Breve Análise do Smartphone Honor 20: uma câmera quádrupla em um smartphone de gama média
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Google Pixel 3a XL | |
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL | |
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro | |
Honor 20 | |
Honor 20 Pro | |
Honor 10 | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Google Pixel 3a XL | |
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL | |
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro | |
Honor 20 | |
Honor 20 Pro | |
Honor 10 |
|
iluminação: 95 %
iluminação com acumulador: 491 cd/m²
Contraste: 875:1 (Preto: 0.55 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 1.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
98.6% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.12
Honor 20 IPS, 2340x1080, 6.3" | Honor 20 Pro IPS, 2340x1080, 6.3" | Honor 10 IPS, 2280x1080, 5.8" | Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.4" | Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL IPS, 2340x1080, 6.4" | Google Pixel 3a XL OLED, 2160x1080, 6" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | -119% | -47% | -33% | -66% | -12% | |
Brightness middle | 481 | 514 7% | 555 15% | 594 23% | 569 18% | 409 -15% |
Brightness | 481 | 495 3% | 537 12% | 607 26% | 537 12% | 410 -15% |
Brightness Distribution | 95 | 92 -3% | 94 -1% | 91 -4% | 79 -17% | 96 1% |
Black Level * | 0.55 | 0.5 9% | 0.39 29% | 0.31 44% | ||
Contrast | 875 | 1028 17% | 1423 63% | 1835 110% | ||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.1 | 5.1 -364% | 2.3 -109% | 1.51 -37% | 3.5 -218% | 1.3 -18% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 2.1 | 7.8 -271% | 6 -186% | 4.27 -103% | 6 -186% | 2.3 -10% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.3 | 5.8 -346% | 3.9 -200% | 2.6 -100% | 5.1 -292% | 1.5 -15% |
Gamma | 2.12 104% | 2.3 96% | 2.19 100% | 2.219 99% | 2.36 93% | 2.22 99% |
CCT | 6442 101% | 8142 80% | 6212 105% | 6390 102% | 6827 95% | 6621 98% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
24.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 10 ms rise | |
↘ 14.8 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 54 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
46 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 20.8 ms rise | |
↘ 25.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 77 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
PCMark for Android | |
Work performance score (sort by value) | |
Honor 20 | |
Honor 20 Pro | |
Honor 10 | |
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro | |
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL | |
Google Pixel 3a XL | |
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (9728 - 13531, n=10) | |
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value) | |
Honor 20 | |
Honor 20 Pro | |
Honor 10 | |
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro | |
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL | |
Google Pixel 3a XL | |
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (7567 - 9326, n=10) |
GFXBench 3.1 | |
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
Honor 20 | |
Honor 20 Pro | |
Honor 10 | |
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro | |
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL | |
Google Pixel 3a XL | |
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (24 - 54, n=10) | |
Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 158, n=169, last 2 years) | |
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Honor 20 | |
Honor 20 Pro | |
Honor 10 | |
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro | |
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL | |
Google Pixel 3a XL | |
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (25 - 56, n=10) | |
Average of class Smartphone (8.3 - 341, n=169, last 2 years) |
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
Honor 20 | |
Honor 20 Pro | |
Honor 10 | |
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro | |
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL | |
Google Pixel 3a XL | |
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (268359 - 322616, n=10) |
Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=161, last 2 years) | |
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL (Chrome 75) | |
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro (Chrome 75) | |
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (48.4 - 60.9, n=6) | |
Honor 20 Pro (Chrome 75) | |
Honor 20 (Chrome 75) | |
Google Pixel 3a XL (Chrome 73) | |
Honor 10 (Chrome 74) |
Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=146, last 2 years) | |
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL (Chrome 75) | |
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (58.3 - 67.8, n=6) | |
Honor 20 Pro (Chome 75) | |
Honor 20 (Chrome 75) | |
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro (Chrome 75) | |
Google Pixel 3a XL (Chrome 73) | |
Honor 10 (Chrome 74) |
WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years) | |
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL (Chrome 75) | |
