Breve Análise do Smartphone Google Pixel 3a XL

Name: Google Pixel 3a XL
Brand: Google

O retorno da Google para a gama média.

A Google, até agora, lançou smartphones carros chefe em sua série Pixel. O 3a e 3a XL mudam isto com seus preços de gama média. A premissa desses dispositivos são câmeras de gama alta a um preço baixo, mas quão bem a Google levou adiante essa ideia? Leia para descobrir nesta análise.

Mike Wobker, 👁 Daniel Schmidt, ✓ Andrea Grüblinger (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 05/29/2019 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android Google Pixel Smartphone Touchscreen

Test device courtesy of Google Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Google Pixel 3a XL (Pixel 3 Serie)

Processador

Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 8 x 2 GHz, Kryo 360 Gold / Silver

Placa gráfica

Qualcomm Adreno 616

Memória

4 GB

Pantalha

6.00 polegadas 2:1, 2160 x 1080 pixel 402 PPI, capacitiva, OLED, Brilhante: sim

Disco rígido

64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB

, 52 GB livre

Conexões

1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Conector para fones de 3,5 mm, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Acelerômetro, Active Edge, barômetro, e-compass,, eSIM

Funcionamento em rede

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM/EDGE: 850, 900, 1,800, 1,900 MHz. UMTS/HSPA+/HSDPA: Bandas 1, 2, 4, 5, 8. CDMA/EVDO: BC0, BC1, BC10. 4G/LTE: Bands 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66., LTE, GPS

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 8.2 x 160.1 x 76.1

Bateria

3700 mAh Lítio-Ion

Sistema Operativo

Android 9.0 Pie

Camera

Primary Camera: 12.2 MPix 1.4 μm, ƒ/1.8, 76° autofocus, detecção facial dual-pixel, estabilização de imagem ótica e eletrônica
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix 1.12 μm, ƒ/2.0, 84° fixed focus

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: Estéreo, Teclado: onscreen, Carregador USB modular, cabo USB Type-C para USB Type-C, adaptador USB Type-A para USB Type-C, fones (somente para dispositivos vendidos na Australia, França, Alemanha, India, Italia e Espanha), 24 Meses Garantia, SAR values: Body – 1.19 W/kg, Head - 1.17 W/kg., fanless

peso

167 g, Suprimento de energia: 81 g

Preço

479 Euro

Links

Google página inicial

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Google Pixel 3a XL Adreno 616, SD 670, 64 GB eMMC Flash	580 (548^min - 602^max) MBit/s
Xiaomi Mi 9 Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	534 (430^min - 578^max) MBit/s -8%
Nokia 8.1 Adreno 616, SD 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash	300 (169^min - 367^max) MBit/s -48%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play Adreno 509, SD 636, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	237 MBit/s -59%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Adreno 509, SD 636, 64 GB eMMC Flash	153 (133^min - 180^max) MBit/s -74%
iperf3 receive AX12
Xiaomi Mi 9 Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	678 (549^min - 725^max) MBit/s +1%
Google Pixel 3a XL Adreno 616, SD 670, 64 GB eMMC Flash	668 (617^min - 692^max) MBit/s
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Adreno 509, SD 636, 64 GB eMMC Flash	317 (163^min - 343^max) MBit/s -53%
Nokia 8.1 Adreno 616, SD 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash	312 (273^min - 341^max) MBit/s -53%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play Adreno 509, SD 636, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	232 MBit/s -65%

Google Pixel 3a XL; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø667 (617-692)

Google Pixel 3a XL; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø580 (548-602)

GPS test: Google Pixel 3a XL – Cycling around a lake

GPS test: Garmin Edge 500 – Cycling around a lake

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

Google Pixel 3a XL

Canon EOS 70 D

Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus

Xiaomi Mi 9

click to load images

Google Pixel 3a XL

Canon EOS 70 D

Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus

Xiaomi Mi 9

click to load images

Google Pixel 3a XL

Canon EOS 70 D

Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus

Xiaomi Mi 9


407 cd/m²	415 cd/m²	414 cd/m²
400 cd/m²	409 cd/m²	406 cd/m²
405 cd/m²	418 cd/m²	414 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 418 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 409.8 cd/m² Minimum: 2.35 cd/m²
iluminação: 96 %
iluminação com acumulador: 409 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.3 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 1.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
100% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.22

