Notebookcheck Logo

Breve Análise do Smartphone Honor 10

Desafio para lutar. O Honor 10 representa o smartphone carro chefe deste ano da subsidiária da Huawei, oferecendo especificações de gama alta com uma câmera dupla potente a um preço médio. Além disso, o smartphone é oferecido em cores novas e incomuns. Um preço mais baixo é bom, mas avaliamos em nosso teste quais são as deficiências que você precisa aceitar em troca.
Atualização: Teste concluído.
Honor 10 (10 Serie)
Processador
HiSilicon Kirin 970 8 x 2.4 GHz, Cortex-A73/-A53
Placa gráfica
ARM Mali-G72 MP12
Memória
4 GB 
Pantalha
5.84 polegadas 19:9, 2280 x 1080 pixel 432 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, 10 pontos multi-touch, IPS, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 128 GB 
, 115 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Conector combinado para fones e microfone (3,5 mm), 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Sensor de aceleração, giroscópio, sensor de proximidade, bússola, BeiDou, IR blaster, USB OTG, USB PD
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM/GPRS/Edge (850, 900, 1800, e 1900 MHz) UMTS/HSPA+ (Band 1, 2, 5, 6, 8, 19), LTE (1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 19, 20 (all FDD), 38, 29, and 40 (TDD)), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 7.7 x 149.6 x 71.2
Bateria
3400 mAh Lítio-Polímero
Sistema Operativo
Android 8.1 Oreo
Camera
Primary Camera: 24 MPix + 16 MPix (f/1.8, EIS, UHD video)
Secondary Camera: 24 MPix (4-em-1 Lightfusion)
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Alto-falante mono, Teclado: virtual, Carregador, cabo USB, acapa de gel, ferramenta SIM, guia de início rápido, guia de segurança, EMUI 8.1, 24 Meses Garantia, Kopf-SAR: 0.79 W/kg, Körper-SAR: 1.15 W/kg, fanless
peso
153 g, Suprimento de energia: 103 g
Preço
449 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

All color variations of the Honor 10
All color variations of the Honor 10
Honor 10 and its predecessor, the Honor 9 (left to right)
Honor 10 and its predecessor, the Honor 9 (right to left)
Honor 10 and its predecessor, the Honor 9 (right to left)

Size Comparison

158.4 mm 75.64 mm 9.55 mm 186 g155.4 mm 75.2 mm 7.5 mm 165 g153.8 mm 72.3 mm 8.3 mm 167 g149.2 mm 70.6 mm 8.4 mm 172 g149.6 mm 71.2 mm 7.7 mm 153 g149.1 mm 70.8 mm 7.65 mm 165 g148 mm 73.4 mm 7.4 mm 156 g147 mm 71 mm 7.5 mm 155 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Huawei P20
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
397 MBit/s +68%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
Adreno 508, SD 630, 64 GB eMMC Flash
329 MBit/s +39%
Nokia 7 Plus
Adreno 512, SD 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash
307 MBit/s +30%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
Mali-G71 MP2, Exynos 7885, 32 GB eMMC Flash
269 MBit/s +14%
Honor 10
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
236 MBit/s
Honor 9
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB eMMC Flash
140 MBit/s -41%
Motorola Moto G6
Adreno 506, SD 450, 32 GB eMMC Flash
113 MBit/s -52%
iperf3 receive AX12
Huawei P20
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
637 MBit/s +203%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
Adreno 508, SD 630, 64 GB eMMC Flash
334 MBit/s +59%
Honor 9
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB eMMC Flash
283 MBit/s +35%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
Mali-G71 MP2, Exynos 7885, 32 GB eMMC Flash
280 MBit/s +33%
Nokia 7 Plus
Adreno 512, SD 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash
247 MBit/s +18%
Honor 10
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
210 MBit/s
Motorola Moto G6
Adreno 506, SD 450, 32 GB eMMC Flash
113 MBit/s -46%
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Honor 10
Honor 10
Honor 10
Honor 10
Honor 10
Honor 10
Honor 10: standard wide-angle
Honor 10: standard wide-angle
Honor 10: 2x hybrid zoom
Honor 10: 2x hybrid zoom
Image 1
Image 1
Image 2
Image 2

