Breve Análise do Smartphone Honor 10 Lite
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Umidigi Z2 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 | |
Nokia 5.1 Plus | |
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite | |
Huawei P Smart 2019 | |
Honor 10 Lite | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite | |
Nokia 5.1 Plus | |
Umidigi Z2 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 | |
Huawei P Smart 2019 | |
Honor 10 Lite |
|
iluminação: 89 %
iluminação com acumulador: 467 cd/m²
Contraste: 805:1 (Preto: 0.58 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.5 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 2.4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
98.6% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.22
Honor 10 Lite IPS, 2340x1080, 6.2" | Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite IPS, 2280x1080, 6.3" | Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Super AMOLED, 2220x1080, 6" | Huawei P Smart 2019 IPS, 2340x1080, 6.2" | Umidigi Z2 Pro IPS, 2246x1080, 6.2" | Nokia 5.1 Plus IPS, 1520x720, 5.8" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | -18% | 21% | 15% | -110% | -37% | |
Brightness middle | 467 | 421 -10% | 570 22% | 458 -2% | 479 3% | 513 10% |
Brightness | 446 | 389 -13% | 565 27% | 440 -1% | 466 4% | 502 13% |
Brightness Distribution | 89 | 85 -4% | 93 4% | 85 -4% | 73 -18% | 89 0% |
Black Level * | 0.58 | 0.33 43% | 0.35 40% | 0.27 53% | 0.36 38% | |
Contrast | 805 | 1276 59% | 1309 63% | 1774 120% | 1425 77% | |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.5 | 3.4 -127% | 1.5 -0% | 1.4 7% | 8.2 -447% | 5.2 -247% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.5 | 5.9 -31% | 3.6 20% | 3.8 16% | 16.2 -260% | 9.8 -118% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.4 | 3.9 -63% | 1.2 50% | 2.4 -0% | 10.5 -338% | 4.1 -71% |
Gamma | 2.22 99% | 2.26 97% | 2.07 106% | 2.22 99% | 2.47 89% | 2.33 94% |
CCT | 6387 102% | 7330 89% | 6504 100% | 6235 104% | 9193 71% | 7423 88% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
27.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 8.4 ms rise | |
↘ 18.8 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 66 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
49.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 22 ms rise | |
↘ 27.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 84 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
GFXBench 3.0 | |
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
Honor 10 Lite | |
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite | |
Huawei P Smart 2019 | |
Umidigi Z2 Pro | |
Nokia 5.1 Plus | |
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (14 - 19, n=12) | |
Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 165, n=170, last 2 years) | |
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Honor 10 Lite | |
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite | |
Huawei P Smart 2019 | |
Umidigi Z2 Pro | |
Nokia 5.1 Plus | |
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (17 - 21, n=12) | |
Average of class Smartphone (12 - 482, n=170, last 2 years) |
GFXBench 3.1 | |
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
Honor 10 Lite | |
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite | |
Huawei P Smart 2019 | |
Umidigi Z2 Pro | |
Nokia 5.1 Plus | |
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (11 - 13, n=12) | |
Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 158, n=170, last 2 years) | |
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Honor 10 Lite | |
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite | |
Huawei P Smart 2019 | |
Umidigi Z2 Pro | |
Nokia 5.1 Plus | |
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (12 - 14, n=12) | |
Average of class Smartphone (8.3 - 341, n=170, last 2 years) |
Basemark GPU 1.1 | |
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Umidigi Z2 Pro | |
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (7.38 - 8, n=2) | |
Vulkan Medium Native (sort by value) | |
Umidigi Z2 Pro | |
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (7.26 - 9.43, n=2) | |
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Umidigi Z2 Pro | |
Nokia 5.1 Plus | |
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (10.3 - 10.3, n=2) |
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
Honor 10 Lite | |
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite | |
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 | |
Huawei P Smart 2019 | |
Umidigi Z2 Pro | |
Nokia 5.1 Plus | |
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (124870 - 183420, n=10) |
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite | |
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 | |
Huawei P Smart 2019 | |
Umidigi Z2 Pro | |
Nokia 5.1 Plus | |
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (104012 - 112870, n=8) |
VRMark - Amber Room (sort by value) | |
Umidigi Z2 Pro | |
Nokia 5.1 Plus | |
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (961 - 1146, n=3) | |
Average of class Smartphone (2523 - 10071, n=6, last 2 years) |
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value) | |
Umidigi Z2 Pro | |
Nokia 5.1 Plus | |
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (431 - 431, n=2) | |
Average of class Smartphone (205 - 7616, n=56, last 2 years) |
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite (Chrome 71) | |
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (47 - 55.1, n=10) | |
Huawei P Smart 2019 (Chrome 70) | |
Honor 10 Lite (Chrome 71) | |
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 (Chrome 70) | |
Umidigi Z2 Pro (Chrome 69) | |
Nokia 5.1 Plus (Chrome 71) |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=204, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite (Chrome 71) | |
Huawei P Smart 2019 (Chrome 70) | |
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (9041 - 10544, n=13) | |
Honor 10 Lite (Chrome 71) | |
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 (Chrome 70) | |