	Google Pixel 3a XL OLED, 2160x1080, 6"	Xiaomi Mi 9 AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.4"	Nokia 8.1 IPS, 2246x1080, 6.2"	Motorola Moto Z3 Play AMOLED, 2160x1080, 6"	Sony Xperia 10 Plus IPS, 2520x1080, 6.5"
Screen		22%	-102%	-158%	-170%
Brightness middle	409	593 45%	567 39%	446 9%	572 40%
Brightness	410	587 43%	547 33%	451 10%	580 41%
Brightness Distribution	96	94 -2%	92 -4%	93 -3%	96 0%
Black Level *			0.61		0.4
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1.3	0.9 31%	4.39 -238%	6.58 -406%	4.5 -246%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	2.3	2 13%	7.28 -217%	11.94 -419%	12.2 -430%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	1.5	1.5 -0%	4.9 -227%	3.6 -140%	7.9 -427%
Gamma	2.22 ^99%	2.27 ^97%	2.248 ^98%	2.199 ^100%	2.16 ^102%
CCT	6621 ^98%	6548 ^99%	7642 ^85%	7116 ^91%	8726 ^74%
Contrast			930		1430

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

242.7 Hz

≤ 99 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 242.7 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 242.7 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
2.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 1.6 ms rise
2.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 1.2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 10 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
3.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 2 ms rise
3.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 1.6 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 10 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	1616 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3523 Points +118%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	1799 Points +11%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	1330 Points -18%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	1346 Points -17%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	1601 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (1616 - 1712, n=3)	1651 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone (844 - 9574, n=82, last 2 years)	5486 Points +239%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	5172 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	10999 Points +113%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	5856 Points +13%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	4941 Points -4%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	4804 Points -7%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	5826 Points +13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (5164 - 5742, n=3)	5359 Points +4%
Average of class Smartphone (2630 - 30323, n=82, last 2 years)	15064 Points +191%
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	6479 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	7482 Points +15%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	6813 Points +5%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	4501 Points -31%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	4278 Points -34%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	5542 Points -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (6090 - 6479, n=3)	6348 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (5192 - 18534, n=58, last 2 years)	11998 Points +85%

PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	9397 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	10985 Points +17%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	8309 Points -12%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	6457 Points -31%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	7181 Points -24%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	6338 Points -33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (7988 - 9458, n=4)	8742 Points -7%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	7377 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	9035 Points +22%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	6887 Points -7%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	5640 Points -24%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	6018 Points -18%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	5789 Points -22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (6633 - 7387, n=4)	7024 Points -5%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	26999 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	62225 Points +130%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	28895 Points +7%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	19873 Points -26%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	Points -100%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	25783 Points -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (19315 - 29229, n=4)	25989 Points -4%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	35596 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	106534 Points +199%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	39655 Points +11%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	20908 Points -41%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	Points -100%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	29065 Points -18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (22381 - 35619, n=4)	32249 Points -9%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	14631 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	25339 Points +73%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	14820 Points +1%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	16939 Points +16%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	Points -100%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	18523 Points +27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (13055 - 18523, n=4)	15710 Points +7%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	2441 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	7166 Points +194%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	2691 Points +10%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	1474 Points -40%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	1469 Points -40%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	2054 Points -16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (2378 - 2477, n=4)	2438 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (812 - 7285, n=26, last 2 years)	4204 Points +72%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	2428 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	9963 Points +310%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	2763 Points +14%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	1333 Points -45%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	1327 Points -45%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	1918 Points -21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (2357 - 2428, n=4)	2407 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (756 - 9451, n=26, last 2 years)	4740 Points +95%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	2489 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3614 Points +45%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	2467 Points -1%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	2337 Points -6%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	2349 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	2741 Points +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (2456 - 2708, n=4)	2556 Points +3%
Average of class Smartphone (1093 - 4349, n=26, last 2 years)	3303 Points +33%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	2528 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	7449 Points +195%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	2772 Points +10%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	1541 Points -39%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	1536 Points -39%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	1898 Points -25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (2506 - 2582, n=4)	2541 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (883 - 23024, n=73, last 2 years)	11109 Points +339%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	2537 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	10291 Points +306%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	2855 Points +13%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	1400 Points -45%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	1397 Points -45%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	1757 Points -31%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (2533 - 2541, n=4)	2536 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (840 - 45492, n=73, last 2 years)	19708 Points +677%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	2495 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3788 Points +52%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	2516 Points +1%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	2384 Points -4%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	2352 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	2645 Points +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (2413 - 2771, n=4)	2562 Points +3%
Average of class Smartphone (1075 - 8749, n=73, last 2 years)	5001 Points +100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	1631 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	5509 Points +238%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	1834 Points +12%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	953 Points -42%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	946 Points -42%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	1354 Points -17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (1594 - 1651, n=4)	1629 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (286 - 17553, n=73, last 2 years)	3084 Points +89%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	1487 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	6355 Points +327%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	1702 Points +14%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	815 Points -45%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	808 Points -46%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	1185 Points -20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (1451 - 1487, n=4)	1476 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (240 - 29890, n=73, last 2 years)	3263 Points +119%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	2466 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3758 Points +52%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	2514 Points +2%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	2327 Points -6%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	2351 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	2073 Points -16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (2436 - 2728, n=4)	2553 Points +4%
Average of class Smartphone (858 - 7180, n=73, last 2 years)	3286 Points +33%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	1754 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	5913 Points +237%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	1964 Points +12%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	1008 Points -43%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	1003 Points -43%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	1433 Points -18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (1742 - 1772, n=4)	1758 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (317 - 20131, n=160, last 2 years)	7767 Points +343%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	1612 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	7076 Points +339%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	1845 Points +14%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	865 Points -46%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	862 Points -47%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	1268 Points -21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (1611 - 1612, n=4)	1612 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (267 - 33376, n=160, last 2 years)	11536 Points +616%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	2532 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3754 Points +48%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	2534 Points 0%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	2384 Points -6%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	2345 Points -7%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	2774 Points +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (2424 - 2763, n=4)	2584 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone (877 - 8480, n=160, last 2 years)	4613 Points +82%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	1550 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	4914 Points +217%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	944 Points -39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (1540 - 1563, n=3)	1551 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (365 - 6635, n=72, last 2 years)	2846 Points +84%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	1416 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	5723 Points +304%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	809 Points -43%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (1408 - 1425, n=3)	1416 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (298 - 8601, n=72, last 2 years)	3095 Points +119%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	2314 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3288 Points +42%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	2282 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (2288 - 2365, n=3)	2322 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (1667 - 4198, n=72, last 2 years)	2704 Points +17%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	53 fps
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	60 fps +13%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	57 fps +8%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	35 fps -34%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	30 fps -43%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	50 fps -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (32 - 53, n=4)	47.5 fps -10%
Average of class Smartphone (23 - 165, n=169, last 2 years)	86.3 fps +63%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	58 fps
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	167 fps +188%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	65 fps +12%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	36 fps -38%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	35 fps -40%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	46 fps -21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (46 - 58, n=4)	55 fps -5%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=169, last 2 years)	280 fps +383%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	28 fps
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	60 fps +114%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	31 fps +11%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	15 fps -46%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	13 fps -54%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	21 fps -25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (17 - 28, n=4)	24.8 fps -11%
Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 165, n=169, last 2 years)	75.5 fps +170%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	29 fps
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	100 fps +245%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	32 fps +10%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	16 fps -45%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	16 fps -45%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	23 fps -21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (29 - 29, n=4)	29 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (12 - 482, n=169, last 2 years)	165.3 fps +470%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	19 fps
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	58 fps +205%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	22 fps +16%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	9.8 fps -48%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	8.4 fps -56%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	14 fps -26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (6.9 - 19, n=4)	15.7 fps -17%
Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 158, n=169, last 2 years)	65.7 fps +246%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	20 fps
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	69 fps +245%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	23 fps +15%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	10 fps -50%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	10 fps -50%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	15 fps -25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (19 - 20, n=4)	19.8 fps -1%
Average of class Smartphone (8.3 - 341, n=169, last 2 years)	117.2 fps +486%

GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	11 fps
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	38 fps +245%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	12 fps +9%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	6 fps -45%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	5.1 fps -54%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	8.3 fps -25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (6.4 - 11, n=4)	9.6 fps -13%
Average of class Smartphone (5 - 119, n=170, last 2 years)	47.8 fps +335%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	11 fps
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	42 fps +282%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	13 fps +18%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	6.3 fps -43%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	6.3 fps -43%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	9.1 fps -17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (8.5 - 11, n=4)	10.4 fps -5%
Average of class Smartphone (3.1 - 216, n=169, last 2 years)	70.6 fps +542%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	11 fps
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	37 fps +236%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	13 fps +18%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	4.9 fps -55%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	7.5 fps -32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (6.8 - 11, n=4)	9.7 fps -12%
Average of class Smartphone (3.6 - 123, n=201, last 2 years)	49.5 fps +350%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	12 fps
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	41 fps +242%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	14 fps +17%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	6.1 fps -49%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	8.6 fps -28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (12 - 12, n=4)	12 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2.3 - 261, n=201, last 2 years)	79.8 fps +565%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	7.2 fps
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	24 fps +233%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	8.2 fps +14%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	3.2 fps -56%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	4.8 fps -33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (4.3 - 7.2, n=4)	6.38 fps -11%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 119, n=201, last 2 years)	37.4 fps +419%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	4.5 fps
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	16 fps +256%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	5 fps +11%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	2.2 fps -51%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	3 fps -33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (4.4 - 4.5, n=4)	4.45 fps -1%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 104, n=201, last 2 years)	32 fps +611%

Basemark GPU 1.1
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	12.45 fps
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	35.63 fps +186%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	13 fps +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (12 - 12.5, n=2)	12.2 fps -2%
Vulkan Medium Native (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	11.62 fps
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	32.2 fps +177%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	12.1 fps +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (7.67 - 11.6, n=2)	9.65 fps -17%
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	13.79 fps
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	37.41 fps +171%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	14.3 fps +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (13.1 - 13.8, n=2)	13.4 fps -3%

AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	158868 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	374820 Points +136%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	169262 Points +7%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	115656 Points -27%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	117574 Points -26%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	140878 Points -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (153450 - 158868, n=3)	156363 Points -2%

VRMark - Amber Room (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	1473 Score
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	4964 Score +237%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	1681 Score +14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (1423 - 1473, n=2)	1448 Score -2%
Average of class Smartphone (2523 - 10071, n=6, last 2 years)	5819 Score +295%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	2794 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	4595 Points +64%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	2731 Points -2%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	2044 Points -27%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	1734 Points -38%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	2364 Points -15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (2621 - 2811, n=4)	2720 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (1196 - 11976, n=151, last 2 years)	6297 Points +125%
System (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	5507 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	8441 Points +53%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	5681 Points +3%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	4628 Points -16%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	4342 Points -21%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	5063 Points -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (5024 - 5507, n=4)	5332 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (2368 - 16475, n=151, last 2 years)	10163 Points +85%
Memory (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	3316 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	4031 Points +22%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	2947 Points -11%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	2208 Points -33%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	1236 Points -63%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	2393 Points -28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (2877 - 3316, n=4)	3094 Points -7%
Average of class Smartphone (962 - 12716, n=151, last 2 years)	6767 Points +104%
Graphics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	2815 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	9270 Points +229%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	3086 Points +10%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	1625 Points -42%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	1611 Points -43%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	2332 Points -17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (2790 - 2818, n=4)	2810 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (1017 - 58651, n=151, last 2 years)	16908 Points +501%
Web (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	1186 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	1378 Points +16%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	1077 Points -9%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	1052 Points -11%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	1046 Points -12%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	1105 Points -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (1144 - 1229, n=4)	1182 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (841 - 2145, n=151, last 2 years)	1564 Points +32%

Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	447 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	1415 Points +217%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	482 Points +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (444 - 447, n=2)	446 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (205 - 7616, n=56, last 2 years)	2316 Points +418%

Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 2.0 | WebXPRT 3 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=161, last 2 years)	120.4 Points +275%
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73)	57.2 Points +78%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (32.1 - 33.6, n=4)	33 Points +3%
Google Pixel 3a XL (Chrome 73)	32.08 Points
Sony Xperia 10 Plus (Chrome 73)	25.96 Points -19%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=146, last 2 years)	136.2 runs/min +319%
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)	65.7 runs/min +102%
Google Pixel 3a XL (Chrome 73)	32.5 runs/min
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (29.6 - 33.7, n=3)	31.9 runs/min -2%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus (Chrome 73)	27.4 runs/min -16%

