Breve Análise do Smartphone HTC U11
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
| HTC U11 | |
| Sony Xperia XZ Premium | |
| LG G6 | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Sony Xperia XZ Premium | |
| HTC U11 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
| LG G6 | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 90 %
iluminação com acumulador: 482 cd/m²
Contraste: 1461:1 (Preto: 0.33 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 2.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.22
| HTC U11 Super LCD5, 2560x1440, 5.5" | HTC 10 Super LCD 5, 2560x1440, 5.2" | Samsung Galaxy S8 Super AMOLED, 2960x1440, 5.8" | Huawei P10 Plus LTPS, 2560x1440, 5.5" | OnePlus 5 AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5" | Apple iPhone 7 Plus IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5" | Sony Xperia XZ Premium IPS, 3840x2160, 5.5" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -13% | 3% | 5% | 13% | 23% | -11% | |
| Brightness middle | 482 | 445 -8% | 566 17% | 568 18% | 426 -12% | 557 16% | 578 20% |
| Brightness | 472 | 434 -8% | 564 19% | 562 19% | 431 -9% | 553 17% | 568 20% |
| Brightness Distribution | 90 | 93 3% | 94 4% | 92 2% | 93 3% | 97 8% | 92 2% |
| Black Level * | 0.33 | 0.36 -9% | 0.43 -30% | 0.35 -6% | 0.62 -88% | ||
| Contrast | 1461 | 1236 -15% | 1321 -10% | 1591 9% | 932 -36% | ||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.2 | 2.8 12% | 2.7 16% | 2.4 25% | 1.6 50% | 1.4 56% | 2.8 12% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 5.4 | 5.8 -7% | 5.4 -0% | 3.8 30% | 4.1 24% | 3.1 43% | 5.1 6% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.2 | 3.7 -68% | 3.1 -41% | 2.5 -14% | 1.7 23% | 1.3 41% | 2.8 -27% |
| Gamma | 2.22 99% | 2.31 95% | 2.15 102% | 2.37 93% | 2.25 98% | 2.21 100% | 2.15 102% |
| CCT | 6581 99% | 7164 91% | 6335 103% | 6779 96% | 6329 103% | 6667 97% | 6728 97% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 81.57 | 63.1 | |||||
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 99.87 | 99.83 |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 24.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 10.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 14 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 54 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 42 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 20.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 21.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 64 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| HTC U11 | |
| HTC 10 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
| Huawei P10 Plus | |
| Sony Xperia XZ Premium | |
| LG G6 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z | |
| Xiaomi Mi 6 | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| Apple iPhone 7 Plus | |
| PCMark for Android | |
| Work performance score (sort by value) | |
| HTC U11 | |
| HTC 10 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
| Huawei P10 Plus | |
| Sony Xperia XZ Premium | |
| LG G6 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z | |
| Xiaomi Mi 6 | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value) | |
| HTC U11 | |
| HTC 10 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
| Huawei P10 Plus | |
| Sony Xperia XZ Premium | |
| LG G6 | |
| Xiaomi Mi 6 | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| Geekbench 4.4 | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| HTC U11 | |
| HTC 10 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
| Huawei P10 Plus | |
| Sony Xperia XZ Premium | |
| LG G6 | |
| Xiaomi Mi 6 | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| HTC U11 | |
| HTC 10 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
| Huawei P10 Plus | |
| Sony Xperia XZ Premium | |
| LG G6 | |
| Xiaomi Mi 6 | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
| T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| HTC U11 | |
| HTC 10 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
| Huawei P10 Plus | |
| Sony Xperia XZ Premium | |
| LG G6 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z | |
| Xiaomi Mi 6 | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| Apple iPhone 7 Plus | |
| 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| HTC U11 | |
| HTC 10 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
| Huawei P10 Plus | |
| Sony Xperia XZ Premium | |
| LG G6 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z | |
| Xiaomi Mi 6 | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| Apple iPhone 7 Plus | |
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
| HTC U11 | |
| HTC 10 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
| Huawei P10 Plus | |
| Sony Xperia XZ Premium | |
| LG G6 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z | |
