Breve Análise do Smartphone HTC U Play
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| OnePlus 3T | |
| HTC U Play | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| OnePlus 3T | |
| HTC U Play | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 90 %
iluminação com acumulador: 424 cd/m²
Contraste: 1696:1 (Preto: 0.25 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.7 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 4.1 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.32
| HTC U Play Super LCD, 1920x1080, 5.2" | OnePlus 3T Optic-AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5" | Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5" | Sony Xperia X LCD, 1920x1080, 5" | Huawei Nova Plus IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5" | Honor 8 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -24% | -14% | -54% | -10% | -16% | |
| Brightness middle | 424 | 421 -1% | 658 55% | 404 -5% | 485 14% | 451 6% |
| Brightness | 432 | 430 0% | 633 47% | 392 -9% | 481 11% | 443 3% |
| Brightness Distribution | 90 | 84 -7% | 93 3% | 91 1% | 90 0% | 93 3% |
| Black Level * | 0.25 | 0.66 -164% | 0.68 -172% | 0.5 -100% | 0.4 -60% | |
| Contrast | 1696 | 997 -41% | 594 -65% | 970 -43% | 1128 -33% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.7 | 7.1 -25% | 4.9 14% | 7.1 -25% | 4.2 26% | 5.4 5% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 10.8 | 15.3 -42% | 9.1 16% | 13.2 -22% | 7.9 27% | 9.9 8% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.1 | 6.8 -66% | 5.8 -41% | 9.7 -137% | 4.8 -17% | 6.7 -63% |
| Gamma | 2.32 95% | 2.23 99% | 2.26 97% | 2.23 99% | 2.36 93% | 2.33 94% |
| CCT | 7359 88% | 7866 83% | 7840 83% | 9502 68% | 7568 86% | 8262 79% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 30 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 19 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 11 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 78 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 14 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 18 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 39 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| HTC U Play | |
| OnePlus 3T | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| Sony Xperia X | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| Honor 8 | |
| Geekbench 4.0 | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| HTC U Play | |
| OnePlus 3T | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| Honor 8 | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| HTC U Play | |
| OnePlus 3T | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| Honor 8 | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
| T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| HTC U Play | |
| OnePlus 3T | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| Sony Xperia X | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| Honor 8 | |
| 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| HTC U Play | |
| OnePlus 3T | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| Sony Xperia X | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| Honor 8 | |
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
| HTC U Play | |
| OnePlus 3T | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| Sony Xperia X | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| Honor 8 | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| HTC U Play | |
| OnePlus 3T | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| Sony Xperia X | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| Honor 8 | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| HTC U Play | |
| OnePlus 3T | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| Sony Xperia X | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| Honor 8 | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| HTC U Play | |
| OnePlus 3T | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| Sony Xperia X | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| Honor 8 | |
| PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value) | |
| HTC U Play | |
| OnePlus 3T | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| Sony Xperia X | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| Honor 8 | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| HTC U Play | |
| OnePlus 3T | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| Sony Xperia X | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| Honor 8 | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value) | |
| HTC U Play | |
| OnePlus 3T | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| Sony Xperia X | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| Honor 8 | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| HTC U Play | |
| OnePlus 3T | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| Sony Xperia X | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| Honor 8 | |
* ... smaller is better
| AndroBench 3-5 | |
| Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value) | |
| HTC U Play | |
| OnePlus 3T | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| Sony Xperia X | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| Honor 8 | |
| Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value) | |
