Breve Análise do Smartphone HTC Desire 530

Name: HTC Desire 530
Brand: HTC

O Desire de todo o mundo? A HTC oferece um novo smartphone da categoria de 200 Euros. O Desire 530 está para convencer os compradores com um design exclusivo, boas câmeras e som excepcionalmente bom, entre outras coisas. Nosso teste revela se o smartphone consegue cumprir com essa alegação, apesar do hardware de nível de entrada.

Andreas Kilian, ✓ Stefanie Voigt (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 06/29/2016 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

ARM Android Touchscreen Smartphone

Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

HTC Desire 530 (Desire Serie)

Processador

Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909 4 x 1.1 GHz, Cortex-A7

Placa gráfica

Qualcomm Adreno 304

Memória

1536 MB

Pantalha

5.00 polegadas 16:9, 1280 x 720 pixel 294 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, IPS, Brilhante: sim

Disco rígido

16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB

, 9.99 GB livre

Conexões

1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Conector para fones de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: micro-SD máx. 2 TB, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: acelerômetro, sensor de proximidade, giroscópio, WiFi Direct, nano-SIM

Funcionamento em rede

802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 4.1, GSM quad-band (850/900/1800/1900 MHz), 3G quad-band (850/900/2100), LTE (B1/B3/B5/B7/B8/B20/B28), Cat4 (max. 150 Mbit/s download, 51 Mbit/s upload), SAR body: 0.314 W/gg, SAR head: 0,375 W/kg, LTE, GPS

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 8.3 x 146.9 x 70.9

Bateria

8.36 Wh, 2200 mAh Lítio-Polímero, Tempo de conversação 3G (de acordo com o fabricante): 14 h, Standby 3G (de acordo com o fabricante): 696 h

Sistema Operativo

Android 6.0 Marshmallow

Camera

Primary Camera: 8 MPix (auto foco f/2.4, 720p video @ 30 fps)
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix (foco fixo f/2.8, 720p video @ 30 fps)

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: Alto falante mono frontal, Teclado: virtual, Fonte de alimentação, cabo USB, in-ear headset, abraçadeira, News Republic, Facebook & Facebook Messenger, Instagram, ZOE Video Editor, Themes, HTC Club, 24 Meses Garantia, fanless

peso

140 g, Suprimento de energia: 58 g

Preço

219 EUR

Links

HTC página inicial

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

HTC Desire 530

Huawei P9

iPhone 6S Plus

Canon EOS 70D (Referenz)

click to load images

HTC Desire 530

Huawei P9

iPhone 6S Plus

Canon EOS 70D (Referenz)

click to load images

HTC Desire 530

Huawei P9

iPhone 6S Plus

Canon EOS 70D (Referenz)


354 cd/m²	370 cd/m²	385 cd/m²
383 cd/m²	375 cd/m²	380 cd/m²
387 cd/m²	372 cd/m²	382 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 387 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 376.4 cd/m² Minimum: 15.82 cd/m²
iluminação: 91 %
iluminação com acumulador: 375 cd/m²
Contraste: 1172:1 (Preto: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 4.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.26

	HTC Desire 530 IPS, 1280x720, 5"	Samsung Galaxy J3 2016 Super AMOLED, 1280x720, 5"	Huawei P8 lite IPS, 1280x720, 5"	ZTE Blade V6 IPS, 1280x720, 5"	LG Class IPS, 1280x720, 5"	Microsoft Lumia 650 OLED, 1280x720, 5"
Screen
Brightness middle	375	295 -21%	365 -3%	336 -10%	518 38%	349 -7%
Brightness	376	299 -20%	353 -6%	315 -16%	492 31%	353 -6%
Brightness Distribution	91	96 5%	93 2%	81 -11%	91 0%	92 1%
Black Level *	0.32		0.42 -31%	0.39 -22%	0.51 -59%
Contrast	1172		869 -26%	862 -26%	1016 -13%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	6	5.8 3%	5.2 13%	8.29 -38%	5.41 10%	2.6 57%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	9.5	8.6 9%			8.76 8%	8.2 14%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	4.5	4.8 -7%	5.85 -30%	8.57 -90%	7.67 -70%	1.8 60%
Gamma	2.26 ^97%	1.84 ^120%	2.17 ^101%	1.96 ^112%	2.19 ^100%	2.06 ^107%
CCT	6975 ^93%	6252 ^104%	7252 ^90%	8172 ^80%	8521 ^76%	6542 ^99%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)			70.86
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)			91.25	89.7

