Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve Análise do Smartphone Google Pixel 3
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Google Pixel 3 | |
| Apple iPhone XS | |
| HTC U12 Plus | |
| Sony Xperia XZ3 | |
| Huawei P20 Pro | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Google Pixel 3 | |
| Apple iPhone XS | |
| Huawei P20 Pro | |
| Sony Xperia XZ3 | |
| HTC U12 Plus | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 91 %
iluminação com acumulador: 393 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.4 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 1.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.6% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.19
| Google Pixel 3 OLED, 2160x1080, 5.5" | Huawei P20 Pro OLED, 2240x1080, 6.1" | Apple iPhone XS OLED, 2436x1125, 5.8" | Sony Xperia XZ3 OLED, 2880x1440, 6" | HTC U12 Plus Super LCD 6, 2880x1440, 6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 14% | 14% | -155% | -7% | |
| Brightness middle | 393 | 569 45% | 639 63% | 543 38% | 395 1% |
| Brightness | 398 | 578 45% | 637 60% | 542 36% | 402 1% |
| Brightness Distribution | 91 | 95 4% | 94 3% | 92 1% | 90 -1% |
| Black Level * | 0.37 | ||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.4 | 1.3 7% | 1 29% | 6.6 -371% | 1.6 -14% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 2.5 | 2.1 16% | 2.2 12% | 11 -340% | 3.4 -36% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.2 | 1.6 -33% | 2.2 -83% | 4.7 -292% | 1.1 8% |
| Gamma | 2.19 100% | 2.31 95% | 1.9 116% | 1.835 120% | 2.14 103% |
| CCT | 6597 99% | 6401 102% | 6364 102% | 6817 95% | 6536 99% |
| Contrast | 1068 |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 245.1 Hz |  | |
The display backlight flickers at 245.1 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 245.1 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 12 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 4.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 2.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 13 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
| PCMark for Android | |
| Work performance score (sort by value) | |
| Google Pixel 3 | |
| Huawei P20 Pro | |
| Sony Xperia XZ3 | |
| HTC U12 Plus | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (7998 - 13211, n=26) | |
| Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value) | |
| Google Pixel 3 | |
| Huawei P20 Pro | |
| Sony Xperia XZ3 | |
| HTC U12 Plus | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (7360 - 9868, n=27) | |
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
| Google Pixel 3 | |
| Huawei P20 Pro | |
| Apple iPhone XS | |
| Sony Xperia XZ3 | |
| HTC U12 Plus | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (33 - 75, n=27) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 165, n=170, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Google Pixel 3 | |
| Huawei P20 Pro | |
| Apple iPhone XS | |
| Sony Xperia XZ3 | |
| HTC U12 Plus | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (54 - 83, n=27) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (12 - 482, n=170, last 2 years) | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Google Pixel 3 | |
| Huawei P20 Pro | |
| Apple iPhone XS | |
| Sony Xperia XZ3 | |
| HTC U12 Plus | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (21 - 59, n=27) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 158, n=170, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Google Pixel 3 | |
| Huawei P20 Pro | |
| Apple iPhone XS | |
| Sony Xperia XZ3 | |
| HTC U12 Plus | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (32 - 61, n=28) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (8.3 - 341, n=170, last 2 years) | |
| AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Google Pixel 3 | |
| Huawei P20 Pro | |
| Apple iPhone XS | |
| Sony Xperia XZ3 | |
| HTC U12 Plus | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (246366 - 299878, n=27) | |
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Google Pixel 3 | |
| Huawei P20 Pro | |
| Sony Xperia XZ3 | |
| HTC U12 Plus | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (162183 - 242953, n=23) | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Apple iPhone XS (Safari Mobile 12.0) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ3 (Chrome 70) | |
| HTC U12 Plus (Chrome 66) | |
| Google Pixel 3 (Chrome 70) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (22.5 - 90.9, n=25) | |
| Huawei P20 Pro (Chrome 65) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Apple iPhone XS (Safari Mobile 12.0) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=204, last 2 years) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ3 (Chrome 70) | |
