Notebookcheck Logo

Breve Análise do Smartphone Google Pixel 3 XL

Giant Pixel.

Agora, em sua terceira geração de smartphones Pixel, a Google quer atrair potenciais compradores de seus concorrentes com recursos de software exclusivos. No entanto, os preços acessíveis são uma coisa do passado, dado que o Pixel 3 XL custa até $999. Descubra em nossa análise se o Pixel 3 XL vale o seu preço.
Google Pixel 3 XL (Pixel 3 Serie)
Processador
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 8 x 2.8 GHz, Cortex-A75 / A55 (Kryo 385)
Placa gráfica
Memória
4 GB 
Pantalha
6.30 polegadas 18.5:9, 2960 x 1440 pixel 522 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, AMOLED, Corning Gorilla Glass 5, HDR Support, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 64 GB 
, 55 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 3.0, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Acelerômetro, Barômetro, Bússola, Giroscópio, Sensor de proximidade
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G: 850, 900, 1,800, 1,900 MHz. 3G: B1, B2, B4, B5, B8. 4G: B1, B2, B3, B4, B5, B7, B8, B12, B13, B17, B18, B19, B20, B25, B26, B28, B29, B30, B32, B38, B39, B40, B41, B42, B46, B66, B71., LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 7.9 x 158 x 76.7
Bateria
13 Wh, 3430 mAh Lítio-Ion
Sistema Operativo
Android 9.0 Pie
Camera
Primary Camera: 12.2 MPix 1.4μm, f/1.8, Phase Detection Autofocus (PDAF) - dual-pixel, Laser AF, OIS, dual-LED flash, videos in up to 2160p at 30 FPS
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix , f/1.8, PDAF, videos in up to 1080p - main camera; 8.0 MP, f/2.2, wide-angle lens - secondary camera
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Alto-falantes estéreo frontais, Teclado: Teclado virtual, Carregador, cabo USB Type-C, 3,5 mm para USB Type-C, adaptador USB OTG, fones USB Type-C, SIM tool, 24 Meses Garantia, IP68 certified, pressure sensitive frame, SAR values: Head - 1.39 W/kg, Body - 1.40 W/kg, fanless
peso
184 g, Suprimento de energia: 75 g
Preço
949 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Google Pixel 3 XL
Google Pixel 3 XL
Google Pixel 3 XL
Google Pixel 3 XL
Google Pixel 3 XL
Google Pixel 3 XL
Google Pixel 3 XL
Google Pixel 3 XL

Size Comparison

158 mm 80 mm 11.9 mm 236 g158.1 mm 73.8 mm 8.5 mm 189 g158 mm 76.7 mm 7.9 mm 184 g157.9 mm 76.7 mm 7.9 mm 175 g156.9 mm 72.4 mm 8.6 mm 189 g157.5 mm 77.4 mm 7.7 mm 208 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
696 (647min - 714max) MBit/s +53%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
663 (289min - 805max) MBit/s +45%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
650 (6min - 792max) MBit/s +43%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
Adreno 630, SD 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
647 MBit/s +42%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
A12 Bionic GPU, A12 Bionic, 64 GB eMMC Flash
602 MBit/s +32%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Mali-G72 MP18, Exynos 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
519 MBit/s +14%
Google Pixel 3 XL
Adreno 630, SD 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
456 (429min - 468max) MBit/s
Google Pixel 2 XL
Adreno 540, SD 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
279 MBit/s -39%
iperf3 receive AX12
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1001 (209min - 1106max) MBit/s +58%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
615 (532min - 642max) MBit/s -3%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
491 (100min - 534max) MBit/s -23%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
Adreno 630, SD 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
677 MBit/s +7%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Mali-G72 MP18, Exynos 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
652 MBit/s +3%
Google Pixel 3 XL
Adreno 630, SD 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
635 (315min - 645max) MBit/s
Apple iPhone Xs Max
A12 Bionic GPU, A12 Bionic, 64 GB eMMC Flash
624 MBit/s -2%
Google Pixel 2 XL
Adreno 540, SD 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
239 MBit/s -62%
03570105140175210245280315350385420455490525560595630Tooltip
Google Pixel 3 XL; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø634 (618-645)
Google Pixel 3 XL; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø456 (429-468)
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 - Overview
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 - Overview
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 – Cycling through a grove
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 – Cycling through a grove
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 - Bridge
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 - Bridge
GPS test: Google Pixel 3 XL - Overview
GPS test: Google Pixel 3 XL - Overview
GPS test: Google Pixel 3 XL - Cycling through a grove
GPS test: Google Pixel 3 XL - Cycling through a grove
GPS test: Google Pixel 3 XL - Bridge
GPS test: Google Pixel 3 XL - Bridge