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years)	148.7 Points +140%
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)	108 Points +74%
Nokia 8.1 (Chrome 71)	72 Points +16%
Google Pixel 3a XL (Chrome 73)	62 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (53 - 66, n=3)	60.3 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 (Chrome 70)	59 Points -5%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play (Chrome 67)	55 Points -11%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus (Chrome 73)	54 Points -13%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=203, last 2 years)	37161 Points +236%
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)	24534 Points +122%
Nokia 8.1 (Chrome 71)	12717 Points +15%
Google Pixel 3a XL (Chrome 73)	11056 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (10245 - 11312, n=4)	10864 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 (Chrome 70)	10145 Points -8%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play (Chrome 67)	8519 Points -23%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus (Chrome 73)	8163 Points -26%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Motorola Moto Z3 Play (Chrome 67)	4820 ms * -43%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus (Chrome 73)	4739 ms * -41%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 (Chrome 70)	3842 (1^min) ms * -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (3361 - 3655, n=4)	3525 ms * -5%
Google Pixel 3a XL (Chrome 73)	3361 ms *
Nokia 8.1 (Chrome 71)	3035 ms * +10%
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)	1873 ms * +44%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=160, last 2 years)	1568 ms * +53%

* ... smaller is better

	Google Pixel 3a XL	Xiaomi Mi 9	Nokia 8.1	Motorola Moto Z3 Play	Sony Xperia 10 Plus	Average 64 GB eMMC Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		95%	-29%	-12%	-23%	-29%	409%
Sequential Read 256KB	315.6	666 111%	279.3 -12%	271.7 -14%	280.3 -11%	274 ?(95.6 - 704, n=203) -13%	1839 ?(226 - 4512, n=192, last 2 years) 483%
Sequential Write 256KB	179.1	388.3 117%	203.8 14%	182.5 2%	205.2 15%	176.2 ?(40 - 274, n=203) -2%	1425 ?(57.5 - 3908, n=192, last 2 years) 696%
Random Read 4KB	92.1	149.4 62%	69.9 -24%	60.6 -34%	77.7 -16%	59.4 ?(9.58 - 148.5, n=203) -36%	277 ?(22.2 - 483, n=192, last 2 years) 201%
Random Write 4KB	87	165.3 90%	7.3 -92%	84.1 -3%	16.77 -81%	32 ?(2.34 - 146.9, n=203) -63%	309 ?(9.4 - 753, n=192, last 2 years) 255%

PUBG Compare

Google Pixel 3a XL; Smooth: Ø39.5 (11-41)

Google Pixel 3a XL; HD: Ø29.9 (28-31)

Arena of Valor

Google Pixel 3a XL; min: Ø59.6 (50-60)

Google Pixel 3a XL; high HD: Ø56 (36-60)

Shadow Fight 3

Google Pixel 3a XL; high: Ø59.4 (51-60)

Google Pixel 3a XL; minimal: Ø59.4 (50-60)

Carga Máxima

Inatividade


36.4 °C	34.2 °C	31.6 °C
36.3 °C	34.6 °C	31.4 °C
34.2 °C	34.4 °C	31.1 °C

Máximo: 36.4 °C
Médio: 33.8 °C


32.4 °C	32.3 °C	35.7 °C
30.8 °C	32.4 °C	36.2 °C
30 °C	32.5 °C	34.8 °C

Máximo: 36.2 °C
Médio: 33 °C

alimentação elétrica 27.9 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.3 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.8 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.4 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36.2 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.9 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Google Pixel 3a XL audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.2% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 25% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 70% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Xiaomi Mi 9 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 29% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.01 / 0.27 Watt
Ocioso	0.7 / 1.63 / 1.67 Watt
Carga	2.64 / 4.62 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Google Pixel 3a XL 3700 mAh	Xiaomi Mi 9 3300 mAh	Nokia 8.1 3500 mAh	Motorola Moto Z3 Play 3000 mAh	Sony Xperia 10 Plus 3000 mAh	Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		-18%	-10%	-44%	-28%	-58%	-54%
Idle Minimum *	0.7	0.67 4%	0.8 -14%	1.3 -86%	0.68 3%	1.18 ?(0.61 - 2.07, n=4) -69%	0.894 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=152, last 2 years) -28%
Idle Average *	1.63	1.26 23%	1.5 8%	2 -23%	2.12 -30%	2.89 ?(1.56 - 4.43, n=4) -77%	1.456 ?(0.6 - 4.26, n=152, last 2 years) 11%
Idle Maximum *	1.67	1.29 23%	1.8 -8%	2.7 -62%	2.17 -30%	2.94 ?(1.6 - 4.52, n=4) -76%	1.616 ?(0.83 - 4.45, n=152, last 2 years) 3%
Load Average *	2.64	3.71 -41%	3.2 -21%	3.7 -40%	3.82 -45%	3.82 ?(2.64 - 5.91, n=4) -45%	6.45 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=147, last 2 years) -144%
Load Maximum *	4.62	9.3 -101%	5.4 -17%	5.1 -10%	6.44 -39%	5.65 ?(4.33 - 7.91, n=4) -22%	9.8 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=147, last 2 years) -112%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		30h 22min
WiFi Websurfing		11h 49min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		16h 00min
Carga (máximo brilho)		4h 49min

