Breve Análise do Smartphone HTC U Ultra

Name: HTC U Ultra
Brand: HTC

O retorno? O smartphone carro-chefe U Ultra é o pavimento da via para a necessidade desesperada de retornar da HTC. Isto poderia ser um sucesso com um assistente inteligente, tecnologia de áudio de alta qualidade, e uma segunda tela. No entanto, alguns resultados do teste deixam algumas dúvidas, depois de tudo. Descubra o que achamos do aparelho, na seguinte análise.

Florian Wimmer, ✓ Stefanie Voigt (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 03/27/2017 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android ARM Touchscreen Smartphone

Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

HTC U Ultra (U Serie)

Processador

Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro 4 x 2.15 GHz, Kryo

Placa gráfica

Qualcomm Adreno 530

Memória

4 GB

Pantalha

5.70 polegadas 16:9, 2560 x 1440 pixel 515 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, SLCD 5, Corning Gorilla Glass 5, tela secundária: 2,05", 1040x160 pixels, Brilhante: sim

Disco rígido

64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB

, 54 GB livre

Conexões

1 USB 3.0, Conexões Audio: Saída de áudio via USB Type-C, 4 microfones para gravações 3D, Card Reader: micro-SD max. 2 TB, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: sensor de proximidade, acelerômetro, bússola, sensor de inclinação, sensor magnético, DLNA, Miracast, USB-OTG

Funcionamento em rede

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM (850/900/1800/1900), UMTS (850/900/1700/1900/2100), LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B17/B20/B28/B38/B39/B40/B41); bandwidth (download/upload): 600Mbps/50Mbps (LTE), LTE, GPS

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 8 x 162.4 x 79.9

Bateria

11.4 Wh, 3000 mAh Lítio-Ion, Quick Charge 3.0, Tempo de conversação 3G (de acordo com o fabricante): 26 h, Standby 3G (de acordo com o fabricante): 300 h

Sistema Operativo

Android 7.0 Nougat

Camera

Primary Camera: 12 MPix Detecção facial e foco a laser, estabilizador ótico de imagem, ƒ/1.8, vidro de safiro, flash dual-LED, vídeos @2160p/30fps
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix ƒ/2.0, voice selfie, videos @1080p/30fps

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: Alto falante frontal, Teclado: Teclado virtual, headset, charger, USB cable, SIM tool, Viveport, Sense Companion (not yet available), HTC Assist, 24 Meses Garantia, SAR: 0.374W/kg (head), 1.2W/kg (body), fanless

peso

170 g, Suprimento de energia: 60 g

Preço

800 Euro

Links

HTC página inicial

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Google Pixel XL 2016 Adreno 530, SD 821, 32 GB eMMC Flash	435 MBit/s +68%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	335 MBit/s +29%
HTC U Ultra Adreno 530, SD 821, 64 GB eMMC Flash	259 MBit/s
LG G6 Adreno 530, SD 821, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	220 MBit/s -15%
iperf3 receive AX12
Google Pixel XL 2016 Adreno 530, SD 821, 32 GB eMMC Flash	515 MBit/s +109%
LG G6 Adreno 530, SD 821, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	325 MBit/s +32%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	281 MBit/s +14%
HTC U Ultra Adreno 530, SD 821, 64 GB eMMC Flash	247 MBit/s

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images


472 cd/m²	453 cd/m²	438 cd/m²
444 cd/m²	470 cd/m²	427 cd/m²
433 cd/m²	450 cd/m²	415 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 472 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 444.7 cd/m² Minimum: 4.1 cd/m²
iluminação: 88 %
iluminação com acumulador: 470 cd/m²
Contraste: 2136:1 (Preto: 0.22 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.5 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 7.6 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
98.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.2