| Xiaomi Mi 6 | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| Apple iPhone 7 Plus | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| HTC U11 | |
| HTC 10 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
| Huawei P10 Plus | |
| Sony Xperia XZ Premium | |
| LG G6 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z | |
| Xiaomi Mi 6 | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| Apple iPhone 7 Plus | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| HTC U11 | |
| HTC 10 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
| Huawei P10 Plus | |
| Sony Xperia XZ Premium | |
| LG G6 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z | |
| Xiaomi Mi 6 | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| Apple iPhone 7 Plus | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| HTC U11 | |
| HTC 10 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
| Huawei P10 Plus | |
| Sony Xperia XZ Premium | |
| LG G6 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z | |
| Xiaomi Mi 6 | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| Apple iPhone 7 Plus | |
| GFXBench | |
| on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| HTC U11 | |
| HTC 10 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
| Huawei P10 Plus | |
| Sony Xperia XZ Premium | |
| LG G6 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z | |
| Xiaomi Mi 6 | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| HTC U11 | |
| HTC 10 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
| Huawei P10 Plus | |
| Sony Xperia XZ Premium | |
| LG G6 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z | |
| Xiaomi Mi 6 | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value) | |
| HTC U11 | |
| HTC 10 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
| LG G6 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z | |
| Xiaomi Mi 6 | |
| Apple iPhone 7 Plus | |
| Lightmark - 1920x1080 1080p (sort by value) | |
| HTC U11 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
| LG G6 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z | |
| Xiaomi Mi 6 | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value) | |
| HTC U11 (Chrome 58) | |
| HTC 10 (Chrome 49) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 (Samsung Browser 5.2) | |
| Huawei P10 Plus | |
| Sony Xperia XZ Premium (Chrome 59) | |
| LG G6 (Chrome 57) | |
| Lenovo Moto Z (Chrome 53) | |
| OnePlus 5 (Chrome 59) | |
| Apple iPhone 7 Plus | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| HTC U11 (Chrome 58) | |
| HTC 10 (Chrome 49) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 (Samsung Browser 5.2) | |
| Huawei P10 Plus (Chrome 58.0.3029.83) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ Premium (Chrome 59) | |
| LG G6 (Chrome 57) | |
| Lenovo Moto Z (Chrome 53) | |
| Xiaomi Mi 6 (Chrome Version 58) | |
| OnePlus 5 (Chrome 59) | |
| Apple iPhone 7 Plus (Safari Mobile 10.0) | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| HTC U11 (Chrome 58) | |
| HTC 10 (Chrome 49) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 (Samsung Browser 5.2) | |
| Huawei P10 Plus | |
| Sony Xperia XZ Premium (Chrome 59) | |
| LG G6 (Chrome 57) | |
| Lenovo Moto Z (Chrome 53) | |
| Xiaomi Mi 6 (Chrome Version 58) | |
| OnePlus 5 (Chrome 59) | |
| Apple iPhone 7 Plus (Safari Mobile 10.0) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value) | |
| HTC U11 (Chrome 58) | |
| HTC 10 (Chrome 49) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 (Samsung Browser 5.2) | |
| Huawei P10 Plus (Chrome 58.0.3029.83) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ Premium (Chrome 59) | |
| LG G6 (Chrome 57) | |
| Lenovo Moto Z (Chrome 53) | |
| Xiaomi Mi 6 (Chrome Version 58) | |
| OnePlus 5 (Chrome 59) | |
| Apple iPhone 7 Plus (Safari Mobile 10.0) | |
* ... smaller is better
| HTC U11 | HTC 10 | Samsung Galaxy S8 | Huawei P10 Plus | Sony Xperia XZ Premium | LG G6 | Lenovo Moto Z | Xiaomi Mi 6 | OnePlus 5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -32% | -5% | 20% | -30% | -21% | -4% | -4% | -5% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 717 | 275.1 -62% | 793 11% | 733 2% | 687 -4% | 428.7 -40% | 439.7 -39% | 728 2% | 748 4% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 206.4 | 115.6 -44% | 193.2 -6% | 182.6 -12% | 194 -6% | 122.8 -41% | 168.3 -18% | 196.7 -5% | 201.5 -2% |
| Random Read 4KB | 91.4 | 29.92 -67% | 127.2 39% | 173.1 89% | 74.1 -19% | 95.2 4% | 117.2 28% | 143.5 57% | 141 54% |
| Random Write 4KB | 80 | 15.89 -80% | 15.25 -81% | 149.8 87% | 17.2 -78% | 16.58 -79% | 74.9 -6% | 25.19 -69% | 19.3 -76% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 68.8 ? | 83.3 ? 21% | 63.9 ? -7% | 54 ? -22% | 36.79 ? -47% | 77.6 ? 13% | 78.5 ? 14% | ||
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 46.25 ? | 65.4 ? 41% | 53.5 ? 16% | 33.61 ? -27% | 33.31 ? -28% | 53.3 ? 15% | 45.64 ? -1% |