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
orginal image
click to load images
Low-light shot without Night Sight
Low-light shot without Night Sight
Low-light shot with Night Sight
Low-light shot with Night Sight
418
cd/m²
413
cd/m²
412
cd/m²
414
cd/m²
410
cd/m²
410
cd/m²
419
cd/m²
414
cd/m²
407
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 419 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 413 cd/m² Minimum: 2.3 cd/m²
iluminação: 97 %
iluminação com acumulador: 410 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.16 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 1.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
100% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.219
Google Pixel 3 XL
AMOLED, 2960x1440, 6.3"
Apple iPhone Xs Max
OLED, 2688x1242, 6.5"
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Super AMOLED, 2960x1440, 6.2"
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
OLED, 3120x1440, 6.3"
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
LCD-IPS, 3840x2160, 5.8"
Google Pixel 2 XL
P-OLED, 2880x1440, 6"
Screen
34%
17%
29%
1%
-11%
Brightness middle
410
656
60%
565
38%
576
40%
477
16%
415
1%
Brightness
413
659
60%
571
38%
582
41%
453
10%
420
2%
Brightness Distribution
97
88
-9%
96
-1%
90
-7%
86
-11%
87
-10%
Black Level *
0.33
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
3.16
1.7
46%
2.3
27%
1.3
59%
2.1
34%
2.7
15%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
5.5
2.8
49%
4.8
13%
3.5
36%
8.2
-49%
4.3
22%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.7
1.7
-0%
1.9
-12%
1.6
6%
1.6
6%
3.3
-94%
Gamma
2.219 99%
1.998 110%
2.16 102%
2.18 101%
2.28 96%
2.36 93%
CCT
6653 98%
6487 100%
6332 103%
6561 99%
6425 101%
6787 96%
Contrast
1445

