Breve Análise do Smartphone HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle

Name: HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle
Brand: HTC

Provocando a gama média. A HTC com frequência tentou ganhar pontos com visuais elegantes, som de alta resolução, e boas câmeras. Por isso o HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle dual-SIM é uma oferta interessante na gama média. Será que o painel de 720p e um SoC relativamente lento, conseguem deter esta onda?

Florian Wimmer, ✓ Manuel Masiero (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 12/16/2016 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android ARM Smartphone Touchscreen

Test device courtesy of HTC Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle (Desire Serie)

Processador

Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928 4 x 1.6 GHz @ 1.6 GHz, ARMv7

Placa gráfica

Qualcomm Adreno 305

Memória

3 GB

Pantalha

5.50 polegadas 16:9, 1280 x 720 pixel 267 PPI, tela táctil capacitiva, IPS, Brilhante: sim

Disco rígido

32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB

, 19.97 GB livre

Conexões

1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Conector de áudio de 3,5-mm, Card Reader: micro-SD máx. 2 TB, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: acelerômetro, proximidade, bússola

Funcionamento em rede

802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 4.1, GSM (850/900/1800/1900), UMTS (850/900/1900/2100), LTE (B1/B3/B5/B7/B8/B20/B28/B40); Bandwidth (download/upload): 150Mbps/50Mbps (LTE); SAR rates: 0.38 W/kg (head), 0.62 W/kg (body), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 7.7 x 156.9 x 76.9

Bateria

10.3 Wh, 2700 mAh Lítio-Ion, Tempo de conversação 3G (de acordo com o fabricante): 24 h, Standby 3G (de acordo com o fabricante): 672 h

Sistema Operativo

Android 6.0 Marshmallow

Camera

Primary Camera: 13 MPix f/2.2, AF, flash LED, vídeos @1080p/30fps
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix f/2.8, vídeos @1080p

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: 2 alto falantes, HTC BoomSound, Teclado: teclado virtual, carregador, cabo USB, headset, abraçadeira, Zoe Video, News Republic, Themes, Boost+, 24 Meses Garantia, Áudio de alta resolução de24 bit, USB-OTG, rádio FM, fanless

peso

155 g, Suprimento de energia: 49 g

Preço

299 Euro

Links

HTC página inicial

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
ZTE Axon 7 Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB eMMC Flash	298 MBit/s +187%
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle Adreno 305, 400 MSM8928, 32 GB eMMC Flash	104 MBit/s
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash	31.2 MBit/s -70%
iperf3 receive AX12
ZTE Axon 7 Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB eMMC Flash	337 MBit/s +234%
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle Adreno 305, 400 MSM8928, 32 GB eMMC Flash	101 MBit/s
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash	32.9 MBit/s -67%

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images


365 cd/m²	376 cd/m²	350 cd/m²
360 cd/m²	380 cd/m²	374 cd/m²
363 cd/m²	378 cd/m²	373 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 380 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 368.8 cd/m² Minimum: 15.9 cd/m²
iluminação: 92 %
iluminação com acumulador: 380 cd/m²
Contraste: 1462:1 (Preto: 0.26 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.6 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 7.4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
96.6% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.29

	HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle IPS, 1280x720, 5.5"	ZTE Axon 7 AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.5"	LG Stylus 2 IPS, 1280x720, 5.7"	Lenovo Moto G4 Plus IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5"	Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5"
Screen		4%	-5%	7%	3%
Brightness middle	380	328 -14%	370 -3%	609 60%	658 73%
Brightness	369	334 -9%	374 1%	589 60%	633 72%
Brightness Distribution	92	88 -4%	92 0%	87 -5%	93 1%
Black Level *	0.26		0.25 4%	0.63 -142%	0.66 -154%
Contrast	1462		1480 1%	967 -34%	997 -32%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	6.6	4.6 30%	6.1 8%	3.8 42%	4.9 26%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	10.4	14.7 -41%	16.5 -59%	8.3 20%	9.1 12%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	7.4	2.8 62%	7 5%	3.1 58%	5.8 22%
Gamma	2.29 ^96%	2.29 ^96%	2.25 ^98%	2.06 ^107%	2.26 ^97%
CCT	8665 ^75%	6612 ^98%	8350 ^78%	6725 ^97%	7840 ^83%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 9 ms rise
32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 23 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 84 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
55 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 11 ms rise
55 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 44 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 91 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle	24799 Points
ZTE Axon 7	122524 Points +394%
LG Stylus 2	28232 Points +14%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus	45232 Points +82%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	62484 Points +152%

Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle	441 Points
ZTE Axon 7	1280 Points +190%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	820 Points +86%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle	1100 Points
ZTE Axon 7	3867 Points +252%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	4042 Points +267%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle	4675 Points
ZTE Axon 7	23319 Points +399%
LG Stylus 2	4307 Points -8%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus	9717 Points +108%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	13955 Points +199%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 7	24310 Points
LG Stylus 2	3744 Points
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus	9773 Points
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	13466 Points
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 7	20408 Points
LG Stylus 2	9085 Points
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus	9527 Points
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	15984 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle	58 Points
ZTE Axon 7	2698 Points +4552%
LG Stylus 2	53 Points -9%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus	667 Points +1050%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	842 Points +1352%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle	46 Points
ZTE Axon 7	4619 Points +9941%
LG Stylus 2	42 Points -9%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus	605 Points +1215%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	719 Points +1463%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle	813 Points
ZTE Axon 7	1099 Points +35%
LG Stylus 2	728 Points -10%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus	1042 Points +28%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	2112 Points +160%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle	10 fps
ZTE Axon 7	53 fps +430%
LG Stylus 2	4.9 fps -51%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus	18 fps +80%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	21 fps +110%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle	5.7 fps
ZTE Axon 7	88 fps +1444%
LG Stylus 2	5.1 fps -11%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus	17 fps +198%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	23 fps +304%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle	4.2 fps
ZTE Axon 7	28 fps +567%
LG Stylus 2	1.8 fps -57%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus	7 fps +67%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	9.7 fps +131%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle	2 fps
ZTE Axon 7	39 fps +1850%
LG Stylus 2	3.9 fps +95%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus	6.6 fps +230%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	9.9 fps +395%

PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle	2383 Points
ZTE Axon 7	4970 Points +109%
LG Stylus 2	4030 Points +69%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus	Points -100%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	6785 Points +185%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle	517 Points
ZTE Axon 7	2165 Points +319%
LG Stylus 2	609 Points +18%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus	283 Points -45%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	1215 Points +135%
System (sort by value)
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle	858 Points
ZTE Axon 7	3307 Points +285%
LG Stylus 2	914 Points +7%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus	1359 Points +58%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	2923 Points +241%
Memory (sort by value)
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle	421 Points
ZTE Axon 7	1489 Points +254%
LG Stylus 2	462 Points +10%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus	604 Points +43%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	1042 Points +148%
Graphics (sort by value)
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle	346 Points
ZTE Axon 7	4631 Points +1238%
LG Stylus 2	324 Points -6%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus	805 Points +133%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	1019 Points +195%
Web (sort by value)
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle	573 Points
ZTE Axon 7	963 Points +68%
LG Stylus 2	1008 Points +76%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus	10 Points -98%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	702 Points +23%

Legend

HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928, Qualcomm Adreno 305, 32 GB eMMC Flash

ZTE Axon 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 64 GB eMMC Flash

LG Stylus 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Lenovo Moto G4 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952, Qualcomm Adreno 405, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 64 GB eMMC Flash

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 | Octane V2 | WebXPRT 2015 | JetStream 1.1

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value)
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle	12145 ms *
ZTE Axon 7	3097 ms * +74%
LG Stylus 2	12713 ms * -5%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus	11102 ms * +9%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	8041 ms * +34%

Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle	2141 Points
ZTE Axon 7	8062 Points +277%
LG Stylus 2	2742 Points +28%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus	3656 Points +71%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	4905 Points +129%

WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value)
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle	51 Points
ZTE Axon 7	111 Points +118%
LG Stylus 2	51 Points 0%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus	61 Points +20%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	84 Points +65%

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle	18.22 Points
ZTE Axon 7	44.75 Points +146%
LG Stylus 2	17.8 Points -2%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus	22.8 Points +25%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	31.12 Points +71%

* ... smaller is better

AndroBench 3-5
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value)
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle	149.4 MB/s
ZTE Axon 7	406.5 MB/s +172%
LG Stylus 2	130.3 MB/s -13%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus	271.4 MB/s +82%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	282 MB/s +89%
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value)
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle	60.6 MB/s
ZTE Axon 7	150.9 MB/s +149%
LG Stylus 2	75.9 MB/s +25%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus	43.48 MB/s -28%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	188 MB/s +210%
Random Read 4KB (sort by value)
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle	17.03 MB/s
ZTE Axon 7	121.1 MB/s +611%
LG Stylus 2	9.8 MB/s -42%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus	36.32 MB/s +113%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	74 MB/s +335%
Random Write 4KB (sort by value)
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle	7.94 MB/s
ZTE Axon 7	16.22 MB/s +104%
LG Stylus 2	7.3 MB/s -8%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus	35.79 MB/s +351%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	7.4 MB/s -7%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle	47.7 MB/s
ZTE Axon 7	78.4 MB/s +64%
LG Stylus 2	74.9 MB/s +57%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus	74.4 MB/s +56%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	79.2 MB/s +66%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle	29.2 MB/s
ZTE Axon 7	51.3 MB/s +76%
LG Stylus 2	49.73 MB/s +70%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus	46.92 MB/s +61%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	50.1 MB/s +72%