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
orginal image
click to load images
543
cd/m²
542
cd/m²
528
cd/m²
534
cd/m²
555
cd/m²
533
cd/m²
532
cd/m²
540
cd/m²
523
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 555 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 536.7 cd/m² Minimum: 2.77 cd/m²
iluminação: 94 %
iluminação com acumulador: 555 cd/m²
Contraste: 1423:1 (Preto: 0.39 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.3 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 3.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
97.2% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.19
Honor 10
IPS, 2280x1080, 5.8"
Honor 9
IPS/LTPS, 1920x1080, 5.2"
Huawei P20 Lite
IPS, 2280x1080, 5.8"
Huawei P20
LTPS, 2240x1080, 5.8"
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
Super AMOLED, 2220x1080, 5.6"
Nokia 7 Plus
IPS, 2160x1080, 6"
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5"
Screen
-4%
-36%
36%
-24%
-8%
-18%
Brightness middle
555
550
-1%
528
-5%
753
36%
541
-3%
458
-17%
656
18%
Brightness
537
535
0%
525
-2%
748
39%
538
0%
463
-14%
634
18%
Brightness Distribution
94
92
-2%
89
-5%
96
2%
96
2%
92
-2%
93
-1%
Black Level *
0.39
0.42
-8%
0.51
-31%
0.37
5%
0.22
44%
0.4
-3%
Contrast
1423
1310
-8%
1035
-27%
2035
43%
2082
46%
1640
15%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.3
3.3
-43%
4.7
-104%
1.3
43%
5.8
-152%
4
-74%
5.3
-130%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
6
4.5
25%
8.9
-48%
2.3
62%
7.4
-23%
7.8
-30%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
3.9
3.6
8%
6.4
-64%
1.7
56%
2.7
31%
4.7
-21%
5.2
-33%
Gamma
2.19 100%
2.38 92%
2.22 99%
2.18 101%
2.07 106%
2.19 100%
2.22 99%
CCT
6212 105%
7226 90%
7987 81%
66.76 9736%
6570 99%
7425 88%
7905 82%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
29.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 15.2 ms rise
↘ 14.4 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 77 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
43.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 18.8 ms rise
↘ 24.4 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 69 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Honor 10
174272 Points
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
83284 Points -52%
Nokia 7 Plus
117165 Points -33%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
68282 Points -61%
Sony Xperia XZ1
167748 Points -4%
Huawei P20
179393 Points +3%
Motorola Moto G6
59454 Points -66%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (173653 - 181973, n=8)
177915 Points +2%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Honor 10
205297 Points
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
116746 Points -43%
Nokia 7 Plus
141701 Points -31%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
87300 Points -57%
Huawei P20
200756 Points -2%
Motorola Moto G6
71352 Points -65%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (152773 - 212278, n=6)
197811 Points -4%
PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Honor 10
8530 Points
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
5916 Points -31%
Nokia 7 Plus
6825 Points -20%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
6264 Points -27%
Sony Xperia XZ1
7056 Points -17%
Huawei P20
8700 Points +2%
Motorola Moto G6
5321 Points -38%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (8115 - 9326, n=8)
8537 Points 0%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Honor 10
7046 Points
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
5214 Points -26%
Nokia 7 Plus
6077 Points -14%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
5085 Points -28%
Sony Xperia XZ1
6443 Points -9%
Huawei P20
7002 Points -1%
Motorola Moto G6
4552 Points -35%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (6293 - 7046, n=8)
6860 Points -3%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Honor 10
3374 Points
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
1993 Points -41%
Nokia 7 Plus
2369 Points -30%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
1513 Points -55%
Sony Xperia XZ1
2909 Points -14%
Huawei P20
3288 Points -3%
Motorola Moto G6
1069 Points -68%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (2174 - 3374, n=8)
3125 Points -7%
Average of class Smartphone (1196 - 11976, n=151, last 2 years)
6297 Points +87%
System (sort by value)
Honor 10
5882 Points
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
4358 Points -26%
Nokia 7 Plus
4976 Points -15%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
3319 Points -44%
Sony Xperia XZ1
5840 Points -1%
Huawei P20
5797 Points -1%
Motorola Moto G6
2560 Points -56%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (3795 - 5987, n=8)
5387 Points -8%
Average of class Smartphone (2368 - 16475, n=151, last 2 years)
10163 Points +73%
Memory (sort by value)
Honor 10
3808 Points
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
2275 Points -40%
Nokia 7 Plus
2503 Points -34%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
1380 Points -64%
Sony Xperia XZ1
1752 Points -54%
Huawei P20
4154 Points +9%
Motorola Moto G6
770 Points -80%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (2417 - 4578, n=8)
3946 Points +4%
Average of class Smartphone (962 - 12716, n=151, last 2 years)
6767 Points +78%
Graphics (sort by value)
Honor 10
4397 Points
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
1331 Points -70%
Nokia 7 Plus
2298 Points -48%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