	HTC U Ultra SLCD 5, 2560x1440, 5.7"	Apple iPhone 7 Plus IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5"	Google Pixel XL 2016 AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.5"	Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Super AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.5"	LG G6 IPS LCD, 2880x1440, 5.7"
Screen		25%	13%	46%	21%
Brightness middle	470	557 19%	402 -14%	554 18%	646 37%
Brightness	445	553 24%	408 -8%	552 24%	611 37%
Brightness Distribution	88	97 10%	85 -3%	96 9%	89 1%
Black Level *	0.22	0.35 -59%			0.23 -5%
Contrast	2136	1591 -26%			2809 32%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	5.5	1.4 75%	4 27%	1.59 71%	4.5 18%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	11.9	3.1 74%	10.1 15%	2.56 78%	8.3 30%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	7.6	1.3 83%	3.2 58%	2.01 74%	6 21%
Gamma	2.2 ^100%	2.21 ^100%	2.19 ^100%	2.01 ^109%	2.27 ^97%
CCT	7454 ^87%	6667 ^97%	7037 ^92%	6321 ^103%	7996 ^81%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)		63.1		82.12	67.74
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)		99.83		99.98	99.05

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
36 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 22 ms rise
36 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 14 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 93 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
44 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 22 ms rise
44 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 22 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 71 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
HTC U Ultra	139017 Points
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	165399 Points +19%
Google Pixel XL 2016	138641 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	128749 Points -7%
LG G6	151751 Points +9%

Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
HTC U Ultra	1643 Points
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	3476 Points +112%
Google Pixel XL 2016	1513 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	1840 Points +12%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
HTC U Ultra	3983 Points
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	5630 Points +41%
Google Pixel XL 2016	4167 Points +5%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	5503 Points +38%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
HTC U Ultra	29668 Points
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	37746 Points +27%
Google Pixel XL 2016	27766 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	28671 Points -3%
LG G6	29276 Points -1%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
HTC U Ultra	33446 Points
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	63386 Points +90%
Google Pixel XL 2016	32652 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	33031 Points -1%
LG G6	32128 Points -4%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
HTC U Ultra	21263 Points
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	15626 Points -27%
Google Pixel XL 2016	18222 Points -14%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	19610 Points -8%
LG G6	22335 Points +5%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
HTC U Ultra	2947 Points
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	3034 Points +3%
Google Pixel XL 2016	3180 Points +8%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	2710 (2421^min) Points -8%
LG G6	3282 Points +11%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
HTC U Ultra	3807 Points
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	4235 Points +11%
Google Pixel XL 2016	3935 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	3015 (2895^min) Points -21%
LG G6	4121 Points +8%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
HTC U Ultra	1646 Points
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	1522 Points -8%
Google Pixel XL 2016	1902 Points +16%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	2002 (1539^min) Points +22%
LG G6	1961 Points +19%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
HTC U Ultra	2225 Points
Google Pixel XL 2016	2560 Points +15%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	2204 (1923^min) Points -1%
LG G6	2669 Points +20%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
HTC U Ultra	2405 Points
Google Pixel XL 2016	2820 Points +17%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	2229 (2043^min) Points -7%
LG G6	2980 Points +24%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
HTC U Ultra	1763 Points
Google Pixel XL 2016	1935 Points +10%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	2121 (1594^min) Points +20%
LG G6	1955 Points +11%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
HTC U Ultra	46 fps
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	57.7 fps +25%
Google Pixel XL 2016	55 fps +20%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	51 fps +11%
LG G6	46 fps 0%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
HTC U Ultra	74 fps
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	92 fps +24%
Google Pixel XL 2016	91 fps +23%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	81 fps +9%
LG G6	75 fps +1%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
HTC U Ultra	23 fps
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	55.2 fps +140%
Google Pixel XL 2016	30 fps +30%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	27 fps +17%
LG G6	27 fps +17%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
HTC U Ultra	26 fps
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	58.7 fps +126%
Google Pixel XL 2016	48 fps +85%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	38 fps +46%
LG G6	38 fps +46%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
HTC U Ultra	12 fps
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	41.5 fps +246%
Google Pixel XL 2016	17 fps +42%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	15 fps +25%
LG G6	16 fps +33%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
HTC U Ultra	12 fps
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	41.3 fps +244%
Google Pixel XL 2016	32 fps +167%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	28 fps +133%
LG G6	29 fps +142%

PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
HTC U Ultra	5217 Points
Google Pixel XL 2016	4739 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	4660 Points -11%
LG G6	5703 Points +9%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
HTC U Ultra	2078 Points
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	3097 Points +49%
Google Pixel XL 2016	2378 Points +14%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	2074 Points 0%
LG G6	2496 Points +20%
System (sort by value)
HTC U Ultra	2834 Points
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	6582 Points +132%
Google Pixel XL 2016	3889 Points +37%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	4080 Points +44%
LG G6	3646 Points +29%
Memory (sort by value)
HTC U Ultra	1581 Points
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	1319 Points -17%
Google Pixel XL 2016	1677 Points +6%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	2072 Points +31%
LG G6	1930 Points +22%
Graphics (sort by value)
HTC U Ultra	4591 Points
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	6875 Points +50%
Google Pixel XL 2016	5017 Points +9%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	2203 Points -52%
LG G6	5138 Points +12%
Web (sort by value)
HTC U Ultra	907 Points
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	1542 Points +70%
Google Pixel XL 2016	977 Points +8%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	994 Points +10%
LG G6	1073 Points +18%

Legend

HTC U Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 64 GB eMMC Flash

Apple iPhone 7 Plus Apple A10 Fusion, Apple A10 Fusion GPU / PowerVR, 128 GB NVMe

Google Pixel XL 2016 Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Samsung Exynos 8890 Octa, ARM Mali-T880 MP12, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash

LG G6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash

Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1 | JetStream 1.1

Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
HTC U Ultra	5511 Points
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	26053 Points +373%
Google Pixel XL 2016	8690 Points +58%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	13191 Points +139%
LG G6	9113 Points +65%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value)
HTC U Ultra	4141 ms *
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	1103 ms * +73%
Google Pixel XL 2016	2654 ms * +36%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	2564 ms * +38%
LG G6	2464 ms * +40%

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
HTC U Ultra	45.08 Points
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	168.1 Points +273%
Google Pixel XL 2016	55.4 Points +23%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	75.1 Points +67%
LG G6	56.6 Points +26%

* ... smaller is better

AndroBench 3-5
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value)
HTC U Ultra	423.9 MB/s
Google Pixel XL 2016	258.2 MB/s -39%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	487.3 MB/s +15%
LG G6	428.7 MB/s +1%
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value)
HTC U Ultra	164.7 MB/s
Google Pixel XL 2016	83.4 MB/s -49%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	145.1 MB/s -12%
LG G6	122.8 MB/s -25%
Random Read 4KB (sort by value)
HTC U Ultra	84.2 MB/s
Google Pixel XL 2016	87.7 MB/s +4%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	86.7 MB/s +3%
LG G6	95.2 MB/s +13%
Random Write 4KB (sort by value)
HTC U Ultra	13.7 MB/s
Google Pixel XL 2016	14.56 MB/s +6%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	15.79 MB/s +15%
LG G6	16.58 MB/s +21%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
HTC U Ultra	82.8 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	76.4 MB/s -8%
LG G6	77.6 MB/s -6%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
HTC U Ultra	67.6 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	50.4 MB/s -25%
LG G6	53.3 MB/s -21%

Carga Máxima

Inatividade


32 °C	32.4 °C	33.4 °C
34 °C	34.6 °C	36.4 °C
35.5 °C	36.9 °C	34.5 °C

Máximo: 36.9 °C
Médio: 34.4 °C


31 °C	33.3 °C	31.3 °C
32 °C	35.1 °C	32.5 °C
31.7 °C	37.2 °C	34.1 °C

Máximo: 37.2 °C
Médio: 33.1 °C

alimentação elétrica 32.2 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21 °C | Voltcraft IR-350

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.4 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.9 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37.2 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.5 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

HTC U Ultra audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 12.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (29% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 74% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 85% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 12% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple iPhone 7 Plus audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 41% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 60% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.12 / 0.28 Watt
Ocioso	1 / 2.41 / 2.46 Watt
Carga	6.8 / 8.9 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	HTC U Ultra 3000 mAh	Apple iPhone 7 Plus 2915 mAh	Google Pixel XL 2016 3450 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge 3600 mAh
Power Consumption		16%	41%	33%
Idle Minimum *	1	0.77 23%	0.53 47%	0.63 37%
Idle Average *	2.41	2.04 15%	1.07 56%	1.1 54%
Idle Maximum *	2.46	2.24 9%	1.12 54%	1.56 37%
Load Average *	6.8	4.69 31%	5.53 19%	5.95 12%
Load Maximum *	8.9	8.66 3%	6.26 30%	6.7 25%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		26h 08min
WiFi Websurfing		9h 06min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		10h 05min
Carga (máximo brilho)		3h 34min

