Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve Análise do Smartphone HTC U11 Plus
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 90 %
iluminação com acumulador: 361 cd/m²
Contraste: 1719:1 (Preto: 0.21 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.5 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 1.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.21
| HTC U11 Plus Super LCD 6, 2880x1440, 6" | HTC U11 Super LCD5, 2560x1440, 5.5" | Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus Super AMOLED, 2960x1440, 6.2" | Huawei Mate 10 Pro OLED, 2160x1080, 6" | Apple iPhone X Super AMOLED, 2436x1125, 5.8" | LG V30 OLED, 2880x1440, 6" | OnePlus 5T AMOLED, 2160x1080, 6" | Google Pixel 2 XL P-OLED, 2880x1440, 6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -8% | 32% | 30% | 40% | -51% | 7% | -9% | |
| Brightness middle | 361 | 482 34% | 560 55% | 629 74% | 600 66% | 432 20% | 425 18% | 415 15% |
| Brightness | 356 | 472 33% | 562 58% | 636 79% | 606 70% | 428 20% | 423 19% | 420 18% |
| Brightness Distribution | 90 | 90 0% | 93 3% | 94 4% | 94 4% | 87 -3% | 92 2% | 87 -3% |
| Black Level * | 0.21 | 0.33 -57% | ||||||
| Contrast | 1719 | 1461 -15% | ||||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.5 | 3.2 -28% | 1.7 32% | 1.7 32% | 1.2 52% | 4.18 -67% | 2.1 16% | 2.7 -8% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 5.3 | 5.4 -2% | 3.4 36% | 3.6 32% | 3 43% | 8.53 -61% | 3.4 36% | 4.3 19% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.7 | 2.2 -29% | 1.6 6% | 2.4 -41% | 1.6 6% | 5.3 -212% | 2.5 -47% | 3.3 -94% |
| Gamma | 2.21 100% | 2.22 99% | 2.13 103% | 2.15 102% | 2.23 99% | 2.33 94% | 2.32 95% | 2.36 93% |
| CCT | 6580 99% | 6581 99% | 6435 101% | 6337 103% | 6707 97% | 7487 87% | 6455 101% | 6787 96% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 81.57 | |||||||
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 99.87 |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 9615 Hz | ≤ 33 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 9615 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 33 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 9615 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 33.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 18.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 14.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 89 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 36.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 14.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 21.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 48 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| HTC U11 Plus | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro | |
| Apple iPhone X | |
| LG V30 | |
| Google Pixel 2 XL | |
| OnePlus 5T | |
| HTC U11 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| Motorola Moto Z2 Force | |
| PCMark for Android | |
| Work performance score (sort by value) | |
| HTC U11 Plus | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro | |
| LG V30 | |
| Google Pixel 2 XL | |
| OnePlus 5T | |
| HTC U11 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| Motorola Moto Z2 Force | |
| Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value) | |
| HTC U11 Plus | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro | |
| LG V30 | |
| Google Pixel 2 XL | |
| OnePlus 5T | |
| HTC U11 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| Motorola Moto Z2 Force | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
| T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| HTC U11 Plus | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro | |
| Apple iPhone X | |
| LG V30 | |
| Google Pixel 2 XL | |
| OnePlus 5T | |
| HTC U11 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| Motorola Moto Z2 Force | |
| 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| HTC U11 Plus | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro | |
| Apple iPhone X | |
| LG V30 | |
| Google Pixel 2 XL | |
| OnePlus 5T | |
| HTC U11 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| Motorola Moto Z2 Force | |
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
