Breve Análise do Smartphone HTC One A9s
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
Size Comparison
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Apple iPhone 7 (Klaus I211) | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 | |
HTC One A9s | |
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Apple iPhone 7 (Klaus I211) | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 | |
HTC One A9s | |
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle |
|
iluminação: 85 %
iluminação com acumulador: 348 cd/m²
Contraste: 1513:1 (Preto: 0.23 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.5 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
95.1% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.3
HTC One A9s IPS, 1280x720, 5" | OnePlus 2 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5" | Lenovo ZUK Z2 IPS, 1920x1080, 5" | Gigaset ME IPS, 1920x1080, 5" | Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 Super AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.2" | HTC One A9 AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | 5% | -18% | -10% | 31% | 24% | |
Brightness middle | 348 | 451 30% | 512 47% | 445 28% | 378 9% | 346 -1% |
Brightness | 320 | 446 39% | 502 57% | 456 43% | 380 19% | 349 9% |
Brightness Distribution | 85 | 90 6% | 84 -1% | 93 9% | 91 7% | 93 9% |
Black Level * | 0.23 | 0.3 -30% | 0.58 -152% | 0.38 -65% | ||
Contrast | 1513 | 1503 -1% | 883 -42% | 1171 -23% | ||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.5 | 3.84 -10% | 3.8 -9% | 4.29 -23% | 1.95 44% | 1.55 56% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6.4 | 11.2 -75% | 7.89 -23% | 3.09 52% | ||
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4 | 3.97 1% | 2.7 32% | 4.97 -24% | 1.86 53% | 2.05 49% |
Gamma | 2.3 96% | 2.46 89% | 2.09 105% | 2.57 86% | 2.13 103% | 2.15 102% |
CCT | 6527 100% | 7283 89% | 6076 107% | 7625 85% | 6376 102% | 6267 104% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 58.07 | |||||
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 90.14 |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
26 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5 ms rise | |
↘ 21 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 59 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
30 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 13 ms rise | |
↘ 17 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 36 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
HTC One A9s | |
OnePlus 2 | |
Lenovo ZUK Z2 | |
Gigaset ME | |
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 |
Geekbench 4.0 | |
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
HTC One A9s | |
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
HTC One A9s |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value) | |
HTC One A9s | |
OnePlus 2 | |
Lenovo ZUK Z2 | |
Gigaset ME | |
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
HTC One A9 | |
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value) | |
HTC One A9s | |
OnePlus 2 | |
Lenovo ZUK Z2 | |
Gigaset ME | |
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
HTC One A9 |
GFXBench 3.0 | |
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
HTC One A9s | |
OnePlus 2 | |
Lenovo ZUK Z2 | |
Gigaset ME | |
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
HTC One A9 | |
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
HTC One A9s | |
OnePlus 2 | |
Lenovo ZUK Z2 | |
Gigaset ME | |
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
HTC One A9 |
GFXBench 3.1 | |
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
HTC One A9s | |
OnePlus 2 | |
Lenovo ZUK Z2 | |
Gigaset ME | |
HTC One A9 | |
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
HTC One A9s | |
OnePlus 2 | |
Lenovo ZUK Z2 | |
Gigaset ME | |
HTC One A9 |
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value) | |
HTC One A9s | |
OnePlus 2 | |
Lenovo ZUK Z2 | |
Gigaset ME | |
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
HTC One A9 |
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
HTC One A9s | |
OnePlus 2 | |
Lenovo ZUK Z2 | |
Gigaset ME | |
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
HTC One A9 |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value) | |
HTC One A9s | |
OnePlus 2 | |
Lenovo ZUK Z2 | |
Gigaset ME | |
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
HTC One A9 |
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value) | |
HTC One A9s | |
OnePlus 2 | |
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
HTC One A9 |
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
HTC One A9s | |
OnePlus 2 | |
Lenovo ZUK Z2 | |
Gigaset ME | |