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
38 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 15 ms rise
38 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 23 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 95 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
53 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 23 ms rise
53 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 30 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 89 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
HTC Desire 530	2922 Points
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016	3350 Points +15%
Huawei P8 lite	3717 Points +27%
LG Class	3803 Points +30%

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
HTC Desire 530	23561 Points
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016	24748 Points +5%
Microsoft Lumia 650	31844 Points +35%

Geekbench 3
32 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
HTC Desire 530	1007 Points
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016	1280 Points +27%
ZTE Blade V6	1807 Points +79%
LG Class	1442 Points +43%
32 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
HTC Desire 530	298 Points
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016	405 Points +36%
ZTE Blade V6	626 Points +110%
LG Class	482 Points +62%

BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
HTC Desire 530	10 Points
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016	569 Points +5590%
Huawei P8 lite	616 Points +6060%
ZTE Blade V6	699 Points +6890%
LG Class	696 Points +6860%
Microsoft Lumia 650	546 Points +5360%
Graphics (sort by value)
HTC Desire 530	231 Points
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016	158 Points -32%
Huawei P8 lite	303 Points +31%
ZTE Blade V6	287 Points +24%
LG Class	312 Points +35%
Microsoft Lumia 650	207 Points -10%
System (sort by value)
HTC Desire 530	742 Points
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016	1134 Points +53%
Huawei P8 lite	1467 Points +98%
ZTE Blade V6	1200 Points +62%
LG Class	1068 Points +44%
Microsoft Lumia 650	552 Points -26%
Overall (sort by value)
HTC Desire 530	149 Points
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016	423 Points +184%
Huawei P8 lite	687 Points +361%
ZTE Blade V6	687 Points +361%
LG Class	561 Points +277%
Microsoft Lumia 650	435 Points +192%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
HTC Desire 530	8.9 fps
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016	7.6 fps -15%
Huawei P8 lite	15.3 fps +72%
ZTE Blade V6	15 fps +69%
LG Class	5.2 fps -42%
Microsoft Lumia 650	5.67 fps -36%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
HTC Desire 530	4.8 fps
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016	4.6 fps -4%
Huawei P8 lite	9.9 fps +106%
ZTE Blade V6	8.5 fps +77%
LG Class	9.8 fps +104%
Microsoft Lumia 650	3.25 fps -32%

GFXBench 3.0
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
HTC Desire 530	1.7 fps
ZTE Blade V6	2.8 fps +65%
LG Class	1.8 fps +6%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
HTC Desire 530	4 fps
ZTE Blade V6	5.8 fps +45%
LG Class	4.1 fps +3%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
HTC Desire 530	4261 Points
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016	3535 Points -17%
Huawei P8 lite	5629 Points +32%
ZTE Blade V6	5013 Points +18%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
HTC Desire 530	3871 Points
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016	3037 Points -22%
Huawei P8 lite	5167 Points +33%
ZTE Blade V6	4415 Points +14%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
HTC Desire 530	6583 Points
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016	8322 Points +26%
Huawei P8 lite	8206 Points +25%
ZTE Blade V6	9542 Points +45%
1280x720 Ice Storm Standard Physics (sort by value)
HTC Desire 530	5756 Points
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016	7751 Points +35%
Huawei P8 lite	7238 Points +26%
ZTE Blade V6	8390 Points +46%
LG Class	8969 Points +56%
1280x720 Ice Storm Standard Graphics (sort by value)
HTC Desire 530	4189 Points
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016	3453 Points -18%
Huawei P8 lite	5732 Points +37%
ZTE Blade V6	5677 Points +36%
LG Class	4740 Points +13%
1280x720 Ice Storm Standard Score (sort by value)
HTC Desire 530	4459 Points
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016	3938 Points -12%
Huawei P8 lite	6010 Points +35%
ZTE Blade V6	6116 Points +37%
LG Class	5295 Points +19%