1496 Points -66%
Sony Xperia XZ1
5923 Points +35%
Huawei P20
3697 Points -16%
Motorola Moto G6
965 Points -78%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (2231 - 4397, n=8)
3638 Points -17%
Average of class Smartphone (1017 - 58651, n=151, last 2 years)
16908 Points +285%
Web (sort by value)
Honor 10
1316 Points
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
1195 Points -9%
Nokia 7 Plus
1101 Points -16%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
766 Points -42%
Sony Xperia XZ1
1181 Points -10%
Huawei P20
1313 Points 0%
Motorola Moto G6
688 Points -48%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (1091 - 1316, n=8)
1245 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone (841 - 2145, n=151, last 2 years)
1564 Points +19%
Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Honor 10
1890 Points
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
1526 Points -19%
Nokia 7 Plus
1646 Points -13%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
865 Points -54%
Sony Xperia XZ1
1856 Points -2%
Huawei P20
1886 Points 0%
Motorola Moto G6
743 Points -61%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (1883 - 1922, n=8)
1901 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (844 - 9574, n=82, last 2 years)
5486 Points +190%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Honor 10
6610 Points
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
4431 Points -33%
Nokia 7 Plus
5867 Points -11%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
4172 Points -37%
Sony Xperia XZ1
6493 Points -2%
Huawei P20
6557 Points -1%
Motorola Moto G6
3868 Points -41%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (6557 - 6792, n=8)
6697 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (2630 - 30323, n=82, last 2 years)
15064 Points +128%
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Honor 10
8634 Points
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
3680 Points -57%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
3942 Points -54%
Sony Xperia XZ1
7979 Points -8%
Motorola Moto G6
2777 Points -68%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (5779 - 9015, n=6)
8080 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone (5192 - 18534, n=58, last 2 years)
11998 Points +39%
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Honor 10
29111 Points
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
14779 Points -49%
Nokia 7 Plus
26610 Points -9%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
16841 Points -42%
Sony Xperia XZ1
31618 Points +9%
Huawei P20
30845 Points +6%
Motorola Moto G6
12756 Points -56%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (20022 - 31605, n=8)
29035 Points 0%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Honor 10
32674 Points
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
15262 Points -53%
Nokia 7 Plus
29333 Points -10%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
18386 Points -44%
Sony Xperia XZ1
47857 Points +46%
Huawei P20
34146 Points +5%
Motorola Moto G6
12441 Points -62%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (22429 - 36231, n=8)
32596 Points 0%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Honor 10
21070 Points
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
13306 Points -37%
Nokia 7 Plus
20085 Points -5%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
13014 Points -38%
Sony Xperia XZ1
23046 Points +9%
Huawei P20
23046 Points +9%
Motorola Moto G6
13997 Points -34%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (14556 - 23046, n=8)
21027 Points 0%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Honor 10
3358 Points
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
1001 Points -70%
Nokia 7 Plus
2035 Points -39%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
1374 Points -59%
Sony Xperia XZ1
4649 Points +38%
Huawei P20
3354 Points 0%
Motorola Moto G6
800 Points -76%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (1943 - 3487, n=8)
3155 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone (812 - 7285, n=26, last 2 years)
4204 Points +25%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Honor 10
3573 Points
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
879 Points -75%
Nokia 7 Plus
1895 Points -47%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
1289 Points -64%
Sony Xperia XZ1
6057 Points +70%
Huawei P20
3550 Points -1%
Motorola Moto G6
690 Points -81%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (1954 - 3734, n=8)
3305 Points -8%
Average of class Smartphone (756 - 9451, n=26, last 2 years)
4740 Points +33%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Honor 10
2773 Points
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
1946 Points -30%
Nokia 7 Plus
2734 Points -1%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
1785 Points -36%
Sony Xperia XZ1
2564 Points -8%
Huawei P20
2811 Points +1%
Motorola Moto G6
1803 Points -35%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (1906 - 2902, n=8)
2732 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (1093 - 4349, n=26, last 2 years)
3303 Points +19%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Honor 10
2891 Points
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
729 Points -75%
Nokia 7 Plus
1332 Points -54%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
835 Points -71%
Sony Xperia XZ1
3673 Points +27%
Huawei P20
2982 Points +3%
Motorola Moto G6
442 Points -85%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (2850 - 2999, n=8)