| HTC U11 Plus | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro | |
| Apple iPhone X | |
| LG V30 | |
| Google Pixel 2 XL | |
| OnePlus 5T | |
| HTC U11 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| Motorola Moto Z2 Force | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| HTC U11 Plus | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro | |
| Apple iPhone X | |
| LG V30 | |
| Google Pixel 2 XL | |
| OnePlus 5T | |
| HTC U11 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| Motorola Moto Z2 Force | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| HTC U11 Plus | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro | |
| Apple iPhone X | |
| LG V30 | |
| Google Pixel 2 XL | |
| OnePlus 5T | |
| HTC U11 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| Motorola Moto Z2 Force | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| HTC U11 Plus | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro | |
| Apple iPhone X | |
| LG V30 | |
| Google Pixel 2 XL | |
| OnePlus 5T | |
| HTC U11 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| Motorola Moto Z2 Force | |
| Lightmark - 1920x1080 1080p (sort by value) | |
| HTC U11 Plus | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro | |
| Google Pixel 2 XL | |
| HTC U11 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| Basemark X 1.1 | |
| Medium Quality (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro | |
| HTC U11 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| High Quality (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro | |
| HTC U11 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value) | |
| HTC U11 Plus | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro | |
| Apple iPhone X | |
| Google Pixel 2 XL | |
| HTC U11 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| Epic Citadel - Ultra High Quality (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro | |
| HTC U11 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Apple iPhone X (IOS 11.1.1) | |
| HTC U11 (Chrome 58) | |
| Motorola Moto Z2 Force (Chrome 63.0.3239.111) | |
| OnePlus 5T (Chrome 63) | |
| HTC U11 Plus (Chrome 63) | |
| Google Pixel 2 XL (Chrome 62) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus (Samsung Browser 5.2) | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro (Chrome 61) | |
| LG V30 (Chrome 62) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Apple iPhone X (IOS 11.1.2) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus (Samsung Browser 5.2) | |
| Motorola Moto Z2 Force (Chrome 63.0.3239.111) | |
| OnePlus 5T (Chrome 63) | |
| HTC U11 (Chrome 58) | |
| HTC U11 Plus (Chrome 63) | |
| Google Pixel 2 XL (Chrome 62) | |
| LG V30 (Chrome 62) | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro (Chrome 61) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| LG V30 (Chrome 62) | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro (Chrome 61) | |
| Google Pixel 2 XL (Chrome 62) | |
| Motorola Moto Z2 Force (Chrome 63.0.3239.111) | |
| HTC U11 Plus (Chrome 63) | |
| OnePlus 5T (Chrome 63) | |
| HTC U11 (Chrome 58) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus (Samsung Browser 5.2) | |
| Apple iPhone X (IOS 11.1.2) | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall | |
| Apple iPhone X (Safari Mobile 11.0) | |
| Google Pixel 2 XL (Chrome 62) | |
| OnePlus 5T (Chrome 63) | |
| HTC U11 Plus (Chrome 63) | |
| HTC U11 (Chrome 58) | |
| Motorola Moto Z2 Force (Chrome 63.0.3239.111) | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro (Chrome 61) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus (Samsung Browser 5.2) | |
| LG V30 (Chrome 62) | |
* ... smaller is better
| HTC U11 Plus | Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | LG V30 | Motorola Moto Z2 Force | Honor View 10 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -14% | -29% | -4% | 11% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 728 | 788 8% | 669 -8% | 696 -4% | 810 11% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 207.9 | 194.2 -7% | 193.2 -7% | 213.6 3% | 194.3 -7% |
| Random Read 4KB | 132.4 | 127.2 -4% | 78.2 -41% | 148.8 12% | 144.3 9% |
