Breve Análise do Smartphone Honor 20 Pro – Quad-Cam e muita energia
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| ZTE Axon 10 Pro | |
| Nokia 9 PureView | |
| OnePlus 7 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A80 | |
| Honor 20 Pro | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Nokia 9 PureView | |
| ZTE Axon 10 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy A80 | |
| OnePlus 7 | |
| Honor 20 Pro | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 92 %
iluminação com acumulador: 514 cd/m²
Contraste: 1028:1 (Preto: 0.5 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 5.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
100% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.3
| Honor 20 Pro IPS, 2340x1080, 6.3" | OnePlus 7 AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.4" | Nokia 9 PureView P-OLED, 2880x1440, 6" | ZTE Axon 10 Pro AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.5" | Samsung Galaxy A80 AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 21% | 34% | 5% | 11% | |
| Brightness middle | 514 | 603 17% | 648 26% | 402 -22% | 478 -7% |
| Brightness | 495 | 605 22% | 641 29% | 399 -19% | 486 -2% |
| Brightness Distribution | 92 | 94 2% | 92 0% | 92 0% | 96 4% |
| Black Level * | 0.5 | ||||
| Contrast | 1028 | ||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.1 | 3.5 31% | 2.3 55% | 4.1 20% | 2.97 42% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.8 | 7.7 1% | 5.2 33% | 6.5 17% | 10.18 -31% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.8 | 2.7 53% | 2.2 62% | 3.7 36% | 2.5 57% |
| Gamma | 2.3 96% | 2.266 97% | 2.3 96% | 2.23 99% | 2.031 108% |
| CCT | 8142 80% | 6775 96% | 6592 99% | 7841 83% | 6533 99% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 333 Hz | ≤ 15 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 333 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 15 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 333 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8710 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 42 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 21 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 21 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 98 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 9 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 13 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 31 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
| PCMark for Android | |
| Work performance score (sort by value) | |
| Honor 20 Pro | |
| OnePlus 7 | |
| Nokia 9 PureView | |
| ZTE Axon 10 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy A80 | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (9728 - 13531, n=10) | |
| Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value) | |
| Honor 20 Pro | |
| OnePlus 7 | |
| Nokia 9 PureView | |
| ZTE Axon 10 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy A80 | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (7567 - 9326, n=10) | |
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
| Honor 20 Pro | |
| OnePlus 7 | |
| Nokia 9 PureView | |
| ZTE Axon 10 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy A80 | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (37 - 60, n=10) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 166, n=173, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Honor 20 Pro | |
| OnePlus 7 | |
| Nokia 9 PureView | |
| ZTE Axon 10 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy A80 | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (40 - 91, n=10) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (12 - 502, n=173, last 2 years) | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Honor 20 Pro | |
| OnePlus 7 | |
| Nokia 9 PureView | |
| ZTE Axon 10 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy A80 | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (24 - 54, n=10) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 166, n=173, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Honor 20 Pro | |
| OnePlus 7 | |
| Nokia 9 PureView | |
| ZTE Axon 10 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy A80 | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (25 - 56, n=10) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (8.3 - 365, n=173, last 2 years) | |
| AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Honor 20 Pro | |
| OnePlus 7 | |
| Nokia 9 PureView | |
| ZTE Axon 10 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy A80 | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (268359 - 322616, n=10) | |
| Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=169, last 2 years) | |
| OnePlus 7 (Chrome 74) | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (48.4 - 60.9, n=6) | |
| ZTE Axon 10 Pro (Chrome 74) | |
| Honor 20 Pro (Chrome 75) | |
| Nokia 9 PureView (Chrome 73.0.3683.90) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A80 (Chrome 75) | |
| Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
| Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=152, last 2 years) | |
| OnePlus 7 (Chome 74) | |
| ZTE Axon 10 Pro (Chrome 74) | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (58.3 - 67.8, n=6) | |
| Honor 20 Pro (Chome 75) | |
| Nokia 9 PureView (Chrome 73.0.3683.90) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A80 (Chome 75) | |
| WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
| Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| OnePlus 7 (Chrome 74) | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (86 - 124, n=10) | |
| Honor 20 Pro (Chrome 75) | |
| ZTE Axon 10 Pro (Chrome 74) | |
| Nokia 9 PureView (Chrome 73.0.3683.90) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A80 (Chrome 75) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=210, last 2 years) | |
| ZTE Axon 10 Pro (Chrome 74) | |
| OnePlus 7 (Chrome 74) | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (20618 - 23285, n=10) | |