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 250 Hz ≤ 99 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 250 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 250 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
22 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 18 ms rise
↘ 4 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 44 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3 ms rise
↘ 5 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 17 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).
Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3 XL
2325 Points
Apple iPhone Xs Max
4774 Points +105%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
3776 Points +62%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
3378 Points +45%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
2457 Points +6%
Google Pixel 2 XL
1916 Points -18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2272 - 2500, n=27)
2416 Points +4%
Average of class Smartphone (844 - 9574, n=82, last 2 years)
5422 Points +133%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3 XL
8292 Points
Apple iPhone Xs Max
11244 Points +36%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
8963 Points +8%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
10024 Points +21%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
8522 Points +3%
Google Pixel 2 XL
6253 Points -25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (7754 - 9231, n=27)
8705 Points +5%
Average of class Smartphone (2630 - 30323, n=82, last 2 years)
14892 Points +80%
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3 XL
10876 Points
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
6202 Points -43%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
8938 Points -18%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
14417 Points +33%
Google Pixel 2 XL
7568 Points -30%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (10876 - 14489, n=25)
13578 Points +25%
Average of class Smartphone (5192 - 18534, n=57, last 2 years)
11924 Points +10%
PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3 XL
11180 Points
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
5822 Points -48%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
12535 Points +12%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
9858 Points -12%
Google Pixel 2 XL
8258 Points -26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (7998 - 13211, n=26)
10123 Points -9%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3 XL
9029 Points
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
5319 Points -41%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
9225 Points +2%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
8178 Points -9%
Google Pixel 2 XL
6994 Points -23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (7360 - 9868, n=27)
8368 Points -7%
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3 XL
34855 Points
Apple iPhone Xs Max
77599 Points +123%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
39745 Points +14%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
57047 Points +64%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
64152 Points +84%
Google Pixel 2 XL
39456 Points +13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (34855 - 65330, n=27)
61139 Points +75%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3 XL
53794 Points
Apple iPhone Xs Max
159735 Points +197%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
46610 Points -13%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
67730 Points +26%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
81502 Points +52%
Google Pixel 2 XL
54156 Points +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (53794 - 85487, n=27)
80548 Points +50%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3 XL
15614 Points
Apple iPhone Xs Max
27717 Points +78%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
26226 Points +68%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
36755 Points +135%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
36762 Points +135%
Google Pixel 2 XL
20233 Points +30%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (15614 - 37475, n=27)
33322 Points +113%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3 XL
6180 Points
Apple iPhone Xs Max
5205 Points -16%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
3895 Points -37%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
4996 Points -19%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
5492 Points -11%
Google Pixel 2 XL
4831 Points -22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (4363 - 6454, n=27)
5811 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone (812 - 7285, n=26, last 2 years)
4204 Points -32%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3 XL
7780 Points
Apple iPhone Xs Max
7055 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
4637 Points -40%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
5305 Points -32%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
8219 Points +6%
Google Pixel 2 XL
5856 Points -25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (5637 - 8312, n=27)
7763 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (756 - 9451, n=26, last 2 years)
4740 Points -39%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3 XL
3594 Points
Apple iPhone Xs Max
2713 Points -25%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
2496 Points -31%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
4150 Points +15%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
2541 Points -29%
Google Pixel 2 XL
2995 Points -17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2124 - 3668, n=27)
3115 Points -13%
Average of class Smartphone (1093 - 4349, n=26, last 2 years)
3303 Points -8%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3 XL
6228 Points
Apple iPhone Xs Max
6667 Points +7%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
4018 Points -35%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
5456 Points -12%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
5438 Points -13%
Google Pixel 2 XL
5050 Points -19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (4034 - 6568, n=27)
5761 Points -7%
Average of class Smartphone (883 - 23024, n=74, last 2 years)
11160 Points +79%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3 XL
8380 Points
Apple iPhone Xs Max
10374 Points +24%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
4797 Points -43%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
5854 Points -30%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
7609 Points -9%
Google Pixel 2 XL
6282 Points -25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (5228 - 8451, n=27)
7671 Points -8%
Average of class Smartphone (840 - 45492, n=74, last 2 years)
19815 Points +136%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3 XL
3280 Points
Apple iPhone Xs Max
2961 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
2561 Points -22%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
4407 Points +34%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
2721 Points -17%
Google Pixel 2 XL
2994 Points -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2110 - 3763, n=27)
3094 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone (1075 - 8749, n=74, last 2 years)
5009 Points +53%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3 XL
4662 Points
Apple iPhone Xs Max
3544 Points -24%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
3256 Points -30%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
4201 Points -10%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
4734 Points +2%
Google Pixel 2 XL
3646 Points -22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (3197 - 4734, n=27)
4388 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone (286 - 17553, n=74, last 2 years)
3077 Points -34%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3 XL
5089 Points
Apple iPhone Xs Max
3726 Points -27%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
3582 Points -30%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
4206 Points -17%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
5190 Points +2%
Google Pixel 2 XL
3872 Points -24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (3488 - 5246, n=27)
4919 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (240 - 29890, n=74, last 2 years)
3252 Points -36%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3 XL
3605 Points
Apple iPhone Xs Max
3027 Points -16%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
2469 Points -32%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
4183 Points +16%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
3620 Points 0%
Google Pixel 2 XL
3028 Points -16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2118 - 3703, n=27)
3217 Points -11%
Average of class Smartphone (858 - 7180, n=74, last 2 years)
3288 Points -9%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3 XL
5133 Points
Apple iPhone Xs Max
4121 Points -20%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
3420 Points -33%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
4275 Points -17%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
4555 Points -11%
Google Pixel 2 XL
4003 Points -22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (3512 - 5200, n=28)
4607 Points -10%
Average of class Smartphone (317 - 20131, n=160, last 2 years)
7682 Points +50%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3 XL
5789 Points
Apple iPhone Xs Max
4828 Points -17%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
3792 Points -34%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