| Random Write 4KB | 135.7 | 15.27 -89% | 10.21 -92% | 78.6 -42% | 160 18% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 75.4 ? | 71.1 ? -6% | 62.8 -17% | 77.4 ? 3% | 81 ? 7% |
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 51.3 ? | 57.2 ? 12% | 47.2 -8% | 54.7 ? 7% | 65.1 ? 27% |
| Asphalt 8: Airborne | |||
| Configurações | Valor | ||
| high | 29 fps | ||
| very low | 30 fps | ||
| Dead Trigger 2 | |||
| Configurações | Valor | ||
| high | 59 fps | ||
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.8 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36.1 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.8 °C / 89 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
HTC U11 Plus audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 31% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 51% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 42% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 61% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Google Pixel 2 XL audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 25% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 45% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 48% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado |   0.03 / 0.14 Watt |
| Ocioso |  0.51 / 1.62 / 1.87 Watt |
| Carga |
3.92 / 8.27 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| HTC U11 Plus 3930 mAh | HTC U11 3000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus 3500 mAh | OnePlus 5T 3300 mAh | Google Pixel 2 XL 3520 mAh | Huawei Mate 10 Pro 4000 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -16% | 10% | 6% | -32% | -2% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 0.51 | 0.73 -43% | 0.68 -33% | 0.58 -14% | 1.28 -151% | 0.85 -67% |
| Idle Average * | 1.62 | 1.96 -21% | 1.13 30% | 1.44 11% | 1.87 -15% | 1.15 29% |
| Idle Maximum * | 1.87 | 1.98 -6% | 1.16 38% | 1.53 18% | 1.89 -1% | 1.23 34% |
| Load Average * | 3.92 | 4.82 -23% | 4.69 -20% | 3.17 19% | 3.73 5% | 4.12 -5% |
| Load Maximum * | 8.27 | 7.15 14% | 5.24 37% | 8.54 -3% | 8.08 2% | 8.42 -2% |
* ... smaller is better
| HTC U11 Plus 3930 mAh | HTC U11 3000 mAh | Huawei Mate 10 Pro 4000 mAh | Apple iPhone X 2716 mAh | OnePlus 5T 3300 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus 3500 mAh | Motorola Moto Z2 Force 2730 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -19% | 33% | -15% | 11% | 8% | 11% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1625 | 1250 -23% | 1744 7% | 1292 -20% | 1754 8% | 1565 -4% | 1630 0% |
| H.264 | 611 | 498 -18% | 929 52% | 634 4% | 799 31% | 742 21% | 811 33% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 607 | 560 -8% | 818 35% | 564 -7% | 718 18% | 736 21% | 531 -13% |
| Load | 291 | 212 -27% | 398 37% | 180 -38% | 257 -12% | 275 -5% | 354 22% |
Pro
Contra
Com o U11 Plus, a HTC se mantém fiel ao seu design. No entanto, dá ao novo carro-chefe uma paleta de cores menor que a do U11. A HTC faz muitas coisas bem com o seu último carro-chefe e, novamente, depende dos grampos experimentados e verdadeiros que já vimos no modelo de irmão menor. Estes incluem: Um SoC Snapdragon extremamente rápido, muito espaço de armazenamento, que pode ser expandido, uma carcaça resistente à água e à poeira, um módulo GPS preciso e uma tela muito bem calibrada, que é muito confortável de segurar apesar do tamanho, graças ao seu novo formato 2:1.
Infelizmente, a tela é comparativamente escura. Isso vai causar alguns problemas durante os dias ensolarados do ano, porque a legibilidade em exteriores é bastante limitada. Outro mistério gira em torno de por que o HTC U11 Plus não utiliza o seu modem LTE em toda sua extensão e, em vez disso, é limitado às velocidades da categoria 15.
Com o U11 Plus, a HTC oferece um ótimo smartphone. No entanto, as falhas, em termos de brilho da tela e velocidade LTE, causam uma boa impressão geral.
A bateria massiva resulta em um ótimo tempo de duração. No entanto, esperamos melhores durações de bateria de um dispositivo com esse tamanho. Dito isto, a duração da bateria ainda pode ser melhorada com atualizações futuras. O desempenho do sistema está em um nível muito alto. Isso faz do HTC U11 Plus um dos smartphones Android mais rápidos do mercado.
HTC U11 Plus
-
02/28/2018 v6 (old)
Daniel Schmidt