| Honor 20 Pro (Chrome 75) | |
| Nokia 9 PureView (Chrome 73.0.3683.90) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A80 (Chrome 75) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Samsung Galaxy A80 (Chrome 75) | |
| Honor 20 Pro (Chrome 75) | |
| Nokia 9 PureView (Chrome 73.0.3683.90) | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (1948 - 3098, n=10) | |
| OnePlus 7 (Chrome 74) | |
| ZTE Axon 10 Pro (Chrome 74) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=167, last 2 years) | |
* ... smaller is better
| Honor 20 Pro | OnePlus 7 | Nokia 9 PureView | ZTE Axon 10 Pro | Samsung Galaxy A80 | Average 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | 13% | -36% | 25% | -46% | 9% | 194% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 843 | 1463 74% | 728 -14% | 769 -9% | 502 -40% | 829 ? -2% | 1894 ? 125% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 247.3 | 392 59% | 200.3 -19% | 503 103% | 190.4 -23% | 376 ? 52% | 1476 ? 497% |
| Random Read 4KB | 173.6 | 175.3 1% | 132 -24% | 150.4 -13% | 117.5 -32% | 168.8 ? -3% | 278 ? 60% |
| Random Write 4KB | 160.4 | 28.7 -82% | 20.18 -87% | 189.5 18% | 21.6 -87% | 143.6 ? -10% | 312 ? 95% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 88.2 ? | 66.8 ? | |||||
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 66.8 ? | 56.3 ? |
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.7 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.2 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.7 °C / 93 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Honor 20 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 73% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 73% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 73% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (120.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 88% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 3% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 96% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
OnePlus 7 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 70.9% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 70.9% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 70.9% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (118.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 86% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 5% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 96% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 2% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado |   0 / 0.1 Watt |
| Ocioso |  0.9 / 1.4 / 2.6 Watt |
| Carga |
5 / 6.9 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Honor 20 Pro 4000 mAh | OnePlus 7 3700 mAh | Nokia 9 PureView 3320 mAh | ZTE Axon 10 Pro 4000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A80 3700 mAh | Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 16% | -27% | 20% | 18% | -7% | -8% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 0.9 | 0.6 33% | 1.65 -83% | 0.76 16% | 0.6 33% | 0.802 ? 11% | 0.883 ? 2% |
| Idle Average * | 1.4 | 1.1 21% | 2.34 -67% | 1.15 18% | 1.2 14% | 2.07 ? -48% | 1.467 ? -5% |
| Idle Maximum * | 2.6 | 2 23% | 2.43 7% | 1.18 55% | 1.4 46% | 2.38 ? 8% | 1.621 ? 38% |
| Load Average * | 5 | 4 20% | 5.02 -0% | 3.95 21% | 5 -0% | 4.87 ? 3% | 6.58 ? -32% |
| Load Maximum * | 6.9 | 8 -16% | 6.51 6% | 7.49 -9% | 7.1 -3% | 7.46 ? -8% | 9.91 ? -44% |
* ... smaller is better
| Honor 20 Pro 4000 mAh | OnePlus 7 3700 mAh | Nokia 9 PureView 3320 mAh | ZTE Axon 10 Pro 4000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A80 3700 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 3% | -32% | -7% | -13% | |
| Reader / Idle | 2030 | 1989 -2% | 1250 -38% | 1927 -5% | 1796 -12% |
| H.264 | 914 | 933 2% | 732 -20% | 1068 17% | 902 -1% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 796 | 901 13% | 486 -39% | 680 -15% | 713 -10% |
| Load | 287 | 278 -3% | 202 -30% | 217 -24% | 200 -30% |
Pro
Contra
Veredicto – Único com muitos destaques
A Honor tomou medidas ousadas com o 20 Pro: Uma tela IPS em um smartphone de gama alta? Essa é uma escolha rara hoje em dia. A tela é de alta qualidade e exibe cores com precisão com as configurações corretas. Como os alto-falantes estéreo podem ser encontrados em muitos smartphones atuais, o alto-falante mono, muito parecido com os tempos de resposta comparativamente lentos da tela, representam um erro muito maior.
Ao mesmo tempo, no entanto, o último carro-chefe da Honor brilha com alguns destaques reais: Tanto o sensor de digitais incrivelmente rápido dentro do botão de energia quanto a nova tecnologia de carregamento rápido, que permite um carregamento muito rápido, independentemente da grande bateria do smartphone, merecem destaque. Bateria Apropos: Embora a bateria dure muito tempo, os usuários não precisam abandonar o desempenho, dispositivos com Snapdragon 855 são um pouquinho mais rápidos, no entanto.
Um monstro em termos de espaço de armazenamento e capacidade da bateria: O Honor 20 Pro oferece muito em relação ao seu preço e vem apenas com pequenas desvantagens.
Além disso, a grande configuração de armazenamento dá ao Honor 20 Pro uma vantagem em termos de preço/desempenho e torna a falta de suporte para microSD um pouco menos dolorosa. Outra fortaleza do telefone é o seu GPS muito preciso.
Embora o recurso mais anunciado, a câmera, seja muito flexível graças às suas quatro óticas diferentes, ele não consegue competir com o topo das câmeras de ponta em termos de qualidade de imagem. Isto é devido aos pequenos problemas de nitidez para as bordas, o limite de 30-FPS para vídeo 4K e o bom, mas não ótimo, efeito Bokeh. No entanto, ficamos impressionados com a grande quantidade de detalhes.
Se os inconvenientes menores não o incomodarem muito, o Honor 20 Pro é definitivamente uma boa opção.
Honor 20 Pro
- 09/27/2019 v7 (old)
Florian Schmitt
Price comparison
