateria

92%

Pantalha

84%

Desempenho do jogos

25 / 63 → 40%

Desempenho da aplicação

48 / 70 → 69%

Temperatura

85%

Ruído

100%

Audio

60 / 91 → 66%

Camera

73%

Médio

72%

84%

Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Honor 5C

Florian Wimmer, 2016-07-19 (Update: 2016-07-21)