	HTC U Ultra 3000 mAh	Apple iPhone 7 Plus 2915 mAh	Google Pixel XL 2016 3450 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge 3600 mAh	LG G6 3300 mAh
Battery Runtime		16%	-8%	44%	22%
Reader / Idle	1568	1835 17%	1333 -15%	1663 6%	1789 14%
H.264	605	813 34%	505 -17%	914 51%	779 29%
WiFi v1.3	546	587 8%	505 -8%	732 34%	692 27%
Load	214	225 5%	230 7%	392 83%	252 18%

Pro

+ Carcaça muito elegante

+ Segunda tela de alta resolução

+ Assistente pessoal pré-carregado

+ Boa configuração de memória

+ Boas fotos da câmera

+ Função de carga rápida

+ Headset de alta qualidade incluído

+ Painel de alta resolução e com ângulos de visão estáveis

+ Baixa temperatura

+ Quatro microfones para gravação de áudio 3D

Contra

- Traseira sensível á pressão

- Imã para as digitais

- Alto falante medíocre

- Sem conector de áudio de 3,5-mm

- WiFi comparativamente lento

- GPS um pouco inexato

- Mudanças fortes das cores da tela

- Alto consumo de energia

In review: HTC U Ultra. Test model provided by Notebooksbilliger.de

Em termos de design, a HTC entrega um excelente aparelho com o seu U Ultra: A parte traseira cintilante é definitivamente chama a atenção. O headset também consegue ganhar pontos em muitos outros aspectos. O headset de gama alta incluído é agradável, a exuberante configuração de memória é um bônus, e as câmeras fazem um trabalho muito bom. O software é atraente e a HTC realmente se esforçou para fazer de seus smartphones algo especial.

Somente a duração da bateria, o lapso na velocidade do WiFi, e o GPU inexato, bem como alguns recursos faltantes, como a carga sem fios ou a proteção contra água e poeira com as quais vem os atuais modelos premium de outros fabricantes, são coisas que colocam o HTC U Ultra em uma má luz. A segunda tela e uma faca de dois gumes: Por outro lado, precisa de poder adicional e nem sempre é a solução mais prática. Por outro lado, é definitivamente agradável ter um reprodutor de música em uma segunda tela pequena. Por isso, o usuário terá que decidir se é útil ou não.

O HTC U Ultra é um gigante: Com uma tela de 5,7polegadas e uma tela secundária, ele possui uma área de superfície de tela única. Um headset inovador e um assistente pessoal também são parte do pacote. É uma pena que a HTC estrague as coisas em sua habilidade chave: Os alto falantes são medíocres apenas.

Em resumo, o HTC U Ultra é, de fato, um smartphone de gama premium graças a suas voas taxas de desempenho, baixas temperaturas, acessórios de alta qualidade, e algumas inovações. No entanto, não consegue competir bem com os modelos top da Apple e Samsung. Para isso falta um pouco de perfeição em algumas áreas.

HTC U Ultra - 03/23/2017 v6 ^(old)
Florian Wimmer

Acabamento

88%

Teclado

65 / 75 → 87%

Mouse

93%

Conectividade

47 / 60 → 78%

Peso

91%

Bateria

91%

Pantalha

85%

Desempenho do jogos

57 / 63 → 90%

Desempenho da aplicação

57 / 70 → 81%

Temperatura

91%

Ruído

100%

Audio

62 / 91 → 68%

Camera

88%

Médio

78%

87%

Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone HTC U Ultra

Florian Wimmer, 2017-03-27 (Update: 2017-04- 4)

Size Comparison

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

HTC U Ultra audio analysis

Apple iPhone 7 Plus audio analysis

Pro

Contra

More articles related to this device

Price comparison