Legend

HTC Desire 530 Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909, Qualcomm Adreno 304, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Samsung Galaxy J3 2016 Spreadtrum SC9830A, ARM Mali-400 MP2, 8 GB eMMC Flash

Huawei P8 lite HiSilicon Kirin 620, ARM Mali-450 MP4, 16 GB eMMC Flash

ZTE Blade V6 Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash

LG Class Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Microsoft Lumia 650 Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 APQ8009, Qualcomm Adreno 304, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 | Octane V2 | WebXPRT 2015 | JetStream 1.1

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value)
HTC Desire 530	17471 ms *
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016	13702 ms * +22%
Huawei P8 lite	15866 ms * +9%
ZTE Blade V6	25141 ms * -44%
LG Class	13980 ms * +20%
Microsoft Lumia 650	18237 ms * -4%

Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
HTC Desire 530	1796 Points
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016	2842 Points +58%
Huawei P8 lite	2483 Points +38%
ZTE Blade V6	2978 Points +66%
LG Class	3028 Points +69%
Microsoft Lumia 650	2574 Points +43%

WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value)
HTC Desire 530	34 Points
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016	39 Points +15%
Huawei P8 lite	47 Points +38%
LG Class	57 Points +68%
Microsoft Lumia 650	52 Points +53%

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
HTC Desire 530	12.1 Points
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016	16.2 Points +34%

* ... smaller is better

AndroBench 3-5 | BaseMark OS II

AndroBench 3-5
Random Write 4KB (sort by value)
HTC Desire 530	8.96 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016	9.43 MB/s +5%
Huawei P8 lite	8.32 MB/s -7%
ZTE Blade V6	3.66 MB/s -59%
LG Class	7.7 MB/s -14%
Random Read 4KB (sort by value)
HTC Desire 530	11.82 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016	16.82 MB/s +42%
Huawei P8 lite	18.46 MB/s +56%
ZTE Blade V6	27.08 MB/s +129%
LG Class	9.67 MB/s -18%
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value)
HTC Desire 530	55.8 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016	41.4 MB/s -26%
Huawei P8 lite	52.8 MB/s -5%
ZTE Blade V6	37.37 MB/s -33%
LG Class	74.1 MB/s +33%
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value)
HTC Desire 530	127 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016	64.4 MB/s -49%
Huawei P8 lite	139.5 MB/s +10%
ZTE Blade V6	269.3 MB/s +112%
LG Class	128.6 MB/s +1%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
HTC Desire 530	18.22 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016	18.7 MB/s +3%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
HTC Desire 530	35.56 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016	20.82 MB/s -41%

BaseMark OS II - Memory (sort by value)
HTC Desire 530	300 Points
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016	315 Points +5%
Huawei P8 lite	816 Points +172%
ZTE Blade V6	922 Points +207%
LG Class	427 Points +42%
Microsoft Lumia 650	575 Points +92%

Real Racing 3
	Configurações	Valor
	high	20 fps
	low	42 fps

Asphalt 8: Airborne
	Configurações	Valor
	high	13 fps
	very low	21 fps

Carga Máxima

Inatividade


37.1 °C	37 °C	36.8 °C
37.2 °C	37 °C	36.4 °C
35.8 °C	36.8 °C	34.5 °C

Máximo: 37.2 °C
Médio: 36.5 °C


33.5 °C	36.3 °C	38.3 °C
33.5 °C	36.3 °C	38.4 °C
32.1 °C	36.1 °C	37.1 °C

Máximo: 38.4 °C
Médio: 35.7 °C

alimentação elétrica 34.1 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.9 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.5 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.2 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38.4 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.2 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.02 / 0.73 Watt
Ocioso	1.58 / 2.59 / 2.66 Watt
Carga	5.22 / 5.67 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Gossen Metrahit Energy