4250 Points -27%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
5651 Points -2%
Google Pixel 2 XL
4405 Points -24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (4133 - 8206, n=28)
5439 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone (267 - 33376, n=160, last 2 years)
11410 Points +97%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3 XL
3676 Points
Apple iPhone Xs Max
2723 Points -26%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
2546 Points -31%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
4364 Points +19%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
2713 Points -26%
Google Pixel 2 XL
3035 Points -17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2185 - 3764, n=28)
3088 Points -16%
Average of class Smartphone (877 - 8480, n=160, last 2 years)
4587 Points +25%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3 XL
60 fps
Apple iPhone Xs Max
60 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
60 fps 0%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
61 fps +2%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
60 fps 0%
Google Pixel 2 XL
59 fps -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (58 - 89, n=27)
62.1 fps +4%
Average of class Smartphone (23 - 165, n=170, last 2 years)
85.7 fps +43%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3 XL
140 fps
Apple iPhone Xs Max
226 fps +61%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
147 fps +5%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
120 fps -14%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
150 fps +7%
Google Pixel 2 XL
112 fps -20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (98 - 152, n=28)
142.5 fps +2%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=170, last 2 years)
279 fps +99%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3 XL
37 fps
Apple iPhone Xs Max
59 fps +59%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
45 fps +22%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
42 fps +14%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
58 fps +57%
Google Pixel 2 XL
35 fps -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (33 - 75, n=27)
54.4 fps +47%
Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 165, n=170, last 2 years)
75 fps +103%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3 XL
56 fps
Apple iPhone Xs Max
107 fps +91%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
74 fps +32%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
73 fps +30%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
71 fps +27%
Google Pixel 2 XL
59 fps +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (54 - 83, n=27)
73.1 fps +31%
Average of class Smartphone (12 - 482, n=170, last 2 years)
164.1 fps +193%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3 XL
25 fps
Apple iPhone Xs Max
58.9 fps +136%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
24 fps -4%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
26 fps +4%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
56 fps +124%
Google Pixel 2 XL
20 fps -20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (21 - 59, n=27)
45.3 fps +81%
Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 158, n=170, last 2 years)
65.2 fps +161%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3 XL
45 fps
Apple iPhone Xs Max
69.3 fps +54%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
47 fps +4%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
29 fps -36%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
58 fps +29%
Google Pixel 2 XL
41 fps -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (32 - 61, n=28)
53.9 fps +20%
Average of class Smartphone (8.3 - 341, n=170, last 2 years)
116.5 fps +159%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3 XL
18 fps
Apple iPhone Xs Max
31 fps +72%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
14 fps -22%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
16 fps -11%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
37 fps +106%
Google Pixel 2 XL
13 fps -28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (13 - 37, n=27)
27.7 fps +54%
Average of class Smartphone (5 - 119, n=171, last 2 years)
47.5 fps +164%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3 XL
33 fps
Apple iPhone Xs Max
40 fps +21%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
28 fps -15%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
31 fps -6%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
35 fps +6%
Google Pixel 2 XL
24 fps -27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (25 - 35, n=27)
33.4 fps +1%
Average of class Smartphone (3.1 - 216, n=170, last 2 years)
70.3 fps +113%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Apple iPhone Xs Max
47 fps
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
18 fps
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
40 fps
Google Pixel 2 XL
16 fps
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (16 - 40, n=17)
29.1 fps
Average of class Smartphone (3.6 - 123, n=202, last 2 years)
49.3 fps
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Apple iPhone Xs Max
36.8 fps
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
33 fps
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
38 fps
Google Pixel 2 XL
26 fps
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (29 - 38, n=16)
35.2 fps
Average of class Smartphone (2.3 - 261, n=202, last 2 years)
79.4 fps
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Apple iPhone Xs Max
32.1 fps
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
19 fps
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
25 fps
Google Pixel 2 XL
9.5 fps
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (12 - 25, n=17)
18.6 fps
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 119, n=202, last 2 years)
37.1 fps
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Apple iPhone Xs Max
16.3 fps
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
13 fps
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
14 fps
Google Pixel 2 XL
9.9 fps
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (11 - 31, n=17)
15.6 fps
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 104, n=202, last 2 years)
31.6 fps
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3 XL
285269 Points
Apple iPhone Xs Max
302955 Points +6%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
250577 Points -12%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
300617 Points +5%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
246366 Points -14%
Google Pixel 2 XL
204654 Points -28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (246366 - 299878, n=27)
277434 Points -3%
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3 XL
215632 Points
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
222290 Points +3%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
250848 Points +16%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
226124 Points +5%
Google Pixel 2 XL
166151 Points -23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (162183 - 242953, n=23)
225534 Points +5%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3 XL
3291 Points
Apple iPhone Xs Max
4895 Points +49%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
3302 Points 0%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
4687 Points +42%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
4288 Points +30%
Google Pixel 2 XL
3351 Points +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (3291 - 4693, n=26)
4111 Points +25%
Average of class Smartphone (1196 - 11976, n=152, last 2 years)
6257 Points +90%
System (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3 XL
4417 Points
Apple iPhone Xs Max
11675 Points +164%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
6413 Points +45%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
8604 Points +95%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
8418 Points +91%
Google Pixel 2 XL
5914 Points +34%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (4417 - 8613, n=26)
7644 Points +73%
Average of class Smartphone (2368 - 16475, n=152, last 2 years)
10131 Points +129%
Memory (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3 XL
2825 Points
Apple iPhone Xs Max
1815 Points -36%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
2625 Points -7%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
6283 Points +122%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
3704 Points +31%
Google Pixel 2 XL
2927 Points +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2193 - 5296, n=26)
3649 Points +29%
Average of class Smartphone (962 - 12716, n=152, last 2 years)
6714 Points +138%
Graphics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3 XL
7989 Points
Apple iPhone Xs Max
15659 Points +96%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
6370 Points -20%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
6273 Points -21%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
7743 Points -3%
Google Pixel 2 XL
6142 Points -23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (5846 - 8001, n=26)
7797 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (1017 - 58651, n=152, last 2 years)
16761 Points +110%
Web (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3 XL
1176 Points
Apple iPhone Xs Max
1731 Points +47%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
1109 Points -6%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
1424 Points +21%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
1400 Points +19%
Google Pixel 2 XL
1186 Points +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (1009 - 1613, n=26)
1344 Points +14%
Average of class Smartphone (841 - 2145, n=152, last 2 years)
1557 Points +32%