Asphalt 8: Airborne
	Configurações	Valor
	high	18 fps

... comparado com

Dead Trigger 2
	Configurações	Valor
	high	29 fps

... comparado com

Carga Máxima

Inatividade


35.4 °C	33.6 °C	33.4 °C
37.4 °C	34.1 °C	34.9 °C
35.8 °C	34 °C	33.3 °C

Máximo: 37.4 °C
Médio: 34.7 °C


31.8 °C	33.3 °C	34 °C
32 °C	33.1 °C	36 °C
31.3 °C	34 °C	35.2 °C

Máximo: 36 °C
Médio: 33.4 °C

alimentação elétrica 35.8 °C | Temperatura do quarto 22.2 °C | Voltcraft IR-350

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.7 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.4 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.8 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.2% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (18.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 32% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 52% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

ZTE Axon 7 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 54% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 71% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		24h 45min
WiFi Websurfing		9h 34min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		10h 22min
Carga (máximo brilho)		3h 54min

	HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle 2700 mAh	ZTE Axon 7 3250 mAh	LG Stylus 2 3000 mAh	Lenovo Moto G4 Plus 3000 mAh	Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL 3000 mAh
Battery Runtime		2%	5%	6%	34%
Reader / Idle	1485	1735 17%	1225 -18%	1226 -17%	1502 1%
H.264	622	704 13%	697 12%	775 25%	905 45%
WiFi v1.3	574	411 -28%	663 16%	735 28%	797 39%
Load	234	245 5%	258 10%	201 -14%	352 50%

Pro

+ Carcaça mate, relativamente elegante

+ Boa configuração de memória

+ Dual-SIM

+ Bom GPS

+ Dispositivos de entrada confiáveis

+ Bom contraste da tela

+ Baixa temperatura

+ Som de alta resolução

+ Excelentes alto falantes

Contra

- Range quando flexionado

- Microfone inferior

- Qualidade pobre das chamadas

- Não é possível atualizar para Android 7

- Câmeras abaixo da média

- Tela de baixa resolução

- SoC desatualizado e de baixo desempenho

- Acesso lento ao armazenamento

In review: HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle. Test model courtesy of HTC Germany.

A HTC tomou algumas atualizações "provocadoras" para o seu Desire 10 Lifestyle. Isto torna o smartphone em um aparelho que pode não ser adequado para qualquer usuário, mas oferece uma ótima experiência de som por pouco dinheiro.

Mas primeiro o primeiro. Estamos na gama média e, portanto, não é surpreendente que a HTC tivesse que fazer alguns compromissos para incorporar recursos de gama alta como som de alta resolução de 24-bits no modelo de teste. A tela não tem uma resolução particularmente alta e não é muito brilhante. A duração da bateria é apenas medíocre e as taxas de desempenho estão evidentemente abaixo do padrão na faixa de preços. As câmeras não são convincentes e não se espera uma atualização para a mais recente versão Android, em vista da tecnologia desatualizada. Os usuários que valorizam a boa qualidade das chamadas terão que procurar outras opções.

O HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle pode ser descrito como um bom reprodutor de áudio de alta resolução com recursos de smartphone. Infelizmente, os aspectos como desempenho, câmeras, qualidade das chamadas e software estão, evidentemente abaixo da média.

Então, quais coisas positivas podem ser ditas? O HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle oferece uma bastante boa configuração de memória, uma carcaça relativamente bem construída, e o módulo GPS também faz um trabalho suficientemente bom. Os dispositivos de entrada são confiáveis, e também está, é claro, o som: Os alto falantes são muito bons e a saída do som via o headset é audivelmente mais completa que em outros smartphones.

Mas será isto suficiente? Provavelmente apenas para os audiófilos que não querem ou não podem pagar pelo HTC 10. Todos os outros vão ter um smartphone que apresenta um desempenho abaixo da média em muitos outros aspectos e realmente só pode servir com um som emocionante. Um genuíno reprodutor de áudio de alta resolução, por exemplo, da Sony, custa quase o mesmo que o HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle. Este fato por si só prova que não muito foi deixado no orçamento para os outros recursos.

HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle - 2016-12-09 12/09/2016 v6 ^(old)
Florian Wimmer

Acabamento

79%

Teclado

66 / 75 → 88%

Mouse

91%

Conectividade

37 / 60 → 62%

Peso

92%

Bateria

92%

Pantalha

83%

Desempenho do jogos

5 / 63 → 8%

Desempenho da aplicação

25 / 70 → 36%

Temperatura

91%

Ruído

100%

Audio

71 / 91 → 78%

Camera

61%

Médio

69%

79%

Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle

Florian Wimmer, 2016-12-16 (Update: 2017-01- 2)