| Google Pixel 3 (Chrome 70) | |
| HTC U12 Plus (Chrome 66) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (3991 - 18275, n=28) | |
| Huawei P20 Pro (Chrome 65) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Huawei P20 Pro (Chrome 65) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2154 - 11204, n=28) | |
| HTC U12 Plus (Chrome 66) | |
| Google Pixel 3 (Chrome 70) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ3 (Chrome 70) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=161, last 2 years) | |
| Apple iPhone XS (Safari Mobile 12.0) | |
| WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
| Apple iPhone XS (Safari Mobile 12.0) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=82, last 2 years) | |
| HTC U12 Plus (Chrome 66) | |
| Google Pixel 3 (Chrome 70) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ3 (Chrome 70) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (19 - 103, n=17) | |
| Huawei P20 Pro (Chrome 65) | |
* ... smaller is better
| Google Pixel 3 | Huawei P20 Pro | Sony Xperia XZ3 | HTC U12 Plus | Average 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | 8% | -24% | -11% | -8% | 260% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 766 | 832 9% | 681 -11% | 709 -7% | 696 ? -9% | 1834 ? 139% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 181.8 | 196.7 8% | 196.1 8% | 195.8 8% | 224 ? 23% | 1426 ? 684% |
| Random Read 4KB | 149.8 | 144.3 -4% | 135.7 -9% | 118.1 -21% | 137.2 ? -8% | 278 ? 86% |
| Random Write 4KB | 133.8 | 160.5 20% | 22.22 -83% | 104.2 -22% | 84.7 ? -37% | 310 ? 132% |
Arena of Valor
Asphalt 9: Legends
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.4 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.2 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Google Pixel 3 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 29% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple iPhone XS audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 26% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 46% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 47% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado |   0.02 / 0.41 Watt |
| Ocioso |  1.21 / 2.01 / 2.05 Watt |
| Carga |
4.06 / 8.79 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Google Pixel 3 2915 mAh | Huawei P20 Pro 4000 mAh | Apple iPhone XS 2658 mAh | Sony Xperia XZ3 3300 mAh | HTC U12 Plus 3500 mAh | Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 38% | 25% | 22% | -10% | 3% | 2% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 1.21 | 0.84 31% | 0.95 21% | 0.8 34% | 0.77 36% | 0.862 ? 29% | 0.895 ? 26% |
| Idle Average * | 2.01 | 1.54 23% | 1.34 33% | 1.2 40% | 2.18 -8% | 1.728 ? 14% | 1.447 ? 28% |
| Idle Maximum * | 2.05 | 1.57 23% | 1.48 28% | 1.5 27% | 2.21 -8% | 2.07 ? -1% | 1.608 ? 22% |
| Load Average * | 4.06 | 2.47 39% | 4 1% | 4.8 -18% | 6.25 -54% | 4.87 ? -20% | 6.41 ? -58% |
| Load Maximum * | 8.79 | 2.49 72% | 5.13 42% | 6.2 29% | 10.16 -16% | 9.27 ? -5% | 9.61 ? -9% |
* ... smaller is better
| Google Pixel 3 2915 mAh | Huawei P20 Pro 4000 mAh | Apple iPhone XS 2658 mAh | Sony Xperia XZ3 3300 mAh | HTC U12 Plus 3500 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 52% | 21% | -8% | 6% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1372 | 1727 26% | 1442 5% | 1270 -7% | 1452 6% |
| H.264 | 727 | 784 8% | 745 2% | 420 -42% | 464 -36% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 471 | 744 58% | 570 21% | 419 -11% | 507 8% |
| Load | 159 | 345 117% | 245 54% | 202 27% | 230 45% |
Pro
Contra
O Google Pixel 3 é um sólido smartphone de gama alta. É caro e tem um design ultrapassado em nossa opinião, mas a sua ótima câmera traseira, experiência Android pura e alto-falantes estéreo são impressionantes. O Active Edge também é uma adição útil, embora sua falta de personalização limita sua utilidade e impede que seja um ponto de venda exclusivo.
O Pixel 3 faz muitas coisas bem. No entanto, o dispositivo não possui recursos de destaque suficientes para justificar um preço de $800, particularmente porque muitos de seus concorrentes oferecem mais por menos.
Além disso, o dispositivo tem uma tela comparativamente escura e sua duração de bateria é decepcionante. Esperamos que a Google melhore isso em futuras atualizações, porque isso prejudica o que seria um carro-chefe sólido. O Pixel 3 não faz muito para se destacar da concorrência, mas fica mais visível. Recomendamos o Pixel 3 para aqueles que querem a mais pura experiência Android que o dinheiro pode comprar, atualizações frequentes, uma câmara traseira líder na sua classe e excelentes alto-falantes.
Google Pixel 3
-
08/31/2022 v7 (old)
Mike Wobker
Price comparison