Legend

 
Google Pixel 3 XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Qualcomm Adreno 630, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, Apple A12 Bionic GPU, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus Samsung Exynos 9810, ARM Mali-G72 MP18, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, ARM Mali-G76 MP10, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Qualcomm Adreno 630, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Google Pixel 2 XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPhone Xs Max (Safari 12)
273 Points +260%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro (Chrome 69)
109.2 Points +44%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (22.5 - 90.9, n=25)
80.3 Points +6%
Google Pixel 3 XL (Chrome 70)
75.8 Points
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium (Chrome 68)
71.2 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus (Samsung Browser 7.0)
69.6 Points -8%
Google Pixel 2 XL (Chrome 62)
64.7 Points -15%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone Xs Max (Safari 12)
43114 Points +166%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=204, last 2 years)
36733 Points +126%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro (Chrome 69)
23285 Points +43%
Google Pixel 3 XL (Chrome 70)
16228 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (3991 - 18275, n=28)
15153 Points -7%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus (Samsung Browser 7.0)
14760 Points -9%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium (Chrome 68)
13360 Points -18%
Google Pixel 2 XL (Chrome 62)
11308 Points -30%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Google Pixel 2 XL (Chrome 62)
3434 ms * -23%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium (Chrome 68)
3179 ms * -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2154 - 11204, n=28)
2905 ms * -4%
Google Pixel 3 XL (Chrome 70)
2785 ms *
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus (Samsung Browser 7.0)
2060 ms * +26%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro (Chrome 69)
1952 ms * +30%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=161, last 2 years)
1583 ms * +43%
Apple iPhone Xs Max (Safari 12)
603 ms * +78%
WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Apple iPhone Xs Max (Safari 12)
155 Points +55%
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=82, last 2 years)
147.1 Points +47%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro (Chrome 69)
124 Points +24%
Google Pixel 3 XL (Chrome 70)
100 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (19 - 103, n=17)
90.2 Points -10%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium (Chrome 68)
75 Points -25%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
64 Points -36%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall
Apple iPhone Xs Max (Safari 12)
347 Points +21%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro (Chrome 69)
334 Points +16%
Google Pixel 3 XL (Chrome 70)
287 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (96 - 291, n=23)
246 Points -14%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium (Chrome 68)
211 Points -26%
Google Pixel 2 XL (Chrome 62)
194 Points -32%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus (Samsung Browser 7.0)
164 Points -43%