2958 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone (286 - 17553, n=73, last 2 years)
3084 Points +7%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Honor 10
2993 Points
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
618 Points -79%
Nokia 7 Plus
1161 Points -61%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
726 Points -76%
Sony Xperia XZ1
3961 Points +32%
Huawei P20
3040 Points +2%
Motorola Moto G6
363 Points -88%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (2844 - 3040, n=8)
2994 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (240 - 29890, n=73, last 2 years)
3263 Points +9%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Honor 10
2582 Points
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
1950 Points -24%
Nokia 7 Plus
2749 Points +6%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
1751 Points -32%
Sony Xperia XZ1
2928 Points +13%
Huawei P20
2795 Points +8%
Motorola Moto G6
1834 Points -29%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (2582 - 2931, n=8)
2842 Points +10%
Average of class Smartphone (858 - 7180, n=73, last 2 years)
3286 Points +27%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Honor 10
59 fps
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
31 fps -47%
Nokia 7 Plus
48 fps -19%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
29 fps -51%
Sony Xperia XZ1
60 fps +2%
Huawei P20
59 fps 0%
Motorola Moto G6
20 fps -66%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (42 - 60, n=8)
57.4 fps -3%
Average of class Smartphone (23 - 165, n=169, last 2 years)
86.3 fps +46%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Honor 10
124 fps
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
34 fps -73%
Nokia 7 Plus
50 fps -60%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
30 fps -76%
Sony Xperia XZ1
111 fps -10%
Huawei P20
125 fps +1%
Motorola Moto G6
22 fps -82%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (45 - 125, n=8)
108 fps -13%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=169, last 2 years)
280 fps +126%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Honor 10
50 fps
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
15 fps -70%
Nokia 7 Plus
22 fps -56%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
14 fps -72%
Sony Xperia XZ1
52 fps +4%
Huawei P20
56 fps +12%
Motorola Moto G6
8.9 fps -82%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (26 - 56, n=8)
50.4 fps +1%
Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 165, n=169, last 2 years)
75.5 fps +51%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Honor 10
59 fps
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
16 fps -73%
Nokia 7 Plus
23 fps -61%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
14 fps -76%
Sony Xperia XZ1
56 fps -5%
Huawei P20
59 fps 0%
Motorola Moto G6
9.4 fps -84%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (23 - 66, n=8)
54.6 fps -7%
Average of class Smartphone (12 - 482, n=169, last 2 years)
165.3 fps +180%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Honor 10
34 fps
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
9.6 fps -72%
Nokia 7 Plus
15 fps -56%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
9.5 fps -72%
Sony Xperia XZ1
42 fps +24%
Huawei P20
39 fps +15%
Motorola Moto G6
5.8 fps -83%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (18 - 39, n=8)
33.6 fps -1%
Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 158, n=169, last 2 years)
65.7 fps +93%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Honor 10
39 fps
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
9.9 fps -75%
Nokia 7 Plus
14 fps -64%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
9.7 fps -75%
Sony Xperia XZ1
41 fps +5%
Huawei P20
39 fps 0%
Motorola Moto G6
6.1 fps -84%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (19 - 39, n=8)
33.9 fps -13%
Average of class Smartphone (8.3 - 341, n=169, last 2 years)
117.2 fps +201%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Honor 10
20 fps
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
5.8 fps -71%
Nokia 7 Plus
9.1 fps -54%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
5.3 fps -73%
Sony Xperia XZ1
25 fps +25%
Huawei P20
23 fps +15%
Motorola Moto G6
3.3 fps -83%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (10 - 23, n=8)
19.8 fps -1%
Average of class Smartphone (5 - 119, n=170, last 2 years)
47.8 fps +139%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Honor 10
23 fps
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
6 fps -74%
Nokia 7 Plus
8.3 fps -64%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
5.3 fps -77%
Sony Xperia XZ1
24 fps +4%
Huawei P20
23 fps 0%
Motorola Moto G6
3.4 fps -85%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (11 - 23, n=8)
20.4 fps -11%
Average of class Smartphone (3.1 - 216, n=169, last 2 years)
70.6 fps +207%
Lightmark - 1920x1080 1080p (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
3.052 fps
Nokia 7 Plus
15.07 fps
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
9.81 fps
Motorola Moto G6
5.38 fps
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (21.5 - 25.9, n=2)
23.7 fps
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
355 Points
Nokia 7 Plus
349 Points
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
190 Points
Motorola Moto G6
129 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (788 - 887, n=2)
838 Points
Average of class Smartphone (205 - 7616, n=56, last 2 years)
2316 Points