	HTC Desire 530 2200 mAh	Samsung Galaxy J3 2016 2600 mAh	Huawei P8 lite 2200 mAh	ZTE Blade V6 2200 mAh	LG Class 2050 mAh	Microsoft Lumia 650 2000 mAh
Power Consumption		50%	9%	21%	22%	44%
Idle Minimum *	1.58	0.96 39%	1.4 11%	1.2 24%	1.2 24%	0.7 56%
Idle Average *	2.59	1.14 56%	2.3 11%	1.8 31%	1.9 27%	1.1 58%
Idle Maximum *	2.66	1.23 54%	2.5 6%	2.1 21%	2.2 17%	1.18 56%
Load Average *	5.22	2.45 53%	3.9 25%	4.1 21%	3.1 41%	4.04 23%
Load Maximum *	5.67	2.92 49%	6 -6%	5.1 10%	5.6 1%	4.07 28%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		18h 37min
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 50)		7h 05min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		7h 37min
Carga (máximo brilho)		4h 10min

	HTC Desire 530 2200 mAh	Samsung Galaxy J3 2016 2600 mAh	Huawei P8 lite 2200 mAh	ZTE Blade V6 2200 mAh	LG Class 2050 mAh	Microsoft Lumia 650 2000 mAh
Battery Runtime		32%	-24%	-7%	0%	-10%
Reader / Idle	1117	1212 9%	715 -36%		976 -13%	910 -19%
H.264	457	590 29%	369 -19%	424 -7%	628 37%	510 12%
WiFi v1.3	425	502 18%	351 -17%	400 -6%	422 -1%	345 -19%
Load	250	433 73%	194 -22%	230 -8%	196 -22%	213 -15%

Pro

+ O cartão micro-SD pode ser utilizado como como armazenamento do sistema

+ Android Marshmallow mais recente

+ Tela táctil precisa

+ Módulo GPS confiável

+ Suporte para LTE

+ Boa qualidade das chamadas mediante o fone

+ Bom som via conector do headset

+ Boa duração da bateria

+ Interface do usuários Android fluente para o uso

Contra

- Desempenho total abaixo da média

- Carcaça relativamente grande

- Qualidade média da câmera principal

- Microfone silencioso no modo mãos livres

- WiFi somente na banda 2,4 GHz

- Sem suporte para Miracast, MHL ou USB OTG

- Sem LED de notificações

- Bateria não removível

- Moderada estabilidade dos ângulos de visão da tela

In review: HTC Desire 530. Review sample courtesy of Notebooksbilliger.de

Se a tentativa da HTC de estabelecer um design exclusivo com o Desire 530 foi um sucesso, provavelmente seja uma questão de gosto. Sem importar isso, a carcaça agrada com uma boa construção e bons botões físicos. No entanto, ele dificilmente transmite uma sensação de alta qualidade devido à escolha de materiais, e, em particular, porque é bastante grande para um smartphone com uma tela de 5-polegadas. Especialmente o moderno sistema operacional, a opção de expandir o armazenamento via cartão micro-SD e a boa duração da bateria estão no lado dos pros. No entanto, é uma pena que o aparelho somente oferece algo mediano em termos de câmeras e a estabilidade dos ângulos do painel. Além disso, o desempenho geral normalmente é mais baixo que o de aparelhos comparáveis.

O HTC Desire 530 adiciona um toque de cor à grande massa de dispositivos Android acessíveis. No entanto, o smartphone não oferece quase nenhum destaque técnico. Os compradores, portanto, provavelmente optarão pelo aparelho pelo design e a moderna interface do usuário Android.

Boas alternativas para o Desire 530 são encontradas nos oponentes mencionados no teste. O Samsung Galaxy J3 (2016) atualmente é cerca de 35 Euros a menos que o do modelo de teste com um preço de 150 Euros. Ele também oferece uma duração de bateria mais longa, excelente tela AMOLED e bateria removível. Em compensação, o comprador não encontrará um sensor de luz ou o mais recente sistema operacional. Quando o melhor desempenho possível é importante, vale a penas dar uma olhada nos modelo de gama média ZTE Blade V6 e Huawei P8 lite . Seus preços caíram notoriamente.

Esta é uma versão reduzida da análise original. Você pode ler a análise completa em inglês aqui.

HTC Desire 530 - 06/22/2016 v5.1 ^(old)
Andreas Kilian

Acabamento

79%

Teclado

66 / 75 → 88%

Mouse

90%

Conectividade

39 / 60 → 64%

Peso

93%