* ... smaller is better

Google Pixel 3 XLSamsung Galaxy S9 PlusHuawei Mate 20 ProSony Xperia XZ2 PremiumGoogle Pixel 2 XLAverage 64 GB UFS 2.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-14%
18%
-20%
-10%
-4%
245%
Sequential Read 256KB
633
819
29%
853
35%
749
18%
760
20%
Sequential Write 256KB
228.6
204.9
-10%
196.4
-14%
171
-25%
195.3
-15%
Random Read 4KB
120.8
129.7
7%
157.4
30%
136
13%
170.6
41%
137.2 ?(78.2 - 192, n=52)
14%
Random Write 4KB
132.7
22.74
-83%
157.8
19%
21.75
-84%
17.84
-87%
84.7 ?(8.77 - 208, n=52)
-36%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
79.2 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
83.2 ?(Huawei NanoSD 128 GB)
34.18 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
67.2 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
72.4 ?(Huawei NanoSD 128 GB)
30.23 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
Arena of Valor
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 min60 fps
 high HD60 fps
  Your browser does not support the canvas element!
Shadow Fight 3
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high60 fps
 minimal60 fps
  Your browser does not support the canvas element!
Carga Máxima
 40.9 °C38.3 °C36.9 °C 
 41.9 °C38.3 °C37.4 °C 
 42 °C38.9 °C36.5 °C 
Máximo: 42 °C
Médio: 39 °C
35.1 °C37.8 °C39.8 °C
35.7 °C37.9 °C39.9 °C
36.4 °C38.4 °C39.8 °C
Máximo: 39.9 °C
Médio: 37.9 °C
alimentação elétrica  42.6 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.6 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.9 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.7 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2036.435.533.72537.834.934.33141.139.539.14038.238.641.45040.73943.263342830.68032.829.731.610031.728.529.312529.824.732.31603923.745.720051.622.558.425054.32161.131556.720.862.840060.119.968.35005720.169.163050.51968.18005118.572100050.719.271.6125053.91975160053.218.172.7200054.71871.4250056.217.468.7315061.717.670.8400061.217.870.9500055.21869.3630055.31871.1800055.41871.61000062.21879.51250054.91873.11600045.41866.7SPL69.464.130.684.2N25.917.21.562.8median 54.7median 18.5median 69.1median 73.5Delta4.2310.410.735.246.432.941.937.237.731.736.839.640.528.330.327.330.326.928.126.732.2244520.952.120.957.119.558.518.562.617.570.917.574.715.778.515.876.916.676.215.873.415.473.615.575.51679.915.880.11676.516.37416.374.916.271.416.458.216.44228.688.41.176.2median 16.4median 73.62.210.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseGoogle Pixel 3 XLGoogle Pixel 2 XL
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Google Pixel 3 XL audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 73.5% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 73.5% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 73.5% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (124.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 93% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 98% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 0% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Google Pixel 2 XL audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 25% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 45% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 48% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.7 / 1.4 / 2 Watt
Carga midlight 4.8 / 9.5 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Google Pixel 3 XL
3430 mAh
Apple iPhone Xs Max
3174 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
3500 mAh
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
4200 mAh
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
3540 mAh
Google Pixel 2 XL
3520 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
1%
26%
-12%
-13%
-15%
-10%
-9%
Idle Minimum *
0.7
1
-43%
0.68
3%
0.95
-36%
0.67
4%
1.28
-83%
0.862 ?(0.42 - 1.8, n=26)
-23%
Idle Average *
1.4
1.4
-0%
0.95
32%
2.17
-55%
2.5
-79%
1.87
-34%
1.728 ?(0.67 - 2.9, n=26)
-23%
Idle Maximum *
2
1.7
15%
1.09
45%
2.25
-13%
2.51
-26%
1.89
5%
Load Average *
4.8
4.6
4%
4.58
5%
4.47
7%
4.3
10%
3.73
22%
Load Maximum *
9.5
6.7
29%
5.16
46%
6.15
35%
6.87
28%
8.08
15%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
28h 45min
WiFi Websurfing
11h 31min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
12h 04min
Carga (máximo brilho)
4h 59min
Google Pixel 3 XL
3430 mAh
Apple iPhone Xs Max
3174 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
3500 mAh
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
4200 mAh
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
3540 mAh
Google Pixel 2 XL
3520 mAh
Battery Runtime
-8%
-19%
6%
-23%
-6%
Reader / Idle
1725
1305
-24%
1343
-22%
1747
1%
1347
-22%
1706
-1%
H.264
724
801
11%
674
-7%
854
18%
520
-28%
672
-7%
WiFi v1.3
691
742
7%
521
-25%
767
11%
547
-21%
581
-16%
Load
299
223
-25%
237
-21%
282
-6%
235
-21%
302
1%