Legend

 
Honor 10 HiSilicon Kirin 970, ARM Mali-G72 MP12, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, ARM Mali-G71 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Nokia 7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Qualcomm Adreno 512, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Qualcomm Adreno 508, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Sony Xperia XZ1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Huawei P20 HiSilicon Kirin 970, ARM Mali-G72 MP12, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Motorola Moto G6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 32 GB eMMC Flash
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Sony Xperia XZ1 (Chrome 61)
61.3 Points +8%
Honor 9 (Chrome 59)
58.6 Points +4%
Honor 10 (Chrome 66)
56.5 Points
Huawei P20 (Chrome 66.0.3359.126)
56.2 Points -1%
Nokia 7 Plus (Chrome 60)
53.9 Points -5%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (33.1 - 58.6, n=8)
51.4 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018 (Chrome 64.0.3282.137)
49.07 Points -13%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL (Chrome 62)
28.09 Points -50%
Huawei P20 Lite (Chrome 63)
23.42 Points -59%
Motorola Moto G6 (Chrome 66)
22.56 Points -60%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=203, last 2 years)
37161 Points +239%
Huawei P20 (Chrome 66.0.3359.126)
11468 Points +5%
Honor 10 (Chrome 66)
10965 Points
Nokia 7 Plus (Chrome 60)
10945 Points 0%
Honor 9 (Chrome 59)
10208 Points -7%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (6692 - 11838, n=8)
10111 Points -8%
Sony Xperia XZ1 (Chrome 61)
10096 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018 (Chrome 64.0.3282.137)
9350 Points -15%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL (Chrome 62)
4398 Points -60%
Huawei P20 Lite
4191 Points -62%
Motorola Moto G6 (Chrome 66)
3943 Points -64%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Motorola Moto G6 (Chrome 66)
11751 ms * -201%
Huawei P20 Lite (Chrome 63)
10788 ms * -177%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL (Chrome 62)
9425 ms * -142%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (3591 - 6221, n=8)
4378 ms * -12%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018 (Chrome 64.0.3282.137)
4275 ms * -10%
Huawei P20 (Chrome 66.0.3359.126)
3979 ms * -2%
Nokia 7 Plus (Chrome 60)
3937 ms * -1%
Honor 10 (Chrome 66)
3899 ms *
Sony Xperia XZ1 (Chrome 61)
3268 ms * +16%
Honor 9 (Chrome 59)
3149 ms * +19%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=160, last 2 years)
1568 ms * +60%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall
Huawei P20 (Chrome 66.0.3359.126)
182 Points 0%
Honor 10 (Chrome 66)
182 Points
Sony Xperia XZ1 (Chrome 61)
170 Points -7%
Nokia 7 Plus (Chrome 60)
168 Points -8%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (119 - 187, n=8)
165.4 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018 (Chrome 64.0.3282.137)
156 Points -14%
Honor 9 (Chrome 59)
107 Points -41%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL (Chrome 62)
95 Points -48%
Motorola Moto G6 (Chrome 66)
90 Points -51%
Huawei P20 Lite (Chrome 63)
86 Points -53%
WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years)
148.7 Points +116%
Huawei P20
69 Points 0%
Honor 10 (Chrome 66)
69 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (69 - 69, n=3)
69 Points 0%
Nokia 7 Plus (Chrome 60)
63 Points -9%
Huawei P20 Lite (Chrome 63)
34 Points -51%
Motorola Moto G6 (Chrome 66)
31 Points -55%