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
HTC One A9 |
* ... smaller is better
AndroBench 3-5 | |
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value) | |
HTC One A9s | |
OnePlus 2 | |
Lenovo ZUK Z2 | |
Gigaset ME | |
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
HTC One A9 | |
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value) | |
HTC One A9s | |
OnePlus 2 | |
Lenovo ZUK Z2 | |
Gigaset ME | |
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
HTC One A9 | |
Random Read 4KB (sort by value) | |
HTC One A9s | |
OnePlus 2 | |
Lenovo ZUK Z2 | |
Gigaset ME | |
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
HTC One A9 | |
Random Write 4KB (sort by value) | |
HTC One A9s | |
OnePlus 2 | |
Lenovo ZUK Z2 | |
Gigaset ME | |
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
HTC One A9 | |
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (sort by value) | |
HTC One A9s | |
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (sort by value) | |
HTC One A9s |
Asphalt 8: Airborne | |||
Configurações | Valor | ||
high | 29 fps | ||
very low | 30 fps |
Dead Trigger 2 | |||
Configurações | Valor | ||
high | 58 fps |
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 33.5 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 32.3 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.1 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
HTC One A9s audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 11.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (28.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 72% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 84% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 13% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple iPhone 7 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 33% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 53% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
desligado | 0.1 / 0.18 Watt |
Ocioso | 1.29 / 2.28 / 2.52 Watt |
Carga |
4.06 / 5.91 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
HTC One A9s 2300 mAh | OnePlus 2 mAh | Lenovo ZUK Z2 3500 mAh | Gigaset ME 3000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 2900 mAh | HTC One A9 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 13% | -4% | -20% | 25% | 25% | |
Idle Minimum * | 1.29 | 0.6 53% | 1.31 -2% | 0.75 42% | 0.96 26% | 0.9 30% |
Idle Average * | 2.28 | 1.7 25% | 2.03 11% | 1.7 25% | 1.64 28% | 1.2 47% |
Idle Maximum * | 2.52 | 1.8 29% | 2.08 17% | 1.84 27% | 1.71 32% | 1.4 44% |
Load Average * | 4.06 | 5.7 -40% | 5.45 -34% | 7.18 -77% | 2.98 27% | 3.8 6% |
Load Maximum * | 5.91 | 6 -2% | 6.75 -14% | 12.75 -116% | 5.08 14% | 5.9 -0% |
* ... smaller is better
HTC One A9s 2300 mAh | OnePlus 2 mAh | Lenovo ZUK Z2 3500 mAh | Gigaset ME 3000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 2900 mAh | HTC One A9 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -12% | 6% | -45% | 46% | -26% | |
Reader / Idle | 1543 | 1393 -10% | 2323 51% | 1154 -25% | ||
H.264 | 587 | 580 -1% | 672 14% | 465 -21% | ||
WiFi v1.3 | 517 | 356 -31% | 546 6% | 393 -24% | 626 21% | 368 -29% |
Load | 245 | 229 -7% | 83 -66% | 483 97% | 176 -28% |
Pro
Contra
O HTC One A9s definitivamente é um smartphone mainstream sólido. Você pode viver com a tela de baixa resolução graças à alta razão de contraste e cores com boa precisão, mas o painel é muito escuro. O padrão wireless 802.11ac faltante, não deveria ser um grande problemas para muito usuários. O desempenho e o equipamento de memória, inclusive foi melhorado – um motivo para se contentar?
Sim, o HTC One A9s é, de fato, um bom smartphone, mas é um segmento com muitos aparelho bons da Lenovo, OnePlus ou Samsung. A concorrência é, portanto, forte para o HTC One A9s, e alguns deles inclusive oferecem mais recursos de gama alta em comparação com o nosso modelo de teste. Mas será que você realmente precisa de um flash dual-LED, autofoco laser ou resoluções mais altas da câmera? Somente você pode responder isso.
O HTC One A9s é uma atualização bem sucedida do HTC One A9 e forneceu bons desempenhos em quase todas as seções de teste, mas não se destaca entre os rivais. Não existem verdadeiros destaques, mas você recebe um aparelho confiável sem frescuras.
A lista de desvantagens sérias para o HTC One A9s é bastante pequena: O alto falante poderia soar melhor e o sinal de WLAN poderia ser melhor. De outra forma, os resultados do teste são bons, mas não há destaques. Portanto, é um aparelho mainstream e um companheiro discreto e confiável, na prática, o qual também pode ser uma qualidade.
HTC One A9s
-
12/15/2016 v6 (old)
Florian Wimmer