Pro

+ Carcaça sólida e estável
+ Boas câmeras
+ Diversas bandas LTE
+ Recursos de software exclusivos
+ Muitos acessórios
+ Tela de cores precisas
+ Sem afogamento sob carga contínua
+ Alto-falantes impressionantes
+ Boa duração da bateria

Contra

- Sem desbloqueio facial
- Faltam alguns recursos de vídeo modernos
- Caro
- Entalhe grande
- Qualidade medíocre de chamadas para um carro chefe
- GPS inexato
The Google Pixel 3 XL Smartphone Review
The Google Pixel 3 XL Smartphone Review

Se você não gosta de entalhes, pode parar de ler agora. O Google Pixel 3 XL tem um nível enorme, que já está um passo atrás de alguns de seus concorrentes que têm entalhes menos obstrutivos, sensores de digitais na tela e até mesmo uma câmera frontal deslizante para maximizar suas relações de tela a corpo.

A câmera traseira do Google Pixel 3 XL tira fotos incríveis, mas seus recursos de vídeo estão desatualizados. Além disso, as câmeras frontais duplas são úteis, mas somente se você tirar selfies regularmente. Os recursos de RA e Digital Wellbeing também são novos, mas eles já estavam disponíveis com aplicativos de terceiros, portanto não são exatamente inovadores.

O Google Pixel 3 XL é muito caro pelo preço total para nos convencer de seus muitos excelentes recursos. Simplesmente não faz nada para se destacar da multidão.

O que resta com o Google Pixel 3 XL, é um smartphone elegante e bem construído que faz muitas coisas bem e poucas coisas mal. Infelizmente, não faz nada para se destacar de um mercado já saturado. A Google está otimista em cobrar até $999 pela versão de 128 GB. Recomendamos que você confira o Pixel 3 XL se puder comprá-lo abaixo do preço de varejo, já que é um ótimo smartphone com câmeras e alto-falantes de primeira classe.

Google Pixel 3 XL - 08/31/2022 v7 (old)
Florian Schmitt

Acabamento
87%
Teclado
66 / 75 → 88%
Mouse
97%
Conectividade
45 / 70 → 64%
Peso
89%
Bateria
89%
Pantalha
90%
Desempenho do jogos
48 / 64 → 75%
Desempenho da aplicação
69 / 86 → 80%
Temperatura
89%
Ruído
100%
Audio
82 / 90 → 91%
Camera
60%
Médio
78%
84%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Google Pixel 3 XL
Florian Schmitt, 2018-11-28 (Update: 2018-11-28)