* ... smaller is better

Honor 10Honor 9Samsung Galaxy A8 2018Nokia 7 PlusAsus ZenFone 4 ZE554KLSony Xperia XZ1Average 128 GB UFS 2.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-50%
-61%
-52%
-52%
-24%
8%
236%
Sequential Read 256KB
828
293
-65%
299.9
-64%
283.1
-66%
287.4
-65%
679
-18%
Sequential Write 256KB
192.1
204
6%
104.2
-46%
211.6
10%
205.3
7%
204.4
6%
Random Read 4KB
145.9
55.7
-62%
82.6
-43%
54.7
-63%
68.6
-53%
156.6
7%
Random Write 4KB
163
32.7
-80%
14.69
-91%
19.62
-88%
7.59
-95%
14.93
-91%
131.6 ?(18.2 - 290, n=113)
-19%
PUBG Mobile
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 HD32 fps
  Your browser does not support the canvas element!
Arena of Valor
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high HD58 fps
Carga Máxima
 35.9 °C35.9 °C34.2 °C 
 35.6 °C35.9 °C35 °C 
 34.5 °C34.7 °C35.4 °C 
Máximo: 35.9 °C
Médio: 35.2 °C
30.7 °C32.7 °C36.4 °C
31.1 °C33 °C35.8 °C
30.3 °C32.4 °C34.3 °C
Máximo: 36.4 °C
Médio: 33 °C
alimentação elétrica  29.3 °C | Temperatura do quarto 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.2 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.9 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36.4 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.8 °C / 89 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.243.42532.939.93137.238.54031.739.35039.638.96328.332.88027.333.710026.934.412526.730.21602432.820020.946.325020.952.231519.555.840018.558.950017.561.963017.563.880015.762.8100015.867.6125016.669.5160015.871.3200015.474.3250015.574.931501674.3400015.873.450001673.4630016.373.9800016.372.71000016.269.71250016.462.71600016.447.4SPL28.684.2N1.156.9median 16.4median 63.8Delta2.210.735.244.432.941.737.232.531.737.339.641.828.335.827.335.926.934.126.7362439.920.944.820.952.219.550.118.554.117.564.817.561.815.769.215.873.816.675.115.874.115.474.115.574.71675.915.8741672.216.374.316.371.916.268.216.456.416.452.128.685.31.161.3median 16.4median 68.22.211hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHonor 10Nokia 7 Plus
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Honor 10 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 9.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 48% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 66% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 27% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Nokia 7 Plus audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 41% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 60% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.02 / 0.26 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 1.12 / 2.26 / 2.3 Watt
Carga midlight 5.14 / 7.89 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Honor 10
3400 mAh
Honor 9
3200 mAh
Nokia 7 Plus
3800 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
3000 mAh
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
3300 mAh
Sony Xperia XZ1
2700 mAh
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
1%
17%
39%
10%
-0%
2%
7%
Idle Minimum *
1.12
1.13
-1%
0.65
42%
0.67
40%
0.84
25%
0.51
54%
0.978 ?(0.67 - 1.4, n=8)
13%
Idle Average *
2.26
2.25
-0%
1.76
22%
1.02
55%
2.31
-2%
2.16
4%
Idle Maximum *
2.3
2.3
-0%
1.78
23%
1.1
52%
2.33
-1%
2.23
3%
2.51 ?(1.23 - 4.3, n=8)
-9%
Load Average *
5.14
4.89
5%
4.47
13%
3.86
25%
4.76
7%
7.45
-45%
Load Maximum *
7.89
7.99
-1%
9.13
-16%
5.97
24%
6.39
19%
9.28
-18%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
19h 22min
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 66)
11h 03min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
11h 02min
Carga (máximo brilho)
3h 36min
Honor 10
3400 mAh
Honor 9
3200 mAh
Huawei P20 Lite
3000 mAh
Huawei P20
3400 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
3000 mAh
Nokia 7 Plus
3800 mAh
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
3300 mAh
Battery Runtime
3%
-16%
36%
22%
7%
16%
Reader / Idle
1162
1399
20%
750
-35%
1888
62%
1546
33%
1703
47%
1665
43%
H.264
662
564
-15%
470
-29%
810
22%
908
37%
706
7%
698
5%
WiFi v1.3
663
516
-22%
582
-12%
818
23%
646
-3%
672
1%
562
-15%
Load
216
278
29%
247
14%
295
37%
260
20%
158
-27%
286
32%