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46.3 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.2 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 35.5 °C / 96 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
HTC U11 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 42% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 61% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Huawei P10 Plus audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 26% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
no name audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (98.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 1.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (2.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 0.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (1.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | reduced highs - on average 6.6% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado |   0.03 / 0.27 Watt |
| Ocioso |  0.73 / 1.96 / 1.98 Watt |
| Carga |
4.82 / 7.15 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| HTC U11 3000 mAh | HTC 10 3000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S8 3000 mAh | Huawei P10 Plus 3750 mAh | Sony Xperia XZ Premium 3230 mAh | Apple iPhone 7 Plus 2915 mAh | Lenovo Moto Z 2600 mAh | OnePlus 5 3300 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -11% | 24% | -41% | -11% | -8% | 21% | -2% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 0.73 | 0.68 7% | 0.78 -7% | 1.03 -41% | 0.62 15% | 0.77 -5% | 0.66 10% | 0.73 -0% |
| Idle Average * | 1.96 | 1.49 24% | 1.1 44% | 2.61 -33% | 2.44 -24% | 2.04 -4% | 1.01 48% | 1.44 27% |
| Idle Maximum * | 1.98 | 1.91 4% | 1.16 41% | 2.83 -43% | 2.59 -31% | 2.24 -13% | 1.09 45% | 1.5 24% |
| Load Average * | 4.82 | 7.4 -54% | 4.15 14% | 7.03 -46% | 4.94 -2% | 4.69 3% | 3.97 18% | 6.91 -43% |
| Load Maximum * | 7.15 | 9.71 -36% | 5.12 28% | 10.08 -41% | 7.91 -11% | 8.66 -21% | 8.34 -17% | 8.51 -19% |
* ... smaller is better
| HTC U11 3000 mAh | HTC 10 3000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S8 3000 mAh | Huawei P10 Plus 3750 mAh | Apple iPhone 7 Plus 2915 mAh | Sony Xperia XZ Premium 3230 mAh | LG G6 3300 mAh | Lenovo Moto Z 2600 mAh | Xiaomi Mi 6 3350 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 1% | 35% | 26% | 30% | 34% | 36% | 20% | 32% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1250 | 1273 2% | 1667 33% | 1655 32% | 1835 47% | 1754 40% | 1789 43% | 1371 10% | |
| H.264 | 498 | 648 30% | 771 55% | 756 52% | 813 63% | 802 61% | 779 56% | 724 45% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 560 | 413 -26% | 719 28% | 760 36% | 587 5% | 695 24% | 692 24% | 407 -27% | 739 32% |
| Load | 212 | 203 -4% | 264 25% | 174 -18% | 225 6% | 236 11% | 252 19% | 320 51% |
| PCMark for Android - Work 2.0 battery life | |
| Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos | |
| Huawei Mate 9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
| Sony Xperia XZ | |
| HTC U11 | |
| HTC 10 | |
Pro
Contra
Apesar do fato de que a HTC não modificou muito o design, o U11 parece ser diferente do HTC 10 e outros concorrentes graças aos diferentes materiais e à extraordinária escolha de cores. Do ponto de vista técnico, o smartphone está em um nível muito alto, pois vem equipado com um processador de gama alta atualizado e uma quantidade de armazenamento apropriada para sua classe. O aumento no preço de rua recomendado de 50 Euros (~$58) é bastante elevado, mas segue a tendência anual.
Embora o som sempre tenha sido um dos destaques da HTC, com o U11 não acontece mais. É verdade, a HTC incluiu muita tecnologia de áudio, mas, francamente, não entendemos a mudança para uma interface de áudio baseada em USB. Uma pena, dado que os fones incluídos são de primeira qualidade. Os usuários que preferem conectar seu alto-falante via Bluetooth também podem ficar decepcionados, dado que o aptX não é suportado.
O HTC U11 impressiona com suas cores pouco comuns, uma ótima câmera e um excelente desempenho do sistema. No entanto, a duração da bateria deixa a desejar.
O HTC U11 tira fotos excelentes de alta qualidade e supera o líder da categoria Galaxy S8 quando se trata de desempenho em baixa iluminação. isso ainda não é suficiente para o primeiro lugar nesta categoria, dado que a câmera perde pontos quando se trata de ajustabilidade e opções de vídeo disponíveis.
O U11 é comparativamente grande, mas ainda inclui apenas uma bateria de 3000 mAh como sua fonte de energia. Uma bateria de maior capacidade poderia ter sido uma melhor escolha, em nossa opinião, especialmente porque as durações não são tão boas em comparação com a concorrência. Apesar de tudo, o HTC U11 é um excelente smartphone.
HTC U11
- 07/22/2017 v6 (old)
Daniel Schmidt
Price comparison