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro (Chrome 75) | |
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (86 - 124, n=10) | |
Honor 20 Pro (Chrome 75) | |
Honor 20 (Chrome 75) | |
Honor 10 (Chrome 66) | |
Google Pixel 3a XL (Chrome 73) |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=203, last 2 years) | |
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL (Chrome 75) | |
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (20618 - 23285, n=10) | |
Honor 20 (Chrome 75) | |
Honor 20 Pro (Chrome 75) | |
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro (Chrome 75) | |
Google Pixel 3a XL (Chrome 73) | |
Honor 10 (Chrome 66) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
Honor 10 (Chrome 66) | |
Google Pixel 3a XL (Chrome 73) | |
Honor 20 (Chrome 75) | |
Honor 20 Pro (Chrome 75) | |
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro (Chrome 75) | |
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (1948 - 3098, n=10) | |
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL (Chrome 75) | |
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=160, last 2 years) |
* ... smaller is better
Honor 20 | Honor 20 Pro | Honor 10 | Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro | Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL | Google Pixel 3a XL | Average 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | 10% | -1% | -4% | 0% | -39% | 6% | 231% | |
Sequential Read 256KB | 829 | 843 2% | 828 0% | 809 -2% | 831 0% | 315.6 -62% | 760 ? -8% | 1839 ? 122% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 196.4 | 247.3 26% | 192.1 -2% | 196.9 0% | 195.6 0% | 179.1 -9% | 297 ? 51% | 1425 ? 626% |
Random Read 4KB | 156.7 | 173.6 11% | 145.9 -7% | 142.5 -9% | 153.3 -2% | 92.1 -41% | 152.9 ? -2% | 277 ? 77% |
Random Write 4KB | 157 | 160.4 2% | 163 4% | 148.5 -5% | 160.2 2% | 87 -45% | 131.6 ? -16% | 309 ? 97% |
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 34.9 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 34.1 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.9 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Honor 20 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 42% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 61% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Google Pixel 3a XL audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.2% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 25% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 70% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
desligado | 0.02 / 0.22 Watt |
Ocioso | 0.88 / 2.27 / 2.34 Watt |
Carga |
4.81 / 6.63 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Honor 20 3750 mAh | Honor 20 Pro 4000 mAh | Honor 10 3400 mAh | Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro 4000 mAh | Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL 5000 mAh | Google Pixel 3a XL 3700 mAh | Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 3% | -10% | 12% | -7% | 30% | 0% | -3% | |
Idle Minimum * | 0.88 | 0.9 -2% | 1.12 -27% | 0.7 20% | 0.81 8% | 0.7 20% | 0.802 ? 9% | 0.894 ? -2% |
Idle Average * | 2.27 | 1.4 38% | 2.26 -0% | 1 56% | 2.35 -4% | 1.63 28% | 2.07 ? 9% | 1.456 ? 36% |
Idle Maximum * | 2.34 | 2.6 -11% | 2.3 2% | 1.3 44% | 2.37 -1% | 1.67 29% | 2.38 ? -2% | 1.616 ? 31% |
Load Average * | 4.81 | 5 -4% | 5.14 -7% | 5.2 -8% | 5.33 -11% | 2.64 45% | 4.87 ? -1% | 6.45 ? -34% |
Load Maximum * | 6.63 | 6.9 -4% | 7.89 -19% | 10 -51% | 8.55 -29% | 4.62 30% | 7.46 ? -13% | 9.8 ? -48% |
* ... smaller is better
Honor 20 3750 mAh | Honor 20 Pro 4000 mAh | Honor 10 3400 mAh | Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro 4000 mAh | Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL 5000 mAh | Google Pixel 3a XL 3700 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 43% | 2% | 35% | 110% | 37% | |
Reader / Idle | 1262 | 2030 61% | 1162 -8% | 1768 40% | 2114 68% | 1822 44% |
H.264 | 606 | 914 51% | 662 9% | 987 63% | 2138 253% | 960 58% |
WiFi v1.3 | 654 | 796 22% | 663 1% | 762 17% | 801 22% | 709 8% |
Load | 208 | 287 38% | 216 4% | 249 20% | 409 97% | 289 39% |
Pro
Contra
Veredicto - Muito espaço de armazenamento e uma boa câmera
O Honor 20 prova ser um smartphone impressionantemente completo. Está disponível por pouco menos de US$ 500 e oferece boa qualidade de câmera, muito espaço armazenamento interno e desempenho suficiente para uso diário e aplicativos mais exigentes. O desempenho do dispositivo pode ser aprimorado ativando seu modo de alto desempenho, embora isso cause impacto na duração da bateria. Isso é muito bom com quase 11 horas e pode facilmente acompanhar sua concorrência.
O Honor 20 pontua bem com a sua boa câmera e a decente duração da bateria. Os usuários terão que se virar sem um cartão microSD.
Não encontramos muito a criticar sobre o Honor 20: Seu design de furos é uma questão de gosto e alguns usuários podem não apreciar o sensor de digitais colocado ao lado. É uma pena que a Honor não tenha incluído um leitor de cartões microSD, particularmente porque o slot dualSIM poderia ter sido facilmente transformado em um slot híbrido.
Honor 20
- 08/19/2019 v6 (old)
Mike Wobker