	Google Pixel 3a XL 3700 mAh	Xiaomi Mi 9 3300 mAh	Nokia 8.1 3500 mAh	Motorola Moto Z3 Play 3000 mAh	Sony Xperia 10 Plus 3000 mAh
Battery Runtime		-15%	-8%	-28%	-27%
Reader / Idle	1822	1650 -9%	1682 -8%	1245 -32%	1400 -23%
H.264	960	1008 5%	857 -11%	648 -32%	701 -27%
WiFi v1.3	709	546 -23%	738 4%	595 -16%	635 -10%
Load	289	194 -33%	246 -15%	199 -31%	154 -47%

Pro

+ Bem construído

+ Boas câmeras

+ Android Pie puro

+ Sem afogamento até sob uso intenso prolongado

+ Bom alto-falantes

+ Duração da bateria comparativamente bom

Contra

- Marcos grossos da tela

- O Active Edge não é personalizável

- Sem leitor de cartões MicroSD

- A duração da bateria não atende as expectativas

The Google Pixel 3a XL smartphone review. Test device courtesy of Google Germany.

O Pixel 3a XL mostra que a Google não esqueceu como produzir um excelente smartphone de gama média. A aparência do 3a XL não é de forma alguma inferior à de seus irmãos mais caros, enquanto seu hardware inferior ainda oferece bom desempenho e pode facilmente lidar com aplicativos exigentes. Embora tenhamos visto a ascensão de câmeras triplas e quádruplas traseiras em smartphones de gama média, a Google consegue envergonhar seus rivais com seu único sensor de 12,2 MP.

O Google Pixel 3a XL é um novo concorrente de gama média que se destaca em muitas áreas. Existem algumas deficiências menores, mas elas não impedem que o dispositivo tenha uma boa relação custo-benefício.

Infelizmente, o 3a XL também herda algumas das críticas que tivemos de outros smartphones Pixel. A falta de funcionalidade dual-SIM adequada é um descuido, assim como a insistência da Google em não incluir um leitor de cartões microSD. Os marcos grossos da tela e o design da carcaça de plástico também dividirão as opiniões, embora tenham suas vantagens. Ou seja, sem entalhe. A decisão de usar um SoC Snapdragon 670 em comparação com algo mais poderoso também atraiu críticas em outras análises. No entanto, o Snapdragon 670 não apresenta nenhuma limitação prática e rodará quase qualquer aplicativo ou jogo que você possa lançar nele.

No geral, o Pixel 3a XL é um smartphone excepcional de gama média que possui uma melhor câmera e duração de bateria do que seus concorrentes. O dispositivo também é bem projetado e a maioria de seus pontos fracos são uma questão de gosto.

Google Pixel 3a XL - 08/31/2022 v7 ^(old)
Mike Wobker

Acabamento

81%

Teclado

65 / 75 → 87%

Mouse

94%

Conectividade

47 / 70 → 66%

Peso

91%

Bateria

90%

Pantalha

91%

Desempenho do jogos

19 / 64 → 30%

Desempenho da aplicação

61 / 86 → 71%

Temperatura

91%

Ruído

100%

Audio

81 / 90 → 90%

Camera

58%

Médio

75%

81%

Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Alex Alderson - Senior Tech Writer - 11244 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2018

contact me via: @aldersonaj

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Google Pixel 3a XL

Mike Wobker, 2019-05-29 (Update: 2019-05-29)

Size Comparison

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

PUBG Compare

Arena of Valor

Shadow Fight 3

Google Pixel 3a XL audio analysis

Xiaomi Mi 9 audio analysis

Pro

Contra

More articles related to this device

Price comparison