Pro

+ Forte relação preço-desempenho
+ Boa tela
+ Bom alto falante
+ Opções de cores incomuns
+ GPS preciso
+ Dual SIM
+ SoC veloz
+ Boa câmera

Contra

- Poucas bandas LTE suportadas
- Não é mais possível expandir o armazenamento
- Perigo de sobreaquecimento sob carga constante
- Bloatware
- Apenas Bluetooth 4.2
Testing the Honor 10. Test unit provided by Honor Germany.
Testing the Honor 10. Test unit provided by Honor Germany.

Com o 10, o Honor está melhor e não oferece apenas uma versão aperfeiçoada do modelo do ano passado, mas também variantes de cor ousadas, chocando a concorrência com um forte preço de entrada de 399 Euros (~$468).

Neste ponto, a comparação direta com o Huawei P20 está se tornando difícil. Embora existam muitas semelhanças na folha de dados, o smartphone muito mais caro da empresa mãe pode fazer tudo, pelo menos, um pouco melhor. Apenas o desempenho do sistema é similar. Com isso, a diferença do preço está bastante justificada em nossa opinião.

Quem estiver procurando um smartphone elegante com uma sensação de gama alta pode optar pelo Honor 10 sem preocupações.  

O Honor 10 ainda é um ótimo smartphone. Ele tem uma tela boa e brilhante que também é bastante grande, mas não tão gigante como a de alguns concorrentes. Além de tudo isso está a boa câmera, uma ótima duração de bateria, e um smartphone rápido. Vendo o seu desempenho de sistema, o visual, ou a sensação táctil, você não diria que custa "apenas" 400 Euros.

Também é positivo que ele use o veloz armazenamento UFS-2.1 agora, que o dual-SIM seja oferecido e que o GPS seja muito preciso Por outro lado, o fato de que apenas poucas bandas LTE sejam suportadas causará algumas frustrações nos EUA. No entanto, ainda podemos oferecer uma recomendação clara para o Honor 10.

Honor 10 - 05/23/2018 v6 (old)
Daniel Schmidt

Acabamento
90%
Teclado
68 / 75 → 91%
Mouse
93%
Conectividade
45 / 60 → 75%
Peso
92%
Bateria
93%
Pantalha
88%
Desempenho do jogos
63 / 63 → 100%
Desempenho da aplicação
70 / 70 → 100%
Temperatura
91%
Ruído
100%
Audio
64 / 91 → 70%
Camera
78%
Médio
80%
89%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Honor 10
Daniel Schmidt, 2018-06- 3 (Update: 2024-11- 4)