| HTC U Play | |
| OnePlus 3T | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| Sony Xperia X | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| Honor 8 | |
| Random Read 4KB (sort by value) | |
| HTC U Play | |
| OnePlus 3T | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| Sony Xperia X | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| Honor 8 | |
| Random Write 4KB (sort by value) | |
| HTC U Play | |
| OnePlus 3T | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| Sony Xperia X | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| Honor 8 | |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (sort by value) | |
| HTC U Play | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| Sony Xperia X | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| Honor 8 | |
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (sort by value) | |
| HTC U Play | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| Sony Xperia X | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| Honor 8 | |
| Asphalt 8: Airborne | |||
| Configurações | Valor | ||
| high | 29 fps | ||
| very low | 30 fps | ||
| Dead Trigger 2 | |||
| Configurações | Valor | ||
| high | 48 fps | ||
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.9 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 34.8 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.3 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
HTC U Play audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 9.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (28.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 72% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 84% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 13% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
OnePlus 3T audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 34% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 53% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado |   0.11 / 0.24 Watt |
| Ocioso |  0.92 / 1.84 / 2 Watt |
| Carga |
4.3 / 6.2 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| HTC U Play 2500 mAh | OnePlus 3T 3400 mAh | Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL 3000 mAh | Sony Xperia X 2620 mAh | Huawei Nova Plus 3340 mAh | Honor 8 3000 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -17% | 4% | 1% | 24% | 0% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 0.92 | 0.61 34% | 0.83 10% | 0.56 39% | 0.49 47% | 0.78 15% |
| Idle Average * | 1.84 | 1.77 4% | 2.11 -15% | 1.69 8% | 1.63 11% | 1.89 -3% |
| Idle Maximum * | 2 | 1.81 9% | 2.12 -6% | 1.75 12% | 1.76 12% | 2.02 -1% |
| Load Average * | 4.3 | 6.67 -55% | 3.41 21% | 6.01 -40% | 2.98 31% | 5.28 -23% |
| Load Maximum * | 6.2 | 10.98 -77% | 5.46 12% | 7.03 -13% | 4.99 20% | 5.44 12% |
* ... smaller is better
| HTC U Play 2500 mAh | OnePlus 3T 3400 mAh | Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL 3000 mAh | Sony Xperia X 2620 mAh | Huawei Nova Plus 3340 mAh | Honor 8 3000 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 24% | 54% | -4% | 59% | 9% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1302 | 1423 9% | 1502 15% | 1240 -5% | 2048 57% | 1487 14% |
| H.264 | 514 | 810 58% | 905 76% | 518 1% | 732 42% | 526 2% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 473 | 494 4% | 797 68% | 434 -8% | 820 73% | 499 5% |
| Load | 223 | 282 26% | 352 58% | 213 -4% | 366 64% | 255 14% |
Pro
Contra
O HTC U Play tem um bom visual, vem com um assistente pessoal, possui duas câmeras de alta resolução, e é entregue com extras generosos em sua caixa. Então por que é tão difícil para nós outorga-lhe uma recomendação de compra incondicional na competitiva gama média superior? Bem, o smartphone da HTC infelizmente não consegue competir com os diversos oponentes carregados de recursos, em muitos aspectos. Embora as câmeras tenham uma resolução alta, ambos os módulos têm problemas com as bordas afiadas ou pixeladas no modo UltraPixel. O assistente pessoal é bom de ter, mas muitos aplicativos com recursos similares podem ser encontrados na Google Play Store. O headset adaptativo é soberbo e inovador, mas levou à perda do conector de 3,5 mm que é bastante importante para muitos usuários.
Infelizmente, o alto falante permanece bem atrás dos padrões conhecidos da HTC; a qualidade do microfone também é apenas medíocre. É difícil para nós recomendar o handset dado que o HTC U Play oferece um desempenho ainda menor que aparelhos do mesmo preço. A duração da bateria situada abaixo da média da categoria ainda é outro problema do smartphone.
A HTC montou um aparelho de gama média elegante e relativamente sólido, instala uma boa câmera frontal e pouco software, e a HTC o equipa com uma boa tela e muitos extras. Infelizmente, os aspectos como som, desempenho, e duração da bateria permanecem atrás das expectativas.
Finalmente, o HTC U Play é um sólido smartphone de gama média, mas a concorrência agora oferece mais. Os usuários que achem que um headset high-tech, o assistente pessoal e a câmera frontal de lata resolução são argumentos convincentes, obterão um smartphone elegante. No entanto, eles também terão que aceitar a medíocre duração da bateria e desempenho um pouco moderado.
HTC U Play
- 03/28/2017 v6 (old)
Florian Wimmer
Price comparison