Nokia 5.1 Plus (Chrome 71) | |
Umidigi Z2 Pro (Chrome 69) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
Nokia 5.1 Plus (Chrome 71) | |
Umidigi Z2 Pro (Chrome 69) | |
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (3999 - 4853, n=13) | |
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 (Chrome 70) | |
Honor 10 Lite (Chrome 71) | |
Huawei P Smart 2019 (Chrome 70) | |
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite (Chrome 71) | |
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=161, last 2 years) |
WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=82, last 2 years) | |
Huawei P Smart 2019 (Chrome 70) | |
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite (Chrome 71) | |
Honor 10 Lite (Chrome 71) | |
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (52 - 69, n=11) | |
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 (Chrome 70) | |
Umidigi Z2 Pro | |
Nokia 5.1 Plus |
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall | |
Honor 10 Lite (Chrome 71) | |
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite (Chrome 71) | |
Huawei P Smart 2019 (Chrome 70) | |
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 (Chrome 70) | |
Umidigi Z2 Pro (Chrome 69) | |
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (147 - 178, n=5) | |
Nokia 5.1 Plus (Chrme 71) |
* ... smaller is better
Honor 10 Lite | Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite | Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 | Huawei P Smart 2019 | Umidigi Z2 Pro | Nokia 5.1 Plus | Average 64 GB eMMC Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | 1% | -6% | 2% | 2% | -8% | -7% | 517% | |
Sequential Read 256KB | 288.5 | 282.6 -2% | 295.8 3% | 288.3 0% | 292.9 2% | 301.6 5% | 274 ? -5% | 1834 ? 536% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 190.6 | 172.4 -10% | 104.9 -45% | 191.4 0% | 188.1 -1% | 88.9 -53% | 176.2 ? -8% | 1426 ? 648% |
Random Read 4KB | 45.15 | 81.3 80% | 84 86% | 45.66 1% | 86.2 91% | 77.7 72% | 59.4 ? 32% | 278 ? 516% |
Random Write 4KB | 66.1 | 18.75 -72% | 15.45 -77% | 70.7 7% | 20.34 -69% | 25.65 -61% | 32 ? -52% | 310 ? 369% |
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 75.8 ? | 85.9 ? 13% | 78.2 ? 3% | 76.2 ? 1% | 76.1 ? 0% | 76.6 ? 1% | 77.4 ? 2% | |
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 67 ? | 64 ? -4% | 64.4 ? -4% | 66.9 ? 0% | 58.9 ? -12% | 59.6 ? -11% | 58.3 ? -13% |
Arena of Valor
Asphalt 9: Legends
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 33.4 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33.4 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.9 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Honor 10 Lite audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 9.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 66% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 80% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Huawei P Smart 2019 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 10% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 66% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 80% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
desligado | 0.01 / 0.04 Watt |
Ocioso | 1 / 2.19 / 2.2 Watt |
Carga |
4.64 / 7.7 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Honor 10 Lite 3400 mAh | Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite 3350 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 3300 mAh | Huawei P Smart 2019 3400 mAh | Umidigi Z2 Pro 3550 mAh | Nokia 5.1 Plus 3060 mAh | Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 9% | 17% | 4% | 14% | 30% | -4% | 2% | |
Idle Minimum * | 1 | 0.56 44% | 0.71 29% | 0.84 16% | 0.71 29% | 0.56 44% | 1.058 ? -6% | 0.895 ? 10% |
Idle Average * | 2.19 | 1.99 9% | 1.36 38% | 2.21 -1% | 2.01 8% | 1.72 21% | 2.2 ? -0% | 1.447 ? 34% |
Idle Maximum * | 2.2 | 2.05 7% | 1.47 33% | 2.23 -1% | 2.03 8% | 1.76 20% | 2.57 ? -17% | 1.608 ? 27% |
Load Average * | 4.64 | 4.62 -0% | 5.13 -11% | 4.2 9% | 3.61 22% | 3.11 33% | 4.61 ? 1% | 6.41 ? -38% |
Load Maximum * | 7.7 | 8.94 -16% | 7.89 -2% | 7.86 -2% | 7.34 5% | 5.2 32% | 7.6 ? 1% | 9.61 ? -25% |
* ... smaller is better
Honor 10 Lite 3400 mAh | Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite 3350 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 3300 mAh | Huawei P Smart 2019 3400 mAh | Umidigi Z2 Pro 3550 mAh | Nokia 5.1 Plus 3060 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 10% | 35% | 6% | 29% | 33% | |
Reader / Idle | 1533 | 1678 9% | 1467 -4% | 1293 -16% | 1269 -17% | 1953 27% |
H.264 | 502 | 662 32% | 836 67% | 464 -8% | ||
WiFi v1.3 | 484 | 547 13% | 605 25% | 506 5% | 669 38% | 779 61% |
Load | 178 | 150 -16% | 273 53% | 257 44% | 294 65% | 198 11% |
Pro
Contra
Em nosso teste, o Honor 10 Lite apresenta-se como um smartphone de gama média de bom desempenho com uma boa câmera selfie. O desempenho do sistema é mais do que suficiente para a maioria das aplicações diárias e oferece reservas suficientes para os jogos atuais. O armazenamento corresponde ao equipamento usual nessa faixa de preço, e o restante dos recursos do smartphone Honor também é competitivo. No entanto, os compradores interessados também devem estar cientes da cobertura de bandas de baixa frequência para GSM e UMTS.
Por cerca de 250 Euros (~$283), o Honor 10 Lite oferece uma boa câmera selfie e um sólido desempenho do sistema na gama média. No entanto, o WLAN lento é desnecessário.
Os compradores interessados talvez possam perguntar sobre as diferenças com o Huawei P Smart (2019). Ele oferece equipamentos de hardware quase idênticos e possui WLAN mais rápida, que também é o maior compromisso entre os dois smartphones. Para os usuários que uma boa câmera frontal é mais importante, devem escolher o Honor 10 Lite, e os usuários que preferirem uma conexão WLAN rápida ficarão mais felizes com o Huawei P Smart (2019). Aqueles que não conseguem decidir podem gostar mais de um dos dispositivos concorrentes.
Honor 10 Lite
-
02/08/2019 v6 (